Folks,
Below is my comment to Sandman MGTOW's most recent video about women commenting on men's issues. While he says that they're part of the Manosphere, I disagree; they comment on men's issues, but they're not part of the 'sphere. Here's the Sandman video on which I commented: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJmc8iKeVx8
----------
Sandman, as someone who follows three of the four women you mentioned; as someone who subscribes to two of their channels; I'd like to comment here. I subscribe to SDM and RFS; I follow Pearly on occasion; and I have no idea who BC is, as I never heard of her before your video. Now, on to my comment.
I think that SDM is sincere; I think she's real; I think she has a good heart. I subscribe to her, and I watch her fairly regularly. I struggled with similar psychological hangups as she did, so I can empathize with her. I think she says things that need to be said, and she does so with wit and humor. She started her channel with the intent of focusing on and directing her content towards women. However, for whatever reason, she got more traction with men. Hence, I wouldn't consider her to be in the Manosphere, and she doesn't place herself there; in fact, she says so in a recent video of hers. I take her at face value, and I believe her when she says that she wants to do her part to fix the damage wrought be feminism. I'll give her props for that. What's going on between men and women isn't what God intended.
Next, I subscribe to Aly too, aka Real Fem Sapien. I wouldn't classify her as Manosphere, either; if anything, I think she targets women as well; most of her content appears to be directed at younger women, and she teaches them how to live as a new Christian, how to live a traditional life, have a happy marriage, and so on. If she brings up men's concerns, it's part of her overall raison d'etre. She's trying to help women understand men, so they can have a better marriage. RFS also brings up men, so as to show how our thoughts, feelings, and actions impact women. Like SDM, RFS isn't a Manosphere; it's just that her content has struck a cord with men as well as women.
As for Pearly, she's more of a moderator/host of a podcast vs. a creator of original content. She has many "woke" guests on, which spices up debate. I don't subscribe to her; I used to, but no more. Though I think her heart is in the right place, many of the debates she hosts are just unwatchable. If I see a video of hers in my feed and it interests me, I'll watch it. Pearly seems to be sincere, so I'll give her the benefit of the doubt until I have reason not to.
I cannot comment on Brett Cooper, other than to say WTF were her parents thinking?! Prior to watching this video here, I had no idea who she was. However, since she's part of Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire, I wouldn't trust anything anyone at DW says. Daily Wire is a "Conservative, Inc." organ, and as such, is controlled opposition; i.e. they carry forth The Narrative put forth by the MSM, Deep State, et al. Why do you think Ben Shapiro and other cucks like him are not only still on Big Tech platforms like YouTube and Facebook, but are heavily promoted? Doesn't that raise any eyebrows? You can read what Andrew Torba, Founder/CEO of Gab, has to say here: https://news.gab.com/2023/01/conservative-inc-and-the-deal-with-the-daily-wire-devil/
Anyway, thouse are my thoughts. I think that SDM, RFS, and Pearly are sincere. I wouldn't place either SDM or RFS in the Manosphere though. They're more about undoing the damage wrought by feminism. They just say stuff that needs to be said, and they say things that strike a cord with good people of both sexes. Pearly is more of a moderator, not an original content creator like SDM or RFS. As for BC, she's part of a major Conservative, Inc. organ; for that reason alone, she should be distrusted. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment