04 October 2013

The World Will NOT End of Debt Ceiling Is Not Raised!


There have been a lot of lies, misinformation, and BS spread by the PC, feminist media, lies that even the brightest and best on Mancoat are believing.  I am here to dispel those lies, and to shine the light of TRUTH on a story that is making the rounds: the incessant braying about the US Government's debt ceiling, which will be reached in the near future.  Here's a post I made on Mancoat, and I am sharing it with my audience.



This default stuff is a LIE!  Let me repeat: this default story is a lie.  Here's why: we'd still be able to service our debt and interest payments, because the US Govt' takes in approximately 200 billion dollars a month; on an annual basis, that equates to 2.4 trillion a year.  Covering debt service, especially at today's historically low interest rates, would be no problem at all.  What WOULD change is how all other spending beyond debt service would be prioritized and appropriated.  Because 2.4 trillion is smaller than the approximate 3.8 trillion we're spending this year (we don't know for sure, because we haven't had a proper budget in almost five years now), hard choices would have to be made.  We may have to cut down on support payments to all the single mother sluts out there; we might not be able to enable their bad behavior anymore.  Is that such a bad thing?

The Democrats and their media sycophants are acting like spoiled brats at the thought of not getting their way.  These are the same people who predicted Armageddon on the eve of the sequester (THEIR idea, BTW!).  These are the same people who cried about Armageddon prior to this week's partial gov't shutdown of non-essential services.  That begs an obvious question: if they're non-essential, WHY do we have them in the first place?  That's another rant for another time.  Anyway, the world didn't end; the sun is still rising in the east and setting in the west; the world is still going on, and will continue to go on if the debt ceiling isn't raised.

The fact of the matter is that we HAVE to get spending under control.  We cannot continue to run TRILLION DOLLAR deficits every year for very long before suffering economic collapse; we just can't do that!  You know what happens when the economy collapses?  Society collapses as well.  You know what happens when society collapses?  I'm not sure we want to go there; even for those of us who are prepared, I'm not sure we want to go there-not when society has the morality (lack thereof, I should say) that allows such trashy TV shows as the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, and Desperate Housewives to be aired!  Do we REALLY want to see society collapse when the majority of people don't even have the morals of an alley cat?!  I'm insulting alley cats when I say that, BTW...

Where are the media on all this?  Where are they?  They brayed, kvetched, and moaned incessantly when we were running deficits of 400 billion a year under George W. Bush and the Republican Congress, yet they have NOTHING to say about deficits that have been TRIPLE & QUADRUPLE that amount?!  We never heard the end of deficits experienced under Republican administrations!  Ah, but now that Barack Hussein Obama and his Demonrat cronies are running deficits of a trillion dollars or more, that's somehow ok.  Anyway, as I said above, we cannot keep that up for much longer.

In closing, if the debt ceiling isn't raised, the world will not end.  It didn't end with the sequester; it didn't end with the partial gov't shutdown this week; and it won't if the debt ceiling isn't raised.  The gov't will still be taking in 200 billion a month, so we can cover our debt and interest payments with no problem.  What WILL change is that we'll have to cut spending in other areas, including those that transfer money from men to women.  AFIAC, that's a good thing that's LONG overdue!  Let's hope that the debt ceiling isn't raised, so hard choices will be made WRT our out of control spending-spending that needs to be brought under control.  Those are my thoughts...



Anonymous said...

You want logic and self-control from politicians? You're funny.

Do you by any chance read Day By Day, a (mostly) political cartoon by Chris Muir? I think you might really enjoy it. He updates daily, but many's the hour I have spent reading through the archives to catch up. Worth it IMO.


Greddy said...

"What WILL change is that we'll have to cut spending in other areas, including those that transfer money from men to women. "

You're too optimistic. If anything, they'll double down on wealth transfer. First to their coffers and then to the bitches.

MarkyMark said...


What if there is little or no wealth to transfer?

Also, the piper MUST be paid; sooner or later, spending must be brought under control. It can happen willingly or unwillingly, but it WILL happen. After all, the laws of economics cannot and will not be repealed.


Anonymous said...

Your Dear Leader is using this to demonise opponents. He allows illegal aliens to march on Washington, but does not allow war veterans to visit the national mall. Even people are being threatened if they take pics of Mt. Rushmore. I heard on the radio that orders came from Washington DC to "hassle" visitors to parks etc. Oboma's true colours are coming out, though if anyone in the lame stream media or who voted for him did any research they would have known this already.

sth_txs said...

It seems that the electricity is still on, the internet still works, gasoline is widely available, groceries are at the store, and banking services are still available.

Yes, the scary government shutdown! :LOL:

rmaxGenactivePUA said...

Women always vote for team slut, this is an inherent fact about women

No matter how good a politician a woman is, the fact is she’s always going to drop it all for an alpha & a shot at alpha sperm

Womens inability to stop being a slut, makes them a leisure class

A womans prime vocation is a prostitute

Either she’s a prostitute to a corporation, government or a husband

Either way she sucks cock …

A wife & motherhood is a privilege given to women, by men so they only have to prostitute themselves to one man

Screw with men & dont listen to us, & we’ll take away your privilege to be a mother & wife

THAT is how it works, WE give you the privilege to be a woman

Women fight for the privilege to be a whore

Man civilises woman

By giving women the vote, you give them the vote to be a whore

Women have no concept of civil liberties, or rights

They only understand privilege, which is why women are a leisure class

& only vote for privilege, which is why they’re terrible at being mothers

& completely useless to society at large

Note the infestation of our society with mangina’s

Precisely as a result of idiot women becoming the head of households

Note how many more mangina’s women churn out, if you give them the vote …

Women are a useless leisure class, give them the rights of one, ie none

Mrs. Anna T said...

Hi Mark, this has nothing to do with the topic of this post, so don't feel like you have to publish. You may refer to what I'm going to say in future posts, though.

Another instance of me being thoroughly annoyed by feminism...

My husband was recently elected as a member of the neighbourhood council and, as part of his position, was given the responsibility of heading the local synagogue committee.

He chose 5 committee members, using strictly professional considerations (I am sure of that, because he told me in detail of all his decision-making process). And oops! What did you think, but all the 5 members are men. The horror!

Within days, he began to be pelted with not-so-polite requests/demands to put at least one woman on the committee, so that "women's opinions may be represented". I was miffed; his consideration was "who will be most appropriate for this job?" and not "I have 5 slots, I need women for two of them".

As a sidenote, there are also all-female and mostly female committees in our neighbourhood. No one seems to see this as a horrific violation of human rights.

So basically, to comply with such nonsensical demands, my husband would have to either artificially create more places on the committee (which was supposed to be small), or tell the members, "Sorry, guys, one of you has to go - we must have a woman in your place". He refused to do either, and was vilified by gossip.

I believe that, if someone were to ask me to join a committee just "because we also need a woman", I would be offended. People should be chosen for jobs with regard to their abilities, not gender.