21 February 2025

Why Modern Sport Bikes' Sales Are Falling

 Guys,

Here's another comment I want to preserve. Though this blog deals mainly with men's issues, I also reserve the right to write about other topics such as motorcycles and motorcycling. Brit Stuart Fillingham has a good video about why modern sport bikes aren't selling as well these days. Below is his video and my response to it.

--------------



Stu, I never got a sport bike simply because they're TOO MUCH for me! Between their power, acceleration, braking, and quick handling, most sport bikes (600s on up) are beyond the skills and abilities of most riders. In order to get anything close to the max capabilities of modern sport bikes, one has to be a national or world class rider; one has to be racing in BSB, Moto America, or WSB to come close to extracting the full capabilities of these motorcycles. I'm good enough to stay alive and keep out of trouble on two wheels, but I'm not on that level. Sport bikes are overkill for me and most riders.

Then, there's the matter that it's a fool's errand to try going fast on public roads anyway. Even if traffic, speed limits, and sketchy pavement weren't enough to deal with, there's the matter of road debris. There's a tight, 90 degree turn near my house that's often covered with mud, dirt, and stones after a heavy rain. Imagine hitting that turn at full speed; your tires will hit that, break loose, and before you know it, you've had a nasty low side crash. Plus there are animals to deal with; if you're in a more rural area, you could find deer or cows in your way. Public roads aren't conducive to going fast; if you want to really push a sport bike, then you need to do a track day; for me, that would be a PITA, as the nearest race tracks are hours away from me.

Thirdly, sport bikes are simply UNCOMFORTABLE! Their riding position makes sense for what a sport bike is designed to do, but it's not comfortable to ride for more than an hour or so. Plus, after you pass a certain age, you might not be able to contort yourself into a sport bike's riding position. Can you still bend your knees that much? If so, how long can you keep them bent that much? Even for the young guys, sport bikes aren't that comfortable. Outside of a race track, are sport bikes really that suitable for most riding? I would submit that they're not.

Finally, there's the cost of owning and operating a sport bike. Yes, they're highly capable machines, particularly for their intended purpose, but that capability comes at a cost. The young guys who used to comprise most sport bike owners can't afford them anymore; 600s carry low five figure price tags, and bigger sport bikes are more expensive. That doesn't take into account the cost to insure these things. In the event of a crash, all that Tupperware will cost a FORTUNE to replace! That's reflected in the insurance premiums one has to pay for a sport bike. Most young guys who would've owned them in the past can't afford that. Secondly, older guys, who are affluent enough to afford them, no longer want them; they want to slow down and enjoy the ride, and sport bikes aren't conducive for that.

In closing, I'm not against modern sport bikes at all. They're truly awesome and wondrous machines. Today's sport bikes on the showroom floor are BETTER than what the professionals raced just a generation ago! Think about it: when Eddie Lawson was racing, his bike had a 120 rear tire-a 120! Can you imagine that? Modern sport bikes have 180s on the rear. That doesn't take into consideration the inferior tires, lower power engines, inferior brakes on the bikes that the pros raced a generation ago. Modern sport bikes are simply too much for most riders. Between that and their high cost of acquisition and ownership, it's only natural that their sales would fall.

20 February 2025

Child Support from Conception

 Guys,

You all MUST WATCH the video below! Dan, host of the Men Need to be Heard YouTube channel, has a barn burner of a video about this. It's almost a half hour long, but it's well worth your time.



19 February 2025

Ryan Spencer on Tamron Hall

 Guys,

A good YouTube channel to follow is Manosphere Highlights Daily; he's MUST SEE TV! He did a recent video about Ryan Spencer, the young woman who went viral on TikTok, crying in her car that she can't find love. Miss Spencer was on The Tamron Hall Show recently, so MHD did a video about it. Below is the comment I left in response, as I've been following Miss Spencer on TikTok since May of last year. I'll post MHD's video and my comment below.

-------------



MHD, I found Ryan Spencer's TikTok soon after Better Bachelor featured her last year, and I started following her; I've seen every TikTok of hers since mid May of last year, and many she made before then. That is to say I have a good idea of who she is and what she's about. She's had good opportunities to find someone, yet they don't stick around. I'll give just two examples.

There was one guy, who she calls "Ohio Man", who ended things with her last summer. She was set up with him via mutual friends. She was never exclusive with OH Man, but they were seeing one another regularly and things seemed to be headed that way. Then, she took a 3 week vacation to Europe with her cousin, and this is what cause things to go off the rails with OH Man. I'll explain.

Now, to those who say that OH Man should've said no girls' trips, there were two flies in the ointment there. One was that Ryan and her cousin, Isabella, planned the vacation in March, long before Ryan met Ohio Man. Two, they weren't exclusive yet, which begs the question: how can one set boundaries with someone you're just getting to know? I think that Ohio Man answered that by flying the coop.

Why do I think Ohio Man flew the coop? There are two reasons. One was that, while in Europe, Ryan posted a TikTok about being on the dating apps, and setting them for wherever they were. If I were a guy dating her and I saw that, I wouldn't be amused. BTW, she ended up taking that one down! Two was that, even though Ryan's TikToks portrayed her and her cousin swimming and going sightseeing, Isabella's were a lot more revealing. Bella's TikToks showed them getting drunk, going to clubs, etc. Since Ryan reposted some of Bella's TikToks, it wouldn't have been any problem for Ohio Man to look at her TikToks too; when he saw Bella's TikToks of their European girls' trip, I think he hit the "eject" button. Ryan, of course, took no accountability; she basically blamed Ohio Man for the failure of that nascent relationship.

There was another good, solid opportunity that she didn't follow up on: the guy from Washington, DC. She didn't have a nickname for him, so I'll call him DC Man. DC Man has a job in DC, so he has to stay there. DC Man was in Ryan's hometown for a family reunion. They had a wonderful first date; they shared a nice dinner, then went back to her place to talk and play board games until 2 AM. It sounded like they really connected, and was thus worthy of a second date. DC Man offered her a train ticket to come down to DC to see him; all she had to do was say "Yes, I'll come down." BTW, Ryan is in CT, and CT has two or three Amtrak Acela stops; getting to DC wouldn't have been a problem. Ryan didn't follow up on that one, and I think she made a mistake. Connections like that don't happen every day; when they do, you need to jump all over them.

Ryan has made other TikToks talking about her multiple "situationships". One, with a pilot whom she nicknamed "Pilot Man", she described as "a one week stand"; those are her words, not mine. She had another situationship with a guy she calls "Hallmark Man". She's had other situationships too.IOW, she's used up and ran through. She made a TikTok a few weeks ago where she bristled at the thought of people asking her about her body count, and she said, "That's none of your fucking business!" Again, those are her words, not mine. No serious guy is going to want her.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on Ryan Spencer, the guest on The Tamron Hall Show. I found her TikTok last year, and I've been following her ever since mid May; I've seen every TikTok she's made since then, and I've seen many she made before then. She's had opportunities, but she can't convert them; she can't secure the relationship she says that she wants. Based on my observations, she's her own worst enemy, but she can't take the accountability to realize that. Those are my thoughts...

16 February 2025

Proof of My Long Held Reservations about Ashley St. Clair

 Guys,

I'm going to write about "conservative" influencer Ashley St. Clair. Some years ago, I saw her in my Twitter feed before I was banned there for the crime of Wrongthink. It was evident that she leaned conservative; she said many of the right things, which I liked. She's also a nice looking gal, which also scored points with me. However, as much as I wanted to like her, my "little voice" told me to hold on; don't be so quick to cheer for her or sing her praises.

Before I continue, let me say that, politically, I'm an Independent; I'm not affiliated with either major political party here in the US. I had been a Republican; in fact, I was a FOURTH GENERATION Republican! However, after years of disappointment over their lack of courage and willingness to be a real opposition party; after years of disappointment over their lack of will to enact a truly traditional, conservative, and American agenda; I became an Independent a few years ago. Secondly, my political views have also evolved over the years; i've become more libertarian in my leanings, though Libertarians, like putative conservatives, have problems. Hence I consider myself to be conservative-libertarian as depicted on the Nolan Chart. As a Christian, I don't know where else I could be, really.

Yesterday, my instinctive reservations about Ashley St. Clair were borne out; yesterday, there was tangible proof as to why I've had reservations about her all these years. The Gateway Pundit, a conservative website, had this article about Ashley St. Clair's recent antics. It turns out that she went on Twitter, now X, to proclaim that, not only is she a single mama to be; she's proclaiming Elon Musk to be the father! I have at least three problems with this development. One is that she's sexually active, something I suspected from her edgy dress. Two is that she'll be a single mom. Three is that she's pointing the finger at Elon Musk in a public fashion-very trashy.

Why do I have a problem with conservatives being sexually active? Mainly because conservatism, as I understand it, has its roots in Christianity and the Bible; at least true conservatism does, I think. Well, the Bible exhorts and admonishes us to save sex for marriage. Given the fact that modern dating and relationships are such a shitshow (sorry, but there's no other word for it) with situationships being the most one can aspire to, I think that the God's instructions in Holy Bible have more than proven their validity and wisdom.

Secondly, WTF are conservatives engaging in single motherhood? What's up with that? Miss. St. Clair isn't the first high profile, conservative woman to become a single mom, either; that dubious distinction goes to Sarah Palin's daughter, Bristol, who was showing an obvious baby bump at the 2008 Republican National Convention. Since conservatives normally lean towards, if not practice and proclaim, Christianity, shouldn't they refrain from sex outside of marriage and single motherhood? Shouldn't they-gasp-try to PRACTICE living better than the anti-God, antichrist, and anti-American leftists do? If they're going to live like everyone else, what, on Earth does conservatism have to offer anyone? How is it really any better than what it purports to be against?

Let me say this: when I first saw pics of Ashley St. Clair, I had reservations about her. Why? she dresses in a borderline provocative manner. Her tops were cut just a bit too low, and they fit her a bit too snugly; her clothing walks right up to the line between sexy and slutty without going over it. Sorry, but that's not what a traditionally conservative woman should do. A truly traditional and conservative woman will dress modestly. THERE, I SAID IT! As Matthew 7:16 and 7:20 say, by their fruits ye shall know them. In other words, if someone professes to be something, then there will be tangible proof via their actions; i.e. their life conduct will demonstrate that they really are that something.

Finally, a woman who is at all traditional and conservative does NOT go proudly proclaiming that she's about to be a single mom! She does not live a libertine lifestyle, let alone show visible proof of the same. Lastly, she doesn't publicly point the finger at the putative father until she has proof, nor does she do so until after trying to privately work things out with the father. How can she have proof without a DNA test having been done? Was a prenatal DNA test done? Did Miss St. Clair ever talk to Mr. Musk privately about this? Did she try to work things out, secure support, etc. prior to going public? Ashley St. Clair is pointing the finger at Elon Musk, claiming he's the father of her baby, yet she's not providing proof. To top it all off, she made this announcement on Musk's platform, X-talk about chutzpah. What Miss St. Clair did is the epitome and quintessence of chutzpah! All I can do is shake my head here.

In closing, though I wanted to like her, I've had long held, instinctive reservations about conservative influencer, Ashley St. Clair. Yesterday, my instincts were once again proven correct; there is now tangible evidence as to why I had instinctive reservations about Miss St. Clair. The moral of the story is: listen to your gut, Fellas! Listen to your "little voice"; it's speaking to you for a reason. Until next time...

14 February 2025

Don't Be Settled For, Fellas!

 Guys,

I follow Strong Successful Male's YouTube channel, and an oft repeated theme is how, when former carousel riders are approaching 30, they make it a point to find and marry their sucker, their nice guy. Here's a good video from Zoe's Stories that's in that vein. Enjoy!



09 February 2025

My Thoughts on Prenups

 Guys,

There's a cool, new YouTube channel that I watch every day: Zoe's Stories. Though the content is at least partially AI generated, it's good. The stories are usually about women mistreating their men, and they're from the woman's point of view; that is, they're told through the woman's eyes. We can gain insight into how women think about men, relationships, and why. For Red Pillers needing their daily dose, I consider this channel MUST-SEE TV!

Since their new episode is about prenups, I left a comment explaining my thoughts about them. What do I think about them, and why? Though you can and should watch the video, you don't have to go there to see my thoughts on prenups. Why? Because I saved them for right here! Down below is my comment I left in response to Zoe's Stories' new video about prenups.

--------------------

I have three thoughts WRT prenups. One is that, when you marry, you ALWAYS have a prenup! It may not be one that's formally presented from one person to another, but it's there. Two, considering that women file for divorce at least 80% of the time and they do so for spurious reasons, a prenup is a necessity for any man who's thinking about marriage. Finally, depending on jurisdiction, prenups may or may not help; some jurisdictions are more prenup friendly (i.e. they honor prenups) than others.

So, what sort of prenup exists when you get married? Simple, it's your state's marriage and divorce laws. They decide how the marriage will be dissolved and how assets will be divided. Think of having a will vs. not having one. Just because you don't have a will when you die doesn't mean that your estate can't be liquidated and closed. It will be, but it won't be you who decides these things; it'll be that state's probate laws that decide on the disposition of assets vs. any last will and testament you leave directing the same. Having a prenup vs. not having one is the same thing. If you have a prenup, then you can decide who gets what if the marriage fails. If you don't have a prenup of your own, the state's marriage and divorce laws will decide these things for you. That's number one.

Number two, women file for divorce the vast majority of the time, and they usually do so for spurious reasons. They leave because "they're not happy"; they leave because they're bored; they leave because they want "to find themselves", a euphemism for riding strange, new dick. Here's something to think about: women don't file for divorce due to adultery any more often than men do. That is to say that, if a man marries, the odds are good that the woman won't honor her marriage vows; the odds are that she'll leave at some point. Overall, women file for divorce 80% of the time; if the woman is college educated (read indoctrinated), then she'll file first 90% of the time. Assuming the divorce rate is 50%, here are the odds of the wife leaving; here's the math: 0.50*0.80=0.4, or 40%; 0.50*0.90=0.45, or 45%. That's approaching 1 OUT OF 2; that's a coin flip! Would you jump out of an airplane if there was almost a 1 in 2 chance of the parachute failing? I know, and I REST MY CASE! If a man is contemplating marriage, he must keep these things in mind.

The final consideration is that some states are more prenup friendly than others; i.e. some states honor and uphold prenups more often than others do. If you're a man considering marriage; if you're a man considering using a prenup to offer some protection; then it behooves you to consult a family law attorney in your state. That family law attorney can tell you more about whether or not prenups are upheld in your state, so you can decide whether marrying with a prenup will offer any meaningful protection. If your state isn't prenup friendly, then marriage cannot and must not be considered.

In closing, there are three important considerations about prenups. One is that, if you marry, there's already a prenup in effect: that states' divorce laws. Two is that women most often file for divorce first, and they do so for questionable reasons. Just a quick visit to TikTok (or ChikTok) will confirm this, as there are women all over the place telling other women that they don't need a good, solid reason to leave, even if they're married to a good guy. Finally, some states honor prenups more than others do; before even considering marriage, it's incumbent upon men to find out if their state is prenup friendly. Those are my thoughts.

Oh, and if you want to see the video, it's right here. Enjoy, Fellas!



29 January 2025

Things to Know and Understand before Buying a Home

 Folks,

This comment was left in response to a video on Chow Time Pod's channel. The video was about women losing their houses. They lost their houses because they bit off more than they could chew. Below is my comment, which has my thoughts and experiences from the home buying process...

---------------

Didn't these women-gasp-do RESEARCH prior before buying a home? I know I did! Buying a house is the biggest purchase most of us will ever make, so it would seem prudent that one would carefully research that purchase first. I was in a unique position to do so though. While I was between jobs back in the early-mid 2000s, I took a temporary office job at a title company. I didn't know such companies existed, but they do. I learned a lot there. When things were slow, I'd read industry and trade publications and websites, and I read about the home buying process. I wasn't in position to buy a home then; it would be another 10 years or so before I was, but I took advantage to learn about buying a home, as I knew that was something I wanted to do at some point.

I learned a lot of things. One was to get a home inspection. One thing I read about was horror stories of people who, in the rush to buy their dream house during the real estate boom back then, would skip the inspection. Weeks or months later, they'd wake up to find a cracked foundation or something serious like that, and they'd be on the hook for tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. While part of me felt bad for these people, another part of me didn't. Why? A home inspection would've caught something serious like that. Moral of the story: don't buy a home without an inspection; don't even think about it, People!

Let me tell you a story. There was a house in my city that I loved. I put in two offers on it, but I walked away from it. Why? Because the seller played games with the inspection. It was a foreclosure. When a home is foreclosed, they turn everything off: the water, furnace, electrical, the whole smash. Before you can do a proper inspection, you have to get the utilities turned on in your name; you have to have everything working before you can inspect it, right? It's elementary. Depending on the utility company and their backlog, this can take a week or so. The seller wouldn't work with me on this; they wouldn't give me sufficient time to get the utilities turned on in order to do a proper inspection. I walked away without thinking twice about it. As much as I liked that house; as much as it pained me to do so; I walked away. Why? Long before I started the home buying process, I'd made up my mind that, if I couldn't get an inspection or the inspection results had bad news, I'd walk away from that house; my motto was: no inspection, no deal.

Long before you even think about buying a home, you have to establish boundaries; you have to figure out what your personal non-negotiables are, so you can override your emotions and walk away from a bad deal. One of mine was the home inspection. I'd learned from my research that an inspection before purchase is a must, so as to avoid any unpleasant and expensive surprises after signing on the dotted lines and getting the keys to the house. Buying a home is a very emotional process, so you have to have your boundaries in place long before you start looking for a house. You have to figure out that, if X happens, I'll walk. People who skipped home inspections to buy a house they loved didn't do this; they didn't figure out what their boundaries were before they started looking at houses. They got caught up in their emotions, and they bought a house that they shouldn't have.

Another thing I learned from my research is that, if you're going to buy a home, you have to set aside at least 1% of its purchase price annually to pay for repairs. There are at least two absolutes when it comes to home ownership: 1) things WILL go wrong; and 2) you're on the hook for them when they do. There's none of this calling the landlord to fix something when it breaks or dies; as a homeowner, that's on you. Your water heater went out? That'll be $1,700, please. Does your HVAC system need replacing? That'll be $12,000, TYVM! I speak from experience, as I had to replace both over the last two years. This is especially true if you buy an older house, which is all you'll likely be able to afford for your first home. An older home will have older systems, and older systems will sooner need repair or replacement-again, elementary. When it comes to home ownership, the Boy Scout motto applies: be prepared. Things WILL go wrong, and you have to be ready when they do, Folks!

A third thing I figured out was that I didn't want to live somewhere with an HOA. It's not just because of the sometimes petty rules they have, though that's part of it. No, it's because, if your HOA doesn't set aside enough money for maintenance (of the roofs, streets, etc.), you can be hit with a special assessment. That's right; you can be hit with a huge, one time fee above and beyond your monthly fee. This can be in the thousands of dollars or more, and you have to pay it all at once! Can you afford to eat that kind of expense? You may have to if you have a bad or shortsighted HOA. Even if you have a good HOA, circumstances beyond their control or ability to anticipate them can trigger a special assessment.

Do you all remember the condo that collapsed in FL a few years ago? It was in Surfside, FL, a Miami suburb. In the wake of that disaster, FL tightened up their building codes and inspection requirements. Guess what? Owners of older condos found themselves hit with SIX FIGURE special assessments! Thanks to the new building codes, older condos required serious structural work to conform to the new building codes. This work cost millions of dollars, which was divided among all the owners of that condominium building. That often worked out to hundreds of thousands of dollars per condo owner. Many people had to sell their condos because they couldn't come up with the special assessment. If you don't have an HOA, you, as an owner, can be more proactive, so as to head off such disasters before they happen.

A fourth thing I learned was that, when you buy a home, you're tied down. When you rent, you can easily walk away, as the property isn't yours. If you're not sure about wanting to stay somewhere long term, do NOT buy a home! If you walk away from a rental, the most you'll be on the hook for is whatever rent is due for the remainder of the lease. If you have a good landlord, you can negotiate that; you can let them know that you're searching for a home or awaiting a promotion that'll necessitate a move, etc. However, it's a lot more difficult to walk away from a mortgage. Keep this in mind before buying a home. You cannot appreciate or understand how owning a home ties you down until you buy one.

Those are just a few things I learned about buying a home. Before you even think about buying a home, you MUST do research! You must have an idea of what you're getting into, as it's the biggest purchase most of us will ever make. You have to figure out your boundaries, and you have to be willing to walk when they're violated. You have to have a fund set aside for home repairs, as things will go wrong; it's not a question of if, but when. Finally, buying a house ties you down, so don't buy a house until you're sure you want to settle down somewhere. Those are my thoughts...

26 January 2025

Why I Became MGTOW

 Guys,

Erin, host of the Far From Eden YouTube channel, is doing a series on Esther Vilar's book, The Manipulated Man. The below post is a comment I left in response to her latest installment in the series, which ran this past Saturday night. It's my MGTOW story.

---------------

Erin, for me, it wasn't hard to accept that I would never marry or have a family; it was simply a matter of logic and risk assessment combined with personal experience. I'll explain...

When I was younger and had my first car, I had a CB radio in it. That was the forerunner of social media. I'd often listen to the truckers' on channel 19, and I heard a TON of horror stories about how their exes had taken them to the cleaners in their divorces. Those stories got my attention.

Secondly, because my first car was a 1966 Chevy in good shape, I used to have guys come up to me all the time talking to me about it. Many of them were married guys who'd tell me about the classic car they'd once had; they'd fondly speak of their old Ford Mustang, Plymouth Barracuda, etc. The married guys spoke of their old cars in a sad, wistful tone. Why? They'd go on to say that their wives made them get rid of them. That got my attention too.

SO! So, I knew that, even as a young man, that marriage was a huge decision; it was something that could make or break me, so I'd better be careful. That said, I still believed that I could find a good woman; I could still get married if I were careful and deliberate. Like a young teenage boy playing baseball, I still had "The Dream" (of making it to the bigs); I still believed that marriage was possible.

Fast forward about 15 years, and I got falsely accused a couple of times. One false accusation was from a woman I'd dated; the other was from a female colleague who wanted me out. Though both shook me up and traumatized me, it was the one outside of work that really bitch slapped me with reality, as that's the one that got me into family court.

This gal I dated briefly made it known that she didn't want to see me. She didn't tell me; she ghosted me, basically. I was like, okay, I'll get on with my life. Then, she started FOLLOWING me! If I passed her on the road, she'd follow me. She drove by my house. She drove by my work. She'd show up where I hung out, even though that was away from where she lived. You get the idea. After this went on for a while, she called the cops, and she accused me of stalking her. The cops arrested me on that criminal charge, and they informed me that there was a restraining order against me.

That meant I had to go to two court hearings: one was in criminal court, and one was in family court. I had to go to criminal court to have the stalking charge adjudicated, while the family court was about whether or not to make the court order permanent. When a DV PPO is taken out, it's temporary; you're instructed to go to a hearing in 10 or 14 days time to determine if it'll be permanent or not.

For the criminal charge, that went well. The judge was scrupulously fair to everyone, which helped. Secondly, she didn't show up for the trial, so the charges were dismissed. It's a little more complicated than that, but that's the gist of how my criminal charges were handled. The details aren't relevant; what's relevant is family court, which I'll tell you about now. To make that long story short, my charges were dismissed with prejudice, meaning that they could never be brought against me again.

Family court is where divorces are handled. Domestic violence restraining orders are also handled in family court; it's in family court where the decision is made whether or not to make them permanent. Hint: they almost ALWAYS are made permanent! My case was during the latter half of the 1990s, which was post OJ. Judges would pass out restraining orders like candy, as they believed it was better to be safe than sorry.

My case came up at the end of the day; it was literally the last one handled. I'll come back to that. Because my case was handled at the end of the day, I saw everyone else's case ahead of mine. Boy it was an EYE OPENER! One, the judge favored the women all day long; all day, the women got favorable rulings. OTOH, the men got screwed. Here is but one example of what family court was like all day.

There was a memorable case that came up in the middle of the day. A couple was divorcing, and it wasn't pretty; to say it was acrimonious would be an understatement. The husband and wife told the judge about a heated argument they'd had. Hubby said that he was going to burn the house down. Wifey threatened to kill him, and she pulled a knife.Their kids, who were present, corroborated what was said and done during that argument; that is to say that these were uncontroverted facts. You can guess what happened next: the judge scolded the man for making terroristic threats, while totally ignoring and absolving the wife for hers!

Finally, it's late afternoon. Our case is literally the last one of the day, so only I, my mom, my attorney, my psychobitch, and the biased judge are left in the courtroom. Psyhcobitch got up and told a bunch of lies; she basically accused me of doing what she'd been doing to me over the past year. After she spoke, my attorney spoke. He began to argue a relevant legal point that could have and should have undermined the court order, and would have if we'd been in a fair courtroom. However, we weren't in a fair courtroom; there were kangaroos jumping around all over the place!  As my attorney was speaking, the judge cut him off. You read that right; the judge CUT OFF my attorney in mid-sentence! He basically said that he didn't want to hear it, and he made the court order permanent.

A year or so later, when I was working on a long term temporary employment assignment to a company that was a household name back in the late 1990s, there was a woman at the company who didn't like me for whatever reason. One woman, who I was friendly with, was in charge of the temp group; we'll call her Katie. Towards the end of my time there, another woman, Mindy, took over. Mindy and I had never gotten along. We'd could barely be civil or cordial with one another. For me, it was no big deal; that happens sometimes.

So, I came in one morning, and all of a sudden, Mindy's acting all nice; she greeted me warmly, asked me how I was doing, and so on. Caught off guard, I played along and was polite to her too. While part of me was hoping that things would be better between Mindy and me, another part of me was wondering if she was up to something. It turned out that she was, and she'd engineered a false sexual harassment  accusation against me. My assignment ended soon thereafter.

I was upset, of course; I was hurt. However, my assignment had lasted 3-4 months longer than originally planned. Secondly, the department head, who was above Mindy, knew that something shady had happened, so he put in a good word with my agency. My agency got me another assignment soon thereafter, I did well at that assignment; the company bought out my contract, and I worked there for 2.5 years.

As the comedian always says, I told you all that to tell you this: my life experiences taught me that women can be DANGEROUS! They taught me that, especially in family court, men have no rights. Between that and the fickle, flaky, and emotional nature of women, I knew that marriage was an almost impossible dream at that point. If I wanted to marry, doing so in the US was out of the question.

To wrap things up, I became a Passport Bro before it was a thing. I met a gal from Peru. We had a relationship that progressed to the point of living together down there for four months. I saw things about her personality that I didn't like, so I ended the relationship. It's a little more complicated than that, but that's another story. In August of 2018, I came back with a street cat my ex had rescued. I've been on one date since then; I've been on one date over the past 6.5 years. That was in September of 2023, and the date was a disaster. I've all but given up. I keep my eyes and ears open in the unlikely event I come across a unicorn, but I'm not holding my breath. I'll just live out the rest of my days as best I can. That's my story.

24 January 2025

Thoughts on Prenups

 Guys,

Here's another comment that I'm saving and sharing here. I made it in response to one of Karyn Seitz' recent videos; this video, released three days ago as I write this, is about the five ironclad boundaries every good man has for his woman. For those who don't know, Mrs. Seitz' is the hostess of The Happy Wife School channel. There's a lot of good info on there, so I'd recommend my readers checking out her channel. Now, on with the comment...

--------------

Ma'am, all five boundaries are good. I'd like to comment more on prenups though. One, some jurisdictions are more prenup friendly than others; i.e. they're more likely to honor a prenup. Two, if a woman won't sign a prenup, that tells a prospective husband everything he needs to know; if she has any objection at all, calling off the wedding is the only option. Three, prenups cannot eliminate child support in any jurisdiction, so that's something to keep in mind. Four, even if man doesn't have a prenup, there's already a prenup in place: that state's laws governing marriage and divorce.

Think of it as you would a will. If you die without a will, your state's probate laws dictate how your estate is liquidated; i.e. there's already a will in place: the state's probate laws. Likewise, when a couple marries without their own prenup(s), the prenup in force is that state's marriage and divorce laws; in the event of a divorce, your state's laws will dictate how the marriage is dissolved. OTOH, if there's a prenup in place, then that, like a will, empowers you to decide how the marriage will be dissolved in the event of a divorce. SO! There's always a prenup; the only question is whether or not it's yours or the state's.

22 January 2025

Reasons for the "Double Standard"

 Folks,

Here's yet another comment to YouTube that I want to save for posterity. My comment is in response to this video here. It pertains to that big, Feminazi boogie man, the "double standard" A woman groused at the fact that men were saying that the subject of the video was an example of the trauma women suffer from a high body count. She said, "it's okay for men to sleep around, yet it wasn't okay for women to do so. Make it make sense." So, I did just that. My comment below was in response to her dig at the "double standard", i.e. studs being celebrated while sluts are disparaged. Anyway, here goes...

----------------

​ @carlousmagus5387  neither men or women should sleep around, as both are affected; they're affected in different ways, but both men and women are negatively impacted by promiscuity. That's number one.

Number two, to address your implied dig at the "double standard", there are reasons for it. Both the content and tone of your comment betray your dislike for the "double standard". You think that if a man sleeps with 100 women, then there's nothing wrong with a woman sleeping with 100 men. While the numbers may be equal here, that's where the equality stops. I'll explain.

Firstly, women want what other women want; the more women a man has, the more desirable he is to other women. Women are big on social proof. If you see a man with a gaggle of women around him, the first thought in your female hind brain will be that there must be something special about him; he must be good, because has all these women around him.

Seocndly, it takes more effort for a guy to sleep with one woman than it takes a woman to sleep with 100 guys. For a guy to even have a chance at sleeping with a  woman, he has to have good game; he has to know how to be a smooth talker, confident, etc. He has to be in the gym; he has to have a good body to get women interested. He has to wear nice clothes. He has to drive the right car. He has to have a certain amount of money. And that's just to get IN the game! That doesn't guarantee a conquest-not by a long shot.

OTOH, in order for a woman to get laid, all she has to do is show up. All she has to do is: 1) go where some guys are: and 2) let it be known that she's DTF. THAT'S IT! If she does those two, simple things, she'll get laid. It doesn't matter what she looks like, either; even if she's fat, ugly, and smelly, if she asks if any guys want to go home with her, she'll have takers.

Thirdly and finally, there's the matter of paternity. When you, as a woman, pop a baby out of your loins, you have NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that it's your child-none! A man doesn't enjoy the same certainty. There's a pithy, little saying that sums up this situation: Mommy's baby, Daddy's maybe. A man can never have the same certainty of paternity that a woman does. Hence, sexual access to women has always been restricted.

In closing, let's recap. Does promiscuity negatively impact both men and women? Yes, but in different ways. Two, there are reasons for the double standard, not the least of which is that women find "players" much more desirable than they do guys who aren't good with women. Three, the effort required of a man to have sex far exceeds that of a woman; all a woman has to do is show up. Three, in order to assure certainty of paternity, women's sexual activity needs to be restricted, so the father can be reasonably sure that the kids are his. Women have no doubt that a child is theirs; men do not.

18 January 2025

Dating Older Women

 Guys,

Here's yet another comment I want to preserve for posterity. A Jay's Rants & Reactions YouTube channel had a video about 50 something women dating; rather, it was a litany of their complaints about dating. Below is my comment in response.

--------------

A Jay, as a 62 year old retiree going on 63, I tried dating an older chick back in September, 2023-never again. That's the only date I've been on since my last relationshit ended back in August of 2018. Why did I try an older chick? One, Ben Franklin said that there are advantages to dating older women. Secondly, you can bang them without worrying about pregnancy, as their eggs are dried up. Thirdly, the woman wasn't bad looking for someone over 50. Fourthly, she looked decent in her pics; she looked good for her age. I was to find out that those were old pics-what a surprise. Finally, she had her place, and I had mine; I figured that maybe I could find a non-cohabiting LTR.

So, how did things go? She suggested a breakfast buffet at a hotel/restaurant in her city about an hour away. I liked the idea. I'd never been to this city before, so I was looking forward to seeing it. We made plans for that Sunday morning. Do you know that that bitch was LATE? She was! Even though I texted her when I left the house; even though I texted her when I entered her city about 5-10 minutes from the hotel/restaurant; even though I texted her when I got there; and even though she said she lived nearby (within walking distance, IIRC); she was STILL LATE!

Ah, but that's not all. She didn't even come into the restaurant to look for me! Had I not gone out looking for her, I'd have never met her; in retrospect, that might not have been a bad thing. Anyway, I found her sitting on like a sofa/bench outside the restaurant entrance, so I brought her to the table. Now, the REAL fun began...

So, we finally sat down to have breakfast. She got her stuff, which included some fruit. Since I eat fruit with my weekday morning breakfasts, I usually skip on the weekends. On weekday mornings, I always eat half a grapefruit with my cereal, milk, and toast. I loaded up with eggs, sausage, bacon, some home fries, and orange juice; that's what I have when I have my one hot breakfast on the weekends. Do you know that this bitch had the nerve to get on me about not having fruit? She did! I was like WTF? I could see why she'd been divorced for decades! Needless to say, there wasn't a second date, and I promptly threw her number away.

Why not date younger? I've thought about dating younger women, but for me, that has its downsides too. Number one, you have to worry about knocking them up. Two, because young women are so promiscuous these days, you have to worry about catching something-uh, no thanks; the last thing I want is to feel a burning sensation when I pee! Goodness knows that, at my age, I have to do that at least a couple of times a night. Three, younger women have worse attitudes than the older women do; more guys give them attention, and it swells their egos accordingly.  Why do you think their standards are so high? Four, many of the younger women are SINGLE MOMS! I've had some nice chats with the young woman who lives across the street from me, and I've thought about asking her out. I think she may be a single mom though; I've seen a little girl over there. Uh, NO THANK YOU! The only upside for dating a younger woman is that she looks better than her older sisters do. How does that cancel out the downsides of dating younger?

A Jay, from where I sit, dating is a big SHITSHOW! Sorry, but there's no other way to put it. I've been on one date over the last almost 6.5 years, and that was a disaster. I'm not eager to repeat it. I'll just do my thing, and I'll do it in peace, TYVM...

15 January 2025

My Thoughts on the Upcoming TikTok Ban

 Folks,

I'll get straight to it: I'm AGAINST the upcoming TikTok ban! I'm against it for a couple of reasons. One, the US Government wants first dibs on spying on Americans; the ban is partly out of jealousy. Two, it establishes the precedent of being able to ban any app or platform that they don't like. Though I have an account on TikTok to follow a few people, I'm not active on it; I've never posted a video on there, nor do I plan to. That is to say that a TikTok ban won't affect me much, if at all, personally. That said, I'm still troubled by the fact that the Feds are riding roughshod over the Constitution by banning TikTok.

I don't know how many of you are familiar with the Twitter Papers. The Twitter Papers were released after Elon Musk purchased the platform from founder Jack Dorsey. The Twitter Papers detailed all the behind the scenes arm twisting the US Government did to censor those who were critical of the COVID vaccine, the COVID narrative, government policy, and so on. The US Government uses the Big Tech platforms for its own ends. If you'd like to learn more, go to https://theconservativetreehouse.com, and search for the Twitter Papers. They're an EYE OPENER!

Truth be told, the US Government has been involved with the Big Tech platforms from the beginning. For example, let's look at Facebook. Do you think Facebook was started by then college student Mark Zuckerberg in his dorm room? If so, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'd LOVE to talk to you about! No, Facebook started life as a DARPA program; it was originally called Project Lifelog. Its purpose was to get people to provide information about themselves and their lives voluntarily; in other words, it was an early form of Facebook. Isn't it propitious how, when Project Lifelog ended (at least as an official DARPA project), Facebook started at the same time?

DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. It's the Department of Defense's agency responsible for developing all the cutting edge, whiz bang devices and systems the US Armed Forces use today. Among the things that DARPA pioneered were stealth aircraft, GPS, the Internet, and even the graphical user interface and mouse we use with our computers.

Let's also not forget that the CIA established its own front venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel, to help FUND a lot of the Big Tech companies when they were started! The Feds, via their front VC firms like In-Q-Tel, provided seed money to all the tech startups, and then let them fight it out to see who would be left standing. There was real competition among the tech startups, but they were all funded by the Feds; no matter who won, they'd be beholden to the US Government, and would therefore do the Feds' bidding in the future. Moreover, even now, intelligence community (IC) heads are on the boards of the Big Tech companies today. That's right; you have IC brass on the boards of the Big Tech companies, influencing what they do.

The Internet was another DARPA project. It was originally conceived by one of their psychologists, a chap by the name of JCR Licklider. Back in the early 1960s, he envisioned what he called the Intergalactic Computer Network where everyone could congregate online. The US Government developed the Internet, in part, to monitor us. Why? I'll get to that in a minute. Anyway, it took until the early-mid 1990s before computer technology and bandwidth caught up to enable Licklider's vision to come true.

Why is that important? Why would the Feds want the Internet and social media companies? Well, I'm old enough to remember when there were only the Big Three TV networks; I'm of course talking about ABC, CBS, and NBC. They controlled TV programming and the news back in those days; if the Big Three networks didn't cover a story, it didn't happen. That is to say that the US Government and the mass media controlled the narrative.

However, what they couldn't control, or even monitor, was public response to the official narrative at any given time. What do the people think about this? What do they think about that? With no monitoring system in place, there was an open feedback loop. What the Internet and the Big Tech social media companies basically did was to close that feedback loop. Now, the US Government can monitor the response to the official narrative at any given time, thus enabling them to adjust their policies and actions in real time.

For example, a year or so ago, there was a big, public push for central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, worldwide. Every government was working on one. When the public got wind of what CBDCs would mean; when the public figured out the implications of having a cashless society; there was a firestorm on social media about it. The people were spreading the word, and efforts were being organized to push back against CBDCs. Notice how governments have since toned down talk of CBDCs? That's why; they saw the firestorm on social media, and they figured out that their present approach to implement CBDCs was not working. That's what the Internet and the Big Tech platforms were created to do. In this way, they were and are arms of the Federal Government.

Now, before I continue, I don't think for one minute that the psychopaths in government have given up on CBDCs-not for a minute. CBDCs are an authoritarian's WET DREAM! They enable control over us that Hitler, Stalin, and Mao could only dream of. I think that, thanks to what they saw on social media and what people were saying about CBDCs, I think that the powers that (shouldn't) be are regrouping, so they can figure out another way to implement CBDCs; I think that they'll use cryptocurrencies as a backdoor way to implement them. THAT is what the Internet and Big Tech were really designed for! That is why, decades ago, DARPA conceived the Internet and social media.

In other words, the Federal Government, via the Internet and the Big Tech social media companies, spies on Americans. They've been doing it for a long time. Now, China, with its TikTok platform, is spying on Americans and users worldwide. As usual, the US Government HATES the competition! One reason for the TikTok ban is to eliminate the competition. It's all right if the Feds spy on us, but not all right for the Chinese to do so. One reason for the ban is a turf war.

The second problem I have with the TikTok ban is the precedent it establishes. If TikTok can be banned today, then what can be banned tomorrow? For example, there's an excellent alternative social media platform called Gab. It was founded by Christian Andrew Torba. Gab is a mix of Facebook and Twitter. Though it's a true free speech platform (i.e. anything goes on there), Gab has a decided Christian, conservative, libertarian, and anti-establishment bent to it. I could see the Feds wanting to close down Gab in the near future. Since the door to banning platforms has been opened with the TikTok ban, what's to stop the Feds from banning Gab? What's to stop them from banning an app or platform that they don't like? The answer, of course, is nothing.

In closing, I'm opposed to the upcoming TikTok ban. Though I think TikTok is a cancer on society; though I think it's rotting the brains of a generation; I don't think it should be banned. People should be free to use any app or social media platform that they like. The US Government is banning TikTok for two primary reasons. One, the Feds hate the competition! It's all right for them to spy on us, but not the Chinese. Two, if TikTok can be banned today, who can be banned tomorrow? The Feds can use the threat of banning a platform to make them play ball; they can twist the arms of, say Facebook, to do the bidding of the Federal Government. Those are the problems I have with the TikTok ban.

That's all for now. Until next time...

09 January 2025

Women Love Bad Boys, or Modern Dating Is a Train Wreck

 Guys,

Here's a comment I left at Real Girl World's latest YouTube video. RGW, hosted by English-Canaidan wife, Hannah Jordan, talks about modern dating and relationships. She has 317 subscribers, but she should have 3.17 MILLION! She puts forth a message that desperately needs to be heard, particularly by today's modern women. It's refreshing to see a based woman out there, even though they're rare. As Proverbs 31 in the Bible says, such women are more valuable than rubies. Anyway, here were my thoughts on modern dating, women desiring bad boys, and so on...

-------------

One, what I can't understand is that, out of all the guys, Luigi Mangione is the ONLY one who's at all good looking! The other guys were 'meh' IMO. What on EARTH do these women see in all the other guys? What is it? It can't be good looks, because I can acknowledge when a man looks good. Other than Luigi Mangione, none of the other men do. Sorry, but their sex appeal escapes me.

Two, my other thought was that many of these girls who were giving the pedos a pass would be the same ones who would cry to HR if one of their nice guy coworkers expressed any interest in them.

Three, modern dating is just a train wreck. I've only been on one date in the last almost 6.5 years, and that was a disaster. Even though I texted her when I left my house; even though I texted her when I entered her city; and even though I texted her when I reached out meeting place; she was still late, even though she lived near the hotel/restaurant where we met for Sunday breakfast buffet. She didn't come into the hotel's restaurant, either; had I not gone looking for her, I'd have never seen her sitting on a bench outside the restaurant entrance. To top it all off, she had the NERVE to criticize what I chose to eat that Sunday morning! She pointed out that I wasn't eating fruit with my breakfast. I was thinking to myself, "Gee, I can see WHY you're single!"

What my date didn't know that Sunday morning of September, 2023 was that I eat fruit with my breakfast on the weekdays. I normally have half a grapefruit with my weekday morning breakfast, so I skip it on the weekends. On weekday mornings, I normally have half a grapefruit, cereal, milk, and toast. On weekends, I change things up; I have eggs, sausage or bacon, toast, orange juice, and sometimes home fries or hash browns. Criticizing what I ate really pissed me off.

Finally, I've been chatting with my neighbor, a young girl who lives across the street. She's in her late 20s or early 30s, but when you're 62 going on 63, that's young. Anyway, we'd had a couple of nice chats, but I think she may have a kid. GOOD GRIEF! I don't date single moms! I don't know her story, so I'm going to wait to find it out before doing anything, but I'm not so keen on possibly dating her, even though she's nice and kinda cute. The only single moms I feel sorry for are widows, as they ended up in their situation through no fault of their own. Otherwise, I think that single moms are a bad risk for guys of any age.

Anyway, modern dating is a train wreck, so many of us men of all ages are walking away from it. Those are my thoughts, Ma'am.

07 January 2025

First Dates, Dating, Relationships, and Marriage

 Guys,

Here's another comment I'm saving here for posterity. Since it includes my thoughts on dating, relationships, and marriage, I thought it would make a good post. Here's a link to the Zeta Male Unscripted video which prompted the comment. Phil, aka Zeta Male Unscripted, is a 57 year old New Englander who's hardcore MGTOW. He knows what's what, so young guys need to listen to him. I heartily recommend his channel. I subscribe to him, and his videos are "must see TV" for me. With that said, here are my thoughts on first dates, dating, relationships, and marriage...

-----------

Phil, I have a few thoughts about what you shared here. Number one, don't encourage guys to get married. Number two, relationshits are fine, but don't get married. Three, foodie dates are a thing many women do. Four, Chad and Tyrone don't have to do anything to get the girls. Five, the first date is for a "vibe check" only. Finally, trips to nice, expensive restaurants should be rare. I'll explain my points in more detail below.

Number one DON'T ENCOURAGE GUYS TO GET MARRIED! Even if they marry young and have the time and energy to rebuild from a divorce, that divorce still puts them behind the 8 ball; it still sets them back. Even if a guy gets married and divorced all in his 20s, he not only loses valuable time rebuilding his now destroyed life; he loses time laying the financial foundation for his later life. A man's 20s are vital for laying a good foundation, and a divorce, at best, delays this most valuable process. A guy needs his 20s to build his value. If he does things right in his 20s, then he'll have enough value later on to attract women if he wishes to do so. He'll also have the wherewithal to build a nice life later, as the foundation has already been put in place during his 20s.

Number two, I see no problem with a guy dating and perhaps having a relationshit or two; he'll learn that he's not missing much by flying solo. I have no problem with a guy having a relationshit or two, as he'll see what us older guys are telling him: he's not missing anything without a woman in his life.

Number three, one third of women admit to doing foodie dates, i.e. going on a date solely for free food, not because they have any interest in the guy himself. If one third of women admit to doing foodie dates, you know that the actual percentage is higher. Why? Because women care about how they're perceived; they care about how they look to others, so many women won't admit to doing foodie dates. Therefore, doing drinks or a cheap dinner date is the only way to go. If a woman is really and truly interested in the guy, she won't care about doing drinks; she won't care about grabbing a bite at Taco Bell or an inexpensive, local place; she won't care about what they do together, just so long as they do something together. That is to say that, if a woman is really into a guy, she won't care about what she does with him, nor will she cares about where she goes with him on the first date.

Number four, the Chads and Tyrones of the world don't have to do anything for the girl to be intimate with her, as she's really into them to begin with; all he'll do is tell her to come over late at night for "Netflix and chill", and she'll go. Why? Because she's REALLY INTO Chad and Tyrone; that's why! This point dovetails with the previous point.

Number five, the first date is just a "vibe check"; its purpose is to determine whether or not to have a second date. THAT'S IT! For that reason, a first date just needs to be quick and cheap. If you like one another, you can either extend the first date or make plans for a second one soon thereafter. If you don't like one another, then the agony isn't prolonged. Nor does the awkward first date cost the guy much, either in terms of money or time. A date doesn't need to be expensive to make that determination, nor does it need to last long. It's just a vibe check.

Finally, nice expensive restaurants are only appropriate for special occasions, such as a school graduation, job promotion, anniversary, etc. If you go to nice places too often, they're no longer special.

Those are my thoughts. In conclusion, DO NOT encourage guys to get married ever! Two, having a relationshit or two is okay. Three, many women do foodie dates, so don't get used; if she's into you, she won't care about what she does with you. Four, the Chads and Tyrones of the world don't even get drinks for their women, because they don't have to. Five, a first date is just a vibe check, so making it quick and cheap is a must. Finally, expensive restaurants should be for special occasions only.