Guys,
This past week, the terrorist and communist, Nelson Mandela, died. The liberal media (redundant?) has had their hopelessly predictable orgasm over this, which didn't surprise me. They have a hard-on for any and all communists, socialists, and statists. Why wouldn't they, since they're brothers in arms?
What did surprise and dishearten me some was that the purported conservative media has gone easy on Mandela as well. You can go to Breitbart.com, and read a piece by Joel Pollak, entitled: Why Conservatives Should Celebrate Nelson Mandela. Sorry, but I cannot and will not celebrate a barbaric communist who killed those who disagreed with him; not only that, he killed them by a most grisly method: necklacing. Notice how communists, socialists, and statists always kill those who disagree with them? I'll come back to necklacing in a bit...
Mark Levin, the well known conservative firebrand who's on during drive time along the east coast, devoted the first hour of his Thursday evening show to Mandela's passing. Since Levin had worked in the President Reagan's Justice Department, I would have expected him to take a harder line against Mandela; after all, when Reagan was president, Nelson Mandela was allied with the USSR & Cuba. Anyway, you can hear the whole love fest here.
You know what's even MORE galling?! The local McDonalds has their American flag at half mast to honor the passing of Nelson Mandela! That's right; the all-American company, McDonalds, is flying their flags at half mast to honor Mandela's death. I'm sorry, but that's just wrong! Even if you think Mandela was a saint (and I don't); even if he were a saint (he was not!); it goes against the flag etiquette I learned as a Boy Scout. I was always told that you only lower the flag to half staff for the passing of a national leader, not international leaders.
Anyway, for the uninitiated, necklacing involved putting tires around the neck and ankles of the victim, filling them with gasoline (or petrol for our British friends), then setting them on fire. Here are some pictures of what necklacing does to someone (HT Elusive Wapiti). Warning: they are graphic! It's bad enough that Mandela and his followers killed those who disagreed with and opposed them; it's even worse that they did so by the most grisly method of killing someone, i.e. burning them to death! What kind of person does that? A barbarian-that's who.
In closing, I am not at all sad that Nelson Mandela is gone. He was a communist, a terrorist, and one who ended up destroying the most prosperous nation on the African continent. He has a pile of bodies behind him, because he killed those who disagreed with and opposed him; moreover, he killed his opponents in the most grisly method one can think of-by burning them to death! All I can say is good riddance, and I wouldn't be sad if he burns in Hell.
MarkyMark
07 December 2013
17 November 2013
Women, Nature, God, and Harleys, by Christopher in Oregon
Guys,
I forgot about THIS classic by CIO. This here is good stuff, interspersed with comments from Yours Truly...
-------------------
Christopher in Oregon said...
There are so many things about women that under the best of circumstances should cause a man to run away from them. In these days of rabid feminism and STD's, a thinking man has run out of reasons to have any dealings with women.
Can't argue with that, especially with what today's modern, empowered woman brings to the table...
I pity men in their twenties. It's a scary battle to fight, if a man even has the wisdom to do so. Most men just give in, and allow themselves to be manipulated by their sexual lust, not realizing that they are just pawns in nature's breeding process, only to be discarded when they have served their purpose.
Man, if only I had had wisdom back in my twenties! It was scary facing the dating scene back then, which for me was 30 years ago now, and things weren't so crazy then. I cannot IMAGINE going into that viper pit now...
Nature (and women) knows nothing of mercy. Ponder how various species of animals feed upon each other. It's a brutal world that most of us are sheltered from, and we often don't realize that human relationship are also dictated by nature, that same cruel mistress that allows animals to be ripped apart by others. Think of the shark, the lion, and virtually all meat-eating animals. It's brutal, but part of the natural order of things. Consider the "acts of God" such as tornadoes and earthquakes that kill vast numbers of people.
Relationship between humans are no less brutal. Think of the wars that have killed millions. Men are used and slaughtered by governments with abandon. The military has always taken men and used them to fight battles that benefit "society", meaning women. Men are expendable to society and nature. And to women.
As RedPillSetMeFree (he has an EXCELLENT blog, BTW!) said, women lie, manipulate, and do whatever they have to do to secure a man's resources, and that they do so without apology-pretty much what CIO said here, but in a different way...
I merely propose stepping off of society's treadmill, and refuse to play the game.
As Joshua, the computer in Wargames, said: strange game-the only winning move is NOT to play...
Refuse to fight in wars for our corrupt government. Resurrect that famous line from the Vietnam era, "Hell, no, we won't go!" Your life is valuable, and don't let anyone pressure you to be "patriotic". Thousands of American men have already been slaughtered in this insane attempt to protect our country from a threat that never existed in the first place.
You got THAT right! What about the white feather campaign in WWI England?
Refuse to beat yourself senseless in college, in hopes of attracting a beautiful woman, who will "allow" you to have sex with her when she deems it necessary. (The beauty won't last) Sex just isn't worth the shit you have to put up with in order to get it.
As the wise man once said, the fucking you're getting isn't worth the fucking you're getting-so true!
I wish I hadn't gone to college either, because that was one reason I went-to be worthy of a 'good' woman. Fortunately, I began to see that this was a fool's errand; unfortunately, I didn't see this until I was almost finished with college, i.e. in my last year....
Refuse to fight your way up the corporate ladder so you can be a "good provider" for a woman that hates you anyway. Your employer views you as a number, and couldn't care if you are destroyed by working for them. Stress kills, so find a job you enjoy, and just get by.
The other advantage to this is that you can leave whenever you want; you're not chained to a job because you have mouths to feed.
Refuse to get married, and become a wage-slave to a family that will never appreciate you, and will be taken from you when your wife decides to dump you (and she will).
Unfortunately, with the legal climate as it is, it doesn't make sense to get married; it's too big a gamble, and what CIO says here has too much of a chance of coming to pass.
Refuse to be one of the legions of men living in a roach infested apartment with several other divorced men because your wife took the home you worked hard to buy for her.
Hear, hear! Why is it Wifey gets to keep the house, while Hubby keeps the mortgage payment? That doesn't seem fair to me, nor does it make good financial sense...
Refuse to spend money on dates in the hope of having access to some wart-encrusted vagina. The money you spend on a date will pale in comparison to the money you will spend getting treated for the STD she gave you.
How much does Valtrex (the Herpes medication) cost per month-$500 or more? That's a lot! And it doesn't even cure the disease, because there is no cure for the Herpes she will give you; Valtrex merely reduces the severity of the outbreaks.
What about HPV, the virus that give genital warts? Do you want YOUR Willy looking like a bunch of cauliflower? Do you feel lucky? Well, do you, Punk?!
Refuse to try and impress women with your ridiculous attempts to be macho. It's no different than a male bird flapping his wings trying to get the attention of the female. It's silly, and just makes you look like a fool. You don't realize that women are laughing at your attempts.
Good advice...
Refuse to be manipulated and controlled by your religion, whatever it may be. The churches, synagogues and mosques and their leaders view you as a provider for a woman, and a protector of your country. You are expendable, and to them your submission is essential in order to fulfill your proper role in their grand scheme of things. You're just there to pay tithing.
Ka-ka-kaboom! Chris DRILLS another one! The only church I would semi trust today is the Mennonite church, because they don't pay their preachers; their preachers have to hold an honest job like the rest of us do, so their conduct, sermons, and advice aren't in any way influenced by what will fill up the offering plates. However, their theology is questionable...
Now, in order to do the things I have recommended will require strength. Most men have been so emasculated and pussy-whipped they are beyond hope. I realize this, and my words are to the enlightened few who actually desire to be something more than just an extension of their penis.
If you really and truly don't want to be used by society, and by that I mean women, religion, government and business, you will have to first realize that from birth, you have been groomed to fulfill your role as an expendable male. Everyone expects you to live your life, and sacrifice it, if necessary, for someone else. In all areas of life, your happiness is secondary, if even that. Everyone's happiness and safety comes before you, because you, you poor befuddled male, have a penis. You are just a tool to be discarded when no longer needed.
Don't be a tool, fool!
Don't forget this: society doesn't give a tinker's damn about you-not you wife, girlfriend, pastor, employer or the government. When you have this firmly entrenched in your mind, then possibly you will make the same decision that I did. Simply refuse to play the game.
Again, Joshua had it right; the only winning move is NOT to play...
Have as few connections with society as possible. Stay out of debt under any circumstances (except for a Harley payment-more on that later). By being in debt, you are a slave to the corrupt banks. Avoid having credit cards for any reason.
I heartily concur with being debt free; now that I am, I will NEVER go back in debt again-never! As the Bible says in Proverbs 22:7, the rich ruleth the poor, and the BORROWER IS SERVANT TO THE LENDER. IOW, your time, effort, and money are not your own when you owe money to lenders.
However, I disagree about not having credit cards, since they can make life easier. For those of us who prefer and/or need to shop online, a credit card is a necessity. The same holds true for renting a car. Even if you can use your debit card to rent a car (and not all car rental companies allow this, BTW), you'll have to put down a deposit on top of your rent. For example, when I visited Chicago between Xmas and New Years a few years ago, I rented a car from Enterprise; they charged me $200 above and beyond the car rental because I used my debit card; at the time, I had no credit card, so I had no choice. Having a credit card can make life easier and more convenient.
HOWEVER-and this is key-pay off your balance in full after using it! Treat it as cash, and don't buy anything you couldn't afford with the cash you already have on hand. I have a MasterCard, but I only use it a handful of times over the year; when I do, I pay off the balance in full. Treat a credit card like a charge card (e.g. American Express), and pay it off in full every month.
If you're afraid of using a credit card for impulse purchases, then you can do like I did for years: keep the card in your desk drawer at home. You could also freeze it in a block of ice, something frugal living websites like Dollar Stretcher recommend. The thinking is that, if tempted to make an impulsive purchase, you'll have to think it through while chipping the ice off your credit card; by the time you will have done so, the temptation will have passed. I thought that was too much work, so I just kept the card in my drawer most of the time.
When I was 16, I had already made the decision that I didn't like women, and didn't want to spend any time in their company. So, I looked for an alternative obsession that would take my time, money and energy, but wouldn't involve being around women. I found two things, and they have been my passion ever since.
I don't dislike women, let alone hate them; I simply do not care for or about them anymore. However, I do not feel the same about them like I once did, nor do I have any ardor for them. I dare say that many men who have swallowed the red pill feel the same way.
I have always loved classical music, and have a truly vast and growing collection. Avoid listening to ANY modern music, as it is designed to get you to think about women, romance and sex. It's very hypnotic, and in this, I agree with Christians. It's evil, and designed to get you to obsess over the flesh. If you have any modern music, trash it. It's garbage, and just re-enforces the matriarchal brainwashing you get bombarded with every day. Join the Musical Heritage Society, and start collecting good music, created by people who actually were gifted. I order much of my music from Amazon, as well.
I can't argue with this, either. Though I'm no longer religious, I don't indulge in a steady diet of modern music; most of my collection is classical also. Listening to too much modern music leaves me feeling unsettled, and I don't like that feeling.
Secondly, learn how to ride a motorcycle. Don't say you can't do it. You can. It's one of the most liberating experiences known to mankind. Take lessons, and learn how to ride safely. Then go buy a Harley Sportster 883. You can get a new one for about $6500. If you have a job, you can afford one. It's a matter of priorities. You'll spend more in one year of dating some Vagina-Beasty, I can assure you. And a Harley won't give you genital warts.
Chris wrote this a few years ago, and the cheapest Sportster goes for about $8k now. Also, it's the low rider, not the regular one that had more ground clearance. That said, Harley-Davidson has their new Street models (the 500 & 750) coming out soon. Their styling is reminiscent of the Honda VT500 Ascot from the early 1980s, but they're modernized and perfected. I could DEFINITELY see myself purchasing a Street 750; that's a hot bike! You can get the look of a street cruiser with modern technology to boot...
As for learning how to ride, you can do so a couple of different ways. One is to take a class through the Motorcycle Safety Foundation, which is what I did over 20 years ago when I began riding. Harley-Davidson offers a variety of riding courses also; whatever your experience level, they have something for you. Why don't dealers selling other motorcycle marques offer rider training too?
Lest you think I'm a shill for Harley-Davidson, nothing could be farther from the truth. In fact, I have never owned a Harley; however, with their new Street models, that could change. Anyway, the reason Harley-Davidson is so successful (in spite of not having cutting edge, high performance bikes like those from the Big Four) is because of their marketing. They offer bikes in many different colors, whereas the Big Four (Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, and Suzuki) only offer one or two colors for the year. Also, I don't know of dealers for any other make that offer riding courses; there are a few non-Harley dealers that do, but they're a handful. On the other hand, all Harley-Davidson dealers offer rider training; they offer one stop shopping, which makes one's life easier. If you can make the customer's life easier (i.e. give him something he'll need anyway), you'll do well in business. Sorry, but I digress...
It will empower you, and distract you. I can't count the number of times going for a ride along the Oregon coast, or back in the deserts of eastern Oregon, or around the massive mountain ranges of the northwest have saved me from loneliness for a woman. When you are out in the wild, communing with the God of nature, you will feel a connection that you never feel when around people, especially women. A woman will always create a rift between you and God. Never forget this. A woman is anti-God. She will always be the stumbling block between you and your creator. Her mere presence prevents God's spirit from being near. She has a negative energy, and will sap your strength.
Chris speaks the truth here, Fellas! I know, because I've had similar experiences. The Force is strong with him...
Every time I ride, I come back renewed. I feel the presence of God, and come back stronger. Riding a motorcycle is one of the finest pleasures still available to men, and allows you to transport yourself solo away from society and the Matriarchy. It saved me when I was young, and today is even more important, as I use it as a way of communing with God. You won't find God in a church full of harpies, whining brats, and thieving pastors. You will find Him out in the forests and mountains. I never felt close to God in church. I just felt tense. Used. On my rides, I often stop and ponder God's creation. I rode down to Crater Lake one day, and just stood at the rim looking down. Such incredible beauty on a scale so vast that it has to be seen to be believed. The presence of a woman would have destroyed the moment completely.
Some of the rural highways in north-central Oregon wind their way up deep canyons like the one near Grass Valley. No guard rails, and you can ride along the edge of the narrow highway as it climbs up and up and look almost straight down hundreds of feet into the abyss.
That sounds GLORIOUS...
One morning three years ago, when I had my Goldwing, I just decided to wake up at 3 a.m., and climbed aboard and went to Nevada. And came back the same day. One-thousand miles of butt-breaking happiness. I was flying along the highway near summer lake, and ran smack into a huge herd of cattle. They use the highways in that part of the state for cattle drives. I stopped, and they stopped. I was only ten feet from the lead animals, and they seemed to glower at me. I think it was the leather gear I was using, but in my defense, it WAS goat skin. Didn't seem to matter to them, though.
I remember riding to work one morning and having a deer jump in front of me. I stopped, and he gave me a look like WTF are you, Pal?!
What's the point of this? I share a few of my countless memories that are still in the making, and will be for many years to come, to show you that you can have a full, rich and immensely happy life if you follow my advice. I have no memories of women in my life, for there have been none to speak of. My memories are those of hundreds of rides all around the northwest, and hundreds more to come. My life is a joy, and it's because I'm a man and I live a man's life. I'm free and independent. So many times when riding, I'll notice men in their mini vans, with fat wives and children, staring enviously at my decked out Harley's and Langlitz Leathers. I paid $2000 for my leathers, and about $500 dollars for each of my Arai helmets, and I didn't have to ask the permission of any woman.
Don't you just LOVE being able to do what you want, when you want, how you want? I do! It's the life of a happy bachelor... :)
The joy of walking into the Harley dealership when I decide I want a new bike, and being able to just do it is incredible. So, I say to you, or those of you who desire the freedom and happiness of the Harley riding bachelor (meaning me) the first step is simple. If you have a girlfriend, call her up and say "Sweetheart. Fuck off. I'm buying a Harley today, and I don't need your mangy ass. Go to hell."
Then go buy your Harley.
Hear, hear!
---------------
Good stuff...
I forgot about THIS classic by CIO. This here is good stuff, interspersed with comments from Yours Truly...
-------------------
Christopher in Oregon said...
There are so many things about women that under the best of circumstances should cause a man to run away from them. In these days of rabid feminism and STD's, a thinking man has run out of reasons to have any dealings with women.
Can't argue with that, especially with what today's modern, empowered woman brings to the table...
I pity men in their twenties. It's a scary battle to fight, if a man even has the wisdom to do so. Most men just give in, and allow themselves to be manipulated by their sexual lust, not realizing that they are just pawns in nature's breeding process, only to be discarded when they have served their purpose.
Man, if only I had had wisdom back in my twenties! It was scary facing the dating scene back then, which for me was 30 years ago now, and things weren't so crazy then. I cannot IMAGINE going into that viper pit now...
Nature (and women) knows nothing of mercy. Ponder how various species of animals feed upon each other. It's a brutal world that most of us are sheltered from, and we often don't realize that human relationship are also dictated by nature, that same cruel mistress that allows animals to be ripped apart by others. Think of the shark, the lion, and virtually all meat-eating animals. It's brutal, but part of the natural order of things. Consider the "acts of God" such as tornadoes and earthquakes that kill vast numbers of people.
Relationship between humans are no less brutal. Think of the wars that have killed millions. Men are used and slaughtered by governments with abandon. The military has always taken men and used them to fight battles that benefit "society", meaning women. Men are expendable to society and nature. And to women.
As RedPillSetMeFree (he has an EXCELLENT blog, BTW!) said, women lie, manipulate, and do whatever they have to do to secure a man's resources, and that they do so without apology-pretty much what CIO said here, but in a different way...
I merely propose stepping off of society's treadmill, and refuse to play the game.
As Joshua, the computer in Wargames, said: strange game-the only winning move is NOT to play...
Refuse to fight in wars for our corrupt government. Resurrect that famous line from the Vietnam era, "Hell, no, we won't go!" Your life is valuable, and don't let anyone pressure you to be "patriotic". Thousands of American men have already been slaughtered in this insane attempt to protect our country from a threat that never existed in the first place.
You got THAT right! What about the white feather campaign in WWI England?
Refuse to beat yourself senseless in college, in hopes of attracting a beautiful woman, who will "allow" you to have sex with her when she deems it necessary. (The beauty won't last) Sex just isn't worth the shit you have to put up with in order to get it.
As the wise man once said, the fucking you're getting isn't worth the fucking you're getting-so true!
I wish I hadn't gone to college either, because that was one reason I went-to be worthy of a 'good' woman. Fortunately, I began to see that this was a fool's errand; unfortunately, I didn't see this until I was almost finished with college, i.e. in my last year....
Refuse to fight your way up the corporate ladder so you can be a "good provider" for a woman that hates you anyway. Your employer views you as a number, and couldn't care if you are destroyed by working for them. Stress kills, so find a job you enjoy, and just get by.
The other advantage to this is that you can leave whenever you want; you're not chained to a job because you have mouths to feed.
Refuse to get married, and become a wage-slave to a family that will never appreciate you, and will be taken from you when your wife decides to dump you (and she will).
Unfortunately, with the legal climate as it is, it doesn't make sense to get married; it's too big a gamble, and what CIO says here has too much of a chance of coming to pass.
Refuse to be one of the legions of men living in a roach infested apartment with several other divorced men because your wife took the home you worked hard to buy for her.
Hear, hear! Why is it Wifey gets to keep the house, while Hubby keeps the mortgage payment? That doesn't seem fair to me, nor does it make good financial sense...
Refuse to spend money on dates in the hope of having access to some wart-encrusted vagina. The money you spend on a date will pale in comparison to the money you will spend getting treated for the STD she gave you.
How much does Valtrex (the Herpes medication) cost per month-$500 or more? That's a lot! And it doesn't even cure the disease, because there is no cure for the Herpes she will give you; Valtrex merely reduces the severity of the outbreaks.
What about HPV, the virus that give genital warts? Do you want YOUR Willy looking like a bunch of cauliflower? Do you feel lucky? Well, do you, Punk?!
Refuse to try and impress women with your ridiculous attempts to be macho. It's no different than a male bird flapping his wings trying to get the attention of the female. It's silly, and just makes you look like a fool. You don't realize that women are laughing at your attempts.
Good advice...
Refuse to be manipulated and controlled by your religion, whatever it may be. The churches, synagogues and mosques and their leaders view you as a provider for a woman, and a protector of your country. You are expendable, and to them your submission is essential in order to fulfill your proper role in their grand scheme of things. You're just there to pay tithing.
Ka-ka-kaboom! Chris DRILLS another one! The only church I would semi trust today is the Mennonite church, because they don't pay their preachers; their preachers have to hold an honest job like the rest of us do, so their conduct, sermons, and advice aren't in any way influenced by what will fill up the offering plates. However, their theology is questionable...
Now, in order to do the things I have recommended will require strength. Most men have been so emasculated and pussy-whipped they are beyond hope. I realize this, and my words are to the enlightened few who actually desire to be something more than just an extension of their penis.
If you really and truly don't want to be used by society, and by that I mean women, religion, government and business, you will have to first realize that from birth, you have been groomed to fulfill your role as an expendable male. Everyone expects you to live your life, and sacrifice it, if necessary, for someone else. In all areas of life, your happiness is secondary, if even that. Everyone's happiness and safety comes before you, because you, you poor befuddled male, have a penis. You are just a tool to be discarded when no longer needed.
Don't be a tool, fool!
Don't forget this: society doesn't give a tinker's damn about you-not you wife, girlfriend, pastor, employer or the government. When you have this firmly entrenched in your mind, then possibly you will make the same decision that I did. Simply refuse to play the game.
Again, Joshua had it right; the only winning move is NOT to play...
Have as few connections with society as possible. Stay out of debt under any circumstances (except for a Harley payment-more on that later). By being in debt, you are a slave to the corrupt banks. Avoid having credit cards for any reason.
I heartily concur with being debt free; now that I am, I will NEVER go back in debt again-never! As the Bible says in Proverbs 22:7, the rich ruleth the poor, and the BORROWER IS SERVANT TO THE LENDER. IOW, your time, effort, and money are not your own when you owe money to lenders.
However, I disagree about not having credit cards, since they can make life easier. For those of us who prefer and/or need to shop online, a credit card is a necessity. The same holds true for renting a car. Even if you can use your debit card to rent a car (and not all car rental companies allow this, BTW), you'll have to put down a deposit on top of your rent. For example, when I visited Chicago between Xmas and New Years a few years ago, I rented a car from Enterprise; they charged me $200 above and beyond the car rental because I used my debit card; at the time, I had no credit card, so I had no choice. Having a credit card can make life easier and more convenient.
HOWEVER-and this is key-pay off your balance in full after using it! Treat it as cash, and don't buy anything you couldn't afford with the cash you already have on hand. I have a MasterCard, but I only use it a handful of times over the year; when I do, I pay off the balance in full. Treat a credit card like a charge card (e.g. American Express), and pay it off in full every month.
If you're afraid of using a credit card for impulse purchases, then you can do like I did for years: keep the card in your desk drawer at home. You could also freeze it in a block of ice, something frugal living websites like Dollar Stretcher recommend. The thinking is that, if tempted to make an impulsive purchase, you'll have to think it through while chipping the ice off your credit card; by the time you will have done so, the temptation will have passed. I thought that was too much work, so I just kept the card in my drawer most of the time.
When I was 16, I had already made the decision that I didn't like women, and didn't want to spend any time in their company. So, I looked for an alternative obsession that would take my time, money and energy, but wouldn't involve being around women. I found two things, and they have been my passion ever since.
I don't dislike women, let alone hate them; I simply do not care for or about them anymore. However, I do not feel the same about them like I once did, nor do I have any ardor for them. I dare say that many men who have swallowed the red pill feel the same way.
I have always loved classical music, and have a truly vast and growing collection. Avoid listening to ANY modern music, as it is designed to get you to think about women, romance and sex. It's very hypnotic, and in this, I agree with Christians. It's evil, and designed to get you to obsess over the flesh. If you have any modern music, trash it. It's garbage, and just re-enforces the matriarchal brainwashing you get bombarded with every day. Join the Musical Heritage Society, and start collecting good music, created by people who actually were gifted. I order much of my music from Amazon, as well.
I can't argue with this, either. Though I'm no longer religious, I don't indulge in a steady diet of modern music; most of my collection is classical also. Listening to too much modern music leaves me feeling unsettled, and I don't like that feeling.
Secondly, learn how to ride a motorcycle. Don't say you can't do it. You can. It's one of the most liberating experiences known to mankind. Take lessons, and learn how to ride safely. Then go buy a Harley Sportster 883. You can get a new one for about $6500. If you have a job, you can afford one. It's a matter of priorities. You'll spend more in one year of dating some Vagina-Beasty, I can assure you. And a Harley won't give you genital warts.
Chris wrote this a few years ago, and the cheapest Sportster goes for about $8k now. Also, it's the low rider, not the regular one that had more ground clearance. That said, Harley-Davidson has their new Street models (the 500 & 750) coming out soon. Their styling is reminiscent of the Honda VT500 Ascot from the early 1980s, but they're modernized and perfected. I could DEFINITELY see myself purchasing a Street 750; that's a hot bike! You can get the look of a street cruiser with modern technology to boot...
As for learning how to ride, you can do so a couple of different ways. One is to take a class through the Motorcycle Safety Foundation, which is what I did over 20 years ago when I began riding. Harley-Davidson offers a variety of riding courses also; whatever your experience level, they have something for you. Why don't dealers selling other motorcycle marques offer rider training too?
Lest you think I'm a shill for Harley-Davidson, nothing could be farther from the truth. In fact, I have never owned a Harley; however, with their new Street models, that could change. Anyway, the reason Harley-Davidson is so successful (in spite of not having cutting edge, high performance bikes like those from the Big Four) is because of their marketing. They offer bikes in many different colors, whereas the Big Four (Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, and Suzuki) only offer one or two colors for the year. Also, I don't know of dealers for any other make that offer riding courses; there are a few non-Harley dealers that do, but they're a handful. On the other hand, all Harley-Davidson dealers offer rider training; they offer one stop shopping, which makes one's life easier. If you can make the customer's life easier (i.e. give him something he'll need anyway), you'll do well in business. Sorry, but I digress...
It will empower you, and distract you. I can't count the number of times going for a ride along the Oregon coast, or back in the deserts of eastern Oregon, or around the massive mountain ranges of the northwest have saved me from loneliness for a woman. When you are out in the wild, communing with the God of nature, you will feel a connection that you never feel when around people, especially women. A woman will always create a rift between you and God. Never forget this. A woman is anti-God. She will always be the stumbling block between you and your creator. Her mere presence prevents God's spirit from being near. She has a negative energy, and will sap your strength.
Chris speaks the truth here, Fellas! I know, because I've had similar experiences. The Force is strong with him...
Every time I ride, I come back renewed. I feel the presence of God, and come back stronger. Riding a motorcycle is one of the finest pleasures still available to men, and allows you to transport yourself solo away from society and the Matriarchy. It saved me when I was young, and today is even more important, as I use it as a way of communing with God. You won't find God in a church full of harpies, whining brats, and thieving pastors. You will find Him out in the forests and mountains. I never felt close to God in church. I just felt tense. Used. On my rides, I often stop and ponder God's creation. I rode down to Crater Lake one day, and just stood at the rim looking down. Such incredible beauty on a scale so vast that it has to be seen to be believed. The presence of a woman would have destroyed the moment completely.
Some of the rural highways in north-central Oregon wind their way up deep canyons like the one near Grass Valley. No guard rails, and you can ride along the edge of the narrow highway as it climbs up and up and look almost straight down hundreds of feet into the abyss.
That sounds GLORIOUS...
One morning three years ago, when I had my Goldwing, I just decided to wake up at 3 a.m., and climbed aboard and went to Nevada. And came back the same day. One-thousand miles of butt-breaking happiness. I was flying along the highway near summer lake, and ran smack into a huge herd of cattle. They use the highways in that part of the state for cattle drives. I stopped, and they stopped. I was only ten feet from the lead animals, and they seemed to glower at me. I think it was the leather gear I was using, but in my defense, it WAS goat skin. Didn't seem to matter to them, though.
I remember riding to work one morning and having a deer jump in front of me. I stopped, and he gave me a look like WTF are you, Pal?!
What's the point of this? I share a few of my countless memories that are still in the making, and will be for many years to come, to show you that you can have a full, rich and immensely happy life if you follow my advice. I have no memories of women in my life, for there have been none to speak of. My memories are those of hundreds of rides all around the northwest, and hundreds more to come. My life is a joy, and it's because I'm a man and I live a man's life. I'm free and independent. So many times when riding, I'll notice men in their mini vans, with fat wives and children, staring enviously at my decked out Harley's and Langlitz Leathers. I paid $2000 for my leathers, and about $500 dollars for each of my Arai helmets, and I didn't have to ask the permission of any woman.
Don't you just LOVE being able to do what you want, when you want, how you want? I do! It's the life of a happy bachelor... :)
The joy of walking into the Harley dealership when I decide I want a new bike, and being able to just do it is incredible. So, I say to you, or those of you who desire the freedom and happiness of the Harley riding bachelor (meaning me) the first step is simple. If you have a girlfriend, call her up and say "Sweetheart. Fuck off. I'm buying a Harley today, and I don't need your mangy ass. Go to hell."
Then go buy your Harley.
Hear, hear!
---------------
Good stuff...
15 November 2013
How to Make a Feminist Mad
Guys,
One of the fellas on Mancoat linked to this. When I saw it, I KNEW I had to share it with my audience; this is so funny! Unfortunately, I cannot embed this video here, because it doesn't agree with Blogger's format; it doesn't display the controls. Go here for some laughs. WARNING: there is foul language, so don't click the link if that offends you! Enjoy...
MarkyMark
One of the fellas on Mancoat linked to this. When I saw it, I KNEW I had to share it with my audience; this is so funny! Unfortunately, I cannot embed this video here, because it doesn't agree with Blogger's format; it doesn't display the controls. Go here for some laughs. WARNING: there is foul language, so don't click the link if that offends you! Enjoy...
MarkyMark
20 October 2013
Republicans Caved-Again!
Guys,
I haven't been in the mood to say much lately, but I am now. Last week, the Republicans caved to the Democrats AGAIN! Again, they wimped out of a budget and/or debt ceiling fight. I knew the writing was on the wall when 25 of the 44 Senate Republicans voted with the Democrats for cloture, which effectively opened the door to get a CR done; I say get a continuing resolution (i.e. CR) done, because we haven't had a proper budget in almost five years now.
When the House initially passed a CR with everything Obama wanted BUT Obamacare funding, I was encouraged; those of us in the Tea Party put pressure on the Republicans, and it appeared that they'd listened to us. When Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT) led the charge in the Senate to defund Obamacare, I was encouraged. When the government was PARTIALLY shut down, I was even more encouraged; the last time the Republicans did this in 1995, it led to our first balanced budget in years, and we even had a surplus! I was hoping the Republicans would fight the good fight this time; I was hoping they would listen to us; after all, if not for the Tea Party, the Republicans could not have won control of the House in 2010.
Ah, but Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn put pressure on Senate Republicans to vote WITH the Democrats! WTF?! By voting to end the filibuster (which is what cloture does, per Senate rules), the 25 French Republicans, in effect, voted to KEEP Obamacare in place; they voted for Obamacare! Oh, I know, I know; when the vote on the CR (restoring Obamacare funding) was held, these same clowns voted against it, but that was meaningless; the Democrats hold 54 Senate seats, while the Republicans hold 44. IOW, when holding a vote of any kind that only requires a simple majority, the Republicans cannot stop anything the Democrats want to do. Why? Because they do not have the votes; 54 is more than 44 the last time I checked.
If the Republicans want to stop the Democrats' agenda, then they have to use the filibuster and vote AGAINST cloture; they have enough votes to stop the Democrats IF they remain united; to invoke cloture, 60 votes are needed, while the Democrats had only 54. IOW, if the Republicans had held fast on the cloture vote of 27 September, then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Democrat cronies could not have passed a CR that restored Obamacare funding. To put it another way, by voting for cloture, the 25 Republican traitors effectively voted FOR Obamacare; they voted to keep in in place. Why? That is NOT what we sent them to do! We sent them to STOP this botched abortion of a law, a law that'll wreck what was once the finest health care system in the world.
What's even more galling is that these same 25 French Republicans will then run back to their states, and say how they voted against Obamacare when the vote came up; they'll say that they tried to stop it but couldn't, since they're the minority party in the Senate. This is true; they voted against the CR when it came up. What they will NOT say is how, by voting for cloture, they enabled the CR to pass in the first place! They're freaking hypocrites and traitors. How stupid do they think we are?!
The reason that this is upsetting is all Republicans campaigned on the promise to repeal, defund, and/or obstruct Obamacare in any way possible. Poll after poll after poll shows that the majority of Americans do NOT want Obamacare, so fighting against it is a winning strategy. However, when push came to shove, most of those rat bastards voted for it; they did not vote to defund the law, which would have delayed or prevented its implementation. When it came time to fight, the majority of Republicans surrendered, and they did so before the fight even began.
I think that had the Senate Republicans held their ground in the cloture vote, then we may have won this fight. The government would still be partially shut down. The fight would still be going on, which means that we'd have a chance to finally begin to reign in our out of control spending. If we don't, then we'll be like Greece in the near future. That's not something any thinking person wants.
I know I shouldn't be surprised, and at the end of the day, I wasn't. After all, the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill (House Speaker John Boehner, House Leader Eric Cantor, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, et al) has caved on every fight with Obama and the Democrats; I figured that they'd cave this time too. However, when the House voted for a CR defunding Obamacare, a part of me was optimistic. Thanks to the backstabbing ways of the French Republicans in the Senate, we (our country) lost an important fight, a fight to remain fiscally solvent. While I am not surprised, I am disgusted. Those are my thoughts...
MarkyMark
I haven't been in the mood to say much lately, but I am now. Last week, the Republicans caved to the Democrats AGAIN! Again, they wimped out of a budget and/or debt ceiling fight. I knew the writing was on the wall when 25 of the 44 Senate Republicans voted with the Democrats for cloture, which effectively opened the door to get a CR done; I say get a continuing resolution (i.e. CR) done, because we haven't had a proper budget in almost five years now.
When the House initially passed a CR with everything Obama wanted BUT Obamacare funding, I was encouraged; those of us in the Tea Party put pressure on the Republicans, and it appeared that they'd listened to us. When Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT) led the charge in the Senate to defund Obamacare, I was encouraged. When the government was PARTIALLY shut down, I was even more encouraged; the last time the Republicans did this in 1995, it led to our first balanced budget in years, and we even had a surplus! I was hoping the Republicans would fight the good fight this time; I was hoping they would listen to us; after all, if not for the Tea Party, the Republicans could not have won control of the House in 2010.
Ah, but Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn put pressure on Senate Republicans to vote WITH the Democrats! WTF?! By voting to end the filibuster (which is what cloture does, per Senate rules), the 25 French Republicans, in effect, voted to KEEP Obamacare in place; they voted for Obamacare! Oh, I know, I know; when the vote on the CR (restoring Obamacare funding) was held, these same clowns voted against it, but that was meaningless; the Democrats hold 54 Senate seats, while the Republicans hold 44. IOW, when holding a vote of any kind that only requires a simple majority, the Republicans cannot stop anything the Democrats want to do. Why? Because they do not have the votes; 54 is more than 44 the last time I checked.
If the Republicans want to stop the Democrats' agenda, then they have to use the filibuster and vote AGAINST cloture; they have enough votes to stop the Democrats IF they remain united; to invoke cloture, 60 votes are needed, while the Democrats had only 54. IOW, if the Republicans had held fast on the cloture vote of 27 September, then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Democrat cronies could not have passed a CR that restored Obamacare funding. To put it another way, by voting for cloture, the 25 Republican traitors effectively voted FOR Obamacare; they voted to keep in in place. Why? That is NOT what we sent them to do! We sent them to STOP this botched abortion of a law, a law that'll wreck what was once the finest health care system in the world.
What's even more galling is that these same 25 French Republicans will then run back to their states, and say how they voted against Obamacare when the vote came up; they'll say that they tried to stop it but couldn't, since they're the minority party in the Senate. This is true; they voted against the CR when it came up. What they will NOT say is how, by voting for cloture, they enabled the CR to pass in the first place! They're freaking hypocrites and traitors. How stupid do they think we are?!
The reason that this is upsetting is all Republicans campaigned on the promise to repeal, defund, and/or obstruct Obamacare in any way possible. Poll after poll after poll shows that the majority of Americans do NOT want Obamacare, so fighting against it is a winning strategy. However, when push came to shove, most of those rat bastards voted for it; they did not vote to defund the law, which would have delayed or prevented its implementation. When it came time to fight, the majority of Republicans surrendered, and they did so before the fight even began.
I think that had the Senate Republicans held their ground in the cloture vote, then we may have won this fight. The government would still be partially shut down. The fight would still be going on, which means that we'd have a chance to finally begin to reign in our out of control spending. If we don't, then we'll be like Greece in the near future. That's not something any thinking person wants.
I know I shouldn't be surprised, and at the end of the day, I wasn't. After all, the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill (House Speaker John Boehner, House Leader Eric Cantor, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, et al) has caved on every fight with Obama and the Democrats; I figured that they'd cave this time too. However, when the House voted for a CR defunding Obamacare, a part of me was optimistic. Thanks to the backstabbing ways of the French Republicans in the Senate, we (our country) lost an important fight, a fight to remain fiscally solvent. While I am not surprised, I am disgusted. Those are my thoughts...
MarkyMark
04 October 2013
The World Will NOT End of Debt Ceiling Is Not Raised!
Folks,
There have been a lot of lies, misinformation, and BS spread by the PC, feminist media, lies that even the brightest and best on Mancoat are believing. I am here to dispel those lies, and to shine the light of TRUTH on a story that is making the rounds: the incessant braying about the US Government's debt ceiling, which will be reached in the near future. Here's a post I made on Mancoat, and I am sharing it with my audience.
------------------
Guys,
This default stuff is a LIE! Let me repeat: this default story is a lie. Here's why: we'd still be able to service our debt and interest payments, because the US Govt' takes in approximately 200 billion dollars a month; on an annual basis, that equates to 2.4 trillion a year. Covering debt service, especially at today's historically low interest rates, would be no problem at all. What WOULD change is how all other spending beyond debt service would be prioritized and appropriated. Because 2.4 trillion is smaller than the approximate 3.8 trillion we're spending this year (we don't know for sure, because we haven't had a proper budget in almost five years now), hard choices would have to be made. We may have to cut down on support payments to all the single mother sluts out there; we might not be able to enable their bad behavior anymore. Is that such a bad thing?
The Democrats and their media sycophants are acting like spoiled brats at the thought of not getting their way. These are the same people who predicted Armageddon on the eve of the sequester (THEIR idea, BTW!). These are the same people who cried about Armageddon prior to this week's partial gov't shutdown of non-essential services. That begs an obvious question: if they're non-essential, WHY do we have them in the first place? That's another rant for another time. Anyway, the world didn't end; the sun is still rising in the east and setting in the west; the world is still going on, and will continue to go on if the debt ceiling isn't raised.
The fact of the matter is that we HAVE to get spending under control. We cannot continue to run TRILLION DOLLAR deficits every year for very long before suffering economic collapse; we just can't do that! You know what happens when the economy collapses? Society collapses as well. You know what happens when society collapses? I'm not sure we want to go there; even for those of us who are prepared, I'm not sure we want to go there-not when society has the morality (lack thereof, I should say) that allows such trashy TV shows as the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, and Desperate Housewives to be aired! Do we REALLY want to see society collapse when the majority of people don't even have the morals of an alley cat?! I'm insulting alley cats when I say that, BTW...
Where are the media on all this? Where are they? They brayed, kvetched, and moaned incessantly when we were running deficits of 400 billion a year under George W. Bush and the Republican Congress, yet they have NOTHING to say about deficits that have been TRIPLE & QUADRUPLE that amount?! We never heard the end of deficits experienced under Republican administrations! Ah, but now that Barack Hussein Obama and his Demonrat cronies are running deficits of a trillion dollars or more, that's somehow ok. Anyway, as I said above, we cannot keep that up for much longer.
In closing, if the debt ceiling isn't raised, the world will not end. It didn't end with the sequester; it didn't end with the partial gov't shutdown this week; and it won't if the debt ceiling isn't raised. The gov't will still be taking in 200 billion a month, so we can cover our debt and interest payments with no problem. What WILL change is that we'll have to cut spending in other areas, including those that transfer money from men to women. AFIAC, that's a good thing that's LONG overdue! Let's hope that the debt ceiling isn't raised, so hard choices will be made WRT our out of control spending-spending that needs to be brought under control. Those are my thoughts...
MarkyMark
There have been a lot of lies, misinformation, and BS spread by the PC, feminist media, lies that even the brightest and best on Mancoat are believing. I am here to dispel those lies, and to shine the light of TRUTH on a story that is making the rounds: the incessant braying about the US Government's debt ceiling, which will be reached in the near future. Here's a post I made on Mancoat, and I am sharing it with my audience.
------------------
Guys,
This default stuff is a LIE! Let me repeat: this default story is a lie. Here's why: we'd still be able to service our debt and interest payments, because the US Govt' takes in approximately 200 billion dollars a month; on an annual basis, that equates to 2.4 trillion a year. Covering debt service, especially at today's historically low interest rates, would be no problem at all. What WOULD change is how all other spending beyond debt service would be prioritized and appropriated. Because 2.4 trillion is smaller than the approximate 3.8 trillion we're spending this year (we don't know for sure, because we haven't had a proper budget in almost five years now), hard choices would have to be made. We may have to cut down on support payments to all the single mother sluts out there; we might not be able to enable their bad behavior anymore. Is that such a bad thing?
The Democrats and their media sycophants are acting like spoiled brats at the thought of not getting their way. These are the same people who predicted Armageddon on the eve of the sequester (THEIR idea, BTW!). These are the same people who cried about Armageddon prior to this week's partial gov't shutdown of non-essential services. That begs an obvious question: if they're non-essential, WHY do we have them in the first place? That's another rant for another time. Anyway, the world didn't end; the sun is still rising in the east and setting in the west; the world is still going on, and will continue to go on if the debt ceiling isn't raised.
The fact of the matter is that we HAVE to get spending under control. We cannot continue to run TRILLION DOLLAR deficits every year for very long before suffering economic collapse; we just can't do that! You know what happens when the economy collapses? Society collapses as well. You know what happens when society collapses? I'm not sure we want to go there; even for those of us who are prepared, I'm not sure we want to go there-not when society has the morality (lack thereof, I should say) that allows such trashy TV shows as the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, and Desperate Housewives to be aired! Do we REALLY want to see society collapse when the majority of people don't even have the morals of an alley cat?! I'm insulting alley cats when I say that, BTW...
Where are the media on all this? Where are they? They brayed, kvetched, and moaned incessantly when we were running deficits of 400 billion a year under George W. Bush and the Republican Congress, yet they have NOTHING to say about deficits that have been TRIPLE & QUADRUPLE that amount?! We never heard the end of deficits experienced under Republican administrations! Ah, but now that Barack Hussein Obama and his Demonrat cronies are running deficits of a trillion dollars or more, that's somehow ok. Anyway, as I said above, we cannot keep that up for much longer.
In closing, if the debt ceiling isn't raised, the world will not end. It didn't end with the sequester; it didn't end with the partial gov't shutdown this week; and it won't if the debt ceiling isn't raised. The gov't will still be taking in 200 billion a month, so we can cover our debt and interest payments with no problem. What WILL change is that we'll have to cut spending in other areas, including those that transfer money from men to women. AFIAC, that's a good thing that's LONG overdue! Let's hope that the debt ceiling isn't raised, so hard choices will be made WRT our out of control spending-spending that needs to be brought under control. Those are my thoughts...
MarkyMark
20 September 2013
Deconstructing Women, by Christopher in Oregon
Guys,
I was reading Christopher in Oregon's comments the Happy Bachelors Forum archives. I came across THIS gem in which he deconstructs women. All I can say is WOW-good stuff...
---------------
Fellows;
I am luckier than most guys in many respects. Probably the biggest thing in my favor is that both of my parents warned me about marraige and women. My mother was very vocal about women and their nasty ways. For this I will always be grateful. She told me in no uncertain terms that women were pretty much all whores and liars, and that for all practical purposes, there were no exceptions. This view is echoed by the Bible as well, as shown by verses in Proverbs and Ecclesiaistes, for those of you silly boys who still embrace Christianity.
Probably the most important bit of information she gave me was that women do NOT age well. She kept telling me that if I could just get to the age of thirty, I "would be home free", as she put it. At the time, I didn't fully understand it. I do now. It's not just a matter of your sex drive diminishing as you get older, but something far more important. A woman's looks almost always head for the gutter as she ages. The more kids she has, the faster her looks deteriorate. I'm not talking when she hits fifty, or even forty.
Thirty. Maybe sooner.
This isn't just an issue of her face loosing that "youthful glow". I recall visiting a Christian relationship site recently that was tactfully talking about how a woman loses her beauty by forty. It said that she wouldn't turn many heads anymore. I thought, "Yeah; she won't turn any heads at forty. Maybe a few stomachs- but no heads."
This is one of the greatest secrets that few people talk about, and young men are almost never warned about. Women get ugly. BUTT UGLY. Even if she doesn't grow obese, as most women do, they develope cellulite.
Cellulite.
Oh, God. Have you ever walked down the aisle in a store and observed the women waddling along in short pants? Have you ever looked at their legs? Their thighs? A ghastly sight. Cellulite jiggling in every direction. It's like the old fifties sci-fi movie "The Blob". Sometimes I'm afraid it's going to jump out and envelope me.
Ick.
Ponder her buttocks. More cellulite. Lots more fat. You could set up a table for six on some of the female bums out there.
Her belly could handle the overflow. I was watching a show on one of the Discovery channels the other day and they were talking about how a woman's belly can grow and stretch to accomodate pregnancy. Yes, indeed. A woman's belly can grow to resemble a beached whale in short order. (It rarely shrinks back)
Contemplate her breasts. Ah, yes. The twin orbs of pleasure that young men so foolishly lust after.
Why?
They're a couple of sacks of fat with oozing nipples on the end. Very few women's breasts look like the one's you see in the movies. Normally, most breasts are NOT attractive at all. They droop. Sometimes they're not identical. Some look like gourds. When children come along, they sag badly. Very badly. Sometimes down to their belly, which by this time is also sagging in a race to hit the floor. In a woman, everything heads south, my friends. NEVER forget this.
I'm going to be blunt. Have you ever smelled a vagina? Seriously. I mean in it's natural, unwashed state? Really stuck your nose right down there and taken a deep breath?
Once.
My G-d. The stench could have knocked a buzzard off a shit wagon at fifty paces. To this day I swear there was a cloud of flies buzzing around that portal of doom. Sometimes when riding my Harley-Beasties around the rural roads here in Oregon, I encounter dead skunks. Road kill. We have a lot of them here, and when they've been baking in the summer sun, you can smell them a long way off even at sixty miles per hour.
Vaginas tend to be even nastier.
I have long said that a vagina is a cesspool of filth and disease, and that I will never place any part of my anatomy into such a sewer. With the odds that a woman has herpes or HPV, this statement is even more true today.
Nature has a clever trick to warn us of danger. Smell. If you encounter something that smells bad, or rancid, Nature is telling you to get away.
(Danger, danger Will Robinson!)
You are being warned that something is probably carrying disease, and is filthy. Definatley not fit for human consumption.
Consider what comes out of a woman's vagina when she has a period. It's not just blood, boys. Other nasty stuff sloughes off. If she has HPV, then dead warts (if she's being treated) come oozing out. Or dead pre-cancerous lesions. Scabs. Brown slime that reeks.
Doubt me? Visit any HPV forum and read the stories. It's enough to make a Billy-Goat puke.
And they wonder why so many men don't want to perform oral sex......
Think about her rectum. Yep. Her butt-hole. Think about how close it is to her vagina. Do you REALLY want your gonads slapping up against her poop-shute?
Really?
How carefully does she wipe after she uses the toilet? Do you know? Of course not. You're taking it on faith that she is very sanitary, and we all know we can trust women.
Look at her pretty face. Think about her mouth. Can you say gingivitus? Tooth decay? Mucous? Plaque? The human mouth is FILTHY, and a woman's mouth is no exception, bucko. She can also carry Herpes and HPV in her mouth from all those blow jobs she's been giving out to every guy in town. Blow jobs that mysteriously disappear once married, I might add.
Look at her beady little eyes. Will they look so pretty when she is squinting through glasses that are as thick as coke bottle bottoms? When they're oozing? When they are dull and lifeless as she hits middle age?
Have you ever watched how a woman's skin sags? Their skin ages much faster than a man's. Loss of collagen you know. They soon look like a mummy. Surely you've seen a middle-aged couple walking along. The man is fifty. In shape. Pleasantly greying on the sides of his head. A bounce in his step.
Jaunty.
Then look at his wife
She looks like an open-casket funeral. The stench of death is about her. He's just hitting his prime in looks, while she's flying towards death. Yes, she may outlive him. If you can call occupying a rotting carcass living.
Deconstruct the female.
This is a common theme by celibate males who seek to warn men about the realities of women.
Deconstruct the female.
I'm sure sometimes women wonder why I'm smiling as I go about my business. It's not just that I'm friendly. I'm deconstructing in my mind. Many times this has saved me.
Women produce the same filth and excretions as men. They require deodrants both for underarms, and even worse, for down below. What happens when a woman uses the toilet? Do you think it comes out smelling like roses? Think again.
Understand that your sex drive is irrational. It's designed by nature to get you to breed. Once the breeding is done, your sex drive diminishes and her looks disappear. Nature doesn't want her being desireable to other men. She needs to take care of the little children, so nature makes her ugly. The more children, the uglier she gets. It's a normal biologiacl result of breeding.
Stop and analyze why you feel desire for a woman. You're being manipulated by nature to do something that is NOT in your personal best interest. It will not be advantageous in any way to breed with a woman. You will be drained physically, emotionally, spiritually and financially. Consider the other examples in nature of males being used and cast aside after breeding. Once they have served their purpose, they are useless to the female.
Do you think you will be treated any differently when the female has used you for breeding? You will only be around as long as she feels she need you financially. No longer.
Deconstruct the female.
Understand what she is physically. Understand the forces that drive her to breed, and the part you play. Is this what you want? To spend your short life in this fashion? Are you destined to be a slave to your desires? Can you rise above nature? Can you use your mind to control your actions?
Are you better and stronger than the other creatures in the world, or are you a slave to your passions just as surely as a dog?
The choice is yours.
Clear your mind of lust. Avoid looking at women. Avoid porn. Masturbate if needed when yonger- or older. Don't date. Don't socialize with women. Concentrate on your hobbies. Your work. Your exercising.
Buy a motorcycle if you can swing it. Ride. Commune with nature. Contemplate your naval. Read the classics. Take up bicycling. Hiking.
Anything.
Use your energies in ways that benefit YOU, not some oozing gash. You don't have to be just another cog in the Matriarchy. Live for yourself.
Whew.
I must end this now, as nature is calling. I'm going to take a much-deserved dump in my newly redecorated bachelor bathroom that no Vagina-Beasty has ever fouled.
Christopher
---------------
It makes you view women in less of a lustful way, doesn't it? Until next time...
MarkyMark
I was reading Christopher in Oregon's comments the Happy Bachelors Forum archives. I came across THIS gem in which he deconstructs women. All I can say is WOW-good stuff...
---------------
Fellows;
I am luckier than most guys in many respects. Probably the biggest thing in my favor is that both of my parents warned me about marraige and women. My mother was very vocal about women and their nasty ways. For this I will always be grateful. She told me in no uncertain terms that women were pretty much all whores and liars, and that for all practical purposes, there were no exceptions. This view is echoed by the Bible as well, as shown by verses in Proverbs and Ecclesiaistes, for those of you silly boys who still embrace Christianity.
Probably the most important bit of information she gave me was that women do NOT age well. She kept telling me that if I could just get to the age of thirty, I "would be home free", as she put it. At the time, I didn't fully understand it. I do now. It's not just a matter of your sex drive diminishing as you get older, but something far more important. A woman's looks almost always head for the gutter as she ages. The more kids she has, the faster her looks deteriorate. I'm not talking when she hits fifty, or even forty.
Thirty. Maybe sooner.
This isn't just an issue of her face loosing that "youthful glow". I recall visiting a Christian relationship site recently that was tactfully talking about how a woman loses her beauty by forty. It said that she wouldn't turn many heads anymore. I thought, "Yeah; she won't turn any heads at forty. Maybe a few stomachs- but no heads."
This is one of the greatest secrets that few people talk about, and young men are almost never warned about. Women get ugly. BUTT UGLY. Even if she doesn't grow obese, as most women do, they develope cellulite.
Cellulite.
Oh, God. Have you ever walked down the aisle in a store and observed the women waddling along in short pants? Have you ever looked at their legs? Their thighs? A ghastly sight. Cellulite jiggling in every direction. It's like the old fifties sci-fi movie "The Blob". Sometimes I'm afraid it's going to jump out and envelope me.
Ick.
Ponder her buttocks. More cellulite. Lots more fat. You could set up a table for six on some of the female bums out there.
Her belly could handle the overflow. I was watching a show on one of the Discovery channels the other day and they were talking about how a woman's belly can grow and stretch to accomodate pregnancy. Yes, indeed. A woman's belly can grow to resemble a beached whale in short order. (It rarely shrinks back)
Contemplate her breasts. Ah, yes. The twin orbs of pleasure that young men so foolishly lust after.
Why?
They're a couple of sacks of fat with oozing nipples on the end. Very few women's breasts look like the one's you see in the movies. Normally, most breasts are NOT attractive at all. They droop. Sometimes they're not identical. Some look like gourds. When children come along, they sag badly. Very badly. Sometimes down to their belly, which by this time is also sagging in a race to hit the floor. In a woman, everything heads south, my friends. NEVER forget this.
I'm going to be blunt. Have you ever smelled a vagina? Seriously. I mean in it's natural, unwashed state? Really stuck your nose right down there and taken a deep breath?
Once.
My G-d. The stench could have knocked a buzzard off a shit wagon at fifty paces. To this day I swear there was a cloud of flies buzzing around that portal of doom. Sometimes when riding my Harley-Beasties around the rural roads here in Oregon, I encounter dead skunks. Road kill. We have a lot of them here, and when they've been baking in the summer sun, you can smell them a long way off even at sixty miles per hour.
Vaginas tend to be even nastier.
I have long said that a vagina is a cesspool of filth and disease, and that I will never place any part of my anatomy into such a sewer. With the odds that a woman has herpes or HPV, this statement is even more true today.
Nature has a clever trick to warn us of danger. Smell. If you encounter something that smells bad, or rancid, Nature is telling you to get away.
(Danger, danger Will Robinson!)
You are being warned that something is probably carrying disease, and is filthy. Definatley not fit for human consumption.
Consider what comes out of a woman's vagina when she has a period. It's not just blood, boys. Other nasty stuff sloughes off. If she has HPV, then dead warts (if she's being treated) come oozing out. Or dead pre-cancerous lesions. Scabs. Brown slime that reeks.
Doubt me? Visit any HPV forum and read the stories. It's enough to make a Billy-Goat puke.
And they wonder why so many men don't want to perform oral sex......
Think about her rectum. Yep. Her butt-hole. Think about how close it is to her vagina. Do you REALLY want your gonads slapping up against her poop-shute?
Really?
How carefully does she wipe after she uses the toilet? Do you know? Of course not. You're taking it on faith that she is very sanitary, and we all know we can trust women.
Look at her pretty face. Think about her mouth. Can you say gingivitus? Tooth decay? Mucous? Plaque? The human mouth is FILTHY, and a woman's mouth is no exception, bucko. She can also carry Herpes and HPV in her mouth from all those blow jobs she's been giving out to every guy in town. Blow jobs that mysteriously disappear once married, I might add.
Look at her beady little eyes. Will they look so pretty when she is squinting through glasses that are as thick as coke bottle bottoms? When they're oozing? When they are dull and lifeless as she hits middle age?
Have you ever watched how a woman's skin sags? Their skin ages much faster than a man's. Loss of collagen you know. They soon look like a mummy. Surely you've seen a middle-aged couple walking along. The man is fifty. In shape. Pleasantly greying on the sides of his head. A bounce in his step.
Jaunty.
Then look at his wife
She looks like an open-casket funeral. The stench of death is about her. He's just hitting his prime in looks, while she's flying towards death. Yes, she may outlive him. If you can call occupying a rotting carcass living.
Deconstruct the female.
This is a common theme by celibate males who seek to warn men about the realities of women.
Deconstruct the female.
I'm sure sometimes women wonder why I'm smiling as I go about my business. It's not just that I'm friendly. I'm deconstructing in my mind. Many times this has saved me.
Women produce the same filth and excretions as men. They require deodrants both for underarms, and even worse, for down below. What happens when a woman uses the toilet? Do you think it comes out smelling like roses? Think again.
Understand that your sex drive is irrational. It's designed by nature to get you to breed. Once the breeding is done, your sex drive diminishes and her looks disappear. Nature doesn't want her being desireable to other men. She needs to take care of the little children, so nature makes her ugly. The more children, the uglier she gets. It's a normal biologiacl result of breeding.
Stop and analyze why you feel desire for a woman. You're being manipulated by nature to do something that is NOT in your personal best interest. It will not be advantageous in any way to breed with a woman. You will be drained physically, emotionally, spiritually and financially. Consider the other examples in nature of males being used and cast aside after breeding. Once they have served their purpose, they are useless to the female.
Do you think you will be treated any differently when the female has used you for breeding? You will only be around as long as she feels she need you financially. No longer.
Deconstruct the female.
Understand what she is physically. Understand the forces that drive her to breed, and the part you play. Is this what you want? To spend your short life in this fashion? Are you destined to be a slave to your desires? Can you rise above nature? Can you use your mind to control your actions?
Are you better and stronger than the other creatures in the world, or are you a slave to your passions just as surely as a dog?
The choice is yours.
Clear your mind of lust. Avoid looking at women. Avoid porn. Masturbate if needed when yonger- or older. Don't date. Don't socialize with women. Concentrate on your hobbies. Your work. Your exercising.
Buy a motorcycle if you can swing it. Ride. Commune with nature. Contemplate your naval. Read the classics. Take up bicycling. Hiking.
Anything.
Use your energies in ways that benefit YOU, not some oozing gash. You don't have to be just another cog in the Matriarchy. Live for yourself.
Whew.
I must end this now, as nature is calling. I'm going to take a much-deserved dump in my newly redecorated bachelor bathroom that no Vagina-Beasty has ever fouled.
Christopher
---------------
It makes you view women in less of a lustful way, doesn't it? Until next time...
MarkyMark
07 September 2013
According to the Bible, Women Are Incapable of Love
Guys,
While leaving a comment over @ Elusive Wapiti, I had to leave a comment on his recent post about pedestalizing men. I posited that women are INCAPABLE of giving love as we understand it. Here's why...
I have heard it said that God will NOT command us to do something we are not capable of doing ourselves. In the Bible (Eph. 5), men are commanded to love their wives, but wives are NOT commanded to love their husbands; wives are commanded to submit to their husbands, but they are NEVER told to love them. Why didn't God put that command in the Bible? Simple-because wives are NOT capable of loving their husbands-duh!
That, of course, begs an obvious question: are there any good women out there? As a matter, no; the Bible says that they don't exist. Where, oh where, does the Bible say THAT, MarkyMark? Ever hear of the book, Ecclesiastes? Well, if you read chapter 7, it clearly lays it out in there. It says that the Preacher (i.e. King Solomon, the richest, wisest man in the world at that time) one in a thousand men he found were good, yet not ONE GOOD WOMAN could he find! Is it any clearer than that?!
Come, let us reason together, shall we? According to classic Christian doctrine, isn't the Bible the Word of God? As such, is it not perfect and inerrant, having no mistakes whatsoever? Does not the Bible, according to Christian doctrine, contain the MIND of God? Well, if God says that no good women exist, mustn't it be true? If God does not give women a command to love their husbands, is it not because they are incapable of following it? If they're incapable of following that command, doesn't that mean, by extension, that women cannot, and will not, love their husbands?
Ah, but MarkyMark, what about Proverbs 31, which lays out the template of the ideal wife? I'm glad you asked, because I am about to tell you! Proverbs 31 does lay out what the ideal wife looks and acts like. HOWEVER-and this is key-I believe that Proverbs 31 is really saying this: if you want a good woman, GOOD LUCK finding one; they don't exist! Even if they do exist, there clearly aren't enough to go around. Finding such a woman would be akin to winning the lottery; you now some lucky SOB will hit it, but it won't be you, Hoss...
In closing, women are incapable of love. Why? Because the Bible never, ever commands a person to do something they are not capable of; since women are never commanded to love their husbands, they are not capable of loving them. Also, Ecc. 7 says that the Preacher found NO good women; since the Bible, the Word of God, says that no good women could be found, there are none out there. It's all in God's word, the Bible, folks...
MarkyMark
While leaving a comment over @ Elusive Wapiti, I had to leave a comment on his recent post about pedestalizing men. I posited that women are INCAPABLE of giving love as we understand it. Here's why...
I have heard it said that God will NOT command us to do something we are not capable of doing ourselves. In the Bible (Eph. 5), men are commanded to love their wives, but wives are NOT commanded to love their husbands; wives are commanded to submit to their husbands, but they are NEVER told to love them. Why didn't God put that command in the Bible? Simple-because wives are NOT capable of loving their husbands-duh!
That, of course, begs an obvious question: are there any good women out there? As a matter, no; the Bible says that they don't exist. Where, oh where, does the Bible say THAT, MarkyMark? Ever hear of the book, Ecclesiastes? Well, if you read chapter 7, it clearly lays it out in there. It says that the Preacher (i.e. King Solomon, the richest, wisest man in the world at that time) one in a thousand men he found were good, yet not ONE GOOD WOMAN could he find! Is it any clearer than that?!
Come, let us reason together, shall we? According to classic Christian doctrine, isn't the Bible the Word of God? As such, is it not perfect and inerrant, having no mistakes whatsoever? Does not the Bible, according to Christian doctrine, contain the MIND of God? Well, if God says that no good women exist, mustn't it be true? If God does not give women a command to love their husbands, is it not because they are incapable of following it? If they're incapable of following that command, doesn't that mean, by extension, that women cannot, and will not, love their husbands?
Ah, but MarkyMark, what about Proverbs 31, which lays out the template of the ideal wife? I'm glad you asked, because I am about to tell you! Proverbs 31 does lay out what the ideal wife looks and acts like. HOWEVER-and this is key-I believe that Proverbs 31 is really saying this: if you want a good woman, GOOD LUCK finding one; they don't exist! Even if they do exist, there clearly aren't enough to go around. Finding such a woman would be akin to winning the lottery; you now some lucky SOB will hit it, but it won't be you, Hoss...
In closing, women are incapable of love. Why? Because the Bible never, ever commands a person to do something they are not capable of; since women are never commanded to love their husbands, they are not capable of loving them. Also, Ecc. 7 says that the Preacher found NO good women; since the Bible, the Word of God, says that no good women could be found, there are none out there. It's all in God's word, the Bible, folks...
MarkyMark
31 August 2013
Pregnancy Tests for Sale!
Guys,
Just when I think women's morality can't get any lower; just when I think things can't be more insane; women's morality goes still lower, and things are sick and getting sicker. I cannot make this stuff up. Stand by for a Daily Mail article about pregnancy tests for sale, along with analysis from Yours Truly...
-------------------------
|
Who was it that said that women are natural liars? Who was it that said that Nature endows all of its creatures with the necessary tools of survival? Who was it that said that, since women are weaker than men, have been endowed with a degree of cunning and deception that men cannot begin to understand? I don't know, but this shows that women are anything BUT sugar and spice and everything nice...
I'm pregnant and will sell you my positive pregnancy test for $20,' one woman on Manhattan's Lower East Side writes. 'I don't care what you need them for.'
Another Dallas-based buyer is motivated by revenge, because after five years and two children with her ex-boyfriend, he came home and told her that he got his receptionist pregnant.
'We had been trying for another [baby]' she writes.
'He texted and said he isn't sure who he wants to be with and I think I handled it well for what a cheating lying dog he is. I would like the last laugh out of this. I will give some girl $40.'
Aw, poor Little Missy took up with a bad boy, and she's surprised that he didn't remain faithful to her. How CLUELESS can you be?! Didn't Little Missy learn that leopards do NOT change their spots?! I guess not...
I would like to ask some questions of Little Missy here. One, why did you go out with a cheating, lying dog? Why did you STAY with him? Surely this isn't the first time he's done this; cheaters have always done it before, so you have no excuse, Darlin'.
Just goes to show you that women WANT promiscuous men-at least the increasingly number of feral women found today do. Thanks to preselection and hypergamy, women want what other women want; to them, it shows that the man has 'value'-though in this case, that value is dubious, at best...
While drugstore pregnancy tests are priced at between $10 and $20, cheaper versions can be bought online or at discount outlets for as little as $1 each.
Yeah, but a used, positive pregnancy test could be worth thousands...
Craigslist has also become an underground online bazaar for other fertility items. Women are selling frozen breast milk for $1 per ounce, baby items and even drugs at a deep discount.
The breast milk works out to $128 per gallon-wow! That begs an obvious question though: why wouldn't a woman just use her OWN breast milk? After all, she'll make it when she gets pregnant and has a kid...
Fertility drugs such as Ganrilex, Menopur and Gonal-f used for IVF and egg freezing are offered at around $100 for several doses rather than the market rate, which can be around $120 for one syringe.
If women would have children when they are younger and more fertile (i.e. is more likely to have kids, and will have an easier time giving birth to them), they wouldn't NEED IVF! Even with IVF, because an older woman's eggs are mostly gone; because those remaining eggs are of lower quality; IVF will only have success rate of 5% or so.
But experts caution that there is no way to verify that the drugs inside the box are as advertised - or, since many medicines require refrigeration - that they have been stored properly.
What else can I add to this?
As with everything else on Craigslist, it seems that the advice let the buyer beware definitely applies here.
Caveat emptor-let the buyer beware, indeed...
------------------------
Guys, I have some closing thoughts about this. Normally, I'd say good bye here, but not this time; this time, I'll share my parting thoughts about this sort of thing...
If your woman insists that she's pregnant, then buy fresh pregnancy tests at the store yourself and have her use them; don't rely on a test she furnishes you. How do you know it's legit if you go solely on her say-so? Spend $20 for some tests; it's cheap insurance.
The second thought I have is that this proves women are NATURAL LIARS AND DECEIVERS; this proves it! The safe thing to do is to assume a woman is always lying to you unless proven otherwise; even then, be suspicious of what she says.
Thirdly, we allow these creatures to VOTE! Did you ever think about that? Women vote; even though they pull these sorts of stunts, they are allowed to vote! Since they comprise the majority of voters, it's no wonder we have increasing corruption, deception, and skullduggery on the part of government; after all, they are reflecting women's desires, inclinations, and wishes.
With that, I shall say good day, Gentlemen; have a good day now...
MarkyMark
Just when I think women's morality can't get any lower; just when I think things can't be more insane; women's morality goes still lower, and things are sick and getting sicker. I cannot make this stuff up. Stand by for a Daily Mail article about pregnancy tests for sale, along with analysis from Yours Truly...
-------------------------
To pee or not to pee: Women sell positive pregnancy tests on Craigslist for $25 each. . . and there is no shortage of motivated buyers
- One seller writes 'Wanna get your boyfriend to pop the question?', while some buyers are motivated by revenge
|
Who was it that said that women are natural liars? Who was it that said that Nature endows all of its creatures with the necessary tools of survival? Who was it that said that, since women are weaker than men, have been endowed with a degree of cunning and deception that men cannot begin to understand? I don't know, but this shows that women are anything BUT sugar and spice and everything nice...
Scrolling through the site, there appears to be no shortage of sellers- and many are aware that their customers could be using the tests for dubious reasons.
What, women do things for dubious reasons?! Say it isn't so! The scary thing is that we allow women to VOTE! Did you ever think about that?
What, women do things for dubious reasons?! Say it isn't so! The scary thing is that we allow women to VOTE! Did you ever think about that?
I'm pregnant and will sell you my positive pregnancy test for $20,' one woman on Manhattan's Lower East Side writes. 'I don't care what you need them for.'
One Los Angeles woman offers to buy a pregnancy test for $20 'to make a video on teen pregnancy' for her local boys and girls club, which commenters point out seems suspect.
Suspect, indeed! Methinks that an entrapment is about to happen here...
Suspect, indeed! Methinks that an entrapment is about to happen here...
Another Dallas-based buyer is motivated by revenge, because after five years and two children with her ex-boyfriend, he came home and told her that he got his receptionist pregnant.
'We had been trying for another [baby]' she writes.
'He texted and said he isn't sure who he wants to be with and I think I handled it well for what a cheating lying dog he is. I would like the last laugh out of this. I will give some girl $40.'
Aw, poor Little Missy took up with a bad boy, and she's surprised that he didn't remain faithful to her. How CLUELESS can you be?! Didn't Little Missy learn that leopards do NOT change their spots?! I guess not...
I would like to ask some questions of Little Missy here. One, why did you go out with a cheating, lying dog? Why did you STAY with him? Surely this isn't the first time he's done this; cheaters have always done it before, so you have no excuse, Darlin'.
Just goes to show you that women WANT promiscuous men-at least the increasingly number of feral women found today do. Thanks to preselection and hypergamy, women want what other women want; to them, it shows that the man has 'value'-though in this case, that value is dubious, at best...
Still, is easy to see how expectant moms in need of extra cash could be tempted by the high markup.
Why not sell the tests for $200? After all, that's a real markup. Also, $200 is cheap compared the bonanza that's worth TENS OF THOUSANDS of dollars to be awarded in the form of child support, alimony, etc...
Why not sell the tests for $200? After all, that's a real markup. Also, $200 is cheap compared the bonanza that's worth TENS OF THOUSANDS of dollars to be awarded in the form of child support, alimony, etc...
While drugstore pregnancy tests are priced at between $10 and $20, cheaper versions can be bought online or at discount outlets for as little as $1 each.
Yeah, but a used, positive pregnancy test could be worth thousands...
Craigslist has also become an underground online bazaar for other fertility items. Women are selling frozen breast milk for $1 per ounce, baby items and even drugs at a deep discount.
The breast milk works out to $128 per gallon-wow! That begs an obvious question though: why wouldn't a woman just use her OWN breast milk? After all, she'll make it when she gets pregnant and has a kid...
Fertility drugs such as Ganrilex, Menopur and Gonal-f used for IVF and egg freezing are offered at around $100 for several doses rather than the market rate, which can be around $120 for one syringe.
If women would have children when they are younger and more fertile (i.e. is more likely to have kids, and will have an easier time giving birth to them), they wouldn't NEED IVF! Even with IVF, because an older woman's eggs are mostly gone; because those remaining eggs are of lower quality; IVF will only have success rate of 5% or so.
But experts caution that there is no way to verify that the drugs inside the box are as advertised - or, since many medicines require refrigeration - that they have been stored properly.
What else can I add to this?
As with everything else on Craigslist, it seems that the advice let the buyer beware definitely applies here.
Caveat emptor-let the buyer beware, indeed...
------------------------
Guys, I have some closing thoughts about this. Normally, I'd say good bye here, but not this time; this time, I'll share my parting thoughts about this sort of thing...
If your woman insists that she's pregnant, then buy fresh pregnancy tests at the store yourself and have her use them; don't rely on a test she furnishes you. How do you know it's legit if you go solely on her say-so? Spend $20 for some tests; it's cheap insurance.
The second thought I have is that this proves women are NATURAL LIARS AND DECEIVERS; this proves it! The safe thing to do is to assume a woman is always lying to you unless proven otherwise; even then, be suspicious of what she says.
Thirdly, we allow these creatures to VOTE! Did you ever think about that? Women vote; even though they pull these sorts of stunts, they are allowed to vote! Since they comprise the majority of voters, it's no wonder we have increasing corruption, deception, and skullduggery on the part of government; after all, they are reflecting women's desires, inclinations, and wishes.
With that, I shall say good day, Gentlemen; have a good day now...
MarkyMark
09 August 2013
Anti-Gun Editor OUT of a Job!
Guys,
I'm sure you all remember how the editor of NY's Rockland County Journal News thought it was cute to publish the names and addresses of area gun permit holders. Well, that woman, Caryn McBride, is OUT of a job-yes! I normally don't cheer over someone's job loss, even if I cannot stand them. I've been out of a job before, and I can empathize with people in that situation. However, there are certain people who deserve to lose their jobs, and that feminist bitch, Caryn McBride, is one of them. Not only is she a feminist; she's anti-gun, which mean's she's anti Second Amendment; she's against God, our country, and its Constitution. Karma's a bitch, Bitch! Stand by for commentary from Yours Truly...
---------------------
According to the Rockland Times, a competitor to the Gannett-owned Rockland County Journal News, editor Caryn McBride is among the casualties of a recent purge at the Journal News.
The report said 17 journalists were among a total of 26 staff members at the Journal News who were let go.
Yes! It's nice to see karma visited upon those who truly deserve it, and it's nice to see it DURING our lifetime... :)
It was the Journal News that in 2012 published the names and addresses of all gun owners in Westchester and Rockland counties under the headline “Where are the gun permits in your neighborhood?”
Why did she think it was anyone ELSE'S business who had the gun permits in their neighborhood? Better yet, why do we have gun permits at all? Doesn't the Second Amendment say that "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall NOT be infringed."? Isn't the requirement to obtain a permit to either own or carry a gun an infringement on one's Second Amendment right?
The Times said police reports showed McBride had called the Clarkstown Police Department to notify them of a flood of angry phone calls and letters the newspaper received after it published the map.
Aw, poor Little Missy can't take the heat, so she cries and moans about it-waaaahhh! Little Missy, Harry Truman said that, if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. Even though you're a liberal, feminist, American hating woman; even though you've probably never been held to account for your actions (i.e. you've received the pussy pass for being a feminist and a woman); you should have had enough common sense to know that, after publishing the names and addresses of area gun owners, there would be a firestorm of controversy and anger over this-duh! You do know that many Americans hold a dim view of anti-gun activists, don't you?
The Rockland editor said she felt threatened by the complaints, but local police didn’t believe there was a credible threat. McBride and other executives then decided to hire armed guards to protect their property, the Times reported, “causing an uproar due to the perceived hypocrisy of the avowed anti-gun editors hiring gun-toting men.”
That's probably because there was NEVER a credible threat. Unlike liberal, anti-American, PC fascists like Caryn McBride, conservatives and libertarians don't engage in violent acts to carry out their aims. If anyone doesn't believe me, just look at the Occupy Wall Street protesters or the government union protesters in Wisconsin last year in their budget showdown with Governor Scott Walker.
Also, like many others, I just LOVE the hypocrisy of Miss McBride and her staff who hired armed guards for protection; that is so rich! On one hand, they decry gun ownership, yet they hire armed men to protect them. The hypocrisy of women and feminists never cease to amaze me...
The layoffs were announced by the newspaper’s CEO, Janet Hasson.
What I ESPECIALLY love about this is that a fellow woman and feminist (redundant?) fired her-ha!
The fallout from the decision to publish the names and addresses of gun-permit holders continued for weeks.
Gee, I wonder why? I mean, these sanctimonious pricks only took active actions against gun owners-people who are exercising their RIGHT to keep and bear arms!
Two months ago, the White Plains-based newspaper admitted that the information it published was badly outdated. The paper acknowledged many people had a dot on their house, indicating there was a gun permit at that address, even though they didn’t own a gun.
You see, THIS is why I am skeptical of anything and everything the news media say. Here, they admitted to using old, inaccurate information! Why does anyone take them seriously anymore? These same, sanctimonious pricks wonder WHY their readership, circulation, and most crucially, their advertising revenues, are dropping-incredible...
For example, The New York Times recently announced its sale of The Boston Globe for a 93% LOSS! That's right; after paying $1.1 billion for the Globe in 1993, the Times sold The Boston Globe for a mere $70 million. Also, The Washington Post was recently sold to Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon.com, for $250 million; keep in mind that The Washington Post had been valued in the BILLIONS of dollars not so long ago...
The responses to the publication included the publication of a map showing “Where are the Journal News employees in your neighborhood?” The Times said a Clarkstown police report confirmed that armed security guards were hired for the Journal News.
Hah, turnabout is fair play! I remember how Caryn McBride and her staff were crying like stuck pigs after this happened. It was all right for them to print the names and addresses of area gun owners, yet it wasn't all right to have the same thing done to them. Again, the HYPOCRISY of these people NEVER ceases to amaze me...
The Times also reported that shortly after the publication of the map, authorities said burglars entered the home of one of the gun owners identified by the newspaper, and a gun safe that was on the premises was damaged in a robbery attempt.
There were actually numerous instances of this happening, because I heard it reported in the local media. Since I'm in NJ, we receive newspapers and broadcasts (both TV & radio) from NYC and its surrounding environs; that would consist of NY state suburbs like Westchester, Rockland, and Putnam Counties for you low information voters out there. Anyway, there were numerous stories like this. Of course, area police chiefs denied any linkage between the stories and the attempted burglaries of gun owners. Even so, outside of the NYC/Tri-State area, this facet of the story (i.e. the attempted burglaries of gun owners in the wake of the article) received little, if any, coverage...
-----------------------
Folks, as I often say, I CANNOT make this up. Have a good day now...
MarkyMark
I'm sure you all remember how the editor of NY's Rockland County Journal News thought it was cute to publish the names and addresses of area gun permit holders. Well, that woman, Caryn McBride, is OUT of a job-yes! I normally don't cheer over someone's job loss, even if I cannot stand them. I've been out of a job before, and I can empathize with people in that situation. However, there are certain people who deserve to lose their jobs, and that feminist bitch, Caryn McBride, is one of them. Not only is she a feminist; she's anti-gun, which mean's she's anti Second Amendment; she's against God, our country, and its Constitution. Karma's a bitch, Bitch! Stand by for commentary from Yours Truly...
---------------------
According to the Rockland Times, a competitor to the Gannett-owned Rockland County Journal News, editor Caryn McBride is among the casualties of a recent purge at the Journal News.
The report said 17 journalists were among a total of 26 staff members at the Journal News who were let go.
Yes! It's nice to see karma visited upon those who truly deserve it, and it's nice to see it DURING our lifetime... :)
It was the Journal News that in 2012 published the names and addresses of all gun owners in Westchester and Rockland counties under the headline “Where are the gun permits in your neighborhood?”
Why did she think it was anyone ELSE'S business who had the gun permits in their neighborhood? Better yet, why do we have gun permits at all? Doesn't the Second Amendment say that "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall NOT be infringed."? Isn't the requirement to obtain a permit to either own or carry a gun an infringement on one's Second Amendment right?
The Times said police reports showed McBride had called the Clarkstown Police Department to notify them of a flood of angry phone calls and letters the newspaper received after it published the map.
Aw, poor Little Missy can't take the heat, so she cries and moans about it-waaaahhh! Little Missy, Harry Truman said that, if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. Even though you're a liberal, feminist, American hating woman; even though you've probably never been held to account for your actions (i.e. you've received the pussy pass for being a feminist and a woman); you should have had enough common sense to know that, after publishing the names and addresses of area gun owners, there would be a firestorm of controversy and anger over this-duh! You do know that many Americans hold a dim view of anti-gun activists, don't you?
The Rockland editor said she felt threatened by the complaints, but local police didn’t believe there was a credible threat. McBride and other executives then decided to hire armed guards to protect their property, the Times reported, “causing an uproar due to the perceived hypocrisy of the avowed anti-gun editors hiring gun-toting men.”
That's probably because there was NEVER a credible threat. Unlike liberal, anti-American, PC fascists like Caryn McBride, conservatives and libertarians don't engage in violent acts to carry out their aims. If anyone doesn't believe me, just look at the Occupy Wall Street protesters or the government union protesters in Wisconsin last year in their budget showdown with Governor Scott Walker.
Also, like many others, I just LOVE the hypocrisy of Miss McBride and her staff who hired armed guards for protection; that is so rich! On one hand, they decry gun ownership, yet they hire armed men to protect them. The hypocrisy of women and feminists never cease to amaze me...
The layoffs were announced by the newspaper’s CEO, Janet Hasson.
What I ESPECIALLY love about this is that a fellow woman and feminist (redundant?) fired her-ha!
The fallout from the decision to publish the names and addresses of gun-permit holders continued for weeks.
Gee, I wonder why? I mean, these sanctimonious pricks only took active actions against gun owners-people who are exercising their RIGHT to keep and bear arms!
Two months ago, the White Plains-based newspaper admitted that the information it published was badly outdated. The paper acknowledged many people had a dot on their house, indicating there was a gun permit at that address, even though they didn’t own a gun.
You see, THIS is why I am skeptical of anything and everything the news media say. Here, they admitted to using old, inaccurate information! Why does anyone take them seriously anymore? These same, sanctimonious pricks wonder WHY their readership, circulation, and most crucially, their advertising revenues, are dropping-incredible...
For example, The New York Times recently announced its sale of The Boston Globe for a 93% LOSS! That's right; after paying $1.1 billion for the Globe in 1993, the Times sold The Boston Globe for a mere $70 million. Also, The Washington Post was recently sold to Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon.com, for $250 million; keep in mind that The Washington Post had been valued in the BILLIONS of dollars not so long ago...
The responses to the publication included the publication of a map showing “Where are the Journal News employees in your neighborhood?” The Times said a Clarkstown police report confirmed that armed security guards were hired for the Journal News.
Hah, turnabout is fair play! I remember how Caryn McBride and her staff were crying like stuck pigs after this happened. It was all right for them to print the names and addresses of area gun owners, yet it wasn't all right to have the same thing done to them. Again, the HYPOCRISY of these people NEVER ceases to amaze me...
The Times also reported that shortly after the publication of the map, authorities said burglars entered the home of one of the gun owners identified by the newspaper, and a gun safe that was on the premises was damaged in a robbery attempt.
There were actually numerous instances of this happening, because I heard it reported in the local media. Since I'm in NJ, we receive newspapers and broadcasts (both TV & radio) from NYC and its surrounding environs; that would consist of NY state suburbs like Westchester, Rockland, and Putnam Counties for you low information voters out there. Anyway, there were numerous stories like this. Of course, area police chiefs denied any linkage between the stories and the attempted burglaries of gun owners. Even so, outside of the NYC/Tri-State area, this facet of the story (i.e. the attempted burglaries of gun owners in the wake of the article) received little, if any, coverage...
-----------------------
Folks, as I often say, I CANNOT make this up. Have a good day now...
MarkyMark
08 August 2013
How to Treat Women Until Things Change
Guys,
I was looking for something else over @ Dr. Helen's place on PJ Media when I decided to read her response to Rush Limbaugh's on air review of her book, Men on Strike. I heard him that day, and what he had to say was dead on target. After reading her piece, I decided to peruse the comments as well, and I found THIS gem by Gawain's Ghost; in it, he discusses how he treats women these days, and why. It's good reading, so I thought I would share it with my readers...
----------------------
Well, Dr. Helen, as you point out in your interview, the great irony here is that this issue harms women more than men. And there can be no resolution until women realize that fact.
That begs and obvious question: will women ever realize that? Given women's solipsistic, gynocentric point of view (i.e. everything is about them), are they capable of cause and effect thinking? I'm not so sure, given women's penchant for choosing cads repeatedly, then complaining about the dearth of good men afterwards. Women will ride the carousel for years, yet never seem to figure out that they may be doing something-gasp-wrong...
I suppose a resolution could be accelerated if more and more men treated women the way I do. I mean, I'm not a cad or a pick up artist. I treat women with respect. I'm polite and courteous, fun to be with. It's just that I understand the law and know that I am held accountable under the law.
Yes, yes, yes, a THOUSAND times yes! Men should understand the law and our inferior legal standing therein. One of the best investments in time a man can make is to take a day off, and spend it in his local family court; he'll see how gynocentric the legal system is, how biased against men it is.
My solution to the problem is really very simple. Marriage is out of the question. I do not allow her access to my property. I certainly do not allow her access to my money. We both have jobs, houses and cars. We both have money. So if she wants to get together, we'll agree on a place or an event, and meet each other there. If she wants to get intimate, we'll agree to share a hotel. After the date, or in the morning, we go our separate ways.
Keep 'em at arm's length, absolutely! If you do this, then she cannot burn you.
Is there any romance in a relationship like that? No, not really. Is there any future in a relationship like that? No, not really. Would I prefer be in a relationship that involved romance and a future? Yes, I would. But unfortunately this culture, this marriage contract, and this legal system prevents it. So I came up with the only solution I could think of, separate lives.
THIS is what feminism led to. THIS is what women wanted, via their support and/or their silence, i.e. their lack of opposition to feminist policies while they were being implemented.
She can take care of herself. Ever since I was 12, I've had girls tell me, "I don't need for you to take care of me." Okay.
Those of us over a certain age can remember Helen Reddy's battle cry: "I am woman, hear me roar in a voice too loud to ignore!" We've also heard about how women are strong, independent, and how they don't need no stinkin' man, how sisters are doin' it for themselves, etc.
If I'm on a date, say we're having dinner at some restaurant, and she starts making snide comments or belittling remarks, which happens quite often, I just stand up, throw $20 on the table and leave. She can drive herself home.
Hear, hear! Don't put up with her feminist bullshit...
If she comes to my house and knocks on the door, I step outside and close the door behind me. What can I do for you? "I wanted to see where you live." You don't need to see where I live. No way am I going to allow her into my house, because I know for a fact that the minute she leaves all she has to do is say "He tried to rape me!" And I will be in a world of trouble.
This is true; all she has to do is point the finger in YOUR direction, and you are toast. Remember the Duke lacrosse team? Remember the boys at Hofstra?
I once had this friend who was dating this girl, and he broke up with her. She called the police and said he was a major cocaine dealer. Saturday morning, we were kicking back on his couch, watching TV, and this tactical SWAT team burst in, held us at gunpoint, and ripped his house apart. They found nothing of course, because it was all a lie. But it did scare the hell out of us. This is what I'm talking about. All she has to do is make an accusation, and law enforcement comes storming in.
I only meet with women in public places. I only have sex in hotel rooms. Since she pays for half, there can be no question as to why she was there.
Absolutely-have a paper trail so you can prove your case. Unfortunately, when it comes to men accused of anything these days, it's no longer innocent until proven guilty; it's guilty until proven INNOCENT! That's a subtle, yet important distinction...
I've dated women, and after a few weeks, she asks, "Is this all there is? Dinners and hotels sex?" She wants to move into my house or she wants to get married. When I tell her that's not going to happen, she gets upset.
I'm nor going to argue with her. I try to explain to her that the terms and conditions of the marriage contract are unacceptable, and that the law and the court system make cohabitation impossible. She gets more upset and stomps off. Oh, well, on to the next girl.
Never argue with a woman; you'll NEVER get anywhere. Also, remind her that THIS is the society women wanted; they're the majority of voters, so we, as men, are powerless to stop anything...
If more men treated women like that, it wouldn't take long before women began to understand that this is their problem. When she realizes that all she has to look forward to is work and going home alone, then she will start considering changes to the contract and the law.
Don't bet on it. Women, given their solipsistic nature, will never draw a connection between X and Y; linear, logical, causal thinking is not women's strong suit. If it were, then women wouldn't ride the carousel with cads for decades of their lives, then wonder why they cannot find a good man when their looks start to fade...
I doubt there will be an organized men's rights movement. Men just don't do that. I know that women don't have any interest in changing the way things are, because they currently have all the power and advantages.
Women have all the benefits and advantages, absolutely. Moreover, they FOUGHT for these benefits and advantages. Why would anyone with a brain think that they'd even think about giving up all their gains?!
So my proposal is for men to make a concerted effort to live separate lives. Oh, yeah, women will complain about it. They want romance. They want love. They want a future. When it becomes apparent that they're not going to get any of that, then things will change.
Again, I wouldn't bet on that, because women don't DO cause and effect thinking; it goes against their very nature. That said, what have he got to lose? After all, we're (i.e. men) a minority of the voters, so we cannot and will not change anything on our own. Ergo, we might as well live our lives for ourselves, while letting women put their money where their mouths are. After all, sisters can do it for themselves; after all, they don't NEED no stinkin' man... ;)
------------------
Have a good day, and I'll be back at you soon...
MarkyMark
I was looking for something else over @ Dr. Helen's place on PJ Media when I decided to read her response to Rush Limbaugh's on air review of her book, Men on Strike. I heard him that day, and what he had to say was dead on target. After reading her piece, I decided to peruse the comments as well, and I found THIS gem by Gawain's Ghost; in it, he discusses how he treats women these days, and why. It's good reading, so I thought I would share it with my readers...
----------------------
Well, Dr. Helen, as you point out in your interview, the great irony here is that this issue harms women more than men. And there can be no resolution until women realize that fact.
That begs and obvious question: will women ever realize that? Given women's solipsistic, gynocentric point of view (i.e. everything is about them), are they capable of cause and effect thinking? I'm not so sure, given women's penchant for choosing cads repeatedly, then complaining about the dearth of good men afterwards. Women will ride the carousel for years, yet never seem to figure out that they may be doing something-gasp-wrong...
I suppose a resolution could be accelerated if more and more men treated women the way I do. I mean, I'm not a cad or a pick up artist. I treat women with respect. I'm polite and courteous, fun to be with. It's just that I understand the law and know that I am held accountable under the law.
Yes, yes, yes, a THOUSAND times yes! Men should understand the law and our inferior legal standing therein. One of the best investments in time a man can make is to take a day off, and spend it in his local family court; he'll see how gynocentric the legal system is, how biased against men it is.
My solution to the problem is really very simple. Marriage is out of the question. I do not allow her access to my property. I certainly do not allow her access to my money. We both have jobs, houses and cars. We both have money. So if she wants to get together, we'll agree on a place or an event, and meet each other there. If she wants to get intimate, we'll agree to share a hotel. After the date, or in the morning, we go our separate ways.
Keep 'em at arm's length, absolutely! If you do this, then she cannot burn you.
Is there any romance in a relationship like that? No, not really. Is there any future in a relationship like that? No, not really. Would I prefer be in a relationship that involved romance and a future? Yes, I would. But unfortunately this culture, this marriage contract, and this legal system prevents it. So I came up with the only solution I could think of, separate lives.
THIS is what feminism led to. THIS is what women wanted, via their support and/or their silence, i.e. their lack of opposition to feminist policies while they were being implemented.
She can take care of herself. Ever since I was 12, I've had girls tell me, "I don't need for you to take care of me." Okay.
Those of us over a certain age can remember Helen Reddy's battle cry: "I am woman, hear me roar in a voice too loud to ignore!" We've also heard about how women are strong, independent, and how they don't need no stinkin' man, how sisters are doin' it for themselves, etc.
If I'm on a date, say we're having dinner at some restaurant, and she starts making snide comments or belittling remarks, which happens quite often, I just stand up, throw $20 on the table and leave. She can drive herself home.
Hear, hear! Don't put up with her feminist bullshit...
If she comes to my house and knocks on the door, I step outside and close the door behind me. What can I do for you? "I wanted to see where you live." You don't need to see where I live. No way am I going to allow her into my house, because I know for a fact that the minute she leaves all she has to do is say "He tried to rape me!" And I will be in a world of trouble.
This is true; all she has to do is point the finger in YOUR direction, and you are toast. Remember the Duke lacrosse team? Remember the boys at Hofstra?
I once had this friend who was dating this girl, and he broke up with her. She called the police and said he was a major cocaine dealer. Saturday morning, we were kicking back on his couch, watching TV, and this tactical SWAT team burst in, held us at gunpoint, and ripped his house apart. They found nothing of course, because it was all a lie. But it did scare the hell out of us. This is what I'm talking about. All she has to do is make an accusation, and law enforcement comes storming in.
I only meet with women in public places. I only have sex in hotel rooms. Since she pays for half, there can be no question as to why she was there.
Absolutely-have a paper trail so you can prove your case. Unfortunately, when it comes to men accused of anything these days, it's no longer innocent until proven guilty; it's guilty until proven INNOCENT! That's a subtle, yet important distinction...
I've dated women, and after a few weeks, she asks, "Is this all there is? Dinners and hotels sex?" She wants to move into my house or she wants to get married. When I tell her that's not going to happen, she gets upset.
I'm nor going to argue with her. I try to explain to her that the terms and conditions of the marriage contract are unacceptable, and that the law and the court system make cohabitation impossible. She gets more upset and stomps off. Oh, well, on to the next girl.
Never argue with a woman; you'll NEVER get anywhere. Also, remind her that THIS is the society women wanted; they're the majority of voters, so we, as men, are powerless to stop anything...
If more men treated women like that, it wouldn't take long before women began to understand that this is their problem. When she realizes that all she has to look forward to is work and going home alone, then she will start considering changes to the contract and the law.
Don't bet on it. Women, given their solipsistic nature, will never draw a connection between X and Y; linear, logical, causal thinking is not women's strong suit. If it were, then women wouldn't ride the carousel with cads for decades of their lives, then wonder why they cannot find a good man when their looks start to fade...
I doubt there will be an organized men's rights movement. Men just don't do that. I know that women don't have any interest in changing the way things are, because they currently have all the power and advantages.
Women have all the benefits and advantages, absolutely. Moreover, they FOUGHT for these benefits and advantages. Why would anyone with a brain think that they'd even think about giving up all their gains?!
So my proposal is for men to make a concerted effort to live separate lives. Oh, yeah, women will complain about it. They want romance. They want love. They want a future. When it becomes apparent that they're not going to get any of that, then things will change.
Again, I wouldn't bet on that, because women don't DO cause and effect thinking; it goes against their very nature. That said, what have he got to lose? After all, we're (i.e. men) a minority of the voters, so we cannot and will not change anything on our own. Ergo, we might as well live our lives for ourselves, while letting women put their money where their mouths are. After all, sisters can do it for themselves; after all, they don't NEED no stinkin' man... ;)
------------------
Have a good day, and I'll be back at you soon...
MarkyMark
07 August 2013
Bridezillas as Aversion Therapy
Folks,
I couldn't watch this show for long periods of time; a minute or so was too long in most cases-ugghh! However, when I used to visit my mom in South Jersey, I would make it a point to take a gander at Bridezillas once in a while. Why? It's excellent AVERSION THERAPY! Whenever I got sappy & sentimental wishing I had that special someone, watching two seconds of Bridezillas snaps me right out of it...
Having said that, I don't understand WHY these guys (i.e. the grooms) go through with MARRYING these bitches; what are they thinking?! Do they think things will get better after the big day? Come on! Sorry, but these dumb fools get what they deserve. Just watching a few minutes of this wretched show is enough to cure me of ANY longing for marriage. Like I said, it's EXCELLENT aversion therapy!
For those who don't know of the show, Bridezillas is shown on the WE cable channel; it's in its tenth season. WE stands for Women's Entertainment. For the past ten years, they've run this reality show. It's my understanding that the producers had ORIGINALLY wanted to show the joys of getting married, and the process that took both the brides and grooms to the altar. However, when the first season was filmed, only 2 of the 15 couples had a happy ending-only two! The producers and cameramen couldn't believe what the vast majority of weddings were like. So, they changed the show to its present format. The evidence doesn't lie, does it?
So, fellas, the next time you get any longings for having that special someone in your life, tune in the WE Channel, and watch some "Bridezillas". I promise that this will cure you of ANY such foolish feelings-ha! Enjoy this video sample from the show.
Makes you want to go out and get married, huh? Just kidding! Until next time...
MarkyMark
I couldn't watch this show for long periods of time; a minute or so was too long in most cases-ugghh! However, when I used to visit my mom in South Jersey, I would make it a point to take a gander at Bridezillas once in a while. Why? It's excellent AVERSION THERAPY! Whenever I got sappy & sentimental wishing I had that special someone, watching two seconds of Bridezillas snaps me right out of it...
Having said that, I don't understand WHY these guys (i.e. the grooms) go through with MARRYING these bitches; what are they thinking?! Do they think things will get better after the big day? Come on! Sorry, but these dumb fools get what they deserve. Just watching a few minutes of this wretched show is enough to cure me of ANY longing for marriage. Like I said, it's EXCELLENT aversion therapy!
For those who don't know of the show, Bridezillas is shown on the WE cable channel; it's in its tenth season. WE stands for Women's Entertainment. For the past ten years, they've run this reality show. It's my understanding that the producers had ORIGINALLY wanted to show the joys of getting married, and the process that took both the brides and grooms to the altar. However, when the first season was filmed, only 2 of the 15 couples had a happy ending-only two! The producers and cameramen couldn't believe what the vast majority of weddings were like. So, they changed the show to its present format. The evidence doesn't lie, does it?
So, fellas, the next time you get any longings for having that special someone in your life, tune in the WE Channel, and watch some "Bridezillas". I promise that this will cure you of ANY such foolish feelings-ha! Enjoy this video sample from the show.
Makes you want to go out and get married, huh? Just kidding! Until next time...
MarkyMark
05 August 2013
Titanic & Men's Choices
Guys,
I wanted to write this long ago, but for whatever reason, I never did. Since it's still talked about; since it was re-released in 3D; I thought it was appropos to discuss the movie, Titanic, at this time.
The movie, Titanic, could have been the home run that Apollo 13 was; it could have provided good drama while respecting the history of the event. However, Titanic, in the words of Time or Newsweek, was nothing but “a quasi Marxian epic.”
I had a few problems with Titanic. One was the meme that women didn’t have any choices in those days-as if men did. Two, the romance between Jack & Rose was BS! Three, the characters, especially Rose’s fiance’, were PC caricatures. Four, as the authoress correctly points out, Rose betrayed her husband to be.
One thing that pissed me off when I saw Titanic was the BS line Rose’s mother uttered about women not having any choices. What, you think that MEN did?! Come on! We had no choice but to marry and have families! We had no choice but to take on any work (no matter how demeaning, dirty, and/or dangerous) to do so. We, as men, had no choices in a lot of matters.
Ever been in a coal mine? I have. Trust me; it’s no place any rational person would want to work! Between the risk of death (black lung and cave-ins), maiming, darkness, and the drudgery of it all, what RATIONAL man would want to do this? Ah, but men did it by the thousands to take care of their wives and families! If a man was from ‘coal country’, what choices did HE have? That never, ever gets pointed out, let alone discussed; that angers me!
If a man lived out on the frontier, what choice did he have but to go out and get the food by old fashioned, hard, and DANGEROUS work? Feminists bitch about how women would be stuck in the home churning the butter, preparing the food, keeping house, etc.; what they ignore is how that food GOT there in the first place! The man had to go out and either farm it, working himself to the bone in the process; or, he had to go out into the wild to hunt and kill the family meals. When out hunting, he had to brave the elements, Indians, and wild animals also interested in his meals, e.g. bears wanting the same deer he was hunting. Feminists forget that just going out to get the family food was a life & death proposition in those days. Yeah, Wifey had to clean and cook the food, but Hubby had to risk life and limb just to PUT it there for her! Why do feminists overlook this? Why do feminists and women (I wonder if there’s difference) overlook the fact that men didn’t have choices, either?
Secondly, the romance between Jack & Rose was utter BS; that would NEVER happen in real life-never! Women, by their very nature, are hypergamous; that is, they seek out and marry men superior to themselves in terms of status, wealth, education, etc. Rose would never be caught dead with a man (i.e. Jack Dawson, Leo DeCaprio's character) from steerage or third class.
Thirdly, the characters in Titanic were PC caricatures. Jack, the working class man, was the virtuous hero. Rose was the put upon, oppressed, poor little woman. Rose’s fiance was the arrogant, uncaring, elitist, rich jerk who couldn’t be bothered with ‘the little people’. I recall that, when Time or Newsweek did a review of the movie (I can’t remember which magazine now, because this was in 1996, or 17 years ago now), they called the movie a “quasi Marxian epic”-and this was from a decidedly LIBERAL publication! The fact that one of those paragons of East Coast, elitist liberalism called the movie that says something.
Finally, Rose betrayed her husband to be-end of story. Even if Jack had had a practical skill and could find gainful employment upon arriving in New York, Rose betrayed her fiance. She’d made a commitment to him, so she owed it to stick by that commitment. Men get bashed for failure to make commitments to women, yet it’s women who break said commitments, e.g. by filing for divorce twice as often as men do.
In closing, I had a few problems with Titanic. One was that women had no choices, while men had endless choices; I demonstrated how that was false. Two was the fact that a woman like Rose wouldn’t be caught DEAD with a working class dog like Jack; her hypergamy wouldn’t allow it. Three, the characters were PC caricatures. Four, Rose betrayed her fiance and her commitment to him.
MarkyMark
25 July 2013
Feminist Hate Quotes
Guys,
Isn't it interesting how the SPLC accuses me and other bloggers of hate speech, yet they don't even MENTION these feminist hate quotes? They don't list any feminist sites on their hate lists, even though they deserve to be there. I have NOTHING on these feminists-nothing! Thanks to the fine folks @ Anti-Misandry for these. Anyway, here are some feminist hate quotes for your enjoyment...
-------------------
"The nuclear family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process." -- Linda Gordon
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.
"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary- vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do." -- Robin Morgan
"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." -- Robin Morgan
"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."
-- Robin Morgan
From her "The Demon Lover" (NY: Norton & Co., 1989 Morgan doesn't hide her bigotry):
* p. 138-9: The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the brotherhood ritual of a sexual thrill in dominance. As a devotee of Thanatos, he is one with the practitioner of sado-masochistic "play" between "consenting adults," as he is one with the rapist.
* p. 224: My white skin disgusts me. My passport disgusts me. They are the marks of an insufferable privilege bought at the price of others' agony.
* p. 229: Sex to this point in my life has been trivial, at best a gesture of tenderness, at worst a chore. I couldn't understand the furor about it.
* p. 316: Did she die of the disease called "family" or the disease called "rehabilitation", of poverty or drugs or pornography, of economics or sexual slavery or a broken body?
"And let's put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that men are oppressed, too, by sexism--the lie that there can be such a thing as 'men's liberation groups.' Oppression is something that one group of people commits against another group, specifically because of a 'threatening' characteristic shared by the latter group--skin, color, sex or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed ****ED UP by being masters, but those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of divesting himself of sexism or racism--the oppressed have no alternative--for they have no power but to fight. In the long run, Women's Liberation will of course free men--but in the short run it's going to cost men a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily. Sexism is NOT the fault of women--kill your fathers, not your mothers".
-- Robin Morgan
"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo."
-- Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto
"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex."
-- Valerie Solana, SCUM founder (Society for Cutting Up Men.)
"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things."
-- Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men, started by Valerie Solanas)
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW
"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin
"In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice." -- Andrea Dworkin
Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin
"To be rapeable, a position that is social, not biological, defines what a woman is." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Q: People think you are very hostile to men.
A: I am." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Men use the night to erase us." -- Andrea Dworkin
"The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Men love death. In everything they make, they hollow out a central place for death, let its rancid smell contaminate every dimension of whatever still survives. Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it, and in life they commit it. They embrace murder as if life without it would be devoid of passion, meaning, and action, as if murder were solace, stilling their sobs as they mourn the emptiness and alienation of their lives."
-- Andrea Dworkin
"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it 'Her'. Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination."
-- Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women
"On the Left, on the Right, in the Middle; Authors, statesmen, thieves; so-called humanists and self-declared fascists; the adventurous and the contemplative, in every realm of male expression and action, violence is experienced and articulated as love and freedom."
-- Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women.
"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -- Ti-Grace Atkinson
"Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice." -- Ti-Grace Atkinson
"Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear" -- Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6
"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression." -- Sheila Jeffrys
"Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated." -- Catherine MacKinnon
"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catherine MacKinnon
"You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs."
-- Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.)
"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent."
-- Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.
"The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men." -- Sharon Stone; Actress
"Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not Rambo."
-- Jodie Foster; Actress - as quoted in The New York Times Magazine.
"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female.
"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference."
-- Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime.
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001.
"If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them." - David Angier
"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." - Catherine Comins
"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE."
-- Marilyn French (her emphasis)
My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter."
-- Marilyn French; The Woman's Room.
"All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey."
-- Marilyn French
"All men are rapists and that's all they are"
-- Marilyn French, Authoress; (later, advisoress to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.)
"The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations...obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign."
-- Marilyn French
"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it."
-- Barbara Jordan; Former Congresswoman.
"Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release."
-- Germaine Greer.
"Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence."
-- Judith Levine; Authoress
"Men's sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can 'reach WITHIN women to ****/construct us from the inside out.' Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women's own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced.'
-- Judith Levine, (explicating comment profiling prevailing misandry.)
"I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love,' for the men women share their lives with--husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, coworkers."
-- Judith Levine, Authoress of My Enemy, My love
"There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts'...includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder."
-- Judith Levine; summarizing comment on the WAS document, (A southern Women's Writing Collective: Women Against Sex.)
"All men are good for is ****ing, and running over with a truck".
Statement made by A University of Maine Feminist Administrator, quoted by Richard Dinsmore, who brought a successful civil suit against the University in the amount of $600,000. Richard had protested the quote; was dismissed thereafter on the grounds of harassment; and responded by bringing suit against the University. 1995 settlement.
((Delaney Nickerson, of the American Coalition for ABUSE AWARENESS, refers to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as "The ****ing Molesters Society". (Miami Herald, April 3, 1995) The ACAA is a lobbying group, which includes Ellen Bass (co-author of THE COURAGE TO HEAL), and Rene Frederickson, leading feminist psychotherapist and strong proponent of repressed memory theory.))
((At the STONE ANGELS satanic ritual abuse conference in Thunder Bay in February, 1995, the following was contained in the handouts at a conference supported financially by the Ontario Government: FMS stands for: FULL OF MOSTLY SHIT; FOR MORE SADISM; FELONS, MURDERERS, SCUMBALLS; FREQUENT MOLESTERS SOCIETY.))
"Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do."
-- Popular Feminist Graffiti
"I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal.".
-- Sylvia Fraser; Journalist
"We are taught, encouraged, moulded by and lulled into accepting a range of false notions about the family. As a source of some of our most profound experiences, it continues to be such an integral part of our emotional lives that it appears beyond criticism. Yet hiding from the truth of family life leaves women and children vulnerable."
-- Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women.
Catharine MacKinnon ( ) maintains that "the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor." In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid--ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed--they're "hiding from the truth." The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to "breed" them for that purpose.
-- Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window; (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, Gloria Steinhem et al tenets of misandric belief.)
"If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal--a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students--I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that women are oppressed"
-- Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University, as quoted in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.
"Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact."
Message on FEMISA, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood.
Another posting on FEMISA: "Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers."
Both quotes taken from Daphne Patai's excellent critical work, Heterophobia
"At Brandies I discovered Feminism. And I instantly became a convert... writing brilliant papers in my Myths of Patriarchy class, in which I likened my fate as a woman to other victims throughout the ages."
-- Heather Hart 7
Here are 10 reasons why we are concerned about feminism and the National Organization for Women.
1. "The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist" (National NOW Times, January, 1988).
2. "Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage" (feminist leader Sheila Cronan).
3. In response to a question concerning China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard responded, "I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world" (Gary Bauer, "Abetting Coercion in China," The Washington Times, Oct. 10, 1989).
4. "Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole...patriarch!" (Gloria Steinem, radical feminist leader, editor of MS magazine).
5. "Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women.... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men.... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft" (from "The Declaration of Feminism," November, 1971).
6. "By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God." (Gloria Steinem, editor of MS magazine).
7. "Let's forget about the mythical Jesus and look for encouragement, solace, and inspiration from real women.... Two thousand years of patriarchal rule under the shadow of the cross ought to be enough to turn women toward the feminist 'salvation' of this world." (Annie Laurie Gaylor, "Feminist Salvation," The Humanist, p. 37, July/August 1988.
8. "In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them" (Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College, and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman).
9. "Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family- maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that." (Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, April 25, 1981.
10. "The most merciful thing a large family can to do one of its infant members is to kill it." (Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in "Women and the New Race," p. 67).
"We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." -- Elizabeth Cady Stanton
From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985:
MALE:...represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants...the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female.
MAN:...an obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched...a contradictory baby-man...
TESTOSTERONE POISONING: ... 'Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from "testosterone poisoning."
Letter to editor: "Women's Turn to Dominate". "......Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking feminist but rather one of those women who bounce off the male-dominated, male-controlled social structures. Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is: if you don't like it, bad luck--and if you get in my way I'll run you down."
Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia. 9 Feb., 1996.
----------------
As I always say, I CANNOT make this up...
MarkyMark
Isn't it interesting how the SPLC accuses me and other bloggers of hate speech, yet they don't even MENTION these feminist hate quotes? They don't list any feminist sites on their hate lists, even though they deserve to be there. I have NOTHING on these feminists-nothing! Thanks to the fine folks @ Anti-Misandry for these. Anyway, here are some feminist hate quotes for your enjoyment...
-------------------
"The nuclear family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process." -- Linda Gordon
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.
"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary- vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do." -- Robin Morgan
"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." -- Robin Morgan
"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."
-- Robin Morgan
From her "The Demon Lover" (NY: Norton & Co., 1989 Morgan doesn't hide her bigotry):
* p. 138-9: The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the brotherhood ritual of a sexual thrill in dominance. As a devotee of Thanatos, he is one with the practitioner of sado-masochistic "play" between "consenting adults," as he is one with the rapist.
* p. 224: My white skin disgusts me. My passport disgusts me. They are the marks of an insufferable privilege bought at the price of others' agony.
* p. 229: Sex to this point in my life has been trivial, at best a gesture of tenderness, at worst a chore. I couldn't understand the furor about it.
* p. 316: Did she die of the disease called "family" or the disease called "rehabilitation", of poverty or drugs or pornography, of economics or sexual slavery or a broken body?
"And let's put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that men are oppressed, too, by sexism--the lie that there can be such a thing as 'men's liberation groups.' Oppression is something that one group of people commits against another group, specifically because of a 'threatening' characteristic shared by the latter group--skin, color, sex or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed ****ED UP by being masters, but those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of divesting himself of sexism or racism--the oppressed have no alternative--for they have no power but to fight. In the long run, Women's Liberation will of course free men--but in the short run it's going to cost men a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily. Sexism is NOT the fault of women--kill your fathers, not your mothers".
-- Robin Morgan
"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo."
-- Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto
"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex."
-- Valerie Solana, SCUM founder (Society for Cutting Up Men.)
"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things."
-- Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men, started by Valerie Solanas)
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW
"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin
"In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice." -- Andrea Dworkin
Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin
"To be rapeable, a position that is social, not biological, defines what a woman is." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Q: People think you are very hostile to men.
A: I am." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Men use the night to erase us." -- Andrea Dworkin
"The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality." -- Andrea Dworkin
"Men love death. In everything they make, they hollow out a central place for death, let its rancid smell contaminate every dimension of whatever still survives. Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it, and in life they commit it. They embrace murder as if life without it would be devoid of passion, meaning, and action, as if murder were solace, stilling their sobs as they mourn the emptiness and alienation of their lives."
-- Andrea Dworkin
"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it 'Her'. Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination."
-- Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women
"On the Left, on the Right, in the Middle; Authors, statesmen, thieves; so-called humanists and self-declared fascists; the adventurous and the contemplative, in every realm of male expression and action, violence is experienced and articulated as love and freedom."
-- Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women.
"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -- Ti-Grace Atkinson
"Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice." -- Ti-Grace Atkinson
"Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear" -- Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6
"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression." -- Sheila Jeffrys
"Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated." -- Catherine MacKinnon
"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catherine MacKinnon
"You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs."
-- Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.)
"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent."
-- Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.
"The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men." -- Sharon Stone; Actress
"Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not Rambo."
-- Jodie Foster; Actress - as quoted in The New York Times Magazine.
"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female.
"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference."
-- Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime.
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001.
"If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them." - David Angier
"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." - Catherine Comins
"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE."
-- Marilyn French (her emphasis)
My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter."
-- Marilyn French; The Woman's Room.
"All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey."
-- Marilyn French
"All men are rapists and that's all they are"
-- Marilyn French, Authoress; (later, advisoress to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.)
"The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations...obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign."
-- Marilyn French
"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it."
-- Barbara Jordan; Former Congresswoman.
"Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release."
-- Germaine Greer.
"Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence."
-- Judith Levine; Authoress
"Men's sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can 'reach WITHIN women to ****/construct us from the inside out.' Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women's own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced.'
-- Judith Levine, (explicating comment profiling prevailing misandry.)
"I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love,' for the men women share their lives with--husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, coworkers."
-- Judith Levine, Authoress of My Enemy, My love
"There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts'...includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder."
-- Judith Levine; summarizing comment on the WAS document, (A southern Women's Writing Collective: Women Against Sex.)
"All men are good for is ****ing, and running over with a truck".
Statement made by A University of Maine Feminist Administrator, quoted by Richard Dinsmore, who brought a successful civil suit against the University in the amount of $600,000. Richard had protested the quote; was dismissed thereafter on the grounds of harassment; and responded by bringing suit against the University. 1995 settlement.
((Delaney Nickerson, of the American Coalition for ABUSE AWARENESS, refers to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as "The ****ing Molesters Society". (Miami Herald, April 3, 1995) The ACAA is a lobbying group, which includes Ellen Bass (co-author of THE COURAGE TO HEAL), and Rene Frederickson, leading feminist psychotherapist and strong proponent of repressed memory theory.))
((At the STONE ANGELS satanic ritual abuse conference in Thunder Bay in February, 1995, the following was contained in the handouts at a conference supported financially by the Ontario Government: FMS stands for: FULL OF MOSTLY SHIT; FOR MORE SADISM; FELONS, MURDERERS, SCUMBALLS; FREQUENT MOLESTERS SOCIETY.))
"Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do."
-- Popular Feminist Graffiti
"I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal.".
-- Sylvia Fraser; Journalist
"We are taught, encouraged, moulded by and lulled into accepting a range of false notions about the family. As a source of some of our most profound experiences, it continues to be such an integral part of our emotional lives that it appears beyond criticism. Yet hiding from the truth of family life leaves women and children vulnerable."
-- Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women.
Catharine MacKinnon ( ) maintains that "the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor." In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid--ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed--they're "hiding from the truth." The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to "breed" them for that purpose.
-- Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window; (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, Gloria Steinhem et al tenets of misandric belief.)
"If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal--a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students--I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that women are oppressed"
-- Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University, as quoted in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.
"Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact."
Message on FEMISA, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood.
Another posting on FEMISA: "Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers."
Both quotes taken from Daphne Patai's excellent critical work, Heterophobia
"At Brandies I discovered Feminism. And I instantly became a convert... writing brilliant papers in my Myths of Patriarchy class, in which I likened my fate as a woman to other victims throughout the ages."
-- Heather Hart 7
Here are 10 reasons why we are concerned about feminism and the National Organization for Women.
1. "The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist" (National NOW Times, January, 1988).
2. "Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage" (feminist leader Sheila Cronan).
3. In response to a question concerning China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard responded, "I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world" (Gary Bauer, "Abetting Coercion in China," The Washington Times, Oct. 10, 1989).
4. "Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole...patriarch!" (Gloria Steinem, radical feminist leader, editor of MS magazine).
5. "Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women.... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men.... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft" (from "The Declaration of Feminism," November, 1971).
6. "By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God." (Gloria Steinem, editor of MS magazine).
7. "Let's forget about the mythical Jesus and look for encouragement, solace, and inspiration from real women.... Two thousand years of patriarchal rule under the shadow of the cross ought to be enough to turn women toward the feminist 'salvation' of this world." (Annie Laurie Gaylor, "Feminist Salvation," The Humanist, p. 37, July/August 1988.
8. "In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them" (Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College, and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman).
9. "Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family- maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that." (Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, April 25, 1981.
10. "The most merciful thing a large family can to do one of its infant members is to kill it." (Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in "Women and the New Race," p. 67).
"We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." -- Elizabeth Cady Stanton
From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985:
MALE:...represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants...the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female.
MAN:...an obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched...a contradictory baby-man...
TESTOSTERONE POISONING: ... 'Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from "testosterone poisoning."
Letter to editor: "Women's Turn to Dominate". "......Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking feminist but rather one of those women who bounce off the male-dominated, male-controlled social structures. Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is: if you don't like it, bad luck--and if you get in my way I'll run you down."
Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia. 9 Feb., 1996.
----------------
As I always say, I CANNOT make this up...
MarkyMark
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
