25 August 2025

Body Count

 Folks,

This my comment to a video on the YouTube Channel, Lily's Stories. This isn't my original comment; it's in response to someone else's comment. Below is Krissa990's comment in color, along with my response without color.

Here's the video.


-------------

Daniel did wrong when he took almost all of their shared assets for himself..even if he may have had legal rights to them due to prenup,it was morally wrong to take almost all their shared assets..she didnt do anything that bad that it would morally justify that,although I wont blaim him for not being able to accept the circumstances and wanting a divorce,but to leave her penniless was wrong and unfair. To tell all the people around them about all the circumstances is something that could have been left out too in my view.


I have no problem with Daniel asking the question and him leaving her; my problem is timing. If I were seeking marriage and family (At 63, I'm not, but play along here), that's something a guy would want to know early on. I'd get a general idea of her number early on, and I'd walk away if I didn't like the answer. Waiting till your second anniversary is WAY TOO LATE! That's something that should've been discerned early in dating.

Secondly, I think that divorce should only happen as a last resort; I think that one should have a good, solid reason for breaking up a marriage, family, and home. If one is going to follow the Bible strictly, only adultery is permitted for divorce. Even if one wants to expand that to spousal abuse, substance abuse, and adultery, what happened here isn't exactly covered. I totally get his disgust over her promiscuity, but he should've found that out long before they even became exclusive as a couple, let alone engaged, and forget about married!

What would be interesting is having Daniel's side of the story. We don't know if he asked about this early on in the relationship; we don't know if he made any attempts to discern the number. Did he look at her friends closely? How did she dress? How did she live her life before him? Answers to those questions, while not yielding an exact number, would at least tell any intelligent and discerning guy whether or not the number was too high. We only have her side of the story; goodness only knows what she left out. As the Fella once said, there are three sides to every story: my side, your side, and the truth.

Oh, and I have one final question: WTF didn't she READ the prenup? NEVER sign any important legal documents without the help of a lawyer! It seems to me that she could have challenged the prenup in court; she could have cited duress os grounds. If Daniel had dropped the prenup on her right before the wedding, that could open the door to a challenge as well. With all that in mind, it's her fault for not reading the prenup, and it was her fault for not negotiating the terms. That's on her.

In closing, I see both parties as being at fault here; while I see her as more of the villain in this story, Daniel isn't innocent. He should've found out her number early on while dating, and if he didn't like the number, then leave at that point. She was in the wrong for being such a 304. As I said, both of them are at fault in this story.

13 August 2025

God Created Marriage for Sex!

 Folks,

Until now, I've not had much to say, hence my absence here. Rest assured that I'm alive and well; I've just been busy doing things in real life. However, after seeing Ace Nate's video about Christianity's woman problem, I had to weigh in. Below is a comment I left in response to his video, which you can watch below. Watch the video, then read my comment below.



-----------

According to my Bible, marriage is provided, in part, to provide a righteous avenue for satisfying the sex drive. Sex is not only for procreation; it's for our pleasure. Read The Song of Solomon in the Bible, and this will be unmistakable! Even in the English translation, the eroticism and passion are clear. I Cor. 7, which the "lovely and gracious" Lila Rose cites, says that God gave Christians marriage as an outlet for satisfying their sexual passions. She conveniently IGNORES that part though!

Secondly, one problem I have with the Roman Catholic Church is the mandatory celibacy of their priests. I Cor. 7 makes a distinction between singleness and marriage. Furthermore, I Cor. 7 says that men are made suitable for one or the other lifestyles by God Himself. This theme continues in Matt. 19, which talks about becoming a eunuch for the Kingdom of Heaven's sake. Jesus says that he who is able to receive it (the gift of celibacy), let him receive it.

Thirdly, with all due respect, Lila Rose is FULL OF SHIT! While she quotes I Cor. 7, she conveniently ignores the beginning verses of that chapter, which teaches the Christian that their body belongs TO THEIR SPOUSE! It goes on to say that it's wrong to deny one another their sexual needs. A little later on, it gives a married couple permission to abstain from regular sex for a time, and then only by MUTUAL CONSENT! IOW, both the husband and the wife have to agree to stop hanky panky for a time. For example, the couple might have a major decision to make, so they want to pray to ask God for wisdom; during this time, they can abstain from regular sexual relations.

In conclusion, God gave Christians marriage as a righteous avenue to satisfy your sexual urges. It's right there in the Bible.

-----------

There's nothing more I can add. Until next time...