MarkyMark's Thoughts on Various Issues

The Ring, by JackofClubs

2012-01-29T10:15:00.002-05:00

Guys,

Here's yet ANOTHER tale of horror from a young, Canadian bachelor. Here's yet another lucky guy who dodged a bullet! JackofClubs is a member of Happy Bachelors, and his story is must read material. Read this story, 'The Ring', by JackofClubs, Fellas! Read it and weep; or I should say read it and rejoice, because he dodged the bullet of marriage to a modern skank. Without any further ado, here's 'The Ring', by JackofClubs...

----------------

Hey guys,

My name is Brian. I'm a 31 year old, self proclaimed jack-of-all-trades IT guy from Ontario, Canada.

I'm sure I mirror a good number of folks when I say the following: I once bought into the great lie that women could do no wrong, and that men should be made to perpetually made to suffer for anything possible, imagined or real. I opened my eyes when I started to notice a trend: The deceit, lack of accountability and decadence that the 'fairer' sex seems to thrive on at other peoples expense, and the agenda to allow it to continue.

The above really started to resonate with me during a downturn in a once happy relationship with my last girlfriend. The downturn consisting of the final three months where I would endure discussions about 'the ring'. I suppose named as such because 'fancy shackle for two months pay' wasn't as catchy sounding. Of course, at the time, I would have happily obliged that request, if it was allowed to be done on my terms (i.e. make it a surprise) rather than make it seem like it was out of servitude. That decision alone saved me from marriage; because she never gave me enough time to make it a surprise. 'The ring' discussion came up constantly, and I soon grew resentful that it wasn't the 'I want to spend the rest of my life with you' discussion or 'I am madly in love with you discussion'. Nope, just an endless loop of her talking about a golden loop. It wasn't long before my eyes flew open and I realized the painful truth: I had become a walking wallet.

Then my eyes opened up to some other painful realities: Divorce and how it can absolutely jeopardize the livelihood and good health of someone completely not at fault.

Needless to say I had enough. One messy breakup later and I still consider myself one lucky bachelor who dodged a bullet. It's been well over one year since then and I feel like i'm seeing the world through different eyes now. I've since sworn off investing anything of significance in the opposite sex. Not out of hatred, mind you, but out of necessity. Society has engineered a situation that propagates the ruination of any man who buys into 'ideal love' (ie marriage). With that knowledge, marriage has become nothing more than a divorce from logic... ...and so, that brings me here.

Hope you have room for one more.

- B

Read more here: 'The Ring' @ Happy Bachelors

----------------

That was a good warning, Fellas. Read it and heed it. Until next time...

MarkyMark

Even Nice Girls Are Sluts These Days

2012-01-29T09:56:00.004-05:00

Guys,

I forget who made this point at Mancoat, but it was an astute one nonetheless. The poster in question posited that even nice girls are sluts. Here's why...

First, let's take a look at your typical slut; this is your typical woman. She becomes sexually active at 13-at the latest! She has 4-6 short term relationships per year lasting 2-3 months each. Between these relationships, she has a couple of one night stands worked in between. By the time your typical woman is 25, she will have been sexually active for 12 years. When we take her yearly partner count (4 relationships + 4 ONS per year)*12, we get 96 partners by the time she's 25; that's being conservative, because we only allowed for ONE ONS in between her short term relationships. If we assume two ONS in between STRs, then we get (4 STRs + 8 ONS)*12=144; that's 144 dicks by the time she's reached 25! That's slutting it up-er, being an empowered, liberated woman...

Now, let us look at what passes for a nice girl these days, shall we? A nice girl doesn't lose her virginity until turning 16. This nice girl has two boyfriends a year; she has two LTRs lasting about six months each per year. Now, if we assume that said nice girl continues this pattern until 25, she'll have slept with 18 men by the time she reaches 25; by the time she's hit 25, our modern day nice girl will have had 18 penises in her birth canal. Since 18<<96 or 144, that passes as a virtuous woman these days.

However, today's nice girl will have no doubt had a couple of one night stands along the way too; what, you think she didn't do the nasty with someone during her spring breaks?! Come on! At the very least, she will have had a couple of short term flings amongst her LTRs. That brings the notch count of today's 'nice girl' (or what PASSES for a nice girl today, I should say) up to 20, minimum-all by the time she reaches 25. BTW, the health text books of a generation ago said that any woman who'd had more than six or seven partners during her lifetime was promiscuous. Therefore, even a 'nice girl' of today is a slut. As Chris in Oregon would say, ICK! Until next time...

MarkyMark

Sexual Catastrophe

2012-01-29T09:45:00.001-05:00

Guys,

A couple of years ago, I read the great game debate over @ View from the Right. While doing so, I found an insightful post by Ian B., who renders his opinions & observations about what caused our dating wasteland, and what we can do about it. This is some of the best stuff I've read thus far...

------------------

Ian B. wrote:

I thought I'd throw my own two cents into the whole debate over Roissyism and the socio-sexual disaster, and offer my diagnosis of the problem and how to solve it.

The Roissyites, and Mark P. [see Mark's explication], do share one profound insight: the ones who are most proximately to blame for the social chaos are women, not men. While men do the wooing, it is women who make the choice to accept a relationship.

Typically, when a woman throws herself at some "alpha male" and gets burned, society places all the blame on the guy for being such a callous, uncaring cad as to sleep with a poor innocent woman and not commit to her. But who is he supposed to commit to? Her, or one of the several other idiot women throwing themselves into his path?

And consider this: For every stupid woman throwing herself at the same jerk that several other women are throwing themselves at, there's a guy who is probably responsible and quite willing commit, but who is being ignored by the tramp. So who is really being more callous, the "alpha male" being enabled by the women, or the vain, selfish women ignoring the decent guys? The problem here is not the existence of a few cads (a few cads, unfortunately, have always and will always be with us), but rather the behavior of women towards them.

So, I've just said who I think is at proximate moral fault for this mess (the women), but I haven't said what the root cause of it is. That is, what changed that allowed this mess to happen? These are two different things. For instance, imagine a town in which all the policemen pack up and leave one day. Subsequently, the town falls into a morass of violent crime. The ones to blame for the crimes are the criminals, but the root cause of the mess is the cops leaving. The solution is not to hope that the criminals will suddenly start behaving responsibly, but rather for the cops to come back.

With that distinction out of the way, let me say that the cause of the disaster is that the cops, by which I mean the majority of masculine men, have left town, and this was caused by the acceptance of feminism.

You may have noticed a common thread in these discussions. The term "alpha male" is used interchangeably to refer to both worthless, no-count cads, and to the men that women find most attractive. The term "beta male," on the other hand, is used interchangeably to refer to both the responsible men, the builders of society, and to the men that women find less attractive.

This might seem strange. There is no necessary logical link between these things. In fact, you might tend to assume that the responsible builders would be stronger, more authoritative, and hence more attractive in general. However, there is a contingent link between these two things within current society.

The problem is that because of feminism, men have been taught for decades that they ought to be sweet, sensitive doormats, attentive and deferential to women's needs, seeing women as goddesses on high pedestals. This message has been preached by the schools, in the media, and even by their families. Unfortunately, this is precisely what turns women off. Regardless of what they think or say they want, most women are actually attracted to (and happiest with) a strong, independent, assertive man who will dominate and lead them.

And since this is what is taught everywhere, only the sociopaths and renegades--that is to say, the unteachable cads who scorn the wisdom of everyone else--manage to avoid absorbing this lesson, and hence end up being the most attractive to women. The potentially responsible leader types are instead conditioned into being feminized squishes by the time they reach adulthood, and so end up being "beta males."

So, here's my two step solution:

1) First of all, men need to be taught to be strong and independent again, from an early age. They need to be taught that women are attracted to assertive, dominating guys rather than suckups. They also need to be taught to see women for what they are: fallen and flawed humans, possessing merits, but also emotional and emotionally manipulative, to be led, and not shining goddesses of wonder to be appeased. This would at least put these men on an even playing field with the cads and the Roissyites, in terms of attracting women, which is half the battle.

Of course, the idea that we should just start teaching men differently is easier said than done. There is one place where it is possible, however: Within the conservative Christian community. There is Biblical precedent for men as leaders, and the conservative Christian community has shown itself surprisingly capable of coming alive and quickly embracing a new movement when it is clear that Scripture is on the movement's side. Witness their rapid mobilization with slavery and abortion, for instance.

What about the secular "beta" males? Well, there's really no hope for them. But really, it's no big loss. There's really nobody more pathetic and shameful than a person who both rejects Christianity and gets immersed in and emasculated by feminist dogma. Like the contraceptive-using cads, Roissyites, and slutty women, they will die childless and alone, and be outbred by the Christians even more than they already are.

2) These newly-minted masculine men need to start engaging in shaming, to establish societal order again. Right now, when a woman gets burned going after a bad boy, most sweet, sensitive "beta" males sympathize with the poor besotted woman, and blame the heartless jerk who did it to her, hoping that they can get her affection with their sensitivity. It doesn't occur to them that while she was throwing herself after the jerk and being subsequently left high and dry by him, other men were being left high and dry by her.

A man who has been trained to see women for what they are will recognize and shame the primary guilty party: the woman. Rather that join her in her pity party, he will blame her.

Honestly, step (2) isn't really a separate step, and should come automatically with step (1). The shaming doesn't even have to be overt. It simply has to take the form of attractive men rejecting women for being sluts.

Women already insult each other all the time for being whores, but that doesn't really bother them. What really shames a woman, what really frightens her deeply enough to modify her behavior, is the prospect of being rejected and found unattractive by desirable men.

If women think that being slutty will make them generally less attractive to desirable men, they will be shamed into not being slutty. And if there are a good number of desirable men out there that happen to be Christians, this should start to take care of itself.

--------------------

That's some of the best analysis as to what caused our dating & mating wasteland; not only that, Ian B. offers some suggestions too. Have a good night now...

MarkyMark

MTV's Jersey Shore as a Petri Dish of Relationships

2012-01-28T15:54:00.002-05:00

Guys,

As you know, I've been following MTV's Jersey Shore since it aired over two years ago. It's so gosh darn bad (in a train wreck sort of way) that I can't help but watch it! Over @ Ferdinand Bardamu's place, there was a post about MTV's hit show. In the comments, a chap by the name of Canon's Canon said that the show is a veritable petri dish for studying 'Game'. While he has a point, that's not the tack I wish to pursue.

Canon's Canon is right about one thing: MTV's Jersey Shore is a petri dish for studying relationships. To me though, it's a petri dish of what NOT to do for pursuit of a healthy relationship. In that show, one can see everything that one can do wrong to pursue a healthy relationship, i.e. one that is a blessing & enrichment to both parties involved.

How does MTV's Jersey Shore show us what NOT to do? Where do I start?! One, both men & women are pursuing relationships based on attraction only. Two, we don't see anyone really getting to KNOW one another-and I don't mean Biblically, either! Three, guys & gals bed down at the drop of a hat.

The first thing that jumped out at me when watching MTV's breakout show, Jersey Shore, is that both the guys & girls are chasing one another SOLELY based on attraction; it's the only litmus test being used by either sex these days! I've seen no attempt by either the men or the women (am I being too generous with those descriptors?) to REALLY get to know their partners on the inside. The only question they ask is this: is he/she hot? Does he/she get my hormones racing? WTF are you doing, people?!

The second thing I noticed is this: the men & women aren't getting to know one another. I haven't see ANY substantive discussions on current events. I've seen no substantive discussions about money & finances. I've seen no discussion or even mention about future goals. I haven't seen any discussions about ANYTHING of substance-nothing! These aforementioned issues are what I call 'make or break' issues; these are issues that can, and often do, sink relationships. Men & women are pursuing relationships with one another while having no idea of who the other is as a person-none!

The third thing I've noticed on Jersey Shore is that guys & gals hop into bed with one another almost instantly. What are you doing, folks?! Ronnie & Sammi, after only a few talks and one date hopped into bed with each other! I'm sorry, but that's way too soon to have sex with someone! Even if one doesn't believe in saving it for marriage, doing it right after meeting someone is too damn soon! If younger men (and especially younger women) are doing this, is it any wonder that STDs are so prevalent? Is it any wonder that there's so much angst about relationships?!

What ends up happening is this: relationships are based on little more than sex. In far too many modern relationships, the only glue holding them together is the physical. There is little or no mental connection made between the man and the woman. There is little or no emotional connection made. Finally, there is little or no spiritual connection made. In order for a relationship to last-REALLY LAST-it has to have all four elements present; there have to be mental, emotional, spiritual, and physical bindings holding it together. Only then will a relationship have what it takes to last. When there's only one binding (especially when it's the physical, as is usually the case in modern relationships) holding it together, the relationship simply doesn't have the strength to withstand any serious stress.

Men & women are pursuing one another based on attraction; granted, the attractants are different for men and women, but they're pursuing one another based on attraction nonetheless. Sorry, but attraction != love. It never has, and it never will. I'm not saying that your beloved should be repulsive, but attraction alone cannot and should not be the sole basis of a healthy relationship.

Here's what's happening. Man & woman get involved with each other solely based on their attraction for one another. They do not really get go KNOW one another. The relationship progresses to the point of marriage. The marriage inevitably has tough times, which stress the relationship. Only then do the husband and wife realize that they're complete strangers! Only then do they realize that they do not really, truly know one another. Only then do they realize that they're not at all in agreement on the 'make or break' issues. Is it any WONDER we have so many divorces?! Come to think of it, it's a wonder we have any marriages that survive at all, given the shaky foundation on which they're built.

In closing, MTV's hit show, Jersey Shore, shows us what's wrong with modern relationships, and the way that men & women approach them. Attraction is the only litmus test used to determine who's 'right' for them. It never occurs to men & women that there has to be SOMETHING else to get them through the next 30 years. Because modern relationships don't have that something else to survive long term, they end up being train wrecks, littering the human landscape with hurt, pain, anger, and goodness knows what else. In light of this, it's a wonder there aren't more divorces! Until next time...

MarkyMark

Franz Klammer's Gold Medal Run

2012-01-24T06:23:00.000-05:00

Guys,

This is something I posted years ago. As I reconstruct the blog, there are certain things I want to have front & center; this is one of them.

This is the gold medal run Franz Klammer made in the 1976 Winter Olympics, the same year Dorothy Hamill won the gold in ladies figure skating. I was 13 going on 14 when I saw this live, and it's something I never, ever forgot; it's one of my favorite memories.

What I liked and admired about Klammer's run is that he flat out WENT for it; he was going to win, or he was going to die trying! All through the run, he's on the edge, the edge of disaster. What's even more impressive is that he did this using the old, heavy wooden skis! He didn't have the modern, composite wonders today's skiers have. Imagine what Klammer could have done with modern skis and training techniques?

I hope you enjoyed that as much as I did. Whether it's the first time you saw this, or you're seeing it again, I hope you enjoyed it. Have a good day now...

MarkyMark

The Costa Concordia & Equality

2012-01-22T11:50:00.008-05:00

Guys,

Here are my thoughts on the Costa Concordia disaster. One, I think it's GREAT that men are no longer deferring to women; why should women get first dibs on the lifeboats if we're equal now, hmmm? Secondly, as the old, Arab proverb says, women want fried ice. When reading the comments over at the Daily Mail article on the Costa Concordia, this is plainly evident; women want to have their cake and eat it at the same time. Finally, women are no longer WORTHY of deference, because they have ceased to be ladies. I shall quote comments from the Daily Mail article about the sinking.

I think that it's GREAT that men are no longer deferring to women in disasters. Why? One, women have, for decades, bleated that they can do anything a man can do, and that they can do it better-grrl power, baby! Well, if you can do anything a man can do and do it better, then it stands to reason that you, as a woman, can die as well as I would have had to in the past. Why should I sacrifice my life when you can sacrifice yours better?

I think it's great that men are no longer deferring to women, because it shows that men are WAKING UP. They're waking up to the reality that we're 'equal' now. They're waking up to the reality that they, as men, are second class citizens. They're waking up to the reality that their lives are just as valuable as those of women. They're waking up to the reality that, as human beings, men have just as much a right to life just as much as any woman does.

I think it's great that men are no longer deferring to women, because this will help bring about the end of feminism. How so? Ulysses S. Grant once said that the best way to repeal a bad law was to STRINGENTLY ENFORCE it. The corollary here is that, by stringently enforcing feminism and the equality it promotes, is that we sooner bring about the end of feminism as we've known it. If we want to put an end to this equality nonsense, then the best way to do that is STUFF it down women's throats till they choke! What can be better than stringently enforcing equality when it comes to boarding the lifeboats?

My second observation from the Costa Concordia sinking is this: women do indeed want fried ice. While that's an old, Arab proverb, it states a timeless truth. When going through the Daily Mail article and its comments, the vast majority of women would, on the one hand, chastise men for being cowards for having the temerity for valuing their own lives and saving themselves; then, these same women would turn around and say that they were equal to men, that they had equal rights, etc. Here's a quote that typifies the eternal solipsism of the female mind...

The feminists have been crying out for equality - you got it, so stop whining! ---------- Please, sir, do forgive me for wanting to enjoy the same rights as a man. How dare I, a mere woman, be so audacious as to dream of equality. And to all those saying "women want it both ways" - we quite clearly don't, as proved by the fact that not a single woman has commented saying women and children first is the way it should be. Yes, we want equality, and yes, we know what it means - and fyi, you don't have to be a woman or a man-hater to be a feminist. Look up its definition before spouting your ignorant opinions.
- Hellen, North East, 15/1/2012 9:59

When called out on their hypocrisy and inconsistency, these same women will deny saying that they want men to die first. While they are TECHNICALLY correct (i.e. they didn't explicitly state this), they are not factually correct; they are not factually correct, because these same women are implicitly saying that we, as men, should die first. Why else would they break out the shaming language? Why else would they call men cowards for saving themselves? Why else would these same women bemoan the lack of chivalry? Is it not because they DO believe that they should get preference for seats on the lifeboats? Here's a comment that exemplifies this train of thought.

Stronger, more able people, people who are more likely to survive adverse conditions should be the last to leave the boat. And seeing as able bodied men are nearly always stronger than able bodied women - then yep, its this group of men that should go last. It has nothing to do with 'equality' and everything to do with helping those people weaker than yourself. Its called bring a decent human being. Able bodied men that think otherwise are nothing but bitter cowards. Being a fairly small, but single woman, I'd help children and anyone that appeared frail or disabled before expecting to get on a lifeboat first. Thats only fair. But an able bodied man before me on the basis of 'equality'? Absolutely not!
- disgustedoflondon, london, 16/1/2012 7:48

Here's an even MORE blatant example of women wanting it both ways...

Women have already lost the respect and rights to be treated differently from men after claiming that they r equal to men.. In good moments, you want same rights but in bad moments you women become a lady.. Stop this hypocrisy ok ? Mark, Canada I'd like to think I'm a lady in both good and bad moments :) Equality means things like equal pay for equal work and not being prevented from gaining promotion because of one's gender ... no one (apart from you, perhaps!) seriously believes that women are physically the same, and that difference should be respected. If you're just going to shoulder the weaker members of society out of the way when it suits .. well, I can't really find the words. Thank goodness there are still gentlemen as well as ladies out there.
- caroline mayor, rennes, france, 16/1/2012 10:11

What Caroline is saying above is this: I want equality when it suits me, and I want chivalry when it does not. When the paychecks are handed out, I want equality; when the bills come due, I want chivalry. I want to have my cake and eat it-wah! BTW, there's nothing hypocritical and inconsistent about that-at least not in her mind or the minds of most women. Can anyone deny that women want fried ice? Can anyone deny the eternal solipsism of the female mind?

Now, I would like to share with you some quotes showing that men are waking up. I would like to share some evidence that men are wising up to women and their bullshit. Women wanted equality, so men are starting to give it to them, hehehe... :)

Referring to the headline - women now have equality. Live with it - you cannot cherry pick.

- Slippery Eel, Holt, Norfolk, 15/1/2012 9:05

Welcome to the world of equality.
- Gaz, n/e, 15/1/2012 9:10

Why should women go first? Women fought for equality, so now they should accept the consequences.
- Squire Trelawney, Land of no hope or glory, 15/1/2012 9:09

Sounds like the days of "women and children first" is long gone. - sd, uk, 15/1/2012 10:16 >>> Children - Yes Woman - No as they cry for equality so let them have it, they can't have it both ways.
- Gaz, n/e, 15/1/2012 9:13

The feminists have been crying out for equality - you got it, so stop whining!
- Triton, Berks, 15/1/2012 8:49

Notice how short, concise, and to the POINT these quotes are? Notice how, with one or two sentences, the men just lay out the obvious truth to women? Notice how women cannot understand these simple, obvious truths? Notice how women do not want to face the CONSEQUENCES of what they asked for-indeed, demanded?

Now, I have some longer, more eloquent quotes from men poking holes through women's bullshit...

Only Children and Elderly people should be given priority. Women don't deserve it as men and women are equal. Women are enjoying the same rights and opportunities as men. Women and Men are equally employed everywhere but when it comes to hard work, women most often refuse to do it and instead they ask their men colleagues to do hard jobs even though women get equal pay as men. Women are not physically weak. Women take part in extremely strenuous games like cycling, swimming, wrestling, tennis, racing etc... Everyone gets life only once. Why he should risk losing his life just for a woman ??? Do you women think men are that stupid ? Women talk about true gentlemen but what about true women ??? I have never seen any true woman in my whole life.. Is there any real woman out there? If No, so stop talking about true Gentleman.. OK..
- Mark, Canada, 16/1/2012 12:25

Pete in Sheffield - I agree partially. Children going first, yes. But women? After a century of complaints of male dominance and pleas for equal rights, women shouldn't be able to pick and choose when the feel they are vulnerable. In 2012 everyone should have got off that boat, but there is no reason at all why men should be held up for the sake of women. If we were to stick to ridiculous P.C rulings, there would be many more dead while officials ordered off passengers by vulnerability.....children first, then disabled, then anyone on medication, OAPs, women, ethnic minorities, then finally can the abled man...oh sorry too late.
- Bobby, Manchester uk, 15/1/2012 9:05

I'm not sure where to come down on this one, on a personal level i agree with the policy women and children first as that's just who i am, however, this is also an old policy, and while kids should still be first the women part is debatable as the time this view comes from is long gone. A large number of women tell us quite loudly that they no longer need protecting or looking out for or any kind of special treatment and that this is no longer chilvary but simply offensive to them, yet whenever there's a disaster etc they always moan about the brutishness of men, we just can't win against this ever growing number of warped minded women so perhaps they'd all like to get together and let us know just what they would prefer, would you still like a bit of chilvary or not? It is for men to decide when to apply it, not women, so want it or not is the only choice, likewise for equality, do you want the same jobs at the same pay, or the same pay but with concessions because you're a woman?
- Dave, Birmingham, 16/1/2012 9:08

The women first tradition is an archaic concept left over from a time when the population was small and infant mortality high. In a time when the rightful concept of women's equality has morphed into something resembling a gynocratic supremacist movement such customs appear less than necessary and the privilege of first place should be reserved for the old, disabled and children not healthy adults. I received my lifeboatmans certificate in 1971 from Gravesend sea school at the age of 14 and have done countless lifeboat drills sometimes in heavy seas, the whole thing appears to have been a complete shambles from start to finish on this particular vessel, considering land was only a few meters away there should have been no real need for anyone to even get their feet wet however on the news clips it appears the passengers had taken charge with a lot of shouting and screaming unsurprisingly most of the voices appear to be female.
- Leew, lancashire, 16/1/2012 3:06

I'm amazed in an era of supposed equality, women still have a sexist and arrogant assumption they should evacuate a sinking ship before men. Certainly children (with fathers & mothers), elderly, pregnant and disabled should get priority, but not the able-bodied generation of women who've been shrieking dementedly about equality for decades. No, you can stay behind with the men and demonstrate this much lauded concept of 'I can do anything a man can do'! You can thank feminism for that. If women are using children to get priority on the lifeboats, why should it be any different for fathers protecting their children? I noticed a number of female commenters attempting the tried and tested shame and guilt tactics, as they desperately seek to maintain the best of both worlds. Now that's shameful in itself! Women need to climb down from their self-exalted chauvinistic pedestals and start mingling with mortal men.
- Magnus Carta, The 6th EU Region, UK, 16/1/2012 9:06

"Women and children go first because they're physically weaker than men, its not sexist, just right. - Jam Sandwich, London UK">>>>>>> This isn't true in every case. I'm in my fifties but reasonably healthy/mobile, so I wouldn't expect a frail 70 y.o. man, for instance, to give up his place for me. Perhaps the priority should be "children and the old and/or infirm"? - Helen, Kent, 16/1/2012 12:11 ++++++++++++++++ Just Face it.. ok.. Women claim that men and women are equal.. Women are enjoying the same rights and opportunities as men so why women should be given priority over men ? It does not make any sense. It is totally sexist.. Women have already lost the respect and rights to be treated differently from men after claiming that they r equal to men.. In good moments, you want same rights but in bad moments you women become a lady.. Stop this hypocrisy ok ?
- Mark, Canada, 16/1/2012 8:40

Women can't say they want to be treated no differently than men and then turn around and say actually they would like to be treated like a "woman" on this occasion. The reality is there is no such thing as a "woman" any more. Women are the same as men, that is what our female teachers at school drum into boys heads all through their school years. Besides why can't women use their much fabled "Girl Power" to save themselves and their children?
- Slicer, The Devil's Manor, Hell, 16/1/2012 12:29

Equality means things like equal pay for equal work and not being prevented from gaining promotion because of one's gender ... no one seriously believes that women are physically the same, and that difference should be respected. - caroline mayor, rennes, france, 16/1/2012 15:11 ---- But that's just the problem Caroline, while in some jobs there is no difference in others there are, for example I worked for a contract cleaning company when i was younger that primarily operated in large event centres, a large part of this job was to clean the ceiling fans/duct work, all of the women refused to climb up the ladder and do it "as they were a woman" yet they all got equal pay and we all held the same job and for the life of me i can't see how a man falling 50ft is less likely to injure him than a woman falling 50ft While physical differences should be respected if they prevent someone from doing an aspect of a job they can't then demand the same pay under equality legislation
- Dave, Birmingham, 16/1/2012 10:51

Here's a good comment-from a WOMAN, no less!

Can't believe some women are moaning that men did not give priority to women. You wanted equality? Well here it is, good or bad. I'm a woman and I would not expect any man to put me first in such a situation. Why should he? If my brother or father had been on that ship and drowned, I certainly would not take comfort in knowing that he had sacrificed his life for a woman such as some of those on this board. I'd like to know how some of you have to come to hate men so much. Extremely odd, infact it is almost bordering on obsessive! Some men are very kind, you need to open your eyes. Nine times out of ten when I am crossing the road it is a man that lets me cross - many women would run you over!!
- Amy, London, 16/1/2012 8:17

Ladies, you all wanted OUT of the social contract, remember? Remember how you said that doing your womanly duties was oppressive? Remember how you said that you wanted to be LIBERATED from being accountable to men? Remember how you wanted to be freed from your DUTIES to help and serve men? Well, you got what you wanted. However, when you opted out of your end of the social contract, you also released us men from OURS...

Now, here's a short quote that provides a segue into my final point...

Just goes to show men these days have no respect for women and children.
- Martine, London UK, 15/1/2012 12:44

Well, that begs an obvious question, Martine. Why should men HAVE respect for women these days, hmmm? Why would I respect someone living the "Sex and the City" lifestyle? Why would I respect someone who engages in skanky, laddette behavior? Why would I respect someone who's main aspiration in life is to be on Girls Gone Wild? Why should I respect someone who's MURDERED their own baby? Who the hell does that?! Who, other than an evil woman (redundant?) would murder their own baby? You know that there have been over forty MILLION abortions in America since Roe v. Wade, right? Why should I respect a sex that doesn't even oppose this hideous practice? Why should I respect women again?

In closing, I like what we've seen in the Costa Concordia sinking. One, it shows that men are wising up and waking up; men are realizing that they too are humans, and therefore have just as much right to live as women do. Two, it's more proof that women want fried ice, and that they're NOT fit to vote or hold positions of authority. Finally, there's no good reason to respect women anymore-not when it was THEY who first violated the social compact that had existed between men and women for thousands of years. Ladies, you want to be released from the 'oppressive' terms of your end of the social contract? Fine, then we too can be released from our end of the social contract-which was really oppressive when you consider that we had to sacrifice our lives for your sorry asses! Thankfully, we, as men, are no longer locked into OUR end of the social contract. That is the REAL lesson of the Costa Concordia, and I think it's about damn time. Thank you, and good day now...

MarkyMark

Marriage Is Mediocrity

2012-01-22T10:45:00.003-05:00

Guys,

I was hangin' out @ Happy Bachelors, and I saw this posted. It's originally from the Don't Marry archives, and I thought that my boys would like to see it here...

-------------------

Marriage is the cradle of mediocrity.

Why Marriage is Bad for Men
By Mac Mcmann

Did you ever see a truly happily married man under the age of say sixty? I mean a real man, one that could help you move a couch, or run a software company. A real man has direction in his life, goals, ambitions; a real man takes the life given to him, and creates something that is a reflection of him. He uses all his abilities everyday, every way he can think of, and when he is done with his current task he moves on to another one. These men are rarely married, and even rarer happily married, they are the snow leopard compared to the house cat. And the reason these men are not married, is because marriage is confining, defining, and boring.

The biggest enemy to a life fulfilled is routine and boredom, ala marriage. Marriage is a trap laid early by society, misery loves company. The miserable peddle this lifestyle. Women lay the trap with lots of sex, good food, a clean bathroom, all can be yours, if you just get married, never again will you go without the gifts a woman can bring. The life seeking man recognizes those traps ahead of time. They are not the lions at the bottom of the pit with the slab of meat dangling precariously over it. They see the trap of marriage ahead of time, the trap of being snared and held up for public viewing with four walls around you.

Married men are on display, a zoo animal that does what he is told, eats when told, works when told, hell they even copulate when they are told. They try to make their little display the best of anyone they know. Look at me in my suburbia American dream, look at my house, look at my boat, and look at how my kid can pitch. Aren’t I doing great? Aren’t I?

And then there are men who do what they want, when they want. These are the men usually loathed by the domesticated men, loathed by the society at large, most of whom dwell in their cages. And then these men are later featured on 60 Minutes for what they have become when they re-write the rules of their particular endeavor. And they did it all without being bored, without being told what to do, and without being married to a woman who thinks it is her job to tame the beast, and churn out a carbon copy of the man in the next cul-de-sac.

Man can survive all sorts of tragedies and set backs in their time on Earth. But accepting boredom is accepting death. It is not greed, violence, jealousy, desire or any other trait but boredom that is the ultimate downfall of man. An unwillingness to fight boredom with the ferocity of a mother bear is acceptance of a life not worth living.

Marriage is the cradle of mediocrity and is beaten into our heads as the thing to do all our childhood. Grow up, fall in love, get a job, and then have kids. In our society marriage is the stage for child rearing. Boys don’t have real men in their home as role models. That is why boys idolize celebrities. They are starving for role models of success, of individualism, of vision and achievement, not someone who spends all day playing yes man, and then can’t even remember the hot sauce at the take out.

Unfortunately for many men they recognize the trappings, after the life of domesticity has firmly gripped their soul. Breaking away is not easy, but it is done on a frequent basis. The saddest thing to see is these men given their freedom at a huge financial cost, and then what do they do with their freedom? They go right back into another zoo, another cage, thinking it will be better with a different zoo keeper. But entrapment is entrapment, no better the quality of the trap.

Then these twice fooled creatures are seen lying to the world and to themselves saying that they are happily married. Like a trained poodle they jump through all the hoops their wife and boss put before him, after completing each trick they pant their little tongue, wag their little tail, and await the kibble for their little reward. Good doggie, good doggie, you play your cards right for the next six days, you might get some Saturday night. Or kiss up for the next seven years and you just might be Junior Executive. And all the while he holds his wife up like a trophy, his quality of entrapment defines him, as he trades up for the biggest cage.

He plays life like it is a monopoly game, go around and around and avoid landing on anything painful. He seeks comfort, safety, and sameness. And you can see it in his eyes, the boredom of a meaningless game, playing by rules he didn’t invent.

The choice is each of ours, on the one hand you have certain boredom until death, and on the other you have the unknown. Not monopoly but a pirate’s adventure, things can go wrong, there can be pain, there can be real fear, but there will never be boredom.

Unfortunately most men choose the boredom without really knowing the alternative was so obvious. Does the snow leopard want the one sure meal at the cost of his freedom, or would he rather starve in a blizzard seeking the last rabbit in his territory. The choice is yours.

-------------------

I thought that was good, so I stayed up a few minutes late to share it. Good night, and remember Fellas: stay single, happy, and free; the life you save may be your own! Until next time...

MarkyMark

A Defense of MGTOW Values, by Spock's Disciple

2012-01-21T12:06:00.001-05:00

Guys,

I was chillin' here reading Happy Bachelors before attending the motorcycle show later. As I was reading, I found this gem by Spock's Disciple...

----------------

Some of these posts from "outsiders" are respectful and therefore merit a respectful response; many of them are typical trolls throwing shaming language around, and are therefore to be banned and ignored.

The only point I have to make about those saying that the men here need to "try harder" and to "get out in the real world"; they've seen the real world, they've been burned at the stake in the real world, sometimes more then once. But these are also men who learn from their experiences, learn from their mistakes, and mistakes of others.

And these are men who've made the choice to live their lives for themselves and only themselves. They are not the property of society; they are not slaves; they are not indentured servants; they are absolutely not obligated to serve anyone, especially not today's modern "woman".

Only an idiot who puts their hand in the fire and gets burned, puts his hand in the fire again because the fools around him telling him he might not get burned twice.

MGTOWs are not losers, they're not winners, they're not players; they are men who have decided their lives are their first priority and nobody else's, especially not today's "empowered" women takes precedence over this; they are not sacrificial lambs to be used to appease a corrupt society's appetites.

Going our own way means the pathetic morals, values and ethics of this rotting society no longer apply to us.

We DO NOT choose to honor traditional roles.

We DO NOT choose to follow the script written by others for the benefit of themselves and not us.

We DO NOT choose to be victims or allow ourselves to be victimized any longer.
We are NOT bitter losers, uptight and frightened men or anything else.
We are men who have declared our independence from this illusion you call a society where our value is determined by others, we don't not allow our self image to be defined by others.

This is what is most frightening to the manginas and the white knights and the feminist trolls here is that some of the slaves have risen up, and decided they've had enough; they aren't going to play by someone else's rules any longer. We are men whose message must be discredited, suppressed and ignored; we are men who are intrinsically disruptive to their illusions of what a society should be, one where authority, whether secular or religious, must be obeyed.

This isn't about female game characters when you come down to it; it's about a man looking into his mirror in the morning after waking up and telling himself, "I am a human being; I value myself; I deserve to live with pride, and be treated with dignity." These men here have come to this realization, and they're not going back to the plantation to be good little slaves.

Self esteem, self respect, self determination...the cornerstones of Going Your Own Way. The men here know this, and don't care what the heck others think and are not looking for their approval.

-------------------

Hear, hear! Preach it, Spock! That was good stuff, stuff my readers need...

MarkyMark

Genital Warts, by Christopher in Oregon

2012-01-21T10:42:00.001-05:00

Guys,

As promised, here's Christopher in Oregon's treatise on genital warts. I must warn you though: if you've just eaten, if you are squeamish, or if you're a woman, DO NOT READ THIS! What you're about to read is graphic, but it's necessary if we men are to control our sex drives; it's necessary if we're to reclaim our power as men. Once you take sex out of the equation, women have little or no power over you-remember that. Now, on with Christopher in Oregon's examination of genital warts...

-------------------

Warning: Graphic conversation follows:

Ah, yes. The effects of an aging or weakened immune system can be profound when it comes to genital warts. They can mass in huge cauliflower like piles, and grow to gigantic proportions. Once the immune system is on the decline, all bets are off. From what I've heard and read, the smell from genital warts can be horrific. Poop and other filth gets trapped beneath the blossoming tops, and is impossible to clean.

Combine that with Herpes sores, and you've got yourself quite a mess. I can only imagine trying to treat the pain of Herpes sores that are located on massive genital warts, all the while my penis is oozing green puss.

Graphic? Disgusting?

You bet. We need more of that. Hollywood makes light of sex, and rarely mentions the downside- STDs. If they do, it's a vague reference to something that requires a shot of penicillin.

The days of penicillin are OVER, boys! The stuff that's out there is NOT cured by any medicine, and not prevented by condoms! Women today are FILTHY, as are, sadly, most men.

If you would be clean, if you would be healthy, if you would be wise, then renounce all sexuality! I admit I was deceived in recent years, and thought I could engage in the use of pornography.

WRONG!

ALL sex leads to physical decay. Do you really want to lie in bed some day as an old men with twenty pounds of quivering warts dangling from your groin like some beast from "The Blob"? Maybe it will grow eyes and stare back at you.....?

It isn't good enough to stay single. It isn't good enough to not date. If a man would be strong, if a man would be wise, he must clear his mind of lust. Stop viewing porn. Stop watching ANY modern films or television shows.

STOP LISTENING TO ANY MODERN MUSIC, which seeks to enslave you with filthy lyrics and that filthy "beat"!

I listen to four to eight hours of classical music a day, sometimes more. It purifies the mind and soul.

To be free from the evils of lust, to be free from God's judgment of STDs, you had better man up, and renounce sex in all of its forms.

There is no room for error these days! If you screw, you will GET screwed.

I remember the first time I heard about genital warts. I had gone to the Oregon State University Medical School bookstore, and bought some hideously expensive books on STDs. I was young. I was horny. But, I was still religious. I wanted to get laid. But, something was holding me back.

My parents warned me about women. They warned me about diseases, yet what did my parents know about HPV or Herpes? Nothing. Nor did I. I just knew that sex carried the risk of the STDs that were present back when my parents were young. Little did I suspect that the landscape had changed dramatically. New bugs abounded, like HIV, HPV, HSV and HCV.

So, I cracked open the books. I purchased more books. What was this new thing called Herpes? I mean I had HEARD of it, but it wasn't something that I really thought about.

Then I saw them.

Warts. Big, juicy, oozing warts.

Crap. I remember the first time I looked at a picture of a homosexual man whose crotch was covered by a mass -a literal MASS- of genital warts. It looked like a Broccoli patch. Flowering all over the place. I was both mesmerized and horrified. I'd never seen anything like it in my life. My eyes were frozen to the page. The warts were just everywhere!

Then I read. And read.

I came to one conclusion right away: I would never engage in sexual intercourse again as long as I lived. (I had only tried it once when I was 21 with a Mormon woman) Something in me triggered a defensive mechanism of sorts. (Sort of like what happens when you are out in the forest and you see 1200 pounds of angry grizzly bear barreling towards your sorry ass. You climb a tree and hope for the best)

I knew I didn't have all of the answers, but in spite of my lust and constant erections, I knew I didn't want THAT sort of thing obscuring the view I had of my tallywacker. I tend to be fairly pragmatic. I could see the downfall associated with trying to yank off bloody chunks of warts from my crotch. I mean, how else do you get rid of them? Ah, the silliness of youth.

Then, I started studying the various methods doctors use to get rid of genital warts.

YIKES!!!!!!!!

If I was still in doubt about my celibacy, the treatments for genital warts convinced me. If you don't know, read about it. It's horrifyingly painful. Warts come back, then they come back again. And again. And again. And....you get the point.

There is something in me that is utterly revolted by any kind of wart. I don't shake hands with people. I keep my distance. But warts on my Willy? Whoda thunk it.

Disgusting.

Did you know you can get cancer of the penis? Do you know what a PENECTOMY is?

Say it slow. P-E-N-E-C-T-O-M-Y.

What's THAT, you say? Well, the anesthesiologist knocks you out, and they slice off all or part of your penis.

WHAAT!?

Yep, penectomy. Keep that word in mind. You can get cancer of the penis from......women. Or, gay men if you prefer.

We've all heard of genital warts. Nasty, slimy, ugly things that march across the landscape of your privates like an invading army. But, the Human Papilloma Virus that causes Genital Warts has something even better in store for you.

Cancer.

Yes, cancer. Many, possibly most strains of HPV are linked with cancer. Cancer of the penis is almost always associated with sexually-transmitted HPV infection. Treatment is painful. Sometimes they get it early, and traditional methods will stop the progression. Sometimes they only have to cut out small pieces of your penis. Kinda looks like Swiss cheese afterwards, but what the heck, it's still there. Sort of.

But what if they don't get to it in time? Well, there's the rub. Well, actually there won't be any more rubbing. Sometimes they cut off an inch or two. Sometimes three or four. Sometimes more. Bet you're wishing you had a twelve inch penis about now....?

Sometimes you lose the whole thing, and you have to pee just like a woman. Sitting down. There's nothing left. You are no longer a real man. Your penis is gone. The stuff of nightmares. This is worse than losing your testicles. (You can lose THOSE, too.)

Say it again: Penectomy. Kind of rolls off the tongue.

Speaking of tongues, you might lose THAT, too. What? Oh, yes. Most cancers of the mouth and adjoining areas are now being linked to HPV. A small price to pay for pleasuring your girlfriend orally, right? I mean, who really needs a tongue? How about your throat? Now, that maybe a problem. Kind of like to swallow food. And breathe.

Now, I don't know about you, but I like my body. Granted, it's not as young as it once was. I can't get erections as easily as I used to, and sometimes not at all. But it's THERE. Dangling at half mast, but it's still MINE. All mine. It's not lying in a garbage can in the operating room waiting to be thrown out with the other medical waste.

So, think long and hard boys. Whether you are Christian, Jewish, Deist or whatever. I have come to the inescapable conclusion that there IS a God, and He does NOT wanting people perverting His system of procreation. I do believe He has a temper, as well as a slightly warped sense of humor.

The cost of sex is simply too high these days. Keep it in your pants.

Christopher in Oregon

-------------------

I know that that was jolting stuff, but it's a good jolt. It's the kind of jolt that wakes you up; it's the kind of jolt to give you a reminder to not do ANYTHING stupid-like have sex with a modern, American skank, er woman. Thank you Christopher for your warning to us all. Until next time...

MarkyMark

Rob Fedders on Women

2012-01-20T23:01:00.003-05:00

Guys,

I was reading some comments to a Dr. Helen post, and there was this GEM of a comment by Rob Fedders. In it, he gives us the lowdown on male/female interactions and relationships. He takes the contents of entire books, and distills their essential message to a few paragraphs. Thank you, Mr. Fedders! This is good stuff...

------------------

Very few women are capable of empathizing with men. There are about as many women who have the ability to empathize with men as there are children capable of empathizing with adults.

This is what most men fail to grasp, and why they go round and round in circles trying to "explain things" to women.

Women just don't care. We are here for their purposes, not ours.

"Women have no sympathy... And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving you any in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so." -- Florence Nightingale

Esther Villar says about the same thing, over and over again, in her book "The Manipulated Man."

What men don't "get" is that we (men) are a "business" to women. The attention women can get from men is their survival tactic. It does not mesh with the male survival drive, which is "go get" or "go create." Sadly, we men have a hard time understanding that women rarely have the same desires as we do.

That is why women ALWAYS marry up-always! Since we're a 'business' for women, marrying down wouldn't make sense as an economic or business model.

Women are designed by nature to look "yummy" to us so that we will give of ourselves to women. This is nature. It is not nature for it to occur the other way around.

I remember Christopher from Oregon making the same point. He said that Nature would make women look beautiful, so that we'd breed with them; it's all about Nature getting us to breed-end of story. It's Nature's way of getting us to do something against our best interest-committing to a woman long term.

It works the same way as with women and children. Children will rarely care for the mother the way that the mother will care for the child. Children are not designed to empathize with mothers in the same way that mothers are designed to empathize with their children.

Women will never "care" about men in the same way that men "care" about the wellbeing of women.

We are both designed this way by nature. It has always been women who have walked out on men more than the other way around... it has always been women that have been more opposed to adultery laws than men... the 10% of children are the result of cuckolding is supposedly a fairly consistent stat over time/history/populations.

We are designed like this by nature, and men who are sitting around and waiting for women to smarten up and show men the proper amount of empathy/sympathy are being no more intelligent than a mother sitting down and crossing her arms until her children show a reciprocal amount of empathy for her... both will be sitting there for a looooong time.

You can even see how this works with the way that men and women buy family vehicles. The wife and kids are always put in the best vehicle/mini-van/SUV as possible to "protect them" etc. etc. while the husband drives the run-down piece of crap to work... when the time comes that the husband gets a second vehicle you can usually hear the wife chirping in, "We had to get Joe a new truck... because the last one wasn't safe and we don't know what we would do if something happened to him.

That's the way it has always been and the way it will likely always be. Men are a tool to women... a "business." And to successfully work that business, they must always appear in the needy/attention category. Babies who don't cry don't get milk... and women who don't get attention don't get taken care of by men. It is an innate feature of humans.

Women do control society's values and mores... they lead with what they think is fashionable, and men follow, because by nature we are designed to give women what they want.

Women "are" society. What women's wants are is what society's want's are. This is where women are lying when they talk about the dreaded "patriarchy." The patriarchy only existed because women explicitly approved of it, and endorsed it morally - causing the men to follow suit.

This is what is happening today too. Most of the anti-feminist battle is not going to be between men and women... it is going to be between women who want a "traditional man" and those who want a collective "government husband." In both cases, the women are advocating for men to take care of women - with little concern for the man's wants and needs - one wants a personal slave to serve her & her offspring, while the other wants a slave class to serve women and their offspring in general.

It's the way human beings are designed. Who cares whether women rule, or if they rule the rulers? The result is the same.

It's not going to change.

These are the types of factors that have to be taken into account every time someone starts advocating for "change" or even worse, "equality." (GAK!)

-----------------

Good stuff, wouldn't you agree? If we wait for women to empathize with us Fellas, we'll be waiting a LONG, long time! Here's a better idea: GYOW, and live life the way YOU want to, not as some woman's tool. Have a good day now...

MarkyMark

Genital Herpes, by Christopher in Oregon

2012-01-20T16:16:00.002-05:00

Guys,

When I got home from work today, I had a few comments awaiting me. One of them was this gem from Christopher in Oregon. It's about genital herpes, and I have to tell you, it's a motivator for staying celibate! Though I messed around some back in the day, it's been over two decades since I had sex. Luckily, STDs weren't as prevalent back then; I didn't catch anything, thank goodness. Having said that, it's only by the grace of God that I didn't knock someone up or catch something nasty. After reading something like this, I'm not sure I EVER want to have sex again! THIS is what you're risking if you have sex with an American woman...

-------------------

A while back a male friend of mine, who has Genital Herpes, was quite open about his suffering with this nasty, nasty disease. He was having a particularly painful outbreak, and told me just what it was like.

His outbreaks are usually about every 60-90 days, and they are nightmarishly painful. In the summer time, they can come every couple of weeks- one after another. He said that for the first few days during an outbreak, it feels like acid is being poured on his genitals. He can't sleep for days when he has an outbreak, and showering becomes an exercise in terror. There is no relief. Searing pain 24/7.

He gets outbreaks that appear anywhere on his scrotum, as well as penis. Many times it has extended to his buttocks, and sitting becomes an impossibility. Things like going to the toilet become all but impossible. He used to get constipated because of his inability to sit on the toilet, until he figured out if he just stood above the toilet and practiced being a dive bomber, he could go. Initially, his aim was often not accurate....

Sometimes he has herpes sores up his urethra, and once even inside his rectum. Too much exposure to sunlight triggers the worst outbreaks, so he dreads summer.

He spends hundreds of dollars on Valtrex most months, and has spent a small fortune on alternative treatments, with negligible results.

Every single thing he does during an outbreak is impacted by Herpes. The pain is so overwhelming, that it affects his career. He has no romantic life, because he feels like a leper. He's been snubbed too many times when he's been honest, and he refuses to lie to someone in order to get laid.

All because he slept with a woman who knew about her infection, but lied to him.

MOST women will contract Genital Herpes at some point. They are more than TWICE as likely to have herpes as men. Is this what you REALLY want to do to yourself? Is sex REALLY worth it? Do you really want to have to look at your tallywacker while it looks like a piece of raw ground beef?

Ick.

I think not.

Women aren't worth it. Pussy isn't worth it.

It's just a dirty, smelly, disease-riddled hole. That's it.

I thank God regularly for instilling in me a sense of morality that kept me from sleeping around and contracting such a disease.

I asked him one time if he had it to do all over again, would he remain celibate like I did? He said no. Unbelievable. In spite of what he's gone through, he still thinks it was worth it just to have sex. Unfuckingbelievable.

Keep it in mind.

Next week: Genital Warts

Christopher in Oregon

-------------------

What I found INCREDIBLE was that the guy would still have sex after what happened to him! Why would a guy do something like that, especially after it caused him so much pain?! Why would he do that? Try as I might, I cannot wrap my arms around that one. Anyway, to my boys reading this, stay single, celibate, happy, and free! Many American women are carrying nasty diseases such as Herpes. Is getting your rocks of worth it, Fellas? Until next time...

MarkyMark

Oops, That Was NO Accident

2012-01-20T14:52:00.000-05:00

Guys,

As I reconstruct the blog, there are certain posts that need to be front & center; there are certain posts that cannot wait to be reposted. This is one of those posts. This is MUST READ material for my boys! You must know the evil and duplicity of which women are capable; you must know that they'll have no problems justifying their evil, either.

I don't hate women, nor do I think that all of them are evil. That said, I can't blame guys who think that-not when this sort of thing is commonplace. I can't blame guys for thinking the worst about women when women pull this sort of crap, then justify it nine ways to Sunday; these gals think that what they want is all that matters, and if it takes 'a little nudge', then so be it. As usual, I'll intersperse my commentary throughout the piece. As always, here's a link to the original piece.

---------------------------

THAT WAS NO "ACCIDENT"
You two were careful, but somehow she got pregnant. It happens. Or not... Getting tricked into fatherhood by a woman hell-bent on getting pregnant is much more common than you think.

Imagine for a moment this perfectly plausible scenario: You've had a steady girlfriend for a year or so and everything's going great. You still hold hands at the movies. Friends tell you you're good together. You're both around 30 years old and making plenty of money, maybe living together, but you're nowhere near considering fatherhood. And though you occasionally get the feeling that her biological clock is set far ahead of yours, she tells you she's "safe," so you don't worry. Why would you? It's not as if you'd just picked her up on Dollar Margarita Night at Señor Frog's. But one morning she tells you something has gone wrong. Unlikely as it sounds, she's pregnant-and she wants to keep it. What she doesn't tell you, though, is this: She wasn't being safe all along. She wanted to have that baby— and the way she saw it, this was the only way to make it happen.

Something HAS gone wrong-for you, pal! I hate to say it, but there is WISDOM in God's commandments against sex prior to marriage. Since men have no rights in these matters, the ONLY way to retain your autonomy is to KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS! The only 100% effective contraceptive is abstention-that's it! The only other 100% effective means of preventing pregnancy is to get snipped...

Here's how a scenario like that played out in real life. Jody (not her real name), a 32-year-old account manager for a major New York ad firm, decided to speed things along with her boyfriend two years ago by getting pregnant without telling him. "It's not about trapping the guy," Jody says. "That's kind of old-fashioned. Yeah, you want him to be into it, but there are other ways to get a guy to commit. If you're smart and in a good relationship, it's just about the fact that you want a kid." Even in her circle of young, urban, and gainfully employed friends, Jody says, this particular brand of subterfuge isn't exactly condemned the way one might expect. In fact, it's sort of, well, normal. "I see and hear people talk about it, and I understand. I get it," she says, "and I don't even think it's that manipulative. It's more like, 'Hey, the timing is right for me. I got pregnant—oops! Well, it's here, let's have it.' I think that's more the way it is now than it was back in the day when you had to marry someone before you got pregnant. Marriage doesn't matter now."

Jody, if it's not about trapping a guy, then what IS it about, hmmm? If having an intentional 'oopsie' doesn't qualify as trapping a guy, then it's one HELL of an imitation! The name of the concept eludes me, but there is a legal concept which states that calling something by a different name does NOT change what it is. That applies here. You can call it what you want, but I call it trapping a guy.

The same goes for manipulation. The word, 'manipulate', means to manage or influence, ESPECIALLY in an unfair manner. You can go to this page on Dictionary.com, and see for yourself. So Jody, you don't think that an 'oopsie' isn't manipulative, huh? Let me ask you a question: would your man, sans your deceptive, dastardly action, would marry you or stick around? You ARE influencing your man to do something that he otherwise wouldn't do; if he WOULD commit to you, if he would marry you, if he would be a daddy on his own, then let me ask you a question, Darlin': why, pray tell me, did you have to resort to trickery to accomplish this, hmmm? I know, and I rest my case! Just because you choose to call it something else does NOT change what it is.

What I find especially offensive is how she doesn't even BRING UP any mention of what he wants; it's as if what your man wants doesn't matter. Witness her wording. "Hey, the timing is right for ME (emphasis mine)". Or, let me quote this gem from earlier in the paragraph: "...it's just about the fact that you want a kid." YOU want a kid, not him! Who do you think you are dictating what someone else can do, hmmm?

Railroading a guy into parenthood isn't just some "baby daddy" soap-opera scenario. You'll never hear the ladies'-room chatter that leads people like Jody to feel justified, but to get some idea of it, consider this: A woman's fertility peaks when she's between the ages of 20 and 24, according to Mayo Clinic statistics. By the time she's 35 to 39, it's already wilted by 25 to 50 percent. And from there the options aren't always so attractive: The average cost of in vitro fertilization in the United States is $100,000 per baby—and insurance generally won't pay a cent. Combine that with the shifting social mores about single motherhood and having kids outside of marriage, and you've got a pretty good explanation for why some women, particularly ones in stable relationships, don't see this as trickery at all—it's more like a nudge.

An oopsie is one HELL of a nudge! More like walking the plank, if you ask me...

"A lot of us feel like it's not even really fair that men should get to vote, considering they could be 72 and, with a little Viagra, have another baby," says Vicki Iovine, author of The Girlfriends' Guide to Pregnancy. "For us women, it's really a limited window. We know that boys who grow up to become men don't necessarily want to be men. They like to be boys. And so women say, 'You know what? He's gonna just have to snap out of it—and my pregnancy will be the thing to do it.'" The end, says Iovine, sometimes justifies the means. "Any guy with a heart and soul, and preferably with a job, once he sees the baby on the sonogram or hears the heartbeat, will melt," she says.

Yeah, but we men get to PAY for any babies though, huh, Vicki? If we can't have a vote on what happens to the child, then we shouldn't have to pay for it, either. You cannot have rights without responsibilities, nor can you have responsibilities without rights. They're hand and glove; they're two sides of the same coin; you cannot have one without the other-end of story. BTW, you're a strong, independent, empowered woman; you don't NEED no stinkin' man, nor do you need his money-except when it's divorce time...

And who the HELL do you think you are, Vicki, passing judgment on whether we're 'grown up' enough for your tastes? How DARE you say that you'll just have to force us snap out of it-how dare you, you bitch! You can call it what you will, but that's imposing your will on someone else. Yeah, you read that right; you're IMPOSING YOUR WILL on someone else!

It doesn't matter what HE thinks; it doesn't matter what he wants; it doesn't matter what his wishes are in the matter. You want a child, so you're going to have one. You're going to do WHAT you want, WHEN you want, HOW you want, and the HELL with anyone else! You know what I call that? I call it immature; I call it selfish; I can call it many things, but 'grown up' is not one of them, Darlin'...

Oh, and one more thing: why don't you gals have babies WITHIN that limited window of yours, hmmm? Why do you go to school, pursue a career, and bang a boatload of bad boys until your 30s? Why do you wait until AFTER your window is closing fast before you decide to have a child, hmmm?

Yes, you gals have a limited window; it's nice to see you admit the obvious, and acknowledge reality. It's about damn time! But, I have to ask you a few questions now. One, who compelled you to wait till AFTER your fertility peaked? Why didn't you go about finding and marrying a man who wanted children while you were in your 20s? Why did you wait till 30 or later before you realized that you wanted a child, hmmm? Whose fault is it that YOU waited till 30 or beyond to have children, Vicki? Finally, what gives you the right to FORCE someone to be a father? What gives YOU the right to do this, when it was YOUR FAULT for waiting too long in the first place?! Sheesh, you're freakin' unbelievable...

Just how many women act on that presumption is hard to say. According to FDA figures, one in a thousand of them should get pregnant over the course of a year if they're using the Pill exactly as prescribed. But it is estimated that in reality 50 times that many get pregnant. There's no way of knowing how much of that disparity can be explained away by "intentional" oversight, but that's a big gap to chalk up to carelessness. And though there was a time when flushing the Pill down the toilet was fodder for Jerry Springer, the rules have changed. "I've been hearing a lot about this lately, and it's coming into the educated and wealthy classes, too," says Pepper Schwartz, a relationships expert for Perfectmatch.com and professor of sociology at the University of Washington in Seattle (she does not support the practice). "These women can afford to take care of the child."

Yes, fifty times MORE women getting pregnant while on the Pill would seem to qualify as premeditated, willful, DELIBERATE deception on the part of the women in question.

Oh, and just because a selfish career bitch can AFFORD to take care of a child doesn't mean that she should. Children of single mothers comprise an OVERWHELMING majority of criminals and prisoners. That's real nice-condemning your child to a life of penal servitude all because YOU wanted to have a kid. It's ALL about you, isn't it Sweet Pee?

Many of them will probably have to. We don't hear about the cases in which a guy suspects he's been duped into fatherhood- but ultimately turns to mush in the soft glow of the sonogram monitor. But as cavalier as certain women are about the "nudge," not all men react so favorably when the "good news" is delivered—especially if they find out they've been snowed. Jody's boyfriend more or less freaked out. She terminated the pregnancy, then their relationship slowly dissolved. "It felt a little like the fun was taken out of everything," she says. "He was shocked and scared."

Man, I don't even know WHAT to say in response to this clueless drivel. Your man was shocked & scared, huh? And your relationship slowly dissolved, huh? What a surprise! I'd be pissed too if I were lied to. I don't care what the lie is about; if I've been lied to, I am upset-especially if it cost me dearly.

Last year, Matt Dubay, a 25-year-old computer programmer in Saginaw, Michigan, says he had the same reaction when his girlfriend, Lauren Wells, allegedly pulled something similar. Dubay claims she told him she was infertile and was using a contraceptive "as an extra layer of assurance and protection." But when she got pregnant anyway and told Dubay she was keeping the baby, he said he wanted no part of it. Earlier this year, he argued in court that her alleged deception should exempt him from having to pay child support. His lawyer, Jeffrey Cojocar, reasoned that Michigan's paternity law violated the Constitution's equal-protection clause: If the situation were reversed and Dubay had gotten Wells pregnant after claiming he was sterile, he'd have no way of forcing her either to keep or to abort the child. The judge didn't buy his argument, but it's helped open a broadening national dialogue: Where do you draw the line between deadbeat dad and victim of deceit?

The judge didn't buy his argument because he is PART of the Gynocracy. Men don't have rights, and that judge was seeing to it that this despicable practice continued.

Where do I draw the line between deadbeat dad and deceit? Let's look at what Dictionary.com has for a definition for the word, deceit: the act or practice of deceiving; concealment or distortion of the truth for the purpose of misleading; duplicity; fraud; cheating: Once she exposed their deceit, no one ever trusted them again. What did his then girlfriend, Lauren Wells do? She told him that: 1) she was infertile; and 2) was using a contraceptive as an extra layer of protection. If that were true, then HOW did she end up pregnant? She ended up pregnant because she WAS fertile, and she was NOT using protection-totally opposite of what she said. I'd say that Mr. Dubay's situation qualified as deceit, wouldn't you? Her actions seem to conform to the definition of the word...

"This case has actually been more of a movement," Cojocar says. "I probably got four or five hundred e-mails—many of them from females." The women Cojocar says he was hearing from were angry because their significant others were supporting exes who they suspected had pulled a sneak pregnancy. Cojocar is appealing the case to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. In the meantime, Dubay is paying $500 a month in child support.

The case has become a cause célèbre for the National Center for Men (NCM), a men's-rights advocacy group that counsels people like Dubay through its website, www.nationalcenterformen.org—so much so that the organization's picking up the tab for his court costs. It's even trademarked the case: "Roe vs. Wade . . . for Men."

"Matt is asking for the reproductive choice he would have had if he were 'Mattilda,'" the website says. The NCM doesn't have much contact with men who acquiesce to their role as new fathers. The guys who come to the organization see their situations as deception in its purest form.

"A lot of these men feel like they have no control," says Mel Feit, the NCM's executive director. "The courts are ruthless in enforcing getting money and not asking questions. Judges aren't allowing the fraud argument, either."

Mel, a lot of those men feel like they have no control because they truly do NOT have any control or rights when it comes to paternity fraud.

As for the courts, they are about anything and everything BUT justice! They don't care if they go after the wrong man for child support; they don't care if a man is innocent. All they care about is recovering money for the state's welfare program-that's it! Thanks to the welfare reform act that the Republicans passed back in the 1990s, a woman HAS to name the father of her child in order to collect welfare benefits. The state, with its ravenous appetite for money, will go after a man for the money. Sometimes, they get the right man; sometimes they don't. In either case, they don't care; all they care about is getting more money in their coffers...

The NCM actually offers the "Reproductive Rights Affidavit" (think of it as the sexual equivalent of a living will), which challenges "any court order that seeks to impose a parental obligation upon me against my will." Unfortunately for Jeremy, a 35-year-old technical consultant and musician in New York, the affidavit doesn't provide a legal cover for now. He thought he'd found himself a nice girl. He had just split with his longtime fiancée but explains that this new woman was saying all the right things—even when it came to practical matters. She was on the Pill. She was pro-choice. So she and Jeremy (who's using a fake name) enjoyed a couple of months of unprotected intimacy.

Ah, you let your guard down-bad move, my friend! Especially when it comes to women. Furthermore, you're a DUMB ASS for having sex with a woman in her 30s-a real dumb ass! Women in their 30s often have a serious case of 'baby rabies'; they realize that their window of fertility is closing fast, and they want to have a kid before it closes. You're especially dumb for having UNPROTECTED SEX with this woman-dumb ass X2.

Then things got weird. She mysteriously quit drinking. She disappeared for days at a time. She told him she was considering going off birth control, though she assured him she hadn't yet. By July, Jeremy had had enough and broke things off. Then in August, he says, she told him she was pregnant and was keeping it. "She was pregnant all of May, all of June, and all of July," Jeremy says. "I said, 'Why didn't you tell me about this sooner?' She's like, 'I didn't want you to influence my decision.' Something that has potential impact on me for the rest of my life, she doesn't want me influencing her decision!?"

Dude, it was ALL ABOUT HER-all about her! It was all about what SHE wanted. It was all about HER desires. She didn't want you reminding her that her actions impacted another human being; she wanted what she wanted, and that was that. The fact that this would impact you for the rest of her life didn't matter to her.

More than a year and $6,500 in legal fees later, Jeremy has a 7-month-old boy he's never met, a child-support case pending, and a judge who's less than sympathetic toward his allegations of contraceptive deceit. Even his own attorney told him he'd better ditch that dream of becoming a full-time musician and focus on the computer gig that he'd hoped would only supplement his income: "She was like, 'You know what? You gotta be a man. You're gonna have to have a job 40 hours a week, and you need to support this child—this is your responsibility and your obligation.' And I'm thinking to myself, like, 'How is all of this my responsibility and my obligation when none of this was my choice?'"

It's your responsibility because The Gynocracy has SAID it's your responsibility, pal! Oh, and burn this into your mind: you have NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER when it comes to marriage, divorce, or paternity issues-none!

And what about this woman growing up and being a WOMAN, hmmm? What about being honest with your man? What about talking to him about your desire to have a child? Why weren't you HONEST about your contraceptive use? What about growing up, finding a WILLING man, marrying him, and giving that child TWO PARENTS, huh? Yeah, what you did was REAL grown up-not! Because you wanted a child come hell or high water, you're willing to CONDEMN that child to underclass status just to satisfy YOUR desires; you want a child, so you're going to HAVE one, Bless God! The fact that you're condemning the poor kid to underclass status doesn't matter to you; all that matters is that you got your kid. That's real grown up if you ask me. That's REALLY mature-not...

The ONLY way for a man to protect himself is to REFRAIN FROM HAVING SEX WITH A WOMAN. If she does say that you got her pregnant, insist on a DNA test! Please, please, please insist on a DNA test before you sign ANY paternity papers! Why? Because, depending on whose numbers you believe, between 10% and 30% of putative fathers are not the BIOLOGICAL father of the child in question! IOW, if a woman points the finger and says that YOU knocked her up, there's a 10%-30% chance that someone ELSE is the father. Once you sign those papers, you're screwed; it doesn't matter if you get a DNA test after the fact, either. Once you sign the papers saying that you're the daddy, then you're on the hook for the next 20 years; the courts WILL force you to pay for that child, even though it's not yours.

In closing, do not have premarital sex. Not only is abstention the only 100% effective contraceptive; abstention will keep you from catching diseases, and there's a very good chance your beloved is carrying one or more STDs-just something to think about. If you insist on having sex, ALWAYS USE PROTECTION; once you're done with it, YOU make sure you dispose of it somewhere where your beloved can't get to it; otherwise, she could get your used condom, and use your genetic materials to IMPREGNATE HERSELF! Don't laugh; it's happened, and that poor SOB was on the hook for it. If you don't like using protection, then get a vasectomy; get snipped, so you cannot leave your genetic materials in someone. Sorry, but that's the way it is. Since most American women are dishonest about contraceptive use, and since most American women are diseased whores carrying host of STDs, I think abstaining from sex is your only hope of staying single and free. Thank you, and good night...

MarkyMark

It's 'Different' When a Woman Does It!

2012-01-20T12:31:00.005-05:00

Guys,

Here's yet another double standard women practice; here's yet another example of female hypocrisy: female sex tourism. Female sex tourism shows other things about women too, things I'll discuss in this article.

---------------

Women who travel for sex: Sun, sea and gigolos

The men are young, gorgeous and up for it. No wonder Western women see a Third World holiday as the gateway to casual sex - sometimes in exchange for cash. But as a new film highlights female sex tourism, Liz Hoggard asks who really pays the price

Sunday, 9 July 2006

An attractive woman sips a cocktail under a bamboo shade. The sand is dazzlingly white, the sea aquamarine. A handsome young man approaches her and showers her with compliments: she is the most beautiful woman he has ever seen, he says. For the first time in years, she truly believes she is desirable.

But this holiday romance is not all it seems. The woman is white, in her late 50s; the man, black, 18 - and paid for his attentions. The scene - from the controversial new French film, Heading South, which opened this weekend, starring Charlotte Rampling, makes us confront uncomfortable truths about sexuality in a globalised world, and the legacy of colonialism.

If this whore is in her late 50s, then she's WELL past her expiration date! Sorry, but any woman in her late 50s is NOT attractive-not in the conventional sense anyway. She may look good for her age, but she's not going to give me or any other straight guy an instant erection. That's the test of a woman's attractiveness: does she give a guy an immediate, primal boner? If not, then she's NOT attractive-end of story.

In the film, an intelligent, provocative take on sex tourism in the late-1970s, Rampling plays Ellen, an American professor, who spends every summer at a private resort in Haiti, where beautiful, muscled black boys are available to the female clientele, mostly affluent single women in their forties, who despair of finding mates through more conventional means. "More than sex, they are seeking a tenderness that the world is refusing them," the film's director, Laurence Cantet, explains.

Why is the world refusing these damsels' tenderness, hmmm? What do we know about these damsels? One, we know that they're toxic, feminist, man hating career bitches from the West. Two, we know that they're in their 40s and 50s. Three, we know that either these women rode the cock carousel when they were younger; or they were married to decent men and got bored during their marriage. Why would any decent, thinking man want to be with toxic women such as these? Can anyone answer that?

Fast-forward 30 years, and the reality of sex tourism is anything but tender. Today beach resorts in developing countries such as Kuta in Bali, Negril in Jamaica and Boca Chica and Sosua in the Dominican Republic have become Third World pick-up spots for women tourists. Tour companies even market package deals as sex holidays for single and unaccompanied women. Forget Shirley Valentine, these women - who range from grandmothers to teens - don't want a long-term relationship. And there's plenty of live flesh on sale.

This is revealing. If men engage in sex tourism, then it's disgusting, perverted, sick, creepy, etc. Ever see what women say about men who vacation in Thailand? Ah, but when women do it, it's all right. Not only that, it's empowering and uplifiting for the women who do it. The above paragraph says that tour companies even MARKET sex tours to women! Could you imagine the outcry if there were tour companies marketing sex tours to men?

Take Jamaica, where 17 per cent of the population lives below the poverty line. Hustling on the beach is the only way that some young men can feed themselves and their families. No wonder they choose older women who pay better than younger ones. In Negril, the men can earn $100 (£60) for sex with a female tourist, £90 for oral sex, which Jamaican men usually regard as taboo. Many others are hired as a guide to the island and throw in sexual services, often just for as meal or a place to sleep.

And Jamaica is a TOTAL matriarchy-total matriarchy! Women have their precious autonomy; they don't need men; they are indeed superior to them, but at what cost? They cannot go out at night at all, because it's too dangerous. For example, if women want to see a movie or play, then they have to: 1) do so during the day and return home before dark; 2) go with a group of their fellow sisters. Patriarchy=prosperity and civilization, whereas matriarchy=misery, poverty, and anarchy. It's always been that way, and it always will be that way.

The definition of a sex tourist is an adult who travels in order to have legal consensual sexual relations with another adult, often for the exchange of money or presents. We still assume that a sex tourist will be male - indeed many regard the relationship between beach boy and female tourist as harmless fun. The woman gets guilt-free sex while keeping a firm hold on the purse strings. Where's the harm?

Here's proof positive of what I was talking about above. With women, sex tourism is 'harmless fun'. With men, it's sick, perverted, creepy, and disgusting. Note how the article subtly promotes this double standard. They say, "We still assume that a sex tourist will be male..."

Jane, 67, a divorcee, has spent the past 10 years holidaying in West Africa. She loves the climate and the people - and she especially loves the men. "They are so wonderfully flattering. They make you feel like a real woman. I don't mind paying for their drinks and meals if they stay the night." Divorced, with two grown-up sons, she explains, "White men my own age are so set in their ways; they just want another wife."

Uh, Jane, the African men make you feel good for one reason, and one reason only: money and gifts. That's it! If you weren't willing to offer those things to them, you can bet your bippy that they wouldn't stick around. I'm 49, and even I don't find 67 y/o women attractive-ick! You're just a shriveled up, old crone with the skin of a prune-if you look THAT good...

As for white men your age wanting wives, oh please. Can anyone say wishful thinking?!

Are men your own age set in their ways? Yes, they are. They're set in their ways for wanting kind women who can be decent, faithful, COMMITTED companions-duh! They want everything that you're not, everything your divorce shows us.

For others, this is exploitation pure and simple. Even where no money is exchanged, this sort of behaviour destabilises local communities and families. Ignorance and lack of concern about the abject poverty and lack of choice that characterises the men's lives leads the women to romanticise their actions. It is true that women sex tourists are still outnumbered by the legions of men who travel to Thailand and the Philippines for sex with prostitutes. Charities such as Amnesty and Unicef have no official policy on female sex tourism, preferring to focus on protecting trafficked women and children. Chris Beddoe, director of Ecpat UK, the children's rights organisation that campaigns against child sex tourism, believes: "If both adult partners are open and honest about what they're getting out of it, that's one thing. But it's another thing to continue the fantasy when there's a denial of the power that money brings to that relationship that creates a culture of dependency and exploitation.'

Ah, but don't tell our wonderful Western women that! Don't tell them that they're doing wrong. Don't you know that our wonderful, divine 'goddesses' can do no wrong? Okay, sarcasm is off.

Nirpal Dhaliwal, author of the recent novel, Tourism (which satirises older white women turned on by young brown flesh), takes a tougher view. "Women enjoy casual sex and prostitution, too, but with far more hypocrisy. They help themselves to men in the developing world, kidding themselves that it's a 'holiday romance' that has nothing to do with the money they spend. Go to any Jamaican beach and you'll find handsome 'rent-a-dreads', who get by servicing Western women - lots from Britain. I've seen similar things in Goa."

That's not a tougher view; it's a fairer, more unbiased view.

Next month a new play, Sugar Mummies, about the pleasures and perils of sex tourism opens at London's Royal Court Theatre. Set in the Jamaican beach resort of Negril, it centres on a group of British and American women, seeking sun sea, sand ... and uninhibited sex with a handsome stranger. Sexually frank and often very funny, the play doesn't pull its punches. The playwright, Tanika Gupta, travelled to Jamaica to research the subject first-hand, and says she was shocked to find how female tourists objectify the black male body. "A lot of women talk about how 'big' black men are and how they can go all night. It becomes such a myth that even the men now use it. There is this terrible mutual delusion going on. And you do find yourself thinking, 'We're not a million miles from slavery.'" The older female tourists even confided to Gupta that although Jamaica was lovely and laid-back, the Dominican Republic and Cuba were "dirt cheap". "You can go as young as you want in Cuba," one woman boasted.

You know what I think? I think that Miss Gupta, no doubt a Westernized (read feminist) woman of Indian descent, was shocked that her fellow 'goddesses' could be so perverted and so debauched. Waaaaahhhh-only MEN are that way! Women are pure, sweet, divine, angelic goddesses who wouldn't do that-waaaaaaahhhhh!

You know what else the above paragraph shows? It shows a couple of things, actually. One, it shows that women can be just as primal as men are on their sex tourist vacations. Two, it also shows the double standard WRT male and female sex tourists. Can you imagine the OUTCRY that would result if men were to talk about another, cheaper locale that would allow them to 'go as young as they want'? Why, it'd be a travesty! Yeah, but when a woman does it, it's okay; that's 'different', you know...

For all the talk of romance, the language of sex tourism is pretty basic. In Jamaica the men are called "beach boys" or "Rastatutes". The women are called milk bottles by the men - partly because of their ultra-white skin, partly because they are seen as vessels waiting to be filled.

You know why I think the local boys call the women milk bottles? Because they can't wait to milk 'em of their money, gifts, and so on. They're not vessels waiting to be filled; the women are easy marks waiting to be fleeced, or milked.

Another myth the play explodes is that sex tourism is only perpetrated by white women. In Jamaica, Gupta met many black American women hiring beach boys. "They might be going back to their roots, or feeling more powerful because they had money, but they were still buying the same services."

Eeeehhh, wrong! The reason why American black women are resorting to sex tourism is because no one here WANTS them! Talk about toxic; American black women make our white women look kind, virtuous, and feminine! Seriously, black women in America give new meaning to the phrase, 'toxic women'. Hell, they're so bad that the brothers here don't even want them!

Think about it, people. Women have it easy in the sexual market place; if they want to get laid, all they have to do is spread their legs. Ah, but black, American women are SO BAD that they can't even give it away to American men of any color-including their fellow black brothers! They have to resort to sex tourism to get laid. Doesn't that tell you anything?

In Bali, South-east Asia, Beddoes encountered wealthy Japanese women paying local boys for sex. The boys themselves claimed they found it less degrading because they saw the Japanese women as smaller and more childlike.

Japanese women are more feminine; they're nicer to look at; and, as a rule, Asian women age a lot better than their Western female counterparts.

Having said that though, what does it say about Japan and Japanese women when THEY have to resort to sex tourism to get sex? That's quite chilling when you think about it; it's quite chilling for a lot of reasons.

Gupta was inspired to write Sugar Mummies after reading the research by UK sociologists, Jacqueline Sanchez Taylor and Julia O'Connell into female sex tourism in the Caribbean. They decided to carry out their own research when they found that the usual analysis of sex tourism does not consider women as buyers of sexual services, because prostitute-users is seen as, by definition, male.

Ah, Jacqueline Sanchez Taylor-now THAT is a feminist if I ever saw one! Having said that, she and Miss O'Connell are at least HONEST sociologists, even if they're of a liberal (read socialist), politically correct persuasion. At least they realized that sex tourism wasn't just the province of men. I guess that that's a start to doing away with the double standard that's often applied to sex tourism.

They interviewed 240 women holidaying in Negril, and two similar resorts in the Dominican Republic. Almost a third said they had engaged in sexual relationships with local men. Though 60 per cent admitted to certain "economic elements" to their liaisons, they did not perceive their sexual encounters as a prostitute-client transaction. Instead they insisted they were helping the men, and the local economy, by giving them money and gifts. When asked to describe "boyfriends", most emphasised how for them black Jamaican men possessed bodies of great sexual value. One 42 year-old English woman who travelled at least three times a year to Boca Chica in the Dominican Republic said: "I'm not naïve. I've been around the block. I come for sex - of course the sun, but mostly the sex. I'm not coming to live and set up house with a guy. I just want some fun and good sex."

Well, Darlin', that begs the question: why can't you get good sex at home? Is it perhaps because local men do not WANT you? As a woman, you don't have to go across the ocean to have sex. All you have to do is signal to a man that you're willing, and spread your legs. That's it! So, why can't you find a willing man at home, hmmm?

"Female sex tourism is much more informal," says Sanchez Taylor, a lecturer in sociology at Leeds University. "It takes place in bars. There's no way for women to go into a brothel and say, 'I want a blow job.'

Oh stop it! Just stop it! Female sex tourism isn't less formal, Mrs. Taylor; it's just more subtle and indirect, like everything women say and do. When a guy goes to Thailand for vacation, he'll get a bar girl, pay her fee, and she'll stay with him for the agreed upon amount of time. During that time, she will 'service' the man and satisfy his needs-much better than women back home ever would, BTW. With men, it's like everything men do: simple, direct, and to the point. If a man goes to Thailand and hits Pattaya Beach, he's going there for ONE reason-sex.

When women engage in sex tourism, it's not quite as obvious, not quite as direct. They don't go to the men, pay X dollars (or pounds, as the case may be), and take him with them for X number of hours or days. No, they give them money; they buy them drinks; buy them clothes and other things; and provide a roof over their heads, all in exchange for sex. Now, pardon me, but if you're exchanging money and gifts for sex, doesn't that qualify for prostitution? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, isn't it fair to say that we're looking at a duck here?

"Women who feel rejected by men in the West for being fatter and older -you know, 35, but they look 40 - find that in Jamaica all this is reversed," says Sanchez Taylor.

Thank you! Finally, we get the truth! These female sex tourists are so repulsive (and not just physically, either) that men back home don't want them. They can't GIVE sex away back home, and they can't give it away for a couple of good reasons: 1) they're fat, old, and ugly; 2) they're even UGLIER on the inside.

"There's a poetic lyricism to the gigolo's chat-up lines," agrees Gupta. "You very quickly understand why the women are buying this. On the first day, this baby aged 18 came to chat me up. At first I thought, this will be good for my play. But then he got a bit fast, so I suggested he move on to some younger women, And he said, 'Me no want the kitten, me want the cat.'"

And these repulsive, love starved Western women buy IN to the bullshit! Again, here's more evidence of why women weren't given power or rights; they can't HANDLE them. The fact that they fall for such BS is proof positive that they're incapable of handling power, responsibility or anything else. Women are only a step above children, and the fact that they fall for such BS lines proves it...

The problem comes, she says, when the women start believing the men they have hooked up with are in love with them. "They confuse what is actually a financial transaction with real love. If you have low self-esteem, if you've not had much luck, if you're older ... you are likely to be more susceptible," says Gupta.

Oh, please. Women fall for the BS because they want to. They fall for it because they're more gullible than men. As I've stated in other posts, there's a reason why the serpent targeted Eve in the Garden first, and that we'd do well to REMEMBER that...

If an older woman's self esteem is part of the equation, it's for this reason: they're past their expiration date; they're no longer young, hot, and desirable as they were in their 20s; they're no longer having droves of guys hit on them now that they're older, fatter, and uglier. These women are no longer the "cat's meow", and they can't HANDLE it-end of discussion.

Some women even marry their boyfriends and take them home to the UK, although few relationships survive the cultural difference. Jamica's most famous holiday romance has recently come crashing down. Female tourism boomed after Terry McMillan's hit novel, How Stella Got Her Groove Back was made into a Hollywood film. The novel, in which Stella, a divorced black woman in her forties, takes a holiday to Jamaica, where she meets and falls in love with Winston, a local man half her age - was a fictionalised account of McMillan's own marriage to Jeremy Plummer, 23 years her junior. This year, McMillan, 53, filed for divorce, claiming that the marriage was based on a "fraud'' because Plummer lied about his sexual orientation and married her only to gain US citizenship. He denies it.

Uh, the cultural difference has little or nothing to do with the demise of these 'romances'. No, the reason these relationships end is for one, simple reason: the guys got what they wanted: money, UK or USA citizenship, and a better life; they got everything from their girlfriend/wife that they set out to get, so they bailed.

It is a nasty twist that the countries where this sort of tourism is most rife are ex-slave colonies. Many are still dealing with the fallout of colonialism. All the hotels, restaurants, cars and glass-bottomed boats in Negril are owned by Americans. The urban economy doesn't even belong to the local people.

What goes unsaid is that this is because the local economy, at least in Jamaica, is matriarchal. Matriarchies NEVER bring prosperity-never! Ah, but we can't say that now, can we? If the feminists writing this article were to discuss that elephant in the room, They'd have to admit a truth that would KILL them: that patriarchy is superior to their beloved matriarchy. We can't point out that, if Jamaica were patriarchal, then it'd be more prosperous; it would be owned and operated by the local people, not outsiders. If you want to know what a matriarchy looks and feels like, then either go to nearest, inner city ghetto; or go to a place like Jamaica. You'll see matriarchy in all its unbridled 'glory'...

Yet the women who sleep with the beach boys insist they are helping race relations. They flatter themselves they have gone native. "In my play there's a scene where a white woman is taking about how she loves R&B and reggae and what she calls hip and hop," says Gupta.

Oh, stop it! Just stop it! This is just an example of the rationalization hamster going full speed. Western women and their hamsters know no bounds...

It is the female tourist who books the flights and determines the length of time she will spend with their boyfriend, as well as making day-to-day decisions when they are together, such as when and where they eat. One 21-year-old migrant from Haiti, who had been working in Sosua, told Sanchez Taylor that he even had to "snog" his tourist client despite a bad toothache and a swollen face. If he did not, he would not be able to afford the antibiotics to cure it.

So, let me get this straight: this chap had to do oral sex to his 'client' even though he had a bad toothache and a swollen face?! There's more of that female empathy in action-ha! What would happen if a man did something like that, hmm? Sorry, I can't help but ask a question begging to be asked...

You know, if it were man buying sex, he'd be called a "John"; he'd be mocked and reviled for doing something like this. How dare he! That begs another question: what do they call female buyers of sex? What name would we give them? After all, they're just like their male counterparts we call "Johns", right?

Oh, and why is it okay when a woman makes her gigolo do something he doesn't want to do (or, in this case, is painful to do, for obvious reasons)? Why is it wrong when a man does it? Why is it 'different' when a woman does it? I see hamster wheels a spinnin'...

In Sugar Mummies, Gupta deliberately allows herself one relationship that might just work. "I'm not saying anything about mixed race relationships, I'm talking about these specific kinds of sex-tourist relationships where women go out there specifically to have sex. It will probably backfire and a whole load more women will go off to Jamaica."

'Sugar Mummies' opens at the Royal Court, London SW1 on 5 August (020-7565 5000)

No strings: 'I wanted to do sex like a man'

Lucy, a 23-year-old events organiser from London, visited St Lucia this year with a friend

You wanted to do sex like a man? Oh, stop it! If you want to have debauched, promiscuous sex; if you want to nurture your inner slut; then you can do so at home quite easily-especially if you're 23!

The words "sex tourism" make me think of City boys who go to Thailand with their mates for seedy conquests to boast about. It's different for women. When they go abroad for sex, it's about wanting to feel special and escaping the boundaries at home.

Translation: at home, I can't act like a slut and preserve my reputation as a 'good girl' back home-gag a maggot! Theres' nothing good about you, Darlin', at least not as a wife candidate.

As for sex tourism being different for a woman, there's the rationalization hamster in action again. I can't define the phrase, 'rationalization hamster', but I know it when I see it-like in this instance. That hamster is running for all it's worth, isn't it?

You know something else, Darlin'? When guys go on vacations to Thailand, it's not to brag about seedy conquests-no, not at all. You know what guys who've vacationed there talk about? Meeting nice, FEMININE women who-gasp-treat them with a modicum of respect! They talk about a woman caring about his needs and meeting them; even if this were done for a price, it's the best experience he's ever had with a woman. Your typical, Anglosphere man never experienced that with the likes of you, Bitch! You and your Anglosphere sisters would rather DIE than even THINK about doing something nice for your man back home! You're the same chicks who, in 10-15 years time (the same time you're past your expiration date), will be bitching and moaning about the lack of good men-incredible...

Oh, and let me point out something else here: EVERY interaction a man has with a woman, especially if it involves sex, will cost him; one way or another, the man WILL pay to have access to her stink box. The only difference is that a whore lets the man know what the cost will be up front.

My friend and I decided to treat ourselves to a stay in a luxury hotel in St Lucia for 10 days of pure pampering - and ideally a sexual encounter. This was the first time I'd gone on holiday explicitly with this intention. I was keen to find a St Lucian man as I'd heard they were very well endowed. I had my eye on Sandi from my first day. He was a local working in the cocktail bar, in his early thirties, and was very handsome, muscular and toned with the perfect six-pack. We spent several evenings drinking, chatting and flirting in the bar.

There are very strict rules at the hotel about staff and guests so I knew I had to make the first move. I told him I was going for a walk on the beach - and we spent our first night together. It was very romantic.

Oh, please, spare me! You got played, Honey. This guy should stop by the seduction fora out there; sounds like this old boy could teach us a thing or two about bedding our hometown sluts...

This was totally different from how I'd behave at home. In London, taking a man home with you, there's always the fear that friends might see you, not to mention potential dangers or the hassle of waking up in your flat with a stranger. But on holiday the boundaries shift and you can behave totally differently. You have a tan, you feel gorgeous, you're treated like royalty - and everything is available and easy.

If you were at all gorgeous (especially on the inside, i.e. you had a decent personality); if you were even an average looking 23 year old woman; then you would have NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER finding a decent man back home-none! Whether you want a LTR or a primal, one night stand, finding a man back home should be no problem; for a woman in her early 20s, all men are, as you put it, 'available and easy'. The fact that you can't find a man back home is rather telling, isn't it?

What's also telling is her comment about how 'the boundaries shift' while on holiday. What she really means is that, on holiday, she can nurture her inner slut; she can act like the slattern she is and face no shame for doing so.

Sandi and I had a great time. On his day off, he took us to a local street party. I paid for taxis, drinks and food. We needed his protection because St Lucian men had certain misconceptions about white women - although I probably wasn't helping.

St. Lucian men view Anglosphere women as they truly are: unbridled, debauched, amoral sluts. And no, my dear, you AREN'T helping to combat that perception...

You know what else just occurred to me? When women have a guy pay for things for them, they say he has no right to 'expect anything' (i.e. sex) in return. Ah, but when the women engage in similar behavior, they're doing it because they 'expect something in return'-duh! How did I miss that?!

When it came to leaving, I surprised myself by feeling quite gutted. I'd wanted to do sex without feelings, just like the men, but there was a definite trembling of the lips - for both of us. But as we flew home, my friend and I were very pleased with everything that had happened. I'm in a relationship at the moment but if I was single again I'd definitely go on that kind of holiday. Why not?

Why not nurture your inner slut at home and save yourself the money, Honey?

Ah, no matter how hard you try, you CAN'T 'have sex like a man', can you? You, as a woman, can't separate sex from love; for you, the two go together like hand in glove.

Around one in five British holidaymakers under the age of 25 is failing to practise safe sex while abroad, according to a study published this month by Trojan Condoms

----------------

This article was RIFE with examples of women's rationalization hamster in action, wasn't it? As I stated above, I can't give you anything close to a dictionary definition of the phrase; for me, it's like defining obscenity. Like obscenity, I know the rationalization hamster when I see it.

Women are indeed hypocrites. For example, they'll chastise a man for engaging in sex tourism, yet for women, it's different. Don't you just LOVE how they say that when you catch them in their inconsistencies? Don't you just love how they excuse their own hypocrisies? But I'm a woman; it's 'different'-yeah, sure.

That wraps up my commentary and analysis of this piece. The more I see of women, the less highly I think of them; the more I think about them and their natures, the less I think of them. A famous man once said that no man who has spent any time really THINKING about women has a high opinion of them. Until next time...

MarkyMark

Costa Concordia: Initial Observations

2012-01-18T06:23:00.000-05:00

Guys,

You've no doubt heard that the Italian cruise ship, the Costa Concordia, ran aground recently. While I have to wait to do a proper rendering of this event, I have a couple of things to say. One, the comments to the recent Daily Mail article on this show that men are wising up-yes! There were many men who rightfully questioned why women should be first in an age of equality. Secondly, women don't like this turn of events, but they cannot see the cause and effect of THEIR role in killing chivalry. I'll have more to say this weekend, so stay tuned...

MarkyMark

The Cost of Marriage, by Christopher in Oregon

2012-01-17T12:34:00.000-05:00

Guys,

Here's yet another MASTERPIECE by Christopher in Oregon. Though he still doesn't have his own blog yet, he does share his thoughts on the Happy Bachelors forum. This is yet another masterpiece by my biking buddy, Christopher in Oregon...

------------------

Fellows,

I think I've mentioned a friend of mine in the past. His name is Tom. We've known each other since we were small children, but parted company when he got married the first time. His wife was a slut of the first order. She cheated on him, even hit on me, and the marriage ended after about ten years. Lost his house. One kid who has been brainwashed by the mother to hate him. Never talks to him.

Married again, second wife cheated on him with a sixteen-year-old, and again, the marriage ended and he lost another house. Two kids; reasonable relationship with both of them although the mother has tried to destroy that.

Ten years ago, he married a CPA he met when he was visiting relatives in Austria. He brought her here, certain that this devout Catholic from the old country would be more traditional. Nope. She cheated on him, and they divorced. Lost another house that he's renting back from the people he sold it to.

He now has three renters occupying the spare bedrooms in order to help pay the rent on what was once his own house.

This formerly robust fellow, who was always athletic, at only 49, is falling apart. The stress has given him severe ulcer problems. He can't eat. He is losing weight like I've never seen before. The stress of his ex-wives, and the problems with his children, are slowly wasting him away. One of his son's is about to marry a tramp, and it's killing my friend.

I warned him each time he got married to not do it. The first time we were nineteen, and each subsequent time I tried to reason with him. He quietly ignored me, and now he is paying the price.

This man's life is effectively ruined. His health is is deteriorating rapidly. Stress is killing him.

All because of women and his inability to see them for what they are and say "NO" to himself.

Such an insane price to pay, and what a vantage point to sit by and watch over a period of thirty years a friend being ruined by women.

Christopher in Oregon

----------------

So, what did we learn from this? Don't get married! The life (not to mention money) that you save may be your own! Until next time...

MarkyMark

Harley Warranties & Decomposing Women, by Christopher in Oregon

2012-01-16T12:40:00.001-05:00

Guys,

I was reading @ Happy Bachelors before retiring, and I found THIS gem by Christopher in Oregon. This is good stuff! Enjoy...

-------------------

Fellows,

It feels good to be back. Truly. I believe, if you don't mind, I shall stick around. If that's okay. Unless some other disaster befalls a friend, or worse yet, little old me.

My thoughts today revolve around a large 800 pound black behemoth sitting in my garage. No, not a woman. Worse. A Harley.

Come this December, I will have been the proud owner of this mass of Milwaukee metal for five years. It's certainly not the only Harley I've owned, but it's the one that I've had longer than any other Harley. When I bought it, it came with a two-year warranty, and naturally, like any discerning motorcyclist, I purchased at great expense, the extended warranty. It came in handy more times than I thought possible.

However, something happened. The warranty ran out. Terror of terrors. A Harley with no warranty. In my possession. Scary thought.

True to form, once the warranty expired, it's as if my beloved Electra Glide has started to fall apart mechanically and electronically. One thing after another. Most recently, it was the stator. What the heck is a stator? I don't know, but it cost me $725 bucks to replace it. Plus, I have found out that stator's sometimes go bad several times a year on some Harley's.

Hmm. Hadn't figured on this. My Beemer and my Hondas and my Kymcos ran and ran and ran and ran. Reliably.

Which brings me to a point. An epiphany, I suppose, about women and how they relate to Harley's. No, I'm not talking about women and their obsession with vibrating Harley motors. I'm talking about how once the newness wears off, the product starts falling apart. A Harley and a woman are much alike. Both can be pretty, sound nice, and be fun to ride hard, but neither is reliable or trustworthy. Either will betray you when you least expect it.

But my line of reasoning goes one step further.

Cost. $$$. Dollars and cents. Money.

The actual expense of maintaining a deteriorating thing, be it a Harley or a woman, that is only going to fall apart at a rapidly increasing pace. My service record for my Harley over the last almost five years, including accessories, reads like a phone book. It's huge. Lest you think I unfairly factor in accessories into the equation, try being married and see how many "accessories" and shiny trinkets you end up buying on your way to the poor house. It adds up. Fast.

A woman's body, like a Harley, starts to fall apart once the ink is barely dry on the contract. At first, it's hidden. You don't really see the process taking place. A little trouble starting one day. A little cough at idle. A minor thing breaking or falling off. Then, one day, the process is no longer hidden. It becomes glaringly obvious that you've married, er, purchased, a lemon. A big fat, quivering cellulite-laden lemon.

And it ain't gonna get any better.

Women decay fast. Really, really fast. If you think a Harley falls to pieces, and they DO, I can assure you, then you have a brief glimmer into your future if you get married.

Fine, so you say have health insurance with a small deductible. It won't be THAT bad, will it? Not really?

Ah, think again.

Do you know what it's like to spend your spare time hauling a woman to the doctor? Then another doctor? And another? Do you know what it's like to sit for hours in the lobby waiting for her to emerge from her latest visit? I do. You sit there watching other men and their fat wives waddling to and fro. You get bored, so you watch the kids in the lobby playing. Uh, no. Better not. Might go to jail. Why do they only have women's magazines in the lobby? Nary a Cycle World to be found. So you watch the fish in the aquarium. Wishing you were in the tank. Swimming gracefully without a care in the world. Then she emerges with a scowl. A little bag full of sample pills and a fistful of prescriptions.

Next stop: the pharmacy. Another line to wait in. What? They can't get the pills ready now? You've got to come back tomorrow? But you wanted to relax tomorrow. Oh, no. You're MARRIED now.

Side effects? She can't sleep because the pills make her nervous and irritable. Another trip to the doctor. Another trip to the pharmacist. More lines. More deductibles. More side-effects. More sleepless nights.

What, you wanted sex tonight? Just a handjob, please? You pig. Don't you know she doesn't feel sexy when she is sick? Sick? You thought she was okay. Just a minor rash. Or something. But, no. She's a woman, and a woman has Problems. Female Problems, which is really YOUR fault, anyway. You pig.

Displacia? What the heck is that? Your wife has displacia? You find out that it's because she slept around a lot before she met you, and now her vagina is going to be a test lab for a few years. No sex for you. Pig. (and you thought she was a virgin when you met her) Do you know what a woman is like when she is recovering from surgery, or worse yet, a yeast infection? How about a hysterectomy? Or breast cancer that one-in-eight eventually get? Do you know what it's like to try and sleep in the same bed with a woman who just had surgery? I don't know personally, but I've heard. You lie there, afraid to turn over in bed because it will disturb her sleep. You have to get up and pee? Think again. You might wake Her Highness up, and you musn't do that. You selfish pig. You should have peed before you went to sleep. But you're over forty, and you have to pee several times at night. Tough. Hold it in, or there will be hell to pay. Real hell.

Do you know what it's like to have to change your bed-ridden wife's diapers? Morning, noon, and night? Day after day? Month after month? Year after year? Can you imagine the smell? The filth? Carrying her soiled body to the tub to wash her, as she is berating you for being... you. All the while your own health deteriorates from stress. The endless monotony. You pray for death. Your own. Or hers. It doesn't matter. Anything to be free. Time passes so agonizingly slowly when you are blessed with a sick wife. Every tick of the clock seems to mock you. Fool. Tick. Fool. Tick. Fool.

Those words you so lightly spoke years ago "In sickness and in health...." Now they come back to haunt you.

There is no light at the end of the tunnel. It goes on and on until one of you is dead. Endless, agonizing drudgery. No reprieve. On one of your endless trips to the pharmacy you look wistfully at a man you see riding by alone on his motorcycle. Knowing he has a freedom you dare not even dream about. It's far too painful.

What? Your insurance won't pay for this new medication? Two-hundred dollars? For pills? Every month. Surely the pharmacist is wrong. Nope, he says. Look right here. Not covered. You could call your doctor, he says, to try something else. No. Better not. Oh, almost forgot the Kotex. Gotta have Kotex. "Heavy days" has taken on a whole new meaning to you. What does the pharmacist have for migraines? Yours, or hers he asks? Hers, you respond. Ah, he says. What does he mean, ah? Is he married? No ring on his finger. Maybe he's smart. Maybe he's a bachelor. Maybe......what's that? I need to see my wife's doctor for another prescription for migraine headaches? Might interact with the $200 a bottle pills, he says. Can't have that. Might kill the wife.

Sigh. You should be so lucky.

You finally drag yourself home, Kotex in tow. What? She wanted Tampons? Back you go. What? The doctor's office called while you were gone. Your wife is now diabetic. From all the weight she has gained. Insulin? Test strips? HOW much is this costing? We have to take a class? To teach us how we are now going to eat? But you're not diabetic, you think. Why should YOU have to give up pies and cakes?

Selfish pig.

Plus, her blood pressure is skyrocketing. She IS a size eighteen, after all. She's not eating more, though. Or so she says. It's her thyroid. Always the thyroid. What? She'll probably get bigger until they straighten out her thyroid, she tells you, as she munches away. You look at her sitting there. Fat. Red-faced. Wearing a mumu. Eating. Always eating.

Thighs. My, how they've grown you think as you get a glimpse of her pasty-white legs peeking out of the mumu.

How about the dentist? Ah, you didn't know your companies health insurance wouldn't cover all of her dental work, did you? What's that? Five-thousand dollars to fix her teeth? And YOU have to pay for it? There goes that big screen you wanted. Ah, hell. There's some consolation. She probably wouldn't have let you buy it, anyway. And if she did, you'd only watch what SHE liked. Possibly the dentist can remove those fangs while he's working on her.....

Ah, well. At least you'll be in love. If you love a woman, and she loves you, it doesn't matter, right? Ah, love is grand. It will carry you through any adversity. These trials will just bring you closer together. Nothing spells lovin' like seeing your wife's teeth all yanked out in anticipation of having dentures installed in her yap.

Gotta run. It's gettin' too damn deep around here.

Christopher in Oregon

----------------

Let this be a warning to you. Good night now...

MarkyMark

Pussy Is Overrated, by Spocks Disciple

2012-01-15T10:39:00.001-05:00

Guys,

I was catching up on some reading @ Happy Bachelors when I saw this gem by Spock's Disciple. In it, he tells us that pussy is overrated, and he makes the case as to WHY. This is good stuff, stuff my boys need to read...

---------------

The need for pussy is a very real and built in addiction for men. We are hardwired by nature for sex and procreation; we are also hardwired to automatically be totally suspicious of other men (even our fathers) when it comes to the matter of women.

It's speaks volumes when there can exist a society such as HB where men can gather and discuss things in a civilized manner. Remember that keyword, civilization; men invented it, and it's been a bedrock of the patriarchy and of progress. When the sight and sound of pussy blinds younger men and allows them to be controlled by women though their hormones, it's when civilization serves a greater purpose.

Because, in civilized society, the power usually rested with the older, more mature and less gullible men who'd made it past their testosterone induced phase of insanity. Civilization was the solution to the earlier, tribal level matriarchies. Remember that pussy is a biochemical WMD; wherever it is used, there is mass chaos and destruction. How many wars and conflicts have been fought at the urging and behest of women? More than any honest man would admit to and would be proud of.

And yet, when most men pass the age of 30-35, they begin to awaken from this biochemical "dream" and what do they awaken beside? What do married men look forward to the next 30-50 years of their lives? Sleeping with a living corpse, which continues to torture and destroy them day by day? Looking forward to the time when the woman undergoes the process of metamorphosis, into a completely insane mummy (menopause and post menopause)?

Pussy is indeed way overrated and if younger men could get a shot of "anti-testosterone" for a few weeks, they could see through the eyes of men who are 40+; without the haze of hormones, you cannot believe how much farther you can see! It's the difference between seeing the horizon through LA style smog and seeing the horizon from a high mountain in the Rockies.

Pussy is a man's Achilles heel; once that man realizes this and takes the appropriate steps, he'll never lose his peace of mind again. To these skeptical young men I say, there is an infinitely vast arena where you can have anything you desire, and can succeed at anything you wish to try for; all you have to do is see women for what they truly are, and become a master of the beast within; once you do that women's true face will be visible to you, and you'll never again partake of that foul potion.

It is possible to tame that beast, and indeed it is a certainty that you will learn much from the process of taming it; all it takes is patience and time. Look at your fellow men, your brothers in arms, and look at their almost invisible chains, and wonder at why you would desire such an existence for yourself?

In my life, I have yet to meet a single man who is or was ever happily married; I've met enough who bore their pain in stoic silence, and with only the occasional grimace of pain as the lash comes down on them again for any trivial infraction against their taskmaster wives.

To the young men out there: read this site and learn; this site is a book with hundreds of pages of accumulated wisdom, a treasure trove many married men wish they had discovered before they became enslaved by pussy.

-----------------

What can I POSSIBLY add to that?! SD, like his hero, applied cold hearted logic when analzying pussy. The Force is STRONG with that one! Actually, there is one thing that the younger men can do until their sex drives die down permanently: masturbate before going out with a woman. Mirror of the Soul recommended this, because it would help you see the woman AS SHE IS; your hormones wouldn't be getting in the way of your better judgement. To put it another way, since the little head had been, shall we say, quieted down, the bigger head could work properly; the bigger head will then allow you to see a woman for who she REALLY is. Until next time...

MarkyMark

Ex-Wives Angry Over Paying Alimony

2012-01-14T13:04:00.003-05:00

Guys,

Here's an excellent article to check out: the one on women angry @ paying alimony to their ex-husbands. Thanks to Ferdinand Bardamu for featuring a link to this piece. Naturally, yours truly couldn't resist the chance to engage in commentary & analysis of the following article. Here goes...

-----------------

Role Reversal: Ex-Wives Angry Over Paying Alimony

Long a Gripe of Divorced Men, More Women Feel Burdened by Spousal Support

By ALICE GOMSTYN
ABC NEWS Business Unit
Sept.30, 2009

He got their second house, an investment property she had bought in Costa Rica, and a $96,000 annual alimony payment.

Wow, $96,000 for an annual alimony payment, along with the second home and an investment property on Costa Rica? Sign me up! I'm in the wrong business! Why work for an honest living when I could have cashed out on some career bitch?! Now we know why women have been so eager to marry us...

She got angry.

Did you get angry when this was happening only to men? Yeah, that's what I thought...

"It's so obscene," said Holly Chiancola, 52, a Gloucester, Mass. real estate agent who is fighting the terms of a divorce settlement ordered by a judge in 2006.

Wah, wah, wah, fucking wah! Now that I'm getting REAL equality, I don't want it anymore-waaaaaaaahhhhh!!

You used to hear about divorced men complaining that their ex-wives were unfairly cutting into their income. Now, as more women become primary breadwinners, the complaints increasingly come from them. The number of American men receiving alimony has climbed, from 7,000 in 1998 to 13,000 last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

Yeah, but when it was happening to men, that was okay. When men complained about it, they were told to quit trying to get out of their obligations; they were told to suck it up; they were told that they hated women; they were told lots of things when they complained about unjust alimony settlements. Women raised nary a PEEP in objection to the injustices heaped upon men in family court; hell, a church mouse made more noise than women did about men getting taken to the cleaners during divorce cases! Now that the shoe is on the other foot, it's now 'different', eh? And I thought women were supposed to be the more empathetic sex-yeah, right!

Chiancola's ex, who declined to comment for this story, is among them.

Good, we need more men like him! When women start getting the equality they kvetched for, then they MIGHT become aware of the injustices done to men over the past decades. When women were making out like bandits in divorce court, everything was okay, huh? Women are fucking hypocrites!

BTW, if I utter or write the phrase, 'hypocritical women', am I being redundant? Am I committing some sort of grammatical faux pas? I was just wondering...

Thanks in part to the pre-financial crisis real estate boom, Chiancola earned considerably more than her ex-husband, a sometime carpenter and fashion model, during their 19-year-marriage. She said her ex didn't hesitate to take advantage of that -- even though her income plummeted after the real estate boom years, and she's now struggling to make her mortgage payments.

I wonder if the Bradley Amendment will be applied to Holly Chiancola? Or does the Bradley Amendment apply only to child support payments? I was wondering, because oftentimes child support payments are set high to include a de facto alimony component as well. I would LOVE to see women subject to the Bradley Amendment though! Then, women like Mrs. Chiancola, whose income fell due to reasons beyond her control (as has happened to many men due to layoffs, health reasons, etc.), would be forced to keep the payments up at their previously high levels; even though their decreased income could no longer support such high alimony payments, it would be nice to see women get a taste of the medicine that they've been dishing out to us over the past two or three decades. REAL equality would be great!

You know how to tell if you're achieving real equality? Do you know how to tell when women are being subject to the same treatment men are? They start squealing like stuck pigs-ha! They start screaming bloody murder! Waaaaaaaahhhh, this isn't fair-waaaaaaaaahhhhhh! It was all right when we were taking you men to the cleaners. Now that you're returning the favor, we don't like it so much-waaaaaaaaaahhhhh!! It was perfectly all right when I was stealing the fruits of your labor; now that you're doing it to me, it sucks-waaaaaaaaahhhh! You know what I have to say to that? Welcome to my life, Bitch! How do you like living in a man's world, hmmmm?

Chiancola said she partly blames Massachusetts' "outdated" divorce laws for her predicament -- she is a supporter of the group Mass Alimony Reform -- but she's also plenty outraged at her husband.

Ah, but they weren't outdated when they were favoring women, were they? When the divorce laws totally favored women, why the laws were modern and fair, weren't they? Now that you have fallen under the purview of laws YOU women pushed, why that's not fair. Tough noogies, Ladies!!!

"He went for the jugular, believe me," she said.

Uh, Darlin', I have to ask some questions here. How often did you cheer your divorcing friends through the years, hmmm? How often did you exhort, admonish, and cheer your friends to 'take that bastard to the cleaners'? How often did you cheer, 'you go, grrl!!'? Is this an instance of bad karma coming home to roost?

Aggressive pursuit of spousal support by men is becoming more common, some divorce lawyers say, as the stigma of asking for alimony fades.

Good, I hope the stigma against men seeking alimony from their ex-wives fades for good! I want to see REAL, genuine equality here, damn it! I want women to get what they said they wanted all those years and decades ago.

You know, we men have to stop being stupid, chivalrous fucks when it comes to women; we have to stop playing fair & just with them. Do they play fair with us? Uh, that was a RHETORICAL question, folks. Well then, let's treat women the same way that they've treated us in divorce. Only when women start to be AFFECTED by these onerous, unfair, and unjust divorce laws will things finally change. The more empathetic sex at its finest-you gotta love it!

"Early on, men were somewhat embarrassed to ask for alimony because it went across their defined roles in the culture. That has diminished," said Marlene Moses, the president-elect of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, an organization of family law attorneys. "There's been a revolution of men and their rights and the vigor with which they pursue legal opportunities for themselves."

It's about damned time we pursue legal opportunities for ourselves! Goodness knows that women have been doing that to us for decades...

It's a revolution, experts say, that has been going on for more than 20 years -- actress Joan Collins' divorce and alimony case made headlines in the 1980s -- but today, it's still catching some women off guard.

It's only catching women off guard because the divorce laws are finally starting to affect THEM...

Take Terry, a 56-year-old Florida healthcare executive, who asked to have her last name withheld because her divorce from her husband is not yet settled.

Terry, the healthcare exec, is making big bucks. In the interest of fairness and the spirit of equality, she should share at least half of that with her ex, hehehe...

"He's a very independent man, a very macho guy, and I was quite surprised that he would ask for alimony," said Terry.

No, what you were surprised at was that he'd play the game the way you and your sisters would play it; you're surprised that he and his fellow, divorcing men are emulating women's winning, lucrative ways. IOW, now that the divorce laws are biting YOU & YOUR FELLOW SISTERS in the ass, it's not all fun & games anymore, is it? Now that you have true equality, it's all of a sudden unfair?! Cry me a river, Bitch!

You know how women are always bleating that they're strong & independent while they receive money from their exes? Well, I think it's good for men to be 'independent' too; I think it's good for men to be as 'independent as women are-all in the spirit of equality, of course... :)

Alimony Ex-Husband: 'I Helped Her'

I'll bet he did, because she wouldn't have time to do more mundane, routine tasks (e.g. paying the bills, looking after the house, et al) herself. Someone has to tend to the home front; in this case, it was her ex.

Oh, and I just love how the writer, a woman, tries to cast the ex-husband in a negative light. She doesn't simply say 'ex-husband'; no, she says 'Alimony ex-husband'. Would she have said that if the roles were reversed? Would she have said that if Terry, the wife, were receiving the alimony instead? No, she would not. If anything, she'd be bitching that the $2,500 per month is too low, that the ex was getting off 'too easy'. Again, women are fucking hypocrites!

Terry said her soon-to-be ex is asking for $2,500 per month in alimomy -- and she's fighting it.

You only got hit with $2,500 per month? Compared to most men, you got off easy, Darlin'. I hope that when you take this before the judge, that you get your alimony assessment INCREASED! Then, we'd have real equality! Then, you gals would start getting a taste of the medicine that you were all giddy about giving to us.

Terry, who earns more than $100,000 a year, said she's not against the principle of women paying alimony to their former spouses. But in her case, she said, it's not warranted. Her husband was laid off from an $85,000 per year job several months ago, but "he's completely capable of earning a living."

Oh, is he really? Just where is your ex supposed to FIND another job, let alone one paying $85,000/year? Where is he supposed to find a job paying anywhere CLOSE to that amount, hmmm? After all, this is the man-cession, isn't it? During this recession, it's been mostly men losing their jobs these days, or have you been living under a rock? No, you were too busy getting your spa treatments, more shoes, etc. to notice that, weren't you?

Secondly, your ex-husband has a penis, not a pussy. Ergo, being a man, he doesn't get any pussy pass like you gals do. Perhaps you women can easily replace a lost job, but it's not so easy for men to do so. Just because you gals get preferences for college admissions decisions; just because you gals get preferences in hiring decisions; just because you gals get preferences in promotion decisions and the raises that go with them; doesn't mean that men get similar treatment. If anything, we get the opposite. Terry, my dear, your husband may be quite capable of earning a living; whether or not he'll actually have the OPPORTUNITY to do so is another matter entirely...

For some men, just as with some women, it's past experience, not future earning potential, that weighs heavily on their decisions to seek alimony. One divorced New England man told ABCNews.com that he deserved tens of thousands in alimony payments because he played a key role in his ex-wife's professional success.

Yeah, past experience of being dumped on and discriminated against in the workplace prompted him to seek alimony-because he knew he'd NEED it...

"I helped her out in the background," said the man, who asked that his name be withheld due to ongoing divorce proceedings. Without him, he said, "there's absolutely no way she could have done what she did."

Now, we're about to get some TRUTH in a MSM piece. Can you believe it?!

Despite the increases in men seeking and receiving alimony, advocates warn against linking the trend to equality in the courtroom. Family court judges still tend to favor women, said Ned Holstein, the founder of Fathers & Families, a group advocating family court reform.

You got that shit right! You bet your ass family court judges favor women! Hell, if they favored women any more than they already do, they'd be women themselves. Wait, we have a word for such treasonous pussies: manginas.

"Family court still gives custody overwhelmingly to mothers, child support overwhelmingly to mothers, and courts still give alimony overwhelmingly to mothers and women," he said.

"The family courts came into existence years ago in order to give things to mothers that mothers needed," he said. "The times have changed and the courts have not."

The man NAILED it.

Recession Brings More Male Alimony?

Today's economy may be adding new men to ranks of alimony-seekers. As traditionally male-dominated industries like finance and construction continue to struggle, more men are finding themselves with lower income or no income at all, forcing a newfound dependence on their wives or, in some cases, ex-wives.

What they don't tell you is that, because we're not in any protected class; because we're white males; firing men is the most expedient thing for companies to do. If women are fired, the NOW Gang will come to their aid. If men are fired, well that's too freakin' bad; they'll just have to suck it up and deal with it.

Again, in the spirit of equality, I think that women should be subject to the same things that men have endured for decades: having all the responsibilities of marriage (e.g. financial provision) with none of the benefits thereof. I think that this is great! We need more men seeking alimony, so women can finally achieve the equality that they've fought for-ha!

Earlier this year, a British judge ruled that Elena Bowes Marano should pay her ex, real estate tycoon Peter Marano, 5 million pounds (about $8 million) after his property portfolio dwindled in value -- an order that Elena, originally from a wealthy California family, is fighting.

Such cases notwithstanding, a reversal of traditional gender roles in a divorce doesn't necessarily create more acrimony, experts say.

BULLLLLLLSHIT!!! If that were the case, then why are women screaming bloody murder now that they're being forced to pay alimony? Wasn't Terry, the healthcare exec mentioned in a previous paragraph, bitching about having to pay a mere $2,500 per month while earning $100,000 per year? Wasn't she saying, "Waaaaaaaahhhh, he can earn a living! Why should I have to pay him alimony?! Waaaaaahhhh!" Are those words and the tone thereof acrimonious? I don't know, but they're a great imitation!

Alexis Martin Neely, a prominent California family lawyer, is an alimony-paying woman content with her divorce settlement. Supporting her husband, she has said, allows him to spend time with their children.

"I do really like him being available for the kids and their school events and if he can't work and do that, I'd rather support him to be readily available for them," she wrote in a blog post. "He deserves it and so do they."

Prima facie evidence that women are NATURAL liars-what a crock...

-------------

All right, that concludes my commentary and analysis of this ABC News piece. I have to tell you, since I unplugged, seeing through this hypocrisy is so easy! I feel like I'm shooting fish in a barrel sometimes.

In all seriousness, I'd like to see alimony changed or abolished altogether. I don't like to see anyone, male or female, be unjustly punished by unfair laws. Clearly, the divorce laws need to be changed. And pigs will fly soon too! Seriously though, the only way these alimony laws will change is if women are affected by them. Otherwise, they won't give a damn about what they do to us. Then again, women don't give a damn about men anyway, but that's another post. Until next time...

MarkyMark

Wise Words from a 38 Year Old Bachelor

2012-01-14T10:48:00.002-05:00

Guys,

Outcast Superstar had this comment left on his now defunct blog. He thankfully put it up on Happy Bachelors also. These are wise words from a Christian man; these are words to LIVE by, Fellas...

-------------------

You will find as you get older that you were indeed saved from a trap. I am 38 and was raised a Christian and believed marriage was my calling only to find out that all the girls I observed were too screwed up to make suitable wives/mothers.

Isn't that the truth! Not all women are too screwed up to be suitable wives and mothers, but they're in a distinct minority. To put it another way, there aren't enough decent women to go around. The number of women who would make decent wives and mothers is asymptotically close to zero; finding a woman like that in modern Amerika would be akin to hitting the lottery...

I know the feelings you describe and know I too could have made a lucky young lady VERY happy if she would have just fought off her natural instict to be a rotten bitch at least until I married her, lol.

Modern, American women are too 'empowered' to be nice to men at all these days! That works in our favor though, because we see the rotten bitch from the get-go; we see her soon enough to bail out when we have nothing invested in her or a relationship with her.

With the feminist movement "liberating" women (men) what you are seeing in modern times are females in their true natural form, warts and all, and as you have found out they are not so pretty and far removed from what we pictured in our childhood dreams as ideal mates.

Zenpriest said it best: feminism liberated us men far more than it ever liberated women.

Girls in generations past were taught to use their youthful looks, virginity and charm and act "lady like" until they landed a lifelong supportive, respectful husband because single females had little means of self support and being an old maid stuck on Mom and Dads' farm was considered a fate worse than death. Although some girls may have secretly lusted after trashy badboys from the wrong side of the tracks they were usually smart enough to know to avoid them or pay the price with a lifetime of abandonment,poverty and abuse.

With inventions like the electric car starter, birth control pill, welfare and telecommunications girls are no longer stuck on Dads' farm or have to rely on a husband for support or even to make babies for that matter. The shitty attitude towards good men and love of assholes was always there, where once it was kept hidden out of necessity of survival, with modern feminism it now is out in the open for all to see.

Amen....

-----------------

I'll be back again soon, Fellas. Until next time...

MarkyMark

EN's Observations of Women

2012-01-14T10:47:00.002-05:00

Guys,

I was reading Dr. Helen's most recent post (the one for 8 Mar 2011), and there was a comment by EN that I liked. EN shares his observations of women...

----------------

As a 58-year-old man who was married for 30 years and divorced my ex 6 years ago, my take is similar to that of other men. Some observations.

1. Women within my lifespan weren't happy in the dark days of the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s... and here we are. It's always the fault of men and they will weepily tell you that, "he used me and cheated on me" ("gosh, over and over and over, you have such bad luck with scumbags. I can't for the life of me figure out why you're so unlucky."). I've known since I was about five years old and listening to my mom that there's never been a strong line between what woman say and what they do. And there's never a woman so unhappy as the one who gets what they say they wanted. An unhappy woman is like granite, only they don't live long enough to changed much by time. Always look to her habits lads, not the ones she says she has, but the ones she actually has. When a woman starts talking about what she wants or expects, it should be like bees buzzing so as not to confuse you. Their world is not bad, just different.

2. Men have it easier than ever. There's simply no need to work too hard for a woman. In fact, it works against you if you do try hard. I would guess that close to 70 percent of the woman I meet are so self loathing as to find any man who would court them, honor them and cherish them as an unworthy tool, as in, "If you think I'm special you're cute, but obviously an idiot". Men who treat them with respect will be treated like a favorite poodle, while guys in dirty tee shirts and a bag full of condoms who do not treat them well will enjoy the more carnal pleasures. It's a simple matter of tee-shirt boy is the one who really understands them, and that's what you lads need to understand. It's not bad or good, just the way it is.

Never forget the serious disconnect between what a woman says and what she does, especially if you like her. In fact, if a woman tells me she likes candle lit dinners and long witty conversations, I immediately assume she prefers her sex in the car on the way home from work, so she can get their in time to watch Grey's Anatomy and talk to her sister on the phone. Embrace the contradiction.

The other 30 percent I know are married and not in my sample. But if I had to guess about them we'd have to back to point one.

-----------------

Good stuff, would you not agree? Until next time...

MarkyMark

What The Toilet Seat Says About Women

2012-01-14T10:14:00.001-05:00

Guys,

I've been thinking about this for a while, and I've had another flash of insight; I've had another 'eureka!' moment. What's that, you ask? What the toilet seat says about women. It says a lot, actually. What does it say about women?

The toilet seat is living proof that women will complain about anything and everything. The toilet seat shows us that women cannot and will not accept responsibility for themselves. The toilet seat shows us that women have no perspective about anything. The toilet seat is living proof of the eternal solipsism of the female mind. The toilet seat provides empirical evidence that, no matter what or how much they get, women will never be happy. Finally, the toilet seat shows us that women are spoiled, entitled brats.

One, it says women will complain about anything-anything! Women can't be happy; they won't allow themselves to be happy; if they have nothing to complain about, by golly, they'll invent something to complain about. In spite of all that they should be thankful for, women aren't thankful at all; they have no gratitude whatsoever. Why? Because they bitch and moan about the toilet seat, that's why!

Two, it says that women cannot and will not accept responsibility for themselves or their actions. Rather than look down, assess the condition of the seat, and make any needed adjustment to the seat prior to sitting down; women would rather blame a man for the fact that she sat down without looking first. Waaaaaahhh, it's all the man's fault-waaaaaahhhh!

Three, it says that women have no sense of perspective whatsoever. Of all the problems in the world; of all the things going on worthy of concern; of all the things they can and should be thankful for; women complain about the freaking toilet seat?! Come on!

Four, the toilet seat is proof positive that women are childish, immature beings whose mental and emotional maturity never progresses beyond the teenage level. Who else besides an immature, spoiled child would make a complaint like that? Who else would absolve themselves of any and all responsibility for themselves other than women? The toilet seat is living proof of the eternal solipsism of the female mind.

Five, it says that no matter how much women get, they won't be happy. Have they changed society in their image? Yes. Do they get preferences in college admissions? Yes, they do. Do they get preference in employment hiring decisions? They most definitely do! I saw inferior (in terms of grades, accomplishments, etc.) female classmates get better jobs than I and other men in our STEM program did. Do females get preference in promotion decisions? Oh, yes they do! When I worked in Whoreporate America, every position of power (other than the division head) in my office was occupied by a woman. Women have gotten everything they said that they wanted over the last few decades, yet they aren't happy; they still find something to bitch and moan about: the toilet seat.

Six, it says that women are entitled; it says that they expect someone else (i.e. men) do everything for them. Rather than put the seat down themselves, they expect a MAN to do it for them. WTF?! Whatever happened to sisters doing it for themselves? Whatever happened to women not needing a stinkin' man? Whatever happened to women needing men like fish need bicycles? If those statements are true, then WHY do women need men to put the toilet seat down for them, hmmm?

You know what's sobering? We gave these creatures the right to vote! Yes, that's right; we gave these childish, immature, spoiled brats the right to decide who has power over us, to decide OUR futures. With the way women handle the toilet seat issue and what it says about them, is it any wonder why they were denied the vote?!

In closing, the toilet seat gives us insight into women and their natures. One, women will complain about everything; for them, complaining is as natural as breathing. Two, the toilet seat shows us women are incapable of accepting responsibility for themselves. Three, the toilet seat shows us women have no perspective whatsoever, and they have no perspective about anything at all. Four, the toilet seat shows us that women are childish, immature beings who are incapable of acting like adults. Five, the toilet seat provides us proof that women cannot and will not allow themselves to be happy; if they have nothing to be unhappy about it, then they'll find something to be unhappy about. Finally, the toilet seat shows us that women are entitled, spoiled brats who expect someone else to do things for them-so much for sisters doin' it for themselves. The toilet seat shows us what women are REALLY like, and it ain't sugar and spice and everything nice. Until next time...

MarkyMark

I Expected More...

2012-01-11T21:23:00.001-05:00

Guys,

The video you're about to see is of Mystery in action. What is a mystery is his results! I'd heard that Mystery was this uber PUA, that he could get any chick he wanted, etc. I expected so much MORE from him that he delivers in this video.

What happened? I thought he'd snap his fingers, and have a Ten! I thought he could cast a spell, and get a chick. I thought he could walk in to a club, work his magic on a chick, and have her in bed in thirty seconds! As I said above, I expected so much more...

MarkyMark

What Women Reveal about Themselves Via Shaming Language

2012-01-10T14:13:00.001-05:00

Guys,

I was reading through one of my older posts when I stumbled across a comment made by JD. He talked about women using shaming language on us, and I responded to him by what I think it revealed about women when they used it. As I reread what I said months ago, I thought it would make a good post on its own. My brilliant insight awed even me! So, the next time a woman shouts you down for voicing our very real, very legitimate complaints, here's what it reveals about the woman. Here's my response to JD below...

You bring up an interesting point, JD, and I'd like to expand on it. It's a point I don't make often enough on here: what shaming language REALLY reveals about the woman using it. When a woman throws a tantrum, and accuses us of not 'manning up', of not 'doing our duty', it's very, very revealing, my friend. It's more revealing than the woman realizes. How so? Give me a few minutes, and I'll explain...

One, it says that women are not at all empathetic, contrary to what the MSM has told us; women are not the great empaths of the universe. The very fact that they won't even acknowledge, let alone LISTEN, to our very real, very substantive complaints is prima facie evidence of this. They just blithely dismiss what we have to say without even listening to it! That should lead any guy with two or more brain cells knocking togethter to ask this one, simple question: if she won't listen to me, my thoughts, and my complaints now prior to a relationship with her, then why should I believe that she'd listen to me after I say "I do"?

Two, when women dismiss our complaints, it says that they don't see us as human beings. They don't see us as having thoughts, feelings, dreams, desires, and needs that matter. It's all about THEM-all about them! They'll crow incessantly about having THEIR needs met, but they won't even take two seconds to listen to ours! They damn sure won't attempt to MEET our needs! That prompts me to ask this: why would I want to be with someone who doesn't view me as a human being? Why do I want to be with someone who cannot and will not see that I have needs, thoughts, desires, and dreams of my own? Why would I want to be with someone who won't lift a finger to meet the same? Why would I want to do that, huh? I can't think of a good reason to...

Three, when a woman hurls shaming language at us, it says that her needs, her thoughts, her desires, and her dreams matter more than ours. Did you ever think about that? In effect, women are saying, "How DARE you not give us what we want-how dare you!" When we try to tell them that there's nothing in it for us to marry them, they try to shout us down with the shaming language; they don't even have the decency to LISTEN to us and what we have to say! Did you ever think about that, JD? Did you ever think that, when a woman hurls her insults at us, she is in effect saying that our needs, our wants, our desires, and our dreams as men do not matter? Isn't she basically saying that, as long as she gets what she wants, then the hell with us?! I think so. Why would I want to marry someone who won't even acknowledge the fact that I'm a human being? Why would I want to be with someone who won't even acknowledge my humanity? Why would I want to be with someone who won't even acknowledge, let alone meet, my needs and desires? Why would I want to be with someone who's going to browbeat me about meeting her wants, but totally ignore mine?! If she wants money for her shoe collection, why that's all right; but, if a man wants to buy the motorcycle he always wanted, then that's bad. How dare I get something that I want! How dare I pursue my dreams! His mission in life is to serve her, to be her slave. Why would I sign up for that? Women's attitudes towards us really disgusts me! I think it's fair to say that the vast majority of them hate us as men. Sorry, but that's how I see it.

No my man, when a woman hurls shaming language at us, she's revealing a lot about herself; she's revealing things she doesn't intend to, but she's revealing a lot nonetheless. She's revealing that she couldn't be bothered to consider that we're human beings; nor can she be bothered to consider that, as such, we have thoughts, desires, needs, and dreams of our own. She can't be bothered with even thinking about them, let along trying to satisfy them. Why, it would be a crime against The Sisterhood to be nice to her man! She can't do that, man! Why, she'll be promoting patriarchal oppression if she does that! When a woman hurls shaming language at us, she's in effect saying that we're subhuman turds who do not matter. Since that's the case, I'm better off without a woman in my life. Women have no idea how counterproductive shaming language is...

MarkyMark

A Woman Unwilling to Accept Responsibility for Her Actions

2012-01-09T16:42:00.001-05:00

Guys,

Avenging Sword had this video in mind when he posted a link to a Dutch police stop on Mancoat. The link didn't work, so I did a search myself; since everything mentioned in that thread happens in the video, I think it's the right one. Anyway, it's a video of a Dutch chick going HYSTERICAL during a police stop-just another example of women throwing a fit when they get called on their bullshit. Is it any WONDER why women weren't allowed to have rights? Is it any wonder?!

Oh, and don't be the chump, er boyfriend, for some bitch; don't pay her fines; don't be a femnnabler! Don't enable women's bad behavior, please. If a woman you know gets in trouble, let her suffer the CONSEQUENCES! She's a strong, independent, empowered woman, right? She can do anything a man can do, and do it better, can she not? Let's give women every opportunity to put their money where their mouths are, Fellas. Enjoy!

Note how restrained the cops are; note how professionally they dealt with the situation-a far cry from our Blue Gun Thugs. That said, if anyone deserved to be tased, it was this stupid bitch and her boyfriend. Yeah, her mangina boyfriend gets in on the act, and he almost gets arrested himself-stupid idiot! Guys, we have got to stop HELPING WOMEN OUT; we have got to stop being femnablers! Women wanted equality, so we ought to give it to them; give it all to them.

As I said above, it's no mystery to me why women weren't allowed to vote, or why their other rights were curtailed. They simply aren't capable or mature enough of EXERCISING THEM. Before you can have rights, you must possess the ability to exercise those rights. Women, as demonstrated in this video, cannot do that. I also understand why Muslims keep their women on a tight leash-because they'll run wild if they aren't. If a picture is worth a thousand words, what's a whole bunch of them worth, hmmm? After all, a motion picture is just a bunch of pics flashed in rapid succession. This video says it all, doesn't it?

Oh, and before I close, let me point out something in the video. The video has English subtitles. At one point, they say that "the woman is talking bollocks". Do women talk any other way? When do they NOT "talk bollocks"? Good day...

MarkyMark

Sexual Harassment Laws, by Artfldgr

2012-01-08T14:09:00.002-05:00

Guys,

I finally found it! I found the essay I was looking for-yes! This is good stuff, stuff that needs to be shared with my readers. Enjoy...

-----------------

Harrasment laws:

Intent: To legislate etiquette rather than leave such behaviors up to culture and wait for them to work themselves out in an orderly fashion.

Methods: change the laws, and definitions of “harassment” with an eye on some arbitrary goal of reduction. In other words, tally the number of “incidents” and if its too high, keep expanding till you can scoop up the fish. Change the standard from reasonable person / reasonable woman, to victims standard. This means that whatever a nutcase thinks is the problem, that’s the problem, regardless if others in the community feel the same way. in this women were made “change agents”. a womans accusation was, and became equivalent to, truth

Desired outcome: that women who were fearful (far from the majority), and helpless socially (far from the majority), and more, would then have a “safe” environment that even granny could come to work and not feel threatened by the testosterone atmosphere. That when this offensiveness is removed, what will be left is a angel bright, strawberry shortcake clean world of friends and help meets.

Actual Outcome: given that the limitation was the victim, any nutcase could snag any guy. Given the presumption of guilt on one side and the presumption of innocence on the other, reverse harassment was ignored. Women in power quickly learned that unless their actions were extreme and singled out one person, they could draconically assign things and pocket men at will.
Given that there is no defense from the imaginations of a “victim”, the men endeavored to find ways to protect themselves from LIABILITY.

The really funny thing about it all is that the solution is direct from sibling rivalry. What happens when one child gets favored over another child unduly? What happens when one is believed and the other not believed?

Well, shows you how well women can raise kids too when they make a playground of the work place. what you have is the girls in the sandbox can tattle at will and be believed. The boys have no recourse. So what happens? Well, once in a while a boy will go postal and feel the punishment is worth all the get backs (in adults its murder suicide, in kids its dumping sand on her head). Some will become subjugated to the will to avoid problems and garner adult accolades (mangina’s in adult life, who have no will to play their own games in life, but make womens games and desires their own. Empty people).

But the vast majority will segregate. They will, like spanky and the rest, create the he man women haters club.

Rather than invite the ones with some unbalancing force into their midst, they will link up to create an opposition force. This force may even have other women in it that feel differently as to the situation, or in their real fairness were punished.

So the men, and the few women, link up and in passive aggressive means they work to undo and get rid of the opposition. This is why a woman that makes an allegation ends up living in a SOCIAL atmosphere that is even less tolerable. Her actions don’t just jeopardize or correct the issue at hands; it’s a nuclear weapon for a fly swatter that decimates the office for several years afterwards.

So now you have the outcome of never intended results. That women are hurt more and more by twiddling with things than the pain they get from leaving them alone. They refuse to look back to who told them the pain would be resolved by the misery.

Game theory says that the safest play is to not participate at work any more. period. if the allegations start from a belief and can be supported by the unique belief of an individual, then there is no appeal to the greater mass of reasonable people. The individual becomes your largest liability, and so you avoid them. you avoid all interpersonal contact that is not work related.

In order to do this you have to foster an atmosphere of paranoia. What would be considered paranoia years ago become the defacto norm. taping conversations for future reference, taping meetings for proof of innocence (since this type of conflict is guilty till proven innocent).

And just like in patent law, you avoid with prejudice the one situation that allows someone to do something. Opportunity

American companies will not open up envelopes of product ideas so that their labs don’t create the opportunity for a connection that can lead to a law suit for duplicate work.

Well, this is the natural outcome. Don’t want to pay $100 for a diner date? Then don’t go to dinner! Want to avoid death in a horrible incident, then be someplace else.

If you and I have no interaction, then there can be no misconstrued contact. Without misconstrued contact, or construed contact, there can be no incident and no bad outcome for the man.

The asymmetry of the situation creates an asymmetry in strategies. The women, who have always found work to be a good fishing ground for mates have now found their source dried up. (lesbians tactics win again… how many will turn to women to get their needs filled?).

If you go to wall street this is very evident. The hottest secretaries in the world work wall street. They also have the most chance at the one thing that they need to make or find a mate, and that’s opportunity.

But wait. Opportunity to meet is opportunity to be taken advantage of.

men are a lot more keen on risk assessment than women. they split the risk hairs closer to the margins. Women like a margin of safety larger than men do, and so men need to be better at assessment.

Risk assessment is easy to understand, an art in practice.

Basically you assess the outcomes and the prospective risks with the payoffs and losses involved. it’s a total fudge in the real world.

If you look at the landscape of relationships at work, the men really gain no advantage by participating. In fact in the past it was considered risky, but that risk was balanced by the rewards.

Today, that risk is no longer balanced by any reward.

Even if the relationship works out in the office, a third jealous party can be offended by it happening and sue that she was harassed by the others actions that created a hostile environment where their collusion was an advantage over her single position.

The main thing is that the definition has been expanded to the point where two people who have no power connection can commit harassment in a single incident based on arbitrary content and attribution of meanings.

Go look up harassment….
xhttp://www.nursingworld.org/dlwa/wpr/wp3.htm

Despite recent attention, sexual harassment -- defined as offensive, unwanted sexual attention -- remains one of the most persistent problems in the workplace. Nurses are not immune to this insidious form of sex discrimination.

harassment need not come from a supervisor, but could be from a coworker or other person who you encounter at work (physician, patient, salesperson).

So a nurse can file a harassment suit if a patient tells off color jokes when nervous. Would you think that that would make hospital administrators favor male nurses as safer liaisons with the public? (nope, cause then they are worried about the male nurse harassing the female patients – lesbians get a free ticket to the show!).

Here is an example of the new load of concerns that a corporate owner has to worry about because he is the government’s agent in mediating interpersonal relationships and problems. We are no longer fit to handle such things ourselves.

http://www.fels.org/news/news9604.htm

reading the above you realize that draconian response is the safest course for a company as they are penalized for less if the accusation is later found to be warranted, and they are no punished for such action in the case of application to innocent people. This means that its safer to kill all the dogs in case of rabies because we only get punished for successful cases of rabies, not for killing dogs.

5. Interview the parties and witnesses: This is most crucial part of the investigation. Here are some tips on interviewing the parties and witnesses:

Reading the article you will notice that a manager is now supposed to be an interrogator with no knowledge of doing so. the other thing you find out is that at any time a large portion of work productivity can be sucked away by endless investigations and constantly putting out fires.

This legislation makes the craziest bitch the most powerful.

Keep The Parties Apart: If it is possible to do so, modify the work while the investigation is in process so the accused is not in direct contact with the accuser. But don't modify the work of the accuser if it could be interpreted as retaliatory. Talk with the accuser before making a change, asking him or her for suggestions on how best to reasonably accommodate his or her work duties during the investigation.

Assume the accused is telling the truth and act on such to the assumed guilty party.

Sort Out The Facts: This is the hardest part of the investigation. When discrepancies exist between the statements, conduct a second round of interviews. In the final analysis, ask these types of questions: .

While keeping things completely secret have many rounds of investigations that call people away from their work for hours on end until all the stories match. If not, then what?

Well, then you have to use the facts around the information to make a choice, right?

C. Does your "gut" instinct tell you who is telling the truth? Do the facts support your "gut" instinct? And do the parties' past histories (work records, prior disciplinary incidents, performance problems) support it?

Ah, yes… so a female manager will have a different gut reaction than a male… (but here will be womens intuition, a more powerful version of GUT than men have installed).

And if regular work relations are not bad enough.

xhttp://life.familyeducation.com/page/40386.html

can anyone say, third job? Overseeing the artificial mother

Claims of Sexual Harassment
To keep safe from a charge of sexual harassment by the nanny, take great care to maintain your relationship with her on a professional level. Sometimes, especially with a live-in nanny or a working relationship in which the nanny is considered one of the family, the line between familiarity and impropriety can be a bit blurry.
In general, the federal laws that prohibit sexual harassment apply only to employers with at least 15 employees; therefore, they will not apply to a nanny situation. However, some states have human rights laws of their own that make essentially all employers liable for harassing conduct of a sexual nature. Examples of conduct that may amount to sexual harassment include: overt sexual advances; obscene comments; language or jokes (verbal or writ¬ten); unwanted physical contact, such as grabbing, rubbing against, or other touching; personal questions of a sexual nature; and, the display of obscene or pornographic material in the work area of the employee.
State laws against sexual harassment usually also prohibit retaliation by an employer if the employee reports harassment to the proper state agency. Typical penalties for a finding of liability for sexual harassment are fines, restitution for lost wages or benefits, reinstatement if the employee has been wrongfully terminated, and punitive damages. The safe course of action, if you have any doubt, is to completely avoid the above types of behavior around the nanny.

So upon hiring a nanny, ones verbal life is curtailed at home!!! Yes, its true… the hiring of an outside person puts a lock on your freedoms to associate, to speak, and to act in your own home.

Bottom line… they have made it a liability to hire women.

Hire a woman and you may have to pay salary for someone who isn’t working (maternity leave)
Hire a woman and you may have to field harassment programs and point people, and lawyer costs
Hire a woman and you will have to allow her to be paid in full during her breast feedings
Hire a woman and you will have to allow her to dress as disruptively as she wants without any recourse
Hire a woman and it becomes dangerous to get rid of her the nuttier she turns out to be.
Hire a woman and she will link up with other nuts and increase the legal load and outcome liability

And more…

Like…. Do anything to mitigate this risk, and suffer punishment too…

No wonder offshoring is appealing on many levels.

you want to see destruction due to feminism?

xhttp://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w060911&s=cottle092506

THE ABSURDITY OF REGULATING MODELS' WEIGHT.
Model Behavior
by Michelle Cottle

all it Revenge of the Carb Lovers. While much of the Middle East continues to devour itself, the hot controversy to come out of the West this week is Madrid's decision to ban super-skinny models from its fashion week, the Pasarela Cibeles, which begins on September 18th. Responding to complaints from women's groups and health associations about the negative impact of emaciated models on the body image of young women, the Madrid regional government, which sponsors the Pasarela Cibeles, demanded that the show's organizers go with fuller-figured gals, asserting that the industry has a responsibility to portray healthy body images. As Concha Guerra, the deputy finance minister for the regional administration, eloquently put it, "Fashion is a mirror and many teenagers imitate what they see on the catwalk."
Activists' concerns are easy to understand. With ultra-thinness all the rage on the catwalk, your average model is about 5' 9" and 110 pounds. But henceforth, following the body mass index standard set by Madrid, a 5' 9" model must weigh at least 123 pounds. (To ensure there's no cheating, physicians will be on site to examine anyone looking suspiciously svelte.) Intrigued by the move, other venues are considering similar restrictions--notably the city of Milan, whose annual show is considerably more prestigious than Madrid's.
Modeling agencies, meanwhile, are decidedly unamused. Cathy Gould of New York's Elite agency publicly denounced the ban as an attempt to scapegoat the fashion world for eatings disorders--not to mention as gross discrimination against both "the freedom of the designer" and "gazelle-like" models. (Yeah, I laughed, too.) Pro-ban activists acknowledge that many designers and models will attempt to flout the new rules. But in that case, declared Carmen Gonzalez of Spain's Association in Defense of Attention for Anorexia and Bulimia, "the next step is to seek legislation, just like with tobacco."
hoa, there, Carmen. I dislike catwalk freaks--pardon me, I mean human-gazelle hybrids--as much as the next normal woman. But surely most governments have better things to do than pass laws about what constitutes an acceptable butt size. Yes, without the coiffed tresses and acres of eyeliner, many models could be mistaken for those Third World kids that ex-celebs like Sally Struthers are always collecting money to feed. But that, ultimately, is their business. These women are paid to be models--not role models. The fashion world, no matter how unhealthy, is not Big Tobacco. (Though, come to think of it, Donatella Versace does bear a disturbing resemblance to Joe Camel.) And, with all due respect to the Madrid regional government, it is not the job of the industry to promote a healthy body image.
Indeed, there seems to be increasing confusion about what it is the "responsibility" of private industry to do. It is, for example, not the business of McDonald's to promote heart healthiness or slim waistlines. The company's central mission is, in fact, to sell enough fast, cheap, convenient eats to keep its stockholders rolling in dough. If this means loading up the food with salt and grease--because, as a chef friend once put it, "fat is flavor"--then that's what they're gonna do. Likewise, the fashion industry's goal has never been to make women feel good about themselves. (Stoking insecurity about consumers' stylishness--or lack thereof--is what the biz is all about.) Rather, the fashion industry's raison d'être is to sell glamour--to dazzle women with fantastical standards of beauty that, whether we're talking about a malnourished model or a $10,000 pair of gauchos, are, by design, far beyond the reach of regular people.
This is not to suggest that companies should be able to do whatever they like in the name of maximizing profits. False advertising, for instance, is a no-no. But long ago we decided that manufacturing and marketing products that could pose a significant risk to consumers' personal health and well-being--guns, booze, motorcycles, Ann Coulter--was okay so long as the dangers were fairly obvious (which is one reason Big Tobacco's secretly manipulating the nicotine levels in cigarettes to make them more addictive--not to mention lying about their health risks--was such bad form). The notion that the fashion industry should endure government meddling because its products or marketing techniques may pose an indirect risk to consumers by promoting an unhealthy desire for thinness seems dubious at best. More often than not, in the recognized trade-off between safety and freedom of choice, consumers tend to go with Option B.
Of course, whenever the issue of personal choice comes up, advocates of regulation typically point to the damage being done to impressionable young people. Be it consuming alcohol, overeating, smoking, watching violent movies, having anything other than straight, married, strictly procreation-aimed sex--whenever something is happening that certain people don't like, the first response is to decry the damage being done to our kids and start exploring legislative/regulatory remedies.

ut here, again, the fashion industry's admittedly troubling affinity for women built like little boys doesn't seem to clear the hurdle for intervention. It was one thing for R.J. Reynolds to specifically target teens with its cigarette advertising. And, while I disagree with the attempts to make the war on fat the next war on smoking (for more on why, see here and here), you could at least make a similar argument that junk-food peddlers use kid-targeted advertising to sell youngsters everything from cupcakes to soda to french fries. But there's a difference between industries that specifically go after young consumers and those that happen to catch their eye--like, say, the fashion industry or Hollywood.
So let's give all those chain-smoking, Evian-guzzling, "gazelle-like" human-coatracks a break. In another couple of years, their metabolisms will slow down or they'll accidentally ingest some real food, and they'll be unceremoniously tossed off the catwalk like a bad pantsuit. Until then, in the name of personal choice, they should be allowed to strut their stuff--no matter how hideously skinny they are.

-----------------

Good stuff, wouldn't you agree? Til next time...

MarkyMark

An Angry American

2012-01-08T13:58:00.000-05:00

Guys,

Here's yet another post I backed up. I originally found it three years ago when searching for something else. At the time, I said that things would get worse under Barack Hussein Obama, and time has proven me right.

------------------

I Am Angry
by Susan Fassanella
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/fassanella1.html

Dear Lew,

the Honorable Ron Paul’s piece on why Americans are angry really stirred me to respond. Mr. Paul’s piece speaks about many issues facing Americans today.

I am a 51-year-old woman. I have been married to the same man since 1976. I am the secretary/office manager for a small legal firm in the D.C. suburbs. My husband manages a wine and spirits store. I have two sons, aged 26 and 22. After realizing it wasn’t possible to support themselves and the government at the same time, both returned to the nuclear nest. Along with most people in my economic situation, I believe I am living what is supposed to be the American dream. I know why I am an angry American. I am frightened because America isn’t the same country it was when I was my children’s age. Allow me to share with you some of the reasons why I am an angry American.

I am angry because my government has been taken over by liars, thieves, thugs, deviants, and micromanagers. The propaganda it produces rivals that of the most fascist dictatorship.

I am angry that my government perceives my intelligence to be that of a jar of pickles incapable of making the smallest decision.

I am angry that my government takes it upon itself to shove its clucking nose into my pantry, medicine chest, bedroom, family room, doctor’s office, workplace, and everywhere else it thinks I need guidance to keep me safe from myself.

I am angry that the will of the American people is ignored on every issue imaginable. If voting really mattered, it would have been outlawed long ago.

I am angry that I am called a conspiracy theorist because I dare to think on my own and question authority and its lies.

I am angry that the more I read about 9-11 the more it looks like an inside job that was allowed to happen, enabling the Patriot Act to be conveniently enacted into law with the ensuing "war on terrah" following closely on its heels.

I am angry that the evil puppets in power think laws are created for the peon masses and it is their right to ignore the ones that get in the way of their agenda.

I am angry that the media has sold its soul to the evil forces running the world.

I am angry that my "leaders" have taken to calling my country the "homeland." It reeks of socialism.

I am angry that my government has invaded yet another sovereign nation and caused untold death and destruction based on a flimsy lie. I am expected to believe that weapons of mass destruction threatened my freedom and then I am told several years and billions of squandered dollars later that a massive intelligence network got the wrong information. A select group of businesses profit enormously from war. When Bush announced his intention to save Iraq from itself and that its oil would pay for the overthrow of Hussein, I laughed so hard I nearly choked. I remember the instability in the Middle East during the 1970s and the gas "shortages" that followed. I knew which direction gas prices would go. How stupid does Mr. Bush and his cronies think I am?

I am angry that the world stands silently by while my government bombs foreign lands with weapons containing depleted uranium and the news magazines wonder on their front covers why lung cancer has increased six-fold in the last year.

I am angry that Americans accept as gospel the propaganda that is routinely cranked out of the Washington lie machine. The lies become more transparent and brazen with each passing year, yet the only thing that seems to matter in living rooms across America is who will be the next American Idol.

I am angry that I am punished with high energy and gas prices and the resulting inflation because tree-hugging terrorists masquerading as environmentalists have handcuffed my country’s ability to produce its own energy. It would be easy to tell the Middle East what to do with their oil if restrictions on exploration and production were lifted in our own backyard.

I am angry that I am constantly admonished by minimalists for being a greedy consumer because I live where I choose, drive the vehicle of my choice, eat meat, and use tin foil to cover my leftovers.

I am angry that my life doesn’t belong to me anymore.

I am angry that I am required to obtain permission, fill out mandated paperwork in quadruplicate, and obtain the correct license or permit for just about everything imaginable. The tentacles of government are strangling my freedom, choice, and privacy at an alarming rate. The wrath of the machine is a constant threat should I dare do anything without leaving a neon paper trail and of course ignorance of the law is never an excuse.

I am angry that property rights are a thing of the past thanks to court-approved eminent domain theft.

I am angry that the Constitution is routinely declared irrelevant making it easier for a fascist police state and new world order to take over.

I am angry that legislation is in the works that will require me to carry "papers" to "prove" who I am. Another coming law I will ignore.

I am angry that my right to own and carry a firearm is drastically regulated and restricted.

I am angry every time I see a young person detained on the side of the road while cops paw through their possessions looking for anything that could enable them to be arrested and dragged through the criminal justice system. This has become so commonplace it is now the accepted norm.

I am angry that roadblocks are set up under the guise of keeping roads free of drunk drivers. What has happened to my right to travel freely? Why am I presumed guilty without probable cause? I am afraid to have a few drinks when I go out to dinner for fear I will be pulled over and end up in court-ordered drug rehabilitation.

I am angry when I read stories of Americans terrorized in airports and treated like common criminals by government minions after they have paid for the right to travel within a private system, yet pilots are blocked from carrying firearms.

I am angry that America has become a nation of busybodies. We are constantly bombarded with messages to be on the lookout for terrorists around every corner, report "suspicious activity," and rat on our neighbor whenever the opportunity presents itself. Is this not how the Nazis gained control of Germany and then most of Europe?

I am angry that the government requires me to sign a form every time I purchase a prescription. Whose business is it that I choose to take a thyroid medication, an antibiotic, a painkiller, an appetite suppressant, or any other substance? Am I dying of cancer? Am I facing debilitating chronic pain? Do I simply want to get HIGH? Heaven forbid someone out there might get their hands on something that might make them FEEL GOOD! No substance should be illegal or unobtainable. If a person wishes to self-medicate, that is their right. The government should not be in the business of criminalizing personal choices of any kind as long as those choices don’t infringe on another’s rights.

I am angry that my government meddles in the lives of people all over the world but looks the other way on the catastrophic issue of what to do about the millions of illegals who have crashed the gates of this nation. My country’s laws are ignored and mocked, yet I am told I must accept with open arms those who are here illegally. My taxes are used to educate their children in their native language. Hospitals are overrun with indigent people seeking medical care. Untaxed dollars earned in the underground economy are sent to the family back home while social services here are stretched to the limit. I read job want ads stating if you aren’t bilingual don’t bother to apply. What would happen to me if I placed an ad that said don’t bother to apply if your English isn’t understandable? Marches are conducted in my cities’ streets waving their countries’ flags as they shamelessly demand their "rights." I am told they deserve the same opportunities that brought my forefathers here. I am scolded that it is un-American to ask why they are not sent home. I am told that the term "illegal alien" offends them and that they prefer to be called "undocumented workers" and that my economy would die without them. I will happily pay more for fruits and vegetables if it means enforcing sensible immigration laws. But immigration isn’t about the cost of lettuce. It is another facet of an agenda that is bent on changing the face of America. When America is no longer a wealthy country of white European descent, it will be a place worse than anything Orwell could have imagined.

I am angry that my country is the only nation on earth who declares that a baby born on its soil is automatically an American citizen.

I am angry that the thugs that run my country don’t have the guts to declare English my nation’s official language.

I am angry that I have to search a package for English and push a button on every telephone system and ATM machine to continue in English.

I am angry that Washington, D.C.’s Metro is now being pressured to replace every station sign with bilingual verbiage to the tune of millions of dollars. Are bilingual road signs going to be the next mandated law of the land? I am currently forced to pay for voting ballots printed in 15 different languages and my tax dollars pay for interpreter services for people who are summoned to court for breaking laws. If English is the international language of the world, why isn’t it good enough to be the official language of the United States?

I am angry when I am told I am a bigot when I thumb my nose at political correctness.

I am angry when I wonder whether an expressed belief or opinion could land me in litigation if someone doesn’t like what I said and wants to silence my voice.

I am angry that diversity and sensitivity training is being forced on people whose only crime is to dare to speak freely.

I am angry that the symbols, customs, and roots of my Judeo-Christian country are being systematically outlawed because my culture offends newcomers. When we freely choose to go somewhere, are we not accepting the customs and cultures of that place? I am weary of being made to feel guilty for being an American.

And finally, I am angry that after working my entire adult life, I don’t see retirement in my life’s picture. My husband and I earn over a hundred thousand dollars a year, but by the time we pay federal taxes, state taxes, social security taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, excise taxes, energy taxes, telecommunication taxes, savings taxes, fees, permits, etc., there isn’t much left. But please don’t think that I mind supporting every deadbeat and down-and-outer with his hand out for a piece of my pie that I worked so hard for. I love supporting the world. After all, it’s the American way, isn’t it?

----------------

Man, that's just how I feel, knowing that my hard earned money is going to support the lazy bums of society...

MarkyMark

Brad Is THE Man!

2012-01-08T13:49:00.000-05:00

Guys,

While I was sifting through artfldgr's posts in an effort to find one he wrote about sexual harassment, I found this. I still haven't found what I'm looking for, but I found yet another gem to share with my readers. This was an e-mail posted on Mancoat, and if THIS isn't typical of the modern, DNA guzzling woman, I don't know what is...

-----------------

Brad,

It would be difficult for me to be any more miserable right now, I feel like the worst person ever. First, let me start by saying that I am truly truly sorry, and I hate myself for hurting you. Of all the people in the whole entire world, you were honestly the last person that I would ever want to wrong in any way. There is no excuse at all or anything that happened, so I won't even try other than to say all of us had WAY too much to drink, and I did a stupid thing. I can handle you being pissed at me, I absolutely deserve it, I can even handle the ugly words that were exchanged between us, what I can't handle is thinking that you see me as a different person. It is weird, I feel like I just went through a horrible break up or something. The world looked funny yesterday, I couldn't crack a smile if you paid me, there are songs I can't listen to, and I just feel beyond crushed. I don't know if you meant everything you said to me, and I am hoping that you didn't. I know that I was wrong on many levels, but I am also hoping that this is something that we can deal with. I know it sounds totally crazy and stupid, but you have come to play such a significant role in my life, I can't imagine my days without you. It is totally strange and weird to say that, and you could say that my behaviour didn't reflect that, and you would be correct. I hate feeling like you hate me, and I hate feeling like all of your friends think I am a terrible person, because I am not. I know there is nothing I can say or do to take back what happened, but I just want you to know that fighting with you was just about the worst thing I could have ever imagined. It was right up there with one of the ugliest nights of my life, and I would give anything in the world to rewind and fix it.

I am not sure if you will respond to this, part of me thinks that you won't. If not today, then maybe some other time. Also, thanks for getting my stuff together, although I think my sunglasses are still at your house, if you could keep your eyes peeled for them that would be great. I can't even focus or work today, I can't eat, I seriously feel like it was an ugly break up, and I am hoping against hopes that it was not that and you are not done with me. Please don't cut me off, I really don't think I can handle that.

I am so sorry.

Elizabeth

RESPONSE:

Dear Elizabeth,

Thank you for your concern. I'll be sure to file it away under "L" for "Long-winded diatribes from drunken whores I couldn't care less about".

You did a stupid thing huh? No...doing long division and forgetting to carry the one is "a stupid thing"; Mixing in a red sock with a load of whites is "a stupid thing"; Blowing some guy in a bathroom for 45minutes while I sit at the bar wondering if you're taking so long because you ate too much bran that morning isn't as much a "Stupid thing" as it is grounds for permanent removal from my social calendar.

To be honest, I'm not sure if it was more amusing that you went and degraded yourself in a public toilet not once but twice in a 2 hour span, or that you seemed to think that by saying "Well, I didn't F**k him" somehow gave you a clean slate. So forgive me if I couldn't care less if the world "looked funny" to you yesterday. Since your world revolves around blow dryers, golden retrievers, Prada Bags and Jelly Beans, I'm sure it must have been most unsettling to actually have to consider someone else's feelings for 24 hours straight. The good news for you is that my friends don't think you're a terrible person, they just think you're the average run of the mill cum-guzzling blond who commands about as much respect as your average child porn collector. I could be wrong but, it's pretty hard to respect some B&T chick who comes out to spend the night at my place even though she's seeing someone else in New jersey and winds up tongue-bathing the taint of anyone who decides 30 minutes of droning commentary on Colin Farrell's new haircut is worth putting up with for a hand job in the men's room. The good thing about being a guy is that when I eventually bump into the young lad who finger-blasted you on top of a towel dispenser last saturday, we'll have a shot and laugh our heads off about the time it happened.

By the way, for the amount of time you claim to spend in spin class you really must be doing something wrong to sport the thunder thighs you do. Watching you parade around my bedroom in a thong was a little like watching sea lions mate. Thought you might like to know.

PS. I BCC'd about 100 people on this email.

Talk to you never,
Brad

-----------------

Though I can't hump 'em & dump 'em due to my morals (I actually think it's WRONG to use someone, but that's just me-probably why I don't have chicks), I can't blame guys who do. If THIS is representative of the modern woman (and I believe that it is), then they aren't GOOD for anything else! Then again, given their diseases, even that's debatable anymore...

MarkyMark

Ten Signs That Happy Women Populate Planet Earth

2012-01-08T13:31:00.002-05:00

Guys,

As I was going through my old posts, I found this. It's one of Marc Rudov's articles. It lists the ten signs that happy women are on Earth. As if women could EVER be happy...

-------------------

Ten Signs Happy Women Populate Planet Earth
1. Divorce rate plummets to 10%; custody fights are relics of the past.
2. Most women's magazines cease operations.
3. Women publicly praise men and fatherhood.
4. Marriage rate increases to 90%.
5. Divorce courts treat men and women equally.
6. Unmarried pregnant women who unilaterally choose to give birth are solely responsible for supporting their children, ending paternity suits.
7. Men respect women and no longer wine & dine or objectify them.
8. Plastic surgery is a marginal industry.
9. National Organization for Women (NOW), whose victimhood propaganda now falls on deaf ears, is extinct.
10. Congress scraps the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and all states remove anti-male biases in domestic-violence laws.

-------------------

Hell will freeze over and the Chicago Cubs will win the World Series before ANY of the above happen, let alone all of the above! Happy women-isn't that an oxymoron? Until next time...

MarkyMark

The Magnificent Eleven, by Sam Spence

2012-01-07T23:21:00.001-05:00

Guys,

Tonight, I decided to chill out while listening to some NFL Films music. To those of us who grew up in the 1970s and watched This Week in the NFL, this will bring back memories of Pat Summerall and Tom Brooksheir showing us the previous week's football highlights. Anyway, this NFL Films classic perfectly captures all the emotions of football. Enjoy...

Hope you enjoyed that as much as I did!

MarkyMark

A Tale of False Accusation

2012-01-07T21:50:00.000-05:00

Guys,

About three years ago now, I visited the False Rape Society blog, and I saw this CHILLING post. It was the comment left by one of the readers. Read it for yourselves...

---------------------

Comment left on this Web site is a 'must-read': young men, especially, beware

Yesterday, my son was in court to change the date of his trial. He stood accused of sexually assaulting his crazy ex girlfriend. His charges were dismissed instead.

We had hired the best lawyer in the city. We were about to sell our home to pay for the trial. Thankfully we did not have to. We still owe considerable money to the lawyer and we will gladly pay it.

Our frustration like everyone on this site is that this girl will get off Scott free. My son passed a lie detector, the police and prosecution also know that:
1.she was stalking our son before the rape claim, calling us at all hours of the night and early am.
2.she once claimed she was pregnant by our son when that did not work was when she claimed rape
3.and she stalked him after the charge.

We decided to record the 3:00am calls she made to our son after the charges. In these calls she was providing my son with conditions / ultimatums for her to drop the charges such as couples counseling, not seeing any other women, no longer speaking to his parents - us, and dropping some friends that she deemed unsuitable. Our lawyer called it coercion. She even asked my son if he would still love her when it was over. My son had to choke out yes to keep the crazy talking.

Today our family is just relieved this horror story is over. At the same time we are very frustrated that we can do nothing about her actions and the harm she caused our son as well as the serious potential harm of going to jail and having a criminal record. By the way I am speaking Canadian law.

I read this site, during the year and a half of our ordeal as a way of giving myself some hope.

I am writing so perhaps others in similar situations will get hope from our story. My advice is keep good records - every detail can be important if you are dealing with a vindictive mentally ill female. And take a lie detector test, maybe not valid in court but it helped us.

---------------------

Guys, have NOTHING-and I mean nothing-to do with American women! This is what you could be in for if you do. It doesn't matter if only one in a thousand women are like this. It doesn't MATTER that the other 999 women are good; all it takes is the one psychobitch to ruin your life. Do YOU want to take the chance that you have the one in a thousand who can and will ruin your life? I don't think so.

Here's something else to consider: the vast majority of American women think that, because you're a man, you're automatically a rapist; because you're a man, you're guilty. The vast majority of American women would blame this young man for 'doing something wrong'. Even though the court dismissed the charges; even though the cops thought that the accuser was full of it; even though he had her on TAPE trying to coerce him; most American women would think that this young man was guilty of something.

Let me put it another way: when the Duke lacrosse team was initially charged, 80% of women surveyed thought that the boys were guilty! Let me repeat that: 80% of American women, even in the face of DNA evidence to the contrary, still thought that 'the boys had done something'! Why? Because of "women's superior way of knowing", that's why! An American woman will hate, fear, and suspect you simply because you're a man. She won't see a problem with false accusations; they don't happen often, if at all, as far as she's concerned. After all, Susan Brownmiller told her so! IOW, most American women would take the accuser's side here. Sorry Fellas, but that's the cold, hard truth.

Do you want to be MARRIED to someone like that, and have to depend on them to have your back if you get falsely accused? No way! Your American wife will not support you at all. If anything, she'll accuse and blame you for having 'done something'! She'll take the accuser's side, not her husband's! Then, for good measure, she'll divorce you and leave you in poverty for the rest of your life. Do you REALLY want to marry someone like that, Fellas? I don't, because THAT is what you'll get if you marry an American woman.

So, what to do? Don't have ANY UNNECESSARY DEALINGS WITH WOMEN! I don't care if they're on fire; you don't put it out. I don't care if she's being raped; you don't step in and help her. I don't care if she's drowning; don't go in after her. I don't care if she needs help on the side of the road; let some other schmuck be Sir Galahad. Besides, women are strong, independent, and empowered these days; they don't need no stinkin' man; let them save themselves! They've heaped hatred, scorn, and derision upon us men for the last few decades, so let them rot...

Don't speak to women first; speak only when spoken to. Don't speak with them for any reason other than conducting business; once business is concluded, end the conversation. Don't spend time with them, unless you want to be nagged, bitched at, and dumped on-and that's BEFORE she concocts an accusation to ruin your life. Don't be alone with a modern woman; that goes without saying! Being alone with a modern, American woman is begging for trouble! Don't have any unnecessary dealings with women. Understand?

Oh, and I wouldn't even use them for sex. One, she might feel slighted that you didn't call her the morning after, so she'll go running to the cops saying that you raped her; once she does, you're toast! Unlike cops from years gone by, today's blue gun thugs are dumb, muscle bound, wannabe Nazi lunkheads; they'll be only too happy to 'protect the damsel in distress'. What that means is you'll up the creek without a paddle, pal.

Secondly, let's call a spade a freakin' shovel here, shall we? Whatever you call it-sport sex, running game, or something else-you're USING someone else for your physical pleasure. You're using the woman. Well, MarkyMark, women are users, so I'm just going to use them back. Sorry, but two wrongs don't make a right; they never have, and they never will. Furthermore, in my Bible, God says that vengeance is His, and that HE will repay! If someone needs to be punished, let God deal with them...

Finally, even if she doesn't accuse you, you have the matter of her diseases. Goodness knows how many and what kind of STDs your modern, empowered slut is carrying! Modern women are a petri dish of STDs and STIs; their vaginas would contain a "who's who" amongst nasty, STDs! Let me ask you a question: do YOU want warts on your willy for the rest of your life? Well, do you, punk?! I didn't think so.

I know that all women aren't the enemy, but it's best to act under the assumption that they are until proven otherwise. Even when you think they're not, don't drop your guard totally. Remember, your modern, American woman, particularly if she's been 'college educated', is steeped in DECADES of feminist propaganda. Her default mode of operation is to assume the worst about men; her default mode is to go on the warpath against you for no reason at all. Ergo, it's best to assume that women are your enemies, and to govern yourself accordingly. I hate to say that, but reality dictates that I do.

It's not different than when I ride. When I ride, I assume that EVERY AUTOMOBILE DRIVER IS OUT TO KILL ME! I assume that every 'cager' (a derisive slang term motorcyclists have for car drivers, most of whom ARE idiots, but that's another rant) is trying his or her best to take me out. Intellectually, I know that this isn't the case, but a sufficient number of cagers do enough dangerous, stupid things to dictate my paranoid view of them. If I assume and act as if they're all out to get me, they won't. Treat women the same way.

I'm out of here. Have a nice day, Fellas...

MarkyMark

Signs Your Woman Is Cheating

2012-01-07T19:50:00.002-05:00

Guys,

As I was going through my old posts and backing them up, I accidentally clicked on a link which led me to this post, the one you're about to read. It's a list of things women do if they're cheating. This will also go into The MGTOW Survival Guide, as it's something men need to know. Enjoy, Fellas...

------------------

If there is something a man cannot overcome in a relationship its humiliation. And indeed, why should he?

This is a message to announce that I am finally offering a public service to help men catch their cheating wife/girlfriend red handed.

I can no linger sit idly by and be indifferent to the cries of my clients and friends who are having their lives shredded by the humiliation of a cheating partner.

What was my tipping point? A client discovered that his 10 Yr old twins were not his. Imagine the anguish. The humiliation!

Not only is that humiliating; not only is the man a genetic dead end (fathering kids that are NOT his); he's legally on the HOOK for those children! Even if the man went into court, showed the judge DNA tests proving the kids aren't his, he'd still be liable for child support.

And get this, in the past two months I’ve already helped 7 men catch their wives red handed!

Good on you, Mate!

Surveys show that most men can go through a divorce or even remain apparently happily married and never know their wife was sleeping with another man, and sometimes men. The existence of any four of these signs means you have some cause for profound concern.

1. She has stories about cheating on a previous partner.
2. She cheated on someone else to be with you.
3. She brags about cheating.
4. She brags about being too smart to be caught.
5. She says you are boring.
6. She refuses to wear panties/underwear.
7. She has a boob job.
8. She has tattoos or body piercings underneath her clothes.
9. She uncharacteristically daydreams while playing with her hair for long periods of time.
10. She is obsessive about wearing form fitting clothes.
11. She flirts with other men.
12. She speaks with admiration about specific men at work.
13. She is repetitively disrespectful to you in private and public.
14. She leaves the room to take calls.
15. She hangs up on calls before answering the call.
16. She unfavorably compares you to other men.
17. She starts shaving body parts she never used to shave before.
18. She is shy about allowing you to see her nude.
19. She dresses sexually but shows no interest in sex with you.
20. She protests you going to the doctors alone with your children.
21. She is coming home late at night or not at all.
22. She packs toiletries when she goes out.
23. She is non-committal in telling you where she is going.
24. She is non-committal in telling you when she will be home.
25. She has great interest in knowing when you will be leaving town.
26. She goes to nightclubs and bars without you.
27. She dresses seductively everywhere she goes.
28. She smiles and laughs with other men but not with you.
29. She opens a new bank account.
30. She withdraws lots of cash and won’t say where it’s going.
31. She has no interest in talking about the future with you.
32. She asks to separate from you.
33. Other women that know her will not allow her near their husbands.
34. Drama with other men seems to follow her in every job.
35. She refuses to introduce you to her male or female friends.
36. You have a nagging feeling that something is terribly off.
37. She makes random speeches about how she would never cheat.
38. She does and says things to take away your power as a man.
39. She disrespects and belittles all men.
40. Your relationship is ALL about filling her needs.
41. Reminisces about previous sexual experiences.
42. Her self esteem is based on the approval of all men, not just one.
43. She has close emotional ties with other men.
44. Too much time at the gym.
45. She tells you not to ‘come’ inside her before a trip.
46. She is secretive and defensive.
47. She gets angry over the smallest of things.
48. Your gut tells you she is not loyal.
49. She is critical of women who are loyal to their man.
50. The passenger seat in the car is consistently changed.
51. Strange hairs on her clothing or in her car.
52. She always seems to have random scratches and bruises.
53. Sex toys show up that you have never known about.
54. Shuts the computer down when you walk in the room.
55. Lingerie shows up that you’ve never seen before.
56. She refuses to linger or cuddle after sex.
57. She does not allow you to get to know her.
58. She thinks nothing of humiliating you.
59. She is seduced by the forbidden and wrong in life.

None of these signs are proof by itself. That’s where I come in. I’ll give help you get the proof you need.

(For the full 411 of how women think and operate when cheating consider my latest book REAL MEN CAN READ WOMEN LIKE A BOOK @ http://thefreedomacademy.com/this-book-is-for-men-only. Read the details on how to profile the ‘huntress’ cheater.)

My methods to help you know if you are being cheated on are extremely subtle, non-confrontational and indeed, the woman in your life need never know that you were suspicious or that I was involved. You won’t even need to leave your house.

In the end, if it is discovered that she is a cheat it will seem to her that she has been caught by coincidence, being none the wiser of what has been happening behind the scenes.

All the work we’ll do together is by phone/text/email and there are no costly or unnecessary private investigators required.

Within 30 days, you could know if your wife/girlfriend is loyal or if she is a cheat.

What is the cost of not knowing the truth?

For one of my clients the cost was raising some other man’s kids while believing they were his for 10 years!

If you are interested in this service for yourself or a friend, please send an email at tfacademy@gmail.com.

I am limited in how many men I can help so please reserve your spot asap.

In the meantime, register for my twitter account http://twitter.com/eadvisor to get genius insights.

Thank you for your interest in this matter.

Thanks for sharing your knowledge in this matter! This is good stuff to know.

Corey Donaldson
www.TheFreedomAcademy.com
COPYRIGHT 2011 © Corey Donaldson

--------------------

Hope this helps you out, Gentlemen...

MarkyMark

Modesty & Hypocristy

2012-01-07T13:15:00.000-05:00

Folks,

About three years ago, Mrs. Amy, who hosted "Clothesline Alley", had an excellent post on modesty. While it is from her point of view, I wanted to rerun it here, and intersperse my thoughts about this as a man. Here goes...

---------------------------

In recent weeks, I have shared several interesting email and phone conversations with several dear bloggy buddies on the subject of modesty and these conversations inspired the bit of writing I am about to share. My intention with this post is not to debate modesty standards, but to share a glimpse into why I have come to accept my certain standards for myself and what exactly modesty means to me. :o)

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Modesty is such a loaded word it seems, with many definitions and assertions swirling around about how it looks or what it means. Living in one of the most decadent and sex obsessed cultures the world has ever seen, modesty is an especially interesting topic to me, both for discussion and for living out as a religious conviction. All around me women parade around in all sorts of undressed states and hardly an eyebrow is raised, but once the hemlines start dropping and the necklines become actual necklines rather than 'bust lines,' that's when the tempers begin to flare and the questions will be asked.

You know, if there is one thing that REALLY PISSES ME OFF, it's hypocrisy! I hate it! I hate it even more when those practising it do so with a straight face and see nothing wrong with it! Such is one of my common gripes with modern women and feminists (really the same thing in 99.9999% of cases).

These immodest, scantily clad women will bitch & moan if you say anything about how they're dressed; don't you dare judge me! That's their cry anyway. However, when someone like Mrs. Amy exercises HER right to dress in a more modest fashion, these same hypocrites will give her grief for doing so! WTF?! They don't want anyone saying anything to THEM about their dress (or lack thereof, I should say), yet they'll turn around and give ladies like Mrs. Amy grief for exercising her right to choose what she wears & when?! Come on!!!

Here in the West, we believe women to be nothing more than objects to be put on display for the enjoyment of the public's feasting eyes. We find the notion of a Muslim woman choosing to wear hijab, in accordance with her faith, to be a terrible abuse inflicted upon herself, yet celebrate the gross unveiling of ourselves, in bikinis on beaches, as we put what should be private on display for all to see. Nothing is sacred here or held in the dignity that it really ought to be. Flesh is exposed without a thought in the world. Sex is used to sell everything. Hardly a soul thinks twice before divulging secrets that should best be kept in the marital bedroom, solely between husband and wife. We argue that this is our right and privilege, as if having the legal right to choose our own clothing and topics of conversation somehow makes it appropriate to drop our behavior down to the lowest common denominator where no propriety or morality exists. Our culture is in complete disarray when it comes to such a precious and delicate possession are our dignity and modesty and I can't help but feel we are all losing out because of this.

You know what gets me? This has to do with hypocrisy again. If a woman were to strip down to her bra & panties, then walk on the street, she'd get many looks, and perhaps get into trouble as well. However, the moment you take those same undergarments, and paint them in a myriad of bright, flashy colors, why that's okay! The same women who wouldn't be caught dead walking down the street in their bra & panties have no compunction about doing so in a bikini-okaaaaaay. What is a bikini, other than a bra & panties painted in bright, flashy colors? Am I the only one who sees the inconsistency here?!

Then, there's the matter about how feminists rail against the objectification of women. "What about my mind, you pig?" was a popular, feminist battle cry in years past. However, these same feminists fought against modest, women's apparel, and made it appear to be a crime against women. Come again?! It's The Patriarchy's fault that women are abused by having to cover up-waaaaahhhh! It's abuse of women! Let women bare all, then they'll be empowered! Uh, when you uncovered women and bared their wares, as it were, you did precisely what you professed to be fighting against: you objectified women-f*&#ing hypocrites! Then again, what do we expect from modern women & feminists?

God knitted together the bodies of us all, made in His image; fearfully and wonderfully we are made. Our bodies have the power to run, to dance, to jump for joy. We can sing songs of thanksgiving, kneel down to pray on our knees, and clap our hands to the music. With our bodies is the power to do great things and in our minds the ability to ponder many noble ideas. Unique to the female form are a couple particularly splendid powers: the ability to be partner with God in Creation as we grow new life in our womb and nourish our babies with mama's milk and also the power endowed in the female form to ignite a man's passion for us, which is a great gift when this man is our husband, but very problematic when he is a man with whom we have no such business sharing such things.

That's because, when this beautiful gift is given to many men, the woman truly belongs to no one. When she has sex with many men, she bonds (thanks to oxytocin) with many and belongs to no one. She cannot become 'one flesh' with her husband. Is it any wonder why divorce has been skyrocketing since the sexual revolution? When a woman finally does marry (after tens if not hundreds of sexual partners), she cannot bond or become one with her husband. She cannot give herself to him, because she's given herself to every other Tom, Dick, and Harry.

That's why modern women are such damaged goods. You can see it in their faces and especially their eyes. One guy on Mancoat used a crude, yet accurate expression to describe this: the thousand cock stare. It used to be that only career prostitutes had this look; now, it seems as if the vast majority of women do, and they sport it at ever younger ages!

I remember how I was out riding last summer. It was a nice, summer day, so I took the long way home from work. I cruised through College Hill, which is in Easton, PA. That's the neighborhood in and around Lafayette College. Anyway, I was crusing down the street when I noticed a party going on at one of the houses. I remember seeing a young woman in her early 20s wearing a short, black dress like the ones you'd see at a nightclub. This woman, though she was beautiful, already had that look! I have to tell you that not only was it sad; it took away from her beauty. Seeing her with that 'thousand cock stare' took away much, if not all, of her allure for me.

Our culture has a firm grasp on this last power and a clear understanding of how to use this power very well. The gift that is female beauty is twisted and perverted nearly everywhere you look. Here in America there is hardly a place to escape the stares of lusty buxom babes on billboards or even the well-lined lips of the Bratz baby dolls. We tarnish the eyes of our children, tempt our young men already struggling with lust as is, and taunt the idea of God ordained marital intimacy, all to exploit His wonderful gift and sell, sell, sell.

Sex is used to sell everything! I remember how years ago, when Chevrolet was doing its "Heartbeat of America" ad campaign, the first ad of the series closed out. It showed the silouhette of a guy and a gal in a Corvette convertible, and there was subdued, sexy music playing in the background. The man puts a lip lock on the girl, the top goes up, shielding the couple from view as the scene faded to black. The not so subtle message was this: guys, get yourself a Corvette, and things like this will happen to you! I could go on, since it seems almost every ad targeted at men uses sex to sell the product; I won't, because I'll be here till next month if I do.

In this upside down world, to object to such exploitation of sexual expression and the female form gets you labeled as insecure, unenlightened, and many less than flattering names. To object to the undressing of women in some circles will now even get you branded as a "misogynist" as it's apparently a woman's empowering right to be a harlot, either in looks or behavior, and quite possibly both. Apparently we ought to celebrate the freedom the Sexual Revolution, abortion on demand, and the birth control pill have offered us, celebrating with joy the removal of the shackles of decency & responsibility that were once dreadfully placed upon the "fairer sex."

What was good is now evil; what was evil is now good. I seem to remember a Bible verse in which the Lord expressed His displeasure over such balderdash. Ah, but God is just a tool of The Patriarchy to subdue women-waaaaaahhhhh!

I used to wonder about modesty myself. "Why on earth would I want to oppress myself in such ways?" I thought to myself, but then one day I woke up. I realized that there was an alternative to tugging on my knee length skirt I felt very uncomfortable in. Rather than pull on my hemline in some desperate attempt to make my short skirt seem longer, I could wear a longer skirt and so my journey into modest dress began. As I let go of the power I had to entice men with whom I had no business trying to do so, the first lessons of modesty's power were ones I learned with great surprise. When I put on my shield of cloth, I suddenly had self-respect and the freedom to move about without worrying that I couldn't move this way or that way without some inappropriate flash of skin happening due to my former clothing that was far too lacking in fabric. Slowly I began to change, dressing with more fabric and comfort in mind.

People treated me markedly different after I began to wear clothing becoming of a young woman and I began to see the world in a strange new light, as well. Gone were the days when I thought being comfortable in my skin meant showing lots of skin and instead being able to let my character, opinions, and ideas shine became my prime way of expressing myself. I wasn't just my physical attributes any longer, defined solely by my youthful body, but a person who had more to offer the world than just mere outward beauty. I learned much about my dignity and worth as a woman and a Child of God as my slavish need to follow the trends of my culture subsided.

I've noticed the same thing. When I dress up, people look at and treat me differently too vs. when I where more casual clothes. People DO perceive you differently, no question about it. I'd like to relate a humorous story at this point...

I used to go bicycling along the Jersey Shore. When I did so, I wore my helmet and a bright, orange safety vest. After all, I wanted the idiot vacationers to see me! When the tourists were on vacation, their minds were often on vacation as well, so I wore a vest that Ray Charles could have seen. Yeah, I wore a helmet, but that doesn't mean I wanted to USE it!

One night, I was out and about and these girls asked me for directions. I had to tell them that I wasn't from around there, and that I couldn't help them. They reacted with surprise; they thought that I was a cop! I told them that no, I wasn't a cop; I wasn't riding a mountain bike (bike cops ride of choice), didn't have a radio, nor did I have a badge or name tag. Why did they think I was a cop? Because I was wearing the safety vest that cops often wear while directing traffic, that's why! Because an element of my attire was associated with cops, I was presumed to be one myself. Just goes to show you that how we dress DOES influence others' perception of us...

Shortly afterward, I became a wife and an exciting new aspect of modesty came to be understood in my mind. This fact being that my beauty is my husband's treasure, for his eyes only, not to be advertised and exploited out in public for all to see. His adoring gaze is the only such gaze I should enjoy, the only one that is godly and appropriate for one who claims to follow God. Being my husband's wife was a wonderful gift from God and not something I should be mistreating and abusing simply because my culture finds such expressions to be acceptable and many times celebrated. What's private should be kept private or else it will lose its magic, its sparkle, and its specialness. The fires of passion within marriage should be well-tended, not allowed to be blown out to go looking for admiration elsewhere.

Fires that aren't well tended have a nasty habit of becoming wildfires; wildfires have a nasty habit of being very destructive...

Now, quite a few years into my modesty journey, my standards of dress have changed drastically from what they once were. My daily uniform consists of long flowing skirts that hit my ankles, tights & socks that cover my legs, and closed toe shoes that hide my feet. My long loose shirts have necklines that show nothing beyond my neck, with sleeves that go past my elbows, if not past my wrists. And my hair stays hidden under a beautiful tichel, hat, or other such headgear each and every day. Only those with whom I would share my deepest secrets, my greatest hopes, my darkest moments are those I literally "let my hair down" with.

It's interesting to witness people's reaction to my dress, especially those who knew me before, those who have seen my hair and know what my natural hair color is. There are a few who think I've lost my marbles, others who have come to understand and even respect my choice, and those who applaud my efforts to cover up in our sexed up world. The reactions from strangers are also intriguing, with many questions asked of me on a regular basis. The inevitable "What religion are you?" but others are always leave me a bit taken aback. The assumptions that my husband must be an evil tyrant type or that I am somehow teaching my daughter to be ashamed of her femininity are among those. It's a sad time & place to live in which submission to the Creator's will from as far back as the Garden, and self-respect is mistaken for oppression.

Unfortunately, it's only religious people who make an effort to dress modestly anymore. That's why you get that question.

I always answer the critics, with thoughtful answers expressed in kindness and perhaps such conversations might even open a few minds, particularly when it comes to our children. Far from being a danger to my precious daughter, I find my choices for her wardrobe and mine to protect us from the harmful exploitation society wants to force upon us. It is my hope to impart to Peapod the knowledge that her body is beautiful just as God made it, that lovemaking within the bounds of marriage is a beautiful gift, and that for others to respect her, she must first respect herself and the dignity God has given her. These are the same lessons I would strive to teach to my son, if we were ever so blessed. If a person wants to be respected, they need to be someone worthy of such treatment, not one to indulge in questionable behavior or to dishonor themselves or others with their choices. If a person makes the choice to act in less than the best ways, they should not be shocked that nobody thinks very highly of them.

Mrs. Amy, you said something deep right here! If a gal wants a prince, then she must comport herself as a princess-duh! One thing that pisses me off to no end about modern women is that they want, demand, and expect to have Prince Charming while forgetting that Prince Charming wants someone who is a Princess! Do they really think that Prince Charming wants some bitter, angry, used up, disease ridden whore? These chicks dress like whores, then they turn around and cry about being TREATED like whores?! Come on! See my previous story about the bike vest, then come back and talk to me.

I know that for me, as a guy, if I see a woman clad in a nice, feminine, yet modest dress, then I'll view her as a lady, because she's comported herself as one. However, if I were to see her in something provocative and slutty, I' NOT going to think of her as a lady! I'll think many things of her, but I won't view her as a lady, nor will I be inclined to treat her like one...

I want Peapod to know that she doesn't need to use her body to prove anything to anybody, nor does she need to feel pressured to conform to the vain & trivial pursuits of of our youth culture. Her mind, her character & virtue, and her talents are what she should be offering to the world and the areas on which the world can judge her by. Her beauty, however, that is to be held in high regard and saved for somebody special, the man she will (God willing) marry one day. She is worth more than being used and abused by someone who does not truly care about her, just as we all are, regardless of what the norms in modern day America might be.

So, strange world I live in, call me backward, ashamed, and weak. I would rather use the power my body has for the goodness my God had in mind. I am not your property society at large, nor do I want to be a stumbling block for the many religious men whom already struggle enough in our world full of lusty temptations. Truly they do not need even one more woman to add to the unfortunate mess. I am a daughter of the King, my husband's wife, my child's mother, and a woman who sees her value and worth simply in being who she is, and not just a pretty picture on which you can all cast your eyes.

-----------------------

Man, that's good stuff! Too bad more women don't understand that; too bad more women never, ever learn what this fine, young lady, Mrs. Amy, has learned; they'll never, ever get it that, if you want Prince Charming, you must first comport yourself as a Princess-duh! One thing I often wonder is why can ladies like Mrs. Amy figure out what should be obvious, yet the vast majority of women never get this? Why is that? Either it's because Mrs. Amy is special and smarter than your average chick (she is), or the vast majority of women are screwed in the head and are incapable of figuring out this little thing called cause & effect? I'm not sure. Until next time, this is MarkyMark signing off...

A Blast from the Past

2012-01-07T12:59:00.002-05:00

Folks,

As you know, I'm reconstructing the blog. As I've gone through old posts, I've found some that need to be posted now. This is one of many posts I've discovered on Mancoat and shared with my readers through the years. It turns out that one of our stalwarts there, Chrisvet, found this blast from the past! It's a list of eleven tips for male managers supervising female employees working for mass transit services. This is good stuff. Thank you, Chrisvet! Now, on with this EXCELLENT piece...

-------------------

Ideas
eleven tips on getting more efficiency out of women employees
by L.H. Sanders March 7, 2005
From the July 1943 edition of Mass Transportation magazine, written for male supervisors of women in the work force during World War Two.

There’s no longer any question whether transit companies should hire women for jobs formerly held by men. The draft and manpower shortage has settled that point. The important things now are to select the most efficient women available and how to use them to the best advantage. Here are eleven helpful tips on the subject from western properties:

1) If you can get them, pick young married women. They have these advantages, according to the reports of western companies: they usually have more of a sense of responsibility than do their unmarried sisters; they’re less likely to be flirtatious; as a rule, they need the work or they wouldn’t be doing it – maybe a sick husband or one who’s in the army; they still have the pep and interest to work hard and to deal with the public efficiently.

Back when married women kept the home, they HAD to be efficient; they didn't have all the labor saving devices that we take for granted today. In fact, when you view the ladies' blogs (all of whom are homemakers themselves) to whom I link, a recurring theme they have deals with time managment.

2) When you have to use older women, try to get ones who have worked outside the home at some time in their lives. Most transportation companies have found that older women who have never contacted the public, have a hard time adapting themselves, are inclined to be cantankerous and fussy. It’s always well to impress upon older women the importance of friendliness and courtesy.

This is a rather telling comment in more ways that one!

3) While there are exceptions, of course, to this rule, general experience indicates that “husky” girls – those who are just a little on the heavy side – are likely to be more even-tempered and efficient than their underweight sisters.

4) Retain a physician to give each woman you hire a special physical examination – one covering female conditions. This step not only protects the property against the possibilities of lawsuit but also reveals whether the employee-to-be has any female weaknesses which would make her mentally or physically unfit for the job. Transit companies that follow this practice report a surprising number of women turned down for nervous disorders.

And feminazis try selling us on the BALDERDASH that men and women are the same-yeah, right! And I'd like to know what this chap means by 'nervous disorders'-things that make you go hmmmm...

5) In breaking in women who haven’t previously done outside work, stress at the outset the importance of time – the fact that a minute or two lost here and there makes serious inroads on schedules. Until this point is gotten across, service is likely to be slowed up.

Women always have to fuss over how they look; talk to friends; or otherwise waste time when you need to leave RIGHT NOW! In fact, in the movie, "Jersey Girl", opens with Ben Affleck & J Lo (who were a married couple in the movie) arguing because he has to get to an important, company party while she is fussing at the mirror and acting like a brat! I think that she was supposed to be pregnant at the time, but she still had NO RESPECT for the importance of her husband's time at all-none! If a chick pulls that crap with me, I just kick her to the curb. I have NO PATIENCE WHATSOEVER for late people. It seems that most of them are women now that I think about it...

6) Give the female employe in garage or office a definite day-long schedule of duties so that she’ll keep busy without bothering the management for instructions every few minutes. Numerous properties say that women make excellent workers when they have their jobs cut out for them but that they lack initiative in finding work themselves.

There it is! Women do NOT have initiative that I've noticed. Ever wonder why there's a dearth of female inventors? It's because they don't have the same intiative, drive, and curiosity that a man does. It's not because she was oppressed by the big, bad Patriarchy...

7) Whenever possible, let the inside employe change from one job to another at some time during the day. Women are inclined to be nervous and they're happier with change.

8) Give every girl an adequate number of rest periods during the day. Companies that are already using large numbers of women stress the fact that you have to make some allowances for feminine psychology. A girl has more confidence and consequently is more efficient if she can keep her hair tidied, apply fresh lipstick and wash her hands several times a day.

What is it with women and their vanity?! What's even worse are the metrosexual guys who are like that-sheesh! One of the things I like about being a man is that life is simple for me; from start to finish, it only takes me about 20-30 minutes to get ready to go somewhere-and that's if I shower & shave! With women, you're talking HOURS...

9) Be tactful in issuing instructions or in making criticisms. Women are often sensitive; they can’t shrug off harsh words the way that men do. Never ridicule a woman – it breaks her spirit and cuts her efficiency.

Women are often sensitive? Try ALWAYS sensitive-sheesh! Even if you use the wrong tone of voice with a chick, she'll have a hissy fit! Things that a guy wouldn't bat an eye at make chicks go ballistic! One of the things I don't miss about working with women is their hyper sensitivity to anything and everything. Now, thanks to feminist indoctrination, it's even worse; what's more, these women can and will ruin your life-all because you looked at them the wrong way...

10) Be reasonably considerate about using strong language around women. Even though a girl’s husband or father may swear vociferously, she’ll grow to dislike a place of business where she hears too much of this.

If women still acted like ladies as they did when this was originally written, I'd have no problem with this. Nowadays though, women are even MORE profane than men are! And I thought that drunken sailors talked badly...

11) Get enough size variety in operator uniforms that each girl can have a proper fit. This point can’t be stressed too strongly as a means of keeping women happy, according to western properties.

Here we go with women and their vanity again...

This feature was first published on section15.ca’s predecessor site CoolWomen.

------------------------

Was that good stuff or what? I thought so! Thanks again to Chrisvet for finding this excellent piece. Man, if that were published today, oy vey! Heads would ROLL for this! OMG, they're dissing women-waaaaahhhhh! They're saying that women are different-waaahhhh! Off with the man's head! How DARE he oppress women like this! Thanks to feminazis and their politically corect, fascist allies, we no longer have the freedom of speech to call a spade a freakin' shovel. Oh well, that's why you have me! Have a nice day, and it's good to be back-even if it's not @ 100% yet...

MarkyMark

Controlling Lust: Part IV

2012-01-06T22:04:00.001-05:00

Guys,

This is the final part of the "Controlling Lust" series. Man, this stuff is golden! This is the kind of thing we ought to be taught by our parents, or learn in school and/or church. This is far better and far more useful than anything you'll find in the Lamestream Media, that's for sure...

-----------------------------

Arousal

So far, we have covered techniques for controlling lust which deal with the object of desire. We learned how we, as men, can keep ourselves from throwing more gasoline on the flame of passion. With the following strategies, we can control the general feelings of sexual arousal that may come on us suddenly and unexpectedly. Remember, we want to attack lust on both fronts. In addition to stopping ourselves from throwing gasoline on the fire, we want to put the fire itself out.

Conquer Fear

If a man wants to control his sexuality, the primary obstacle he must overcome is fear. Perish the thought that you cannot control yourself! Don’t think that God gives you desires against your will. Forget the idea you will inevitably harm yourself if you don’t relieve your sexual tension. All these notions are false! When you are aroused, you should remind yourself that the arousal will eventually subside. If you persist, you can gain the ability to shut off your arousal at will.

Also, stop listening to people around you that say you are missing out on life if you don’t get lucky in love. Don’t listen to people who think your manhood depends on scoring with women. These people cannot discern the difference between bravery and stupidity. These people may talk a good talk about “being a man” and “taking risks” but these are the same ones that get skewered alive in the end. In actuality, they are often afraid of being alone and end up jumping from the frying pan into the fire. Keep these people from driving you insane: take the steering wheel away from them.

Channeling the Tension

How can you, as a man, regain control of yourself if you find that you are sexually aroused? Simple. Close your eyes, clear your mind of troublesome thoughts, and take several deep breaths. Imagine the sexual tension moving away from your reproductive organs and the power of the tension dissipating throughout the rest of your body. If thinking about this draws your mind back towards sex, however, then just focus on closing your eyes and breathing deeply. Assure yourself that you are the master of your body. After all, you are a man with free will, not a male bovine. As the physical tension subsides, you may notice that you feel more energized. However, it may be just as likely that you will feel totally relaxed with your mind uncluttered by sexual desires. It can indeed be exhilirating as you realize that you are no longer a pawn of female sexuality.

Get Out of Bed

You will find that there are certain circumstances that leave you vulnerable to feelings of arousal. Make it easy on yourself by avoiding these circumstances if possible. For instance, you may find that you are often aroused while lying in bed. Perhaps in such a moment of idleness, thoughts of sex come too easily to you. Get out of bed, channel the tension until it subsides, and only return to bed when you are tired enough to fall asleep.

More generally, make sure to preoccupy yourself with your responsibilities and things that you like to do. Never allow yourself to get bored. You owe it to yourself to live a proactive and productive life.

Get Mad

In addition to the above techniques, it is helpful to think about the costs of giving in to your desires. Think about the shame, sadness, and sense of disappointment you will feel if you turn your back on your goal for self-control. You should see any unwanted arousal on your part as not as a nice feeling, but as a competitor or even an adversary. It is an impediment to your goal for greater male self-esteem and for a greater sense of dignity. Use your indignation at being a slave of female sexuality to give you focus and power in this matter.

Conclusion

As we can see, by dealing with the object of desire and with the general feeling of arousal, you, as a man, can control your lust. From time to time, sexual arousal may be a minor nuisance, but ideally it will not overcome you as it has probably often done in the past. You will feel no compelling necessity to invest time or money for female companionship unless it benefits you in some meaningful fashion. You can take or leave women, and you just might decide to leave them.

As you practice self-control, remember the old adage: “If at first you don’t succed, try, try again.” Also, remember that when you give in to your desires, you are still making a choice. The choice can be an informed one or it can be based on delusional thinking. It’s up to you.

How will others react to this plan for controlling lust? Who cares. Social conservatives have browbeaten us men for so long, demanding that we be chaste and self-controlled. Social liberals plaintively demand that we stop sexually objectifying women and/or stop basing our manhood on sexual conquest. Perhaps, it is time to give these people and so many others a taste of their own medicine. Men do not necessarily have to rely on the help of other people to achieve their goal of sexual self-control. Men do not even have to be religious to understand the value of learning continence. Rather than being beggars whining for a scrap of bread, men can control their hunger and therefore set terms for when they want to eat. Indeed, when it comes to sexual self-control, men can turn their back on the overpriced delicacies that society shoves in their face and go their own way.

--------------------------

Yes, Fellas, thanks to the wisdom that Faith & Society left up for us, we now have the tools to CONTROL our sexual appetites; we now have what we need to take away a woman's "nuclear option"-yes! We have the tools to be real men, and control ourselves. Thank you.

MarkyMark

Controlling Lust: Part III

2012-01-04T22:05:00.001-05:00

Guys,

Here's Part III of F&S's "Controlling Lust" series.

---------------------------------

Dealing with Beautiful Women in General

Now that we understand the components of lust, let us turn our attention to some techniques a man can use to defuse his lust and reassert control over his own desires. The following techniques deal with the object of desire, the beautiful woman that comes into our presence either physically or mentally. The underlying approach is to place the object of desire in a harsher light than to which we are accustomed.

The Cold Eye

The Cold Eye technique is crude but effective: don’t look at a beautiful woman any longer than you would look at another person. You are not deliberately averting your eyes all the time, but neither are you staring at women the way a cheetah does a baby antelope. Basically, the idea is not to feed your arousal any more than the opportunity permits. This technique is especially helpful in dealing with media images of beautiful women. If you catch a glimpse of a gorgeous model on a billboard, for instance, don’t dwell on it. Move on. Why? Because there is nothing to see. Pretty women are a dime a dozen, and you should never forget that.

Undress the Beauty

Instead of undressing a woman’s body in your mind, you should undress her beauty. In other words, stop thinking about how good she looks, and put a more realistic spin on her womanhood. There are several aspects of women that you can choose to dwell upon in a critical fashion:

1. Sexual History: If a woman is scantily clad, then that’s all the more reason for you to reflect on her low morals and the possibility of her being involved in a promiscuous lifestyle. Contemplate yourself being cuckolded by a woman like her or catching STDs from her. Imagine some low-life freak sticking his tongue in her face, and imagine her enjoying it.

2. Intelligence: Many pretty women have never bothered to apply themselves intellectually. Imagine the torment you might face of trying to carry on a conversation with a beautiful woman you see. Imagine the disappointment you might feel when you realize she is shallow in her thinking and behavior.

3. Emotional Stability: Physically attractive women can be neurotic just like everyone else. How would you like to live with an emotionally disturbed person on a daily basis? Consider that a lot of women in the sex industry have a drug habit, have eating disorders, have been in abusive relationships, have illegitimate kids, etc. Think about these things the next time you see a pin-up girl.

4. Materialism: So many women are mercenary in their relationships. They don’t care about you as a person. Power and status are their real lovers. So, imagine the apple of your eye telling you in nasal tone that you are a loser and that you don’t have what she wants (i.e., money).

5. Attention-Seeking Behavior: Consider that your beloved most likely has a large ego and thrives on the attention men give her. She has no plans for giving you what you desire. She got what she want and most likely does not care that you have been left frustrated on the sidelines.

5. Hateful Behavior: Consider that a beautiful woman may have a degree of hostility towards men. She may be a feminist, or consider herself a victim of “Patriarchy.” She might be the kind of person that cuts you off from your friends, hobbies, and dreams. Consider the idea of her bankrupting you in divorce court. Imagine her being abusive emotionally or physically.

6. Physical Beauty: Addressing this factor is going for the jugular. Think about the biological processes that women start go though as the years progress. Their skin wrinkles, they start to retain body fat, etc. They age faster than men! One day, you will look around and wonder where the elitist princesses of your generation went. All you will notice are dumpy looking ladies with terrible personalities. The change starts happening after the age of 35. Do you still want to pin your future and self-worth as a man on something as transitory as the way a woman looks?

When you start thinking intently and critically on one or more of these characteristics, you will most likely feel your desire wane. You will notice that the beautiful woman you see doesn’t seem so sublime anymore. Her stature in your mind shrivels up and shrinks in importance.

The Disintegration Button

Whenever the image of an attractive woman enters your mind, reflect on how she is hurting you by causing the physical discomfort and mental distress associated with sexual tension. After all, she arouses you, but refuses to makes herself available for the physical and emotional intimacy you desire. You should consider her as being no better than a tease and thus not worthy of existing in your mind. Imagine yourself pushing a disintegration button and envision her body being atomized into a billion pixels.

Male Super-Hero vs. Female Sex Villain

This technique will likely sound hilarious to many readers, and yet it can serve as some comic relief for the tension you may feel in a given circumstance. Imagine you are the representative of men everywhere, pitted in a battle between the sexes. You are not going to allow feminists and other women who don’t respect men to reduce guys to useful idiots. Therefore, when approached by a female, you should see yourself as having special abilities in resisting the beauty emanating from her body. In your mind, imagine her special powers of seduction and beguilement melting away in the presence of your masculinity. Imagine yourself blasting her into the next star system with your Ion Beam of Male Indifference!

Dealing with a Beautiful Friend

The aforementioned techniques are effective for dealing with beautiful women we don’t know. However, additional caution is needed when dealing with woman we do know. In such a case, you cannot afford to get aroused by a female friend’s body if you cannot afford the fallout of losing the ability to think.

There are several potential pitfalls in personally interacting with a beautiful woman. If she befriends you, it may be because she wants to take advantage of you. Even if she is sincerely affectionate towards you, her feelings may nonetheless change later on. You both may end up assuming things about each other, only to find yourselves disappointed. Also, she may be have a limitation of how intimate she wants to be with you; maybe she sees you just as a friend.

Another thing to keep in mind that sexual arousal is like alcohol. It impairs your judgment. Let’s expand the analogy further: People often take precautions if they know they are going to drink socially. They may even appoint someone as a “designated driver” to bring them home from some public event. In the same fashion, you need to be aware of your surroundings and who your with not before you choose to have sex, but before you choose to succumb to your arousal!

You must continually remind yourself that arousal is dangerous around a woman that has not completely divulged to you who she is as a person. Men should not trust their sexuality to women who have not demonstrated they will give him a steady and reliable source of love, compassion, and assistance. Don’t allow your male ego to fool you into thinking you can flirt with disaster. Really, it is a simple thing to just keep women as friends or acquaintances only, leaving romance out of the picture. You only need to look at married men to realize that it is often easier to live without a woman than it is to live with one.

Have a Plan

If you insist on being open to the prospects of an intimate relationship with a woman, you will need to have a plan for how such a woman might fit into your life. Perhaps it is in your best interest to move abroad to meet women. You might want to consider more traditional societies where men are still respected as human beings and are valued for their contribution to their communities. At any rate, whether you seek a foreign wife or a woman in your own culture, decide beforehand on how you are going to handle women who are attracted to you. Stick to your principles.

It is best to do a cost-benefit analysis of the various scenarios which are likely to arise when approaching attractive women. You must decide under which circumstances you will allow yourself to become vulnerable. In other circumstances, you must be resolved to turn off your sex drive. This is part and parcel of exercising complete control over your sexuality.

Have Standards She Has to Meet

Do not think of any woman as a potential mate unless you have resolved the following issues regarding her…

1. Does she go out of the way to assist you in some meaningful fashion? Does she come over to your place and cook for you? Does she take you out to eat? Does she lend you money, help you clean up a house, etc.? Remember she must show she is a real friend prior to any relationship. Talking sweetly to you, brushing up against you, hugging you, throw her arms around you, fluffing her hair, batting her eyes, etc. doesn’t count. If she is flirting with you before being demonstrating that she is a real friend, then she is trying to control you through your sexual appetite. Avoid her.

2. Would she be a good wife or mother of your children? You should ask yourself this because many women are not content with casual, short-term relationships. Many want you to commit. Would she be the kind of woman you would want to embrace after she turns wrinkled and gray?

3. Does she have a good reputation among friends, family members, and other people that you both know? Remember, people can change, so does she have a bedrock foundation of integrity and loyalty? Are their any disturbing qualities that you notice? Be honest with yourself and don’t overlook them. It doesn’t matter how charming her personality is initially. Drop her if she shows signs of being an evil flake. Your better being alone than being with her. Trust me on that.

4. What other essential qualities do you look for in your mate? What about your personal beliefs? You better determine all your essential criteria before talking to women.

As harsh as it sounds, your presupposition should be that when it comes to relationships, women are guilty until proven innocent. Why? Because quite frankly, a statistically significant amount of them are screwing up men’s lives, and society now often excuses bad behavior in women while still punishing men. The gratification of your sexual desire is not worth this price.

Just Say No

If a woman you know tries to push you into intimacy with her before you are prepared, refuse her advances. Tell her up front that you do not want a relationship with anyone you do not know well. If she gets angry, pesters you, questions your manhood, becomes critical, or engages in some other form of inappropriate behavior, then she has done you a favor by revealing what kind of woman she is. In that case, dump her.

In Case of An Emergency

There might be some instances where you find yourself unexpectedly aroused by a woman that you know. If you get aroused by a female friend, but want to reassert control over your feelings, then remember to use some of the techniques mentioned earlier. For instance, you can undress her beauty in your mind by reflecting on the kind of woman she might really be. Another option is to just get away from her. It sounds drastic, but remember that your friendship with her is not worth the cost of you losing your mind and doing something you’ll later regret. After all, you can live happily without women.

Sometimes a woman you know may enter your mind and cause you to become aroused. One way to defuse the tension is to think of the image in your brain as an evil impostor trying to destroy your peace of mind. Since the imposter is not the real woman, you can mentally disintegrate it.

If She’s Already Taken

There are times when you might find yourself aroused by an attractive woman already in a relationship with another man. You need not be the lamb lead to the slaughter. In such a case, simply imagine her significant other seeing you naked and him knowing what you are thinking about his woman!

------------------------------

What did I tell you? Is that good stuff, or what?! Thank you to Faith & Society for leaving these pearls of wisdom up!

MarkyMark

Men Didn't Agree to Feminism, by Eternal Bachelor

2012-01-03T13:44:00.000-05:00

Guys,

I'm rerunning another oldie but goodie from Eternal Bachelor. It's his outstanding post on how men didn't agree to feminism, and how it's biting women in the ass. Can you say schadenfreude?! I can! Boys, don't get involved with American women; they're sluts, skanks, and disease ridden whores. Besides, if you marry an American woman, she'll just divorce you and screw you over anyway. Why bother with the bullshit?! Instead, hoist up a cold one, and enjoy the show as these bitter, angry, old slatterns crash and burn-yeah, Baby!

In fact, the next time you hear some bitter, angry, thirtysomething woman complain about being unable to find a man, laugh in her face! Rub the salt in their wounds till they scream bloody murder! Remind them that they wanted their 'empowerment; remind them that a woman needs a man like a fish needs bicycle; remind them that they don't need no stinkin' man. Remind these hags that they got what they said they wanted, so they ought to be happy, right? Or, you could do what EB suggested, and quietly tell them it's not your problem, then walk away.

But, whatever you do, do NOT give them a shoulder to cry on; do not say, "Oh, you poor thing...", because you're just enabling them. These stupid bitches need to be reminded that they made their beds; now they can lie in them and like it. Now, enjoy another EB classic...

---------------------------------

Us men didn’t agree to feminism

——————————————————————————–

11 July 2006

When the feminists urged women to shrug off modesty and virtue, when they encouraged women to sneer at the concept of being a traditional stay-at-home woman and to storm forth into the workplace, and when they insisted that having kids out of wedlock was fine because kids don’t need dads, women were so busy agreeing with these things, vowing to live this “liberated” lifestyle and celebrating with bra-burning and lesbian poetry workshops, that they seemed to sort of not notice a distinct lack of men agreeing with any of this nonsense.

There may have been a few manginas around to agree with this just in the hope of getting a shag, but there were no vast numbers of normal men declaring, on behalf of all men, present and future, that us guys will still want to marry women when they’re past thirty, have fucked a dozen or more guys and perhaps have a tattoo for good measure. There were no resounding motions put forth by large meetings of men declaring that they believed that they would like nothing more than to marry a woman who has an illegitimate bastard or three. There were no ground-breaking surveys (except, perhaps, any that the feminists got round to forging) showing how most men hate being lumbered with the house, furniture, the kids and all of their cumbersome salaries after a divorce and how we would dearly love to have them all stripped from them after a divorce.

No, there was none of that.

Instead, us men are still wanting to marry traditional women. We still want virtuous and feminine women. We still want to raise our children, not some other guy’s cast-off bastard, or some child that might be ours, mummy isn’t quite sure. We still have the responsibilities of being the head of the family in terms of being financially responsible for a wife and children, so naturally we’ll only accept this if we have the benefits of it as well, namely the authority in the family.

Us men are also perceptive enough to see the endless double-standards of this so-called “modern gender roles”, namely that us guys have to be traditional when it suits women (pay for dates, open doors, be the primary breadwinner, etc) and be modern when it suits women (accept their whoring around, helping with the housework even when we’ve been at work all day, not give a shit that “our” child might actually be some biker thug’s that wifey banged when we were away on business, etc.)

Additionally, curiously enough, the idea that a wife can take most or all of our assets and also a big chunk of our future earnings makes us want to avoid marriage. Similar arrangements for co-habiting makes us want to avoid co-habiting as well. It seems obvious really, but it’s something women and governments can’t get their heads around; “Well gee, if a guy gets married there’s about a 50% chance he’ll end up divorced and stripped of his assets and maybe paying most of his future income to his wife and kids he can’t see, but I can’t understand why men are avoiding marriage in such vast numbers! Duh!”

A lot of women’s failure to comprehend how badly they’ve wrecked their chances of marriage by following feminist principles is down to the way the mass media so often presents men as being eager to date single mothers and sluts. This is because the makers of movies, soap operas and adverts need to cater to their main target demographic, women - including many single 30+ career girls and single mothers - so have to show them as having happy endings.

Take, for example, the movie The Forty-Year-Old Virgin; I’ve not seen the movie but many have informed me that it basically consists of a merry bachelor who is bullied and shamed in to getting hitched to some old slag single mum. Let’s not forget the BT adverts I get so worked up about, whereby a charming young man ends up hitched to an aging slapper and her snot-nosed bastards.

Another example is East Enders. I don’t watch it but a lot of women waffle on about it at work so I inadvertantly end up knowing some of the basics. There’s a character called Mo who used to be married to a wife-beater (she smacked his head in with an iron on a Christmas episode; good old BBC, proving a nice Christmas pressie to men by showing us being a bunch of violent bastards who deserve a good clobbering.) Mo divorced him, married another guy, ended up divorced from him when she was pregnant and so is now a single mother. Anyway, I was unfortunate enough to catch an episode whilst round a mate’s house (his sister lives with him and watches East Enders and every other trashy soap.) In it, a dishy doctor (well, I don’t think he’s dishy, but that’s how I imagine TV Guides would describe him as) was taking Mo out to dinner and he was chatting her up with plenty of flattering remarks. He soon ended up proposing to her whilst she shyly accepted.

The reason I mention this is because many women take Soap Operas incredibly seriously, as if they are an accurate reflection of real life. This is why many women happily sleep around, whelp bastards and generally ruin themselves and yet still think it realistic to expect to be happily married some day; many seem to believe that, in real life, just as in soap operas and chick-flicks, dishy and wealthy bachelors are just falling over themselves to marry neurotic twice-divorced thirty-something single mothers.

On behalf of all eligible bachelors, I can say that we most certainly are not!

It’s quite insane to witness, but there are so many women ruining themselves in their youths, thinking that just because there are quite a few younger men willing to jump through hoops to get a shag, then that means these guys will still be there when the women are older, saggier, used up and bitter. Furthermore, if any guy who is still willing to get married wants a wife, not a whore, and many women cannot tell the difference, or foolishly think they can suddenly switch from being a cum-leaking slut to a nice traditional lady. They can’t. A woman who spends her 20s sleeping around, boozing away and maybe getting a tattoo or an abortion, or maybe whelping a bastard, cannot declare she’s a respectable lady her 30s. There’s no such thing as a born again virgin.

Yet on and on women go, ruining themselves, spending their younger years whoring around, getting tattoos, drinking and partying, and are rather surprised when they discover that no guys want them anymore. And then we have to listen to the endless whining and complaints that men are “intimidated” or “scared of commitment”, when really us men, quite simply, just didn’t agree to all this liberated slut-fest revolution women kicked off, and we would like a traditional woman.

It’s not that difficult.

Now it’s pretty much too late. Most women have ruined themselves, and more young women do so every day and will only regret it when they get old and lonely and realise a dozen one-night-stands makes them a slut, and once a slut, always a slut. Furthermore, women’s entry into the workplace, and the economies adaption to a dual-income family, not to mention the bloated welfare state to fund single-mothers and childcare, has left it impossible for a woman married to an average guy to be a stay-at-home mother. And the divorce and Child Support laws have chased most men away from marriage and parenthood for good anyway.

Silly women.

Still, us men didn’t agree to it. We tried to warn them, but hey, what did we know, we’re only men. Sexist Neanderthal pigs, I believe the term was, to describe any guy who tried to speak out against this feminist rubbish at the outset. Oh well, at least us men are stoic and resourceful enough to make the best of things, to largely cut ourselves off from mainstream society or perhaps move abroad and find a traditional woman.

Britain and other Western nations can fall apart like all matriarchies do, crumbling bankrupted wrecks full of bitter spinsters, whining neo-Marxist politicians, slutbag single mums, their loser thug boyfriends and rampant illegitimate bastards.

Poetic justice for a matriarchy? Now that’s something I can agree with.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:35 PM

——————————————————————————–

At 8:03 AM, Anonymous said…

“Most women have ruined themselves, and more young women do so every day.”

Yep. Like lemmings over the cliff; and the beauty of it is, we don’t even have to push them off, just watch them march to their doom - old, alone except for their cats, and wondering what the fuck happened.

And I will hoist a beer and laugh at them.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:09 PM, Anonymous said…

I am glad you’re against tattoos, but what do you think of belly button piercings that are so common? Because they make me feel sick, there is a hole in her skin with a piece of cheap metal sticking out!! How is that attractive, its the opposite with me.

And I quite literally pass out when I see on a tongue.

——————————————————————————–

At 1:24 AM, baldtires said…

Unless a woman spends the best 20 years of her life bonding with a man, he won’t stick around for the worst 40.

And no, the “best 20″ are NOT from 38 to 58.

’twas ever thus - except those “worst” years historically didn’t drag on quite so long. You’d think that would INCREASE the importance of forming a strong bond of mutual trust and respect.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:31 AM, Anonymous said…

Outstanding essay!

Yes women are apparently empty vessels. They need constantly to be told what to think and do. Hence the endless talking with other females, looking to advice columnists and TV talk show personalities, magazines on how to act this way or that way, terrified when left alone and hear a noise at night, etc… They are amoral, mental children.

What’s the scariest thing for a child?

Abandonment. Being left on the side of the road. Marriage/Dating Strike/Ostracism = Worst Nightmare for Women (nuclear bomb).

Like children they crave attention. Ignore them and they become apoplectic.

--------------

Ah, there's nothing like rereading a classic from The Man, Eternal Bachelor! I'm glad someone archived his stuff; I really am. Ladies, I hope you enjoy your toys and your cats, because us men are too smart to marry you-ha! And to my boys, I wish you all a good day...

MarkyMark

Controlling Lust: Part II

2012-01-02T22:09:00.001-05:00

Guys,

Here's Part II of the "Controlling Lust" series that Faith & Society wrote. Read it; learn it; understand it; and apply it.

------------------------------

The Anatomy of Lust

Having described the benefits of controlling sexual desire, I want to address the problem of lust. There are two components to lust: the object of desire and the arousal.

The Object of Desire

The object of desire may take one or more of the following three forms: the Beautiful Stranger, the Beautiful Thought, or the Beautiful Friend.

The Beautiful Stranger represents those sexually attractive women which appear in our world but which we are not likely to ever know personally. We see them on the sidewalks, in the shopping malls, on the billboards, on the Internet, on television, in magazines, etc. They can be painted, or take the form of digital animation. They can be airbrushed or touched up with some photo imaging software. They cover themselves with mascara, lip gloss, and topical treatments of various kinds. Whether they be virtual or in the flesh, we are confronted with them on a daily basis and are not likely to escape them.

The Beautiful Thought represents those sexually attractive women that keep intruding into our minds. They may be thoughts of women we have actually seen or they may be entities created wholly from the fabric of our imaginations. They worm into our lives at the most unexpected and unwelcome moments.

The Beautiful Friend represents sexually attractive women that we actually know and interact with. These women can be coworkers, classmates, friends, women we meet at church, etc. Their personalities are known to us. For the most part, they probably represent the greatest danger to male self-control because of their personal dealings with us. These are the women that we cannot easily dismiss as being unpleasant people or the mere wisps of our imaginations. These are the nice ones that we are tempted to pursue.

The Arousal

In response to the objects of desire, a man reacts with arousal. In order to control arousal, we must acknowledge that the problem with lust is not that men think too much about sex. It is that they don’t think enough. They don’t think logically about it, especially regarding the social and personal costs of sexual desire. There are two basic ingredients involved in the unrealistic thinking that fuels arousal and thus lust.

First, there is fear. Men are afraid that they cannot control their feelings, and that if they try to, they will harm their bodies or have psychological problems. Men are afraid that if they don’t act on their impulses, they will miss out on some wonderful experience in life that men are obligated to have. Men are afraid that if they don’t submit to female sexuality (through marriage or otherwise), they will branded as being asexual, gay, weird, spiritually immature, etc. The result of fear is that men either are conquered by female sexuality, or retreat from it only to be defeated in some future battle.

The second ingredient often found in arousal is adulation. The object of desire is presented to men in strictly positive terms. In other words, when men lust, they merely see some gorgeous, sexually available woman eager to pleasure her beholder. Men’s minds usually trail off to some scene from an XXX rated video they play over and over in their minds. There are no unpleasant parts in the movie script.

The fantasy of finding a beautiful woman that will satisfy every primal urge for physical and emotional intimacy is just too compelling for men. They are looking for the feeling they lost when they grew up and were too old to to be held to the bosom of their mothers. They imagine some larger-than-life personification of the feminine driving away the shadows of loneliness and despair from their gray adult world. When they think of finding that one special woman for their lives, they do not think about the regimen of soiled diapers, boring trips to Home Depot, senseless arguments, and mountains of bills. No, they imagine themselves stepping into some scene from a Playboy magazine.

And so a man yearns for sexual union with beautiful women as the key to resolving the things that are banal about his life. He forgets that many women are just mediocre human beings driven by self-interest. In the end, he sets himself up for disappointment, failure, shame, and disaster. Instead of being nobody’s fool, he becomes everybody’s fool.

--------------------------

That was good stuff. There are two more parts on the way, so keep your eyes peeled!

MarkyMark

A Pithy, Little Saying

2012-01-02T18:14:00.000-05:00

Guys,

I don't know what made me think of this, but here's a pithy, little saying I saw on a blog or a bumper sticker somewhere. It's about divorce, and it says: "Mama got the gold mine. Daddy got the shaft!" Truer words were never spoken. Don't get married, Fellas! Have a good day...

MarkyMark

What Gay Men Think of Women

2012-01-02T13:42:00.003-05:00

Guys,

In response to my post, "This Guy Nailed It", Christopher from OR left the following comment. Enjoy...

--------------------------

Hilarious. He mentions KPTV12- my favorite station here in Portland....

Anyhoo, I have several gay friends, and brother, these guys are SMART when it comes to women. Make no mistake; most gay men are extremely aware of just how rotten women are.

I have one friend in particular who is both black and gay, and very highly educated. When I get him started on his opinion of women....Brother, just sit back and enjoy the ride. He is very articulate, and has nothing but contempt for women.

I know two other gay guys at work who were married to thoroughly nasty women who feel the same way. Come to think of it, I actually am friends with at least eight gay men who with only two exceptions were once straight. They ALL despise women, and are very open about it.

There's a reason why most women resent male homosexuality, and it has little to do with morals. As one gay friend put it, "Women hate us because they can't control us. It's all about control. What they can't control, they hate."

His exact words.

Now, I'm not advocating anyone become gay, but I can understand WHY they made the choice, even though I don't share their desires. Many men NEED sex and companionship, and if they can't get it from women.....

Ah, well. Fortunately my desires are elsewhere.

-------------------

Thought provoking stuff, isn't it? I thought so...
MarkyMark

Controlling Lust: Part I

2012-01-01T22:02:00.001-05:00

Guys,

As promised, here's Part I of the promised reprise of Faith & Society's "Controlling Lust" series! This is some of the most important information I shall disseminate here, so pay attention, Fellas. Here is a series of essays giving us solid, practical information about how to reduce women's power over us. The only thing that modern women have are their 'whore powers', their powers of sexual enchantment. Her whore powers are her nuclear option, if you will. Diffuse her nuclear option, and you've defeated the modern, predatory woman's main weapon.

Other than sex, modern women have NOTHING AT ALL TO OFFER US-nothing! They don't know how to cook or clean, and they're proud of their lack of domestic skills. Funny thing is that I never considered it empowering to be ignorant in the rudiments of taking care of one's self. Modern, American women are not sane, pleasant, or reasonable; they're bitches, and bless God, they're proud of it! Ever seen the sticker or t-shirt that says: "You say 'bitch' like it's a bad thing"? THAT is the modern woman's mentality. Modern women don't even make good companions anymore!

What I'm trying to say is this: sexual charms are all a woman has; defeat them, and you've defeated her. She can't offer to keep a home for you, because she doesn't know how. She can't charm you with her ladylike words and deeds, because being a lady equals being weak. The modern woman is compelled to show her inner bitch, because it's a sign of being true to The Sisterhood. If you resist a woman's sexual charms, she WILL reveal her inner bitch; you will see her as she really is. Furthermore, she'll move on to another target. Once you've defeated her whore powers, she has no other way to get you. That, and she doesn't want to waste time on someone into whom she cannot quickly sink her claws. That's what you want-for her to go after another target. This series will give you the tools to do that.

-----------------------------

[This is the first installment of a four-part series on how men can avoid being slaves to female sexuality.]

There was a time when women were thought to be the ones who needed protection from sexual predators. In many instances, this idea is still used to punish innocent men for their natural sexual inclinations, yet ironically, a striking change in sexual relations has developed. Men are now realizing that they are the ones who have to arm themselves against the sexuality of the opposite sex. Why? Because female sexuality has been turned into a weapon against men.

Why Control Lust?

If you believe the current situation regarding how women treat men is agreeable, the following discussion on controlling lust will be of no use to you. You will instead need an education on the blatant misandry that is so prevalent in contemporary society. I am certain that in this sex-saturated society, many men would question why they should control their sexual desires. After all, isn’t sexual desire a good thing? Aren’t men programmed with a sex drive? Who doesn’t want to have sex with women?

The answer is simple. Our refusal as men to control our sex drive is costing us personally and collectively. Our strong desires for physical and emotional intimacy makes us vulnerable to manipulation by people who don’t often have our best interests at heart. Do not think that I am just talking about some bad woman luring away a man from his happy family. No, I am talking about the entire social structure of contemporary Western civilization. The Sex Industry, the Marriage Industry, the Divorce Industry, the Domestic Violence Industry, the Sexual Harassment Litigation Industry, and indeed Madison Avenue could not function except for the fact that a horny male and his money are soon parted. I suspect that most instances of wealth transfer from men to women are based upon this truth.

Men are being exploited by commercialism, the religious establishment, the workplace, academia, government, etc. because they have been programmed to believe that their lives revolve around getting their rations of intimacy from women. Men do not need intimacy from women in order to be happy, but society suppresses this truth. It suppresses this truth because it needs men to slave away for something that is overvalued: a woman’s affection. “Sex sells” because men don’t question the quality of the product.

When society approaches the matter of chastity, it always looks at the matter from the supply side. In other words, it’s about limiting the access to women, whether the access is in person or virtually. Government passes all sorts of draconian laws to control what men do sexually. The religious establishment condemns pre-marital sex, prostitution, pornography, and sometimes even masturbation, while urging men to nonetheless get married as a rite of passage into adulthood. Contemporary women demand compliance to a laundry list of ridiculous, unrealistic, self-serving criteria before men may receive attention. In essence, the supply-side approach to chastity creates an artificial scarcity and drives up the costs men bear in their lives for what they desire.

The Demand Side

I approach the matter of chastity from a different angle: the demand side. A man should ask just why would he want to have sex with a woman in the first place. What have women done for him, besides look pretty and bother to talk to him? Just why would he want to live with a woman for the rest of his life simply because she has decided to have children by him? What else is a woman going to do for him besides take his money and time? Is the temporary euphoria of sex and romance really worth the long-term price he is going to have to pay? Believe me, he will have to pay a steep price whether the sex is socially sanctioned or not.

Some men think they can avoid the dangers of sexual liaisons in today’s society by resorting to pornography. But such is not particularly helpful because it still holds men captive to the power of female sexuality. They are paying a price for their desire in terms of time and money, and yet they merely receive the sizzle without the steak. In the wake of pornography, men are still left salivating for the real thing.

It is time for men to stop being so desperate for something they can live quite contentedly without. When dealing with a woman, it is best to trump the Sex Card she may be prone to play with you. Who cares if she is drop dead gorgeous, has a PhD, shares your hobbies, and is talking to you? Women of generations past actually contributed something useful to the physical survival of their husbands and their family unit. How does the apple of your eye measure up in that regard, considering her looks will fade and her agreeable personality may change?

When a man stops worrying about whether or not he will be lucky in love, something happens. He becomes at peace with himself. Things that used to appear to be important are revealed as being trivial. The man becomes self-confident in his dealings with the opposite sex because he no longer feels there are any high stakes involved. He no longer sees himself as a loser because he is no longer playing a game rigged against him. He can engage life on his own terms and not compromise his core values and goals. He defines his own manhood instead of succumbing to the winds of fashion. He can get through the day with his health, sanity, and bank account still intact. What kind of man would not want these things?

In short, what I propose is not castration or repression of a man’s desire, but that a man master his feelings. He should be able to turn on or off his own sex drive as he pleases. He should never feel that he is at the mercy of his own biology. Contrary to popular opinion, a man is not doomed to go stir crazy from practicing abstinence. He should realize that he has genuine choices about how he reacts when confronted with female sexuality. Let women prove their merit to the man for a change. Let his sex drive serve him, not the other way around.

-----------------------------

That's good, powerful stuff, Fellas! Look for Part II soon...

MarkyMark

Susan Walsh's Position on Divorce: My Take

2012-01-01T14:44:00.009-05:00

Guys,

I've been sick the last few days, so I've had time to do a lot of reading. I re-read the imbroglio between Dalrock & Susan Walsh. It was a dispute about what constituted frivolous divorce. A lot of guys piled on Susan Walsh, myself included. I didn't do that over at Dalrock's, but I did so here. If you scroll down, you'll note that I've since removed my post that was critical of Mrs. Walsh.

As I re-read the discussions, particularly Susan's comment clarifying her position, I couldn't find any problems with it. If anything, I found her position quite reasonable. I'm going to post her comment below, then comment on it. Here goes...

----------------

Well this is quite a discussion. I have not been in hiding, but rather preparing for Christmas, hosting family from Europe, and putting in only the minimal time at my own blog. I am not afraid to engage here, though in truth I do not believe I can get a fair hearing.

Given the sniping to which she was subjected, I can't blame her for feeling this way...

For the purposes of clarifying where I stand on these issues, I will comment on the original statement, and then describe my own beliefs re marriage and divorce.

First, it is true that I retorted to Doug with great emotion in the original comment. My response was overblown and said in great frustration. I apologize for offending anyone here who has experienced frivolous divorce and/or cares deeply about misandrist law. In truth, it was not my intention to say that women do not file for divorce frivolously. I am well aware that they do. However, my desire to have the exchange put in context is legitimate.

Doug’s claim that a woman divorcing for infidelity is engaging in frivolous divorce, and that a double standard for cheating is fair based on sex drive differences, angered many women and men at HUS, generating the longest thread ever, nearly 1,800 comments. There has been great frustration with Doug in recent days at the site, and it was in the interest of fairness that I allowed him to register many comments that I believed to be unethical and unfair. Cherry picking one comment out of a thread of well over 1,000 was deceptive, and I remain surprised that it became the topic of a post.

I will now state my beliefs, to the extent they are informed, about these issues. It is true that I have not devoted myself to the study of marriage or divorce law. While that is Dalrock’s specialty, my own blog covers a very wide range of issues relating to all facets of navigating the SMP. I do agree that I should understand family law if I am promoting marriage, which is why I agreed to write a post about it.

1. Any divorce initiated for the purposes of personal growth or development, having new experiences, getting a new lease on life, etc. is frivolous and wrong. There should be no compensation to the initiating spouse.

That, too, is my definition of frivolous divorce. I don't think that the initiating spouse should get anything, either.

2. Domestic violence laws set the bar too low, and presume male guilt. Female-inflicted violence is ignored or suppressed.

I agree. I have no problem with this.

3. Any parent receiving child support should be fully accountable for the expenditure of those funds, with documentation and review.

I agree with this also. A question to be asked would be: how does one IMPLEMENT this?

4. Every divorce where children are present should presume joint custody.

Which would preclude the initiating spouse from moving hundreds of miles away, as is often the case now. Also, as a practical matter, how should joint custody periods be implemented? This would be important, because a child can't be switching schools all the time. While this wouldn't be an issue if the parents live in the same town, it would be an issue if they lived in different towns, even if those towns are near one another. Where would the child(ren) live, when, and for how long?

5. The Women’s Movement has eliminated the justification for alimony, for the most part. Alimony should never be calculated based on the income of a second spouse, as it was in MA until recently. I do not support lifetime alimony under any circumstances.

I have no issue with this.

6. Infidelity is never a frivolous reason for divorce. In invalidates the marriage contract. I reject outright any claims that because women bond more easily during sex, they should refrain from adultery, while men can have sex on the side without threatening the marriage and family.

I think adultery voids the marriage contract also. One, one of the Ten Commandments tells us not to do it. Two, one of the marriage vows involves 'forsaking all others'. Being faithful is part of the deal-simple as that.

As for Doug's comment, what can I say? Adultery, if committed by the woman, has more impact (both on the couple and society) because the husband can no longer be sure if her children are also HIS children. No matter what happens, a woman is always sure of the paternity of her children. The husband can never have 100% certainty of paternity; the only way to assure the husband that the children are his entails the wife being faithful. Therefore, women's adultery has always been more frowned upon than men's adultery.

Having said that, it's wrong for both parties (i.e. the husband and wife) to commit adultery. As Mrs. Walsh pointed out, it voids the marriage contract.

7. Witholding sex from a spouse indefinitely is a legitimate reason for divorce or sex outside the marriage, if the parties do not wish to divorce.

I agree with this. Though I don't condone adultery, I can understand why the denied spouse would seek fulfillment elsewhere.

Having said that though, what about if one of the spouse has a health issue that precludes sex? For example, a war veteran is impotent due to combat injuries, and he can no longer 'do the deed'. What then? For me, I'd draw the line at WILLFUL DENIAL of fulfilling your spouse's sexual needs.

8. While claims of abuse may be overblown, real domestic violence does occur and is a legitimate reason for divorce.

If it happens on a repeated basis and the guilty party is unrepentant, then I'd agree. I disagree if the DV is a one time thing. Having said that though, according to Erin Pizzey, who had the world's first shelter, DV usually goes both ways, and is indicative of a serious, underlying dysfunctional dynamic in the relationship. IOW, DV is seldom as the feminists say; seldom do we have the situation where one party is guilty of committing the DV.

9. Unhealthy or destructive habits such as substance abuse, excessive spending into extreme debt, or refusal to contribute effort to the family are all valid grounds for divorce by either party.

I don't have an issue with the destructive habits-again, if the offending spouse is guilty of doing these things on a flagrant, repeated, unrepentant basis.

As for the refusal to contribute effort to the family, that is a rather vague and frivolous reason for divorce. Does that mean that, if Hubby refuses to take out the trash twice, that Wifey has good reason for divorce? What if Hubby didn't fix a leaky faucet right away? What if Hubby, for whatever reason, lacks the experience or ability to fix something around the house, yet the family doesn't have the money to call in a contractor? Does this constitute failure to contribute effort to the family? I'm not asking to be a dick; I'm asking because I seek clarification on this. I'm willing to give Mrs. Walsh the benefit of the doubt here, and say that she phrased this part of her statement poorly.

10. I support prenups, and believe they should include severe penalties for cheating by either party.

I have two problems with prenups; one is practical, while the other goes against my values. On a practical level, a judge can set aside part or all of a prenup, thus rendering part or all of it null and void. In terms of my values, a prenup starts off a marriage with the assumption that things aren't going to work, and that an escape hatch is needed. That said, I could see having one if there is a wealth disparity between the would-be spouses.

I do think that, unlike now, prenups should be worth more than the paper they're printed on. They are contracts, so they should be treated as such. That is to say that they should be enforceable. As for the penalties, that would depend on the prenup, and how it's structured.

All of the above statements apply equally to men and women.

I suspect that men here will find them wanting. I can only say that I strive for fairness, regardless of sex.

I have no problems with any of this. If genuine equality before the law existed, then this discussion wouldn't be taking place.

Which brings me to my final remarks. I see that I am characterized here as being biased towards women, helping them to snag husbands at the expense of men. Again, my remarks on my own blog were taken out of context, so I’ll clarify.

I am a woman. As such, despite my efforts and desire to learn, I will never fully grok the male experience. It is not possible. When I am accused of seeing the world through a “female centric” or “Team Woman” lens, I can only say that none of us can ever be fully neutral. I recognize that as a limitation, not a point of pride.

I find this understandable, and I have no problem with it. I, being a man, can never hope to achieve 100% understanding of what it's like to be a woman; I can never fully grok the female experience. None of us is without bias. I give Mrs. Walsh credit for acknowledging hers, and how it might impact her observations, thoughts, and opinions.

I am pro-relationship and pro-marriage, but not because it benefits women. I believe that healthy relationships and good marriages confer great benefits on both sexes. Certainly, the young men who read and comment at HUS desire LTRs and marriage. I do everything I can to help them meet their goals, and appreciate the many male commenters who advise them.

Believe it or not, in my heart of hearts, I agree with this sentiment. I think that men and women were meant to be together; that we belong together; that sex separatism is unnatural; and that men and women have an underlying need & desire to be together. I think that good, healthy marriages give us good, healthy families; and good, healthy families make for a good, healthy nation. I also think that good marriages and relationships can and do benefit both men and women on a physical and psychic level.

Having said that, given the current environment, it's difficult if not impossible to achieve that in the current legal and societal milieu. Where is marriage supported in society? How can a man have a good relationship or marriage when women behave so badly? How can a man take the risk of getting married when he stands to lose everything, all because Wifey wakes up one day and decides to do the "Eat, Pray, and Love" thing? Kobe Bryant just got popped for what, 190 MILLION dollars in his recent divorce? How does that make a man want to take the plunge?

The bottom line is that I am writing for the 80%. I have no use for sluts of either gender. I disrespect promiscuity as a lifestyle, but more importantly I find it damaging to society as a whole. Men and women understand one another far less than they did 40 years ago at the Sexual Revolution. HUS is a place where I hope to chip away at that. I started the blog to make women more suitable for LTRs, and now I write for both men and women. I will continue to do that.

When Mrs. Walsh speaks of writing for the 80%, here's what she means. In one of her comments, Mrs. Walsh is of the opinion that the 80/20 rule isn't hard and fast, nor does it break down that cleanly. IOW, she's saying that 80% of women are not having sex with 20% of men; she's saying that 20% of women are sluts having sex with 20% of the male sluts, as I understand her thesis. That means that 80% of women are NOT getting what they want (a good relationship with a good guy) in the current sexual market place, or SMP. That's what she means by 'writing for the 80%'.

I have deep respect for many in the manosphere, and value the comments that many of you have left on my blog. You are spending your time and energy to make positive changes that you believe in. I support your mission. It is not the same as mine, but we do overlap. I hope we can continue to work together.

I think that men and women can and should work together to fix the mess in which we find ourselves. The War of the Sexes has gone on long enough. Those are my thoughts...

MarkyMark

Happy New Year to All Bachelors!

2012-01-01T00:01:00.000-05:00

Guys,

Happy New Year to all of you! Let's continue being happy, single, and free! Let's continue giving American women the husband they deserve-NONE. Let's continue enjoying the main fruit of feminism-our freedom. Feminism did more for men than it did for women; don't forget that, Fellas. Long live the marriage strike!

With that in mind, here's an article about how it's working. Women are getting the husband that they deserve-none-and I'm glad to see that! Listen to these old, man-hating, feminazi hags cry like stuck pigs that they can't find any 'good men', and remember how good life is WITHOUT one of them. Let's all cry for them-not!

Avoid them if you can; life is simpler and better without a woman in it to make you miserable. If you still get sexual needs that cannot be fulfilled via self-stimulation, then hump & dump these chicks if you must; goodness knows that they spurned good, decent gentlemen who wanted them in their prime; she spurned them in favor of bad boys who treated her badly and got her panties wet when everyone wanted her in her 20s; so I see nothing wrong with returning the favor they've no doubt dished out to countless guys over the years. Whatever you do, do NOT have a relationshit with one of these bitches, let alone MARRY one. That would be a fate worse than death!

Anyway, I'll post the article below, and I'll intersperse my biting thoughts as always. Hope you like those bicycles, ladies-ha! You don't need no stinkin' man, right? Well, we don't need no stinkin' bitch, either. I know I like my freedom from bitches like you; that alone makes life good and worth living... :)

-------------------------------

Why do successful women settle for lazy lumps?

Monday December 29 2008

'He doesn't have a penny, he lives with his mother. He takes my car and uses all the damn petrol. He got drunk at my company party and bored the whole table with his thoughts on what we were doing wrong. He's a dropout; doesn't even have a degree. He's doing my head in."

Awwwww, let's all cry for poor, little Veronica-not! Anyway, I have a few pointed questions for you, my dear. One, how many guys did YOU use when you were young, hot, and desirable, hmmm? How many guys did you go out with years ago, guys in whom you had NO INTEREST WHATSOEVER, yet you used them for free dinners and movies, hmmm? How many guys did you string along over the years? How many guys' heads have you 'done in', as you put it? Looks to me like karma is biting you in the ass, Darlin'...

So goes the latest lament of Veronica (not her real name), a senior purchaser for a large firm -- financially secure, glamorous and owner of two houses.

She no doubt achieved her financial security at the expense of more deserving men over the years, truth be told. She got the good jobs that guys SHOULD have gotten, yet thanks to the pussy pass/penis exclusion, they did not. I remember how, when I worked for a certain, Fortune 500 company, I was told as a new employee that, if I didn't have indoor plumbing (read a vagina), then I could FORGET about being promoted; one of my female colleagues told me this, BTW...

And WTF is this snobbery about not having a degree, Darlin'? Who the hell do you think you are?! You think you're special because you have a sheepskin (no doubt a worthless one like women's studies or some similar such fluff)? Did you know that many blue collar guys earn MORE than you do? I'm serious. Just check out what automotive technicians make; hint, it's a lot more than many of us who hold degrees...

She's dating a man she knew from college years ago, when she wouldn't even have coffee with him. So why is she seeing him now?

Why is she seeing this former, college classmate now? I'll tell you why: because all the bad boys she banged when she was young & hot no longer want her, that's why! The bad boys she banged back when have moved on to younger, hotter chicks, who like you, enjoy being treated like crap. But, that's another rant for another day...

"Ah, look, it's better than being alone," she sighs. "What good is my success if I have nobody to talk to at night? A Prada handbag can't give you a cuddle."

Uh, Veronica, I thought a woman needed a man like a fish needed a bicycle! I thought you strong, independent, empowered women didn't NEED no stinkin' man! I thought you were happier having a cat. You telling me that you lied?! Wow, a woman lying-like that's a shocker...

Veronica is part of an ever-growing number of career- driven Irish women who have worked hard, achieved material success, and yet allowed their otherwise exacting standards to lapse when it comes to love.

That's because the guys who meet those standards have other options-duh! Why would they settle for some bitter, angry, used up, over the hill whore carrying more baggage than Samsonite? Why would he do that when he can have someone younger, hotter, fresher, and isn't angry, bitter, used up, and hating men yet? You see, the thing you stupid bitches never, ever seem to get through your thick skulls is that men who even meet a FRACTION of your unreasonably long lists have other options-duh!

Take a look around any bar and you'll see stunning women, coiffed and groomed, seated with noticeably shabbier men who are reticent when it comes to their round and who have to be helped off their stools at the end of the night.

I don't know if these women are stunning or not, but I'll play along with this generous assumption and probable lie. If that is true, then what does that tell us about the women, hmmm? Can we not infer that men that they'd deem worthy (read rich, tall, dark, handsome, and successful) do not WANT these aging career bitches? It certainly looks like that to me. That leads to yet another question: WHY do more suitable men not want these aging, used up career slags? It couldn't be that they're not WORTH having, could it?! Nah, that would imply that the women are less than perfect; saying that a woman might not be perfect is a crime against humanity! We can't have that now...

How did such odd pairings come about, and why do the resigned-looking girlfriends of such losers put up with it?

Uh, it could be that these purportedly wonderful women aren't so wonderful. It could also be that, after having been banged & clanged by countless bad boys, these chicks are out of options. This is the best that they can hope to get, as any guy they'd truly be interested in would be smart enough to AVOID them...

And why are they giving the time of day to blokes they wouldn't have spat on 10 years ago?

Because they have no one else to whom they can GIVE the time of day, that's why!

"All the good ones are gay or married", sighs Jill (33) and single. "I went straight from college to a very cutthroat job, travelled a lot, and wanted to settle down. I was ready, but the pickings are slim. They're called the dregs for a reason; they're all that's left".

Not all the good guys are taken or married, Jill. Some of us are just smart enough to AVOID THE LIKES OF YOU! I'm serious; I do NOT want a woman in my life. I find the likes of you so disgusting that I don't even want to BANG you anymore!! Even the thought of having sex with some over the hill, disease ridden, misandric career bitch turns my stomach. I think I'd rather masturbate, thank you very much! Not only will the experience be better; I don't have to worry about knocking you up, nor do I have to worry about catching one of your diseases in that petri dish of a vagina you have! Oh, gag a maggot! That's what taking of whiff of your vagina would do too-gag a maggot...

Now, assuming that what you say is true, assuming that you DID want to settle down, let me ask you a few more pointed questions. One, why did you take a job that had you playing Road Warrior, huh? Wouldn't that obviously take you away from meeting men where you lived? I mean, if you're not THERE to meet them, how can you hope to meet them, Darlin'? Don't your actions contradict your stated intentions? Isn't it true that your words do not agree with your actions? I think so.

Here's what I think happened. Back in college and immediately thereafter, you were still in your 20s; you were still young, hot, and desirable. Why guys were coming down the tracks like rush hour trains! So what if you blew one off? You knew that there'd be 100 other swingin' dicks to take his place, right? You young girls have it so DAMN EASY when it comes to meeting someone of the opposite sex-so easy! Men are so plentiful that you can and do reject them for the most innocuous and perplexing of reasons.

Oh, that guy's hair is a shade or two too light in brown-out with him! That guy's not wearing wing tip shoes; reject him! That guy's an inch too short-next! That guy only drives a Ford; I want someone with a BMW, damn it! Out he goes! And, this other guy actually treats me nicely; I can't have that! Give me a real man; give me someone who'll treat me like crap, so I can fall in love with him. I could go on, but you get my point.

The problem arises from the fact that you deluded career bitches think that this sort of thing will continue your whole life long; you think that, since men are coming down the tracks like rush hour trains, that this will always be the case. You think that, because all the boys want you now, that they'll always want you. Sorry, but life doesn't work like that, girls. Only when it's too late do you realize that, as you get older, there are fewer men around. The men you flocked to when you were young & hot have other options; they're going for the NEXT group of twentysomething chicks who think that they'll smash the glass cieling. Why would they want your old, shriveled up hide, when they can have someone young, hot, perky, and sans the baggage you have? Can't think of a good reason why a man would do that...

She siphoned off what she thought was the best of a bad lot in the form of a vertically challenged, badly-dressed misogynist.

You KNOW it's getting bad when a short, ugly misogynist is all that's left-ha!!

"I ironed his shirts, made him dinner, wore sexy lingerie, and alphabetised his porn collection.

"We went to a friend's wedding and I got a bit weepy and asked him if we were ever going to tie the knot.

"He dumped me -- by text -- then had the nerve to ask me to wash the stuff he left in the laundry basket before he collected it."

Good for him! WTF do you think any guy with any brains is going to do when you even SUGGEST tying the knot? Why would a man say 'yes' to a proposition that offers nothing to him whatsoever, hmmm?

Men would appear to have cottoned on to the fact that girls, who may have previously turned up their noses at them, are now making a beeline for them like the last seat in a game of musical chairs.

Ah, the worm has turned-yes! You gals had all the power before 30; it's only right that we get it afterwards. I know you all don't like that, because your whore powers are all you have; that's all you have to offer, so when your whore powers fade, you must panic, huh?

Not surprisingly, they're taking full advantage.

After chicks took full advantage of their early, superior position in the dating world, why wouldn't we men do likewise? Why wouldn't we return the favor, hmmm? Now that the tables have turned, the chickies have their panties all wadded up. Too freakin' bad, ladies! You used and abused us when you were in demand; now, you get to EXPERIENCE what you dished out to us when every swingin' dick wanted you.

"The tables have turned in a big way," laughs Aidan, a 32- year-old man who takes time out of his drinking and computer games schedule to visit the dole office and make vague feints at job seeking.

Ah, a guy taking it easy-yes! That's what Eternal Bachelor suggested we do, hehehe...

"These chicks all get a bit desperate after 30: all they want is to be in a relationship and are dying to get someone down the aisle. I'm seeing two of them at the moment."

Do they know about each other?

"They have an idea that I'm in demand, so they try extra hard. If one of them annoys me, I just disappear for a while with the other one. A bit of competition doesn't do any harm."

Good, if a woman knows that she can easily be replaced, she's more likely to-gasp-treat you decently! That's got to stick in her craw, but too bad. They should have treated us better when everyone wanted them, huh? Now that we can play them against one another, they have one of two choices: shape up, or ship out, bitch! There are plenty more where you and your kind came from. If you give me too much shit, I'll just find someone else, thank you...

According to available census figures, the number of single people (aged 15 to 38) in this country has increased by 140,000 between 2002 and 2006, and at least half of those are female.

Ah, this news warms the cockles of my heart! It fills me with much schadenfreude to see more women getting the husband they deserve-none.... :)

There is a tendency to get married later in life, but it would seem that once women reach a certain age, it's viewed as the point of no return.

Hint: it's called the 'expiration date' for a reason-duh! Once women pass 30, their looks, bodies, and along with them, their whore powers, start to fade. They can no longer cast a spell on men like they used to in their 20s.

Once a guy reaches his late 20s to earlly 30s, here's what happens. One, his sex drive dies down, so he isn't so easily blinded by the 'hormone goggles'. Two, men start seeing male friends and family members get burned in divorce. Three, since they've had DECADES of abuse and mistreatment from women, they're deciding that maybe they don't need, let alone want, one of them. A guy starts to realize that he has something precious: his freedom, and he's not going to surrender it to some bitch...

Deborah is recently divorced from a wealthy businessman, who kept her in Louboutin shoes but bored her senseless.

Aw, a gold digging whore got bored with the rich businessman keeping her well-what a surprise-not!

She cut him loose in a show of inner strength, kissing her five-star lifestyle goodbye, and made many "I don't neeeeeed a man" noises.

Silly girl-the only chicks who make these noises are those whose whore powers have faded; the only women who make these noises can't GET a man to begin with! Rather than admit the obvious (that no one wants their sorry, used up, diseased hides), they pretend that they don't want men anyway. Nice try ladies, but we're on to your bullshit...

Her married friends, supportive initially, soon stopped inviting her to dinner and she found herself ostracised with nobody to play with.

"It's a whole new thing, being a divorcee in Ireland" she says.

It's a whole new thing, because you're not 20 anymore, Darlin'! Men aren't falling all over themselves to be with you. THAT is what's new...

"I'm 40, have a bit of cash, but don't have any kids and it seems that getting rid of my husband was throwing away my social credential.

You do have a social credential, only your married friends haven't let you in on the secret: you are damaged goods!

"I never get asked anywhere any more, unless I'm the token single chick, and people that I thought were mates get uncomfortable when I chat to their husbands.

Well, your friends have seen how you did NOT honor your marriage vows; they've already seen that you don't view marriage as precious and sacrosanct. They rightfully fear and suspect that your lack of respect for marriage will carry over to their husbands-duh!

"It seems I've gone from being part of a group to being a pariah, and am regarded as a threat."

That's because you ARE a threat, Darlin'! See my above comment...

She recently banged into a fortysomething former television presenter she knew years ago and had rejected. He's broke, unmarried and adamant about staying that way.

That man is no fool! He's no fool about marriage and the avoidance thereof; neither is he a fool about her feelings for him. Deborah didn't want this man when he wanted her; it says that she rejected him. Well, this man also knows that she really, truly doesn't want him now, either; the only difference is that she's run out of options, and she's willing to settle for him. Oh, I bet he's flattered; he gets to be her consolation prize-wow! That's a position every guy aspires to-not! Hey, if the kitten didn't want me, then I don't want the cat-end of story.

Desperate for a partner so she could re-establish a social life, she's put her reservations aside and embarked on a relationship, but has discovered his single status may not be self-imposed.

He uses nappy rash powder on his privates because "he likes the way it feels"; refuses to eat 'foreign muck', and is "awful in bed". And he's bald.

Yet she persists, convinced she has a shot at 'fixing' him. She's hoping she can change his mind on marriage.

What a shocker-a chick thinking that she can fix a man! Where have we seen THAT movie before?

She is aware that if she fancies a holiday she'll have to pay for his ticket and the most she can hope for is a grudging hand with taking the bins out.

Ah, now SHE'S doing the keeping, huh? How do you like being the 'man' in the relationship, Sweet Pee? Isn't so much fun now, is it?

This has got to stick in her craw. One, like every woman, she no doubt harbored her princess fantasies as a young girl. Two, she was used to having men come down the tracks like rush hour trains, and she thought that this would continue. Silly girl!

She's left The Joy of Sex in his bathroom, where she's sure he'll flick through it.

Oh, I'm sure he's flicked through it. He might even practice the techniques on you. But, what he's really wanting to do is learn these techniques, so he can land someone better than you, my dear.

There are women who have thrown their hands in the air, choosing solitude over compromise.

Oh, now I KNOW that this has to be written by a woman! Only a woman would tell such a bald faced lie like this! No woman wants solitude-none! If there's one thing that drives cold, nightmarish fear into women, it is the fear of being alone. Why do you ALWAYS see them out and about in groups, huh? Because they can't stand the thought of being alone, that's why! Women have GOT to be with someone, or else they can't go out for the evening. Women want solitude like fish want bicycles-what a freakin' lie...

Vivian (38) is a spa manager whose days are long and whose fuse is short.

"Listen: I've been out on so many blind dates I should have my own guide dog.

"I'm sick of having to spend evenings listening to losers, paying for a meal I didn't enjoy.

How does it feel, Darlin'? How do YOU like listening to some loser, and paying for a meal you don't enjoy? WTF did you think men have done for their whole lives?! Ah, but that's different; that's okay when you're taking advantage of the man, isn't it? Now that the shoe is on the other foot (yours), you don't like it so much, do you?

This is living proof that women aren't empathetic like we're always told in the Lamestream Media. If women had any empathy whatsoever, then they'd know that this is what men put up with to be with their sorry asses!

"My nights off are now spent in the bath with a good book and I'm fine with that."

You'll have to be fine with that, because that's as good as it'll ever get for you and your sister over the hill, bitter, angry, used up, misandrist career bitches...

Her milk of human kindness has clearly soured. But for women like divorcee Deborah, still resolute in dating her feckless and fiscally unsound man, hope springs eternal. Now Deborah has no choice but to eternally spring -- for everything.

"Her (Vivian's) milk of human kindness has soured." Translation: she's been used and abused by bad boys for decades. Now that they've gotten tired of her, she hates men.

Isn't it funny how the Lamestream Media paints US as being fiscially irresponsible? Which sex owns hundreds of pair of shoes?! Which sex will blow hundreds of dollars on a sack made of leather, aka a handbag? I know, and I rest my case!

Is it better to be alone than to compromise?

For a guy, it most definitely is better to be alone than compromise with some bitch! You know what compromise means to women, don't you? Women will tell you that it means give & take: you do all the giving, while they do all the taking-ha! That's a woman's definition of compromise. In that light, it is better to be alone than compromise-at least from a man's point of view, anyway...

Dumbing down ultimately leads to disappointment and frustration, but it gets cold and lonely on the lofty peak of high moral ground. Perhaps we could meet somewhere in the middle.

I'm not interested in meeting women in the middle. They heaped hatred, scorn, abuse, derision, etc. on us for over 40 years; they made their beds; now, I think that these women should sleep in them, know what I mean? Furthermore, I'm not interested in surrendering my balls, my freedom, my life, and my thoughts to someone who hates me and everything about me. No, I'll keep my freedom, thank you very much. Meanwhile, I'll do my part to give women the husband they deserve-none! Let's all do likewise, Fellas. If you think women are screaming now, you haven't seen ANYTHING yet! Let's enjoy the show, Fellas, while we take it easy, and enjoy our lives apart from women... :)

MarkyMark

Oscar Wilde on Women

2011-12-31T20:01:00.001-05:00

Guys,

We have a discussion going on Mancoat that's about relationships. I won't go into the discussion itself, but two of the guys posted quotes from Oscar Wilde. Judging by what he said, I think it's fair to say that the man knew women...

------------------------

"I am afraid that women appreciate cruelty, downright cruelty, more than anything else. They have wonderfully primitive instincts. We have emancipated them, but they remain slaves looking for their masters all the same." - Oscar Wilde

“The husbands of very beautiful women belong to the criminal classes.”
-Oscar Wilde

”Men always want to be a woman’s first love-women like to be a man’s last romance.”
-Oscar Wilde

“Dammit sir, it’s your duty to get married. You can’t be always living for pleasure.”
-Oscar Wilde

“As long as a woman can look ten years younger than her own daughter, she is perfectly satisfied.”
-Oscar Wilde

-----------------------

Were those quotes profound, or what?! Did that man know & understand women, or did he know & understand women?! I think it's fair to say that he did! Have a good night now...

MarkyMark

What Your Wife Will Become

2011-12-31T13:31:00.001-05:00

Guys,

I just ran across a Craigslist ad that cracked me up! It's from an obviously unhappily married man (redundant?) who's been married a long, long time. I won't add anything, because I can't. You guys will laugh too, and you'll thank God Almighty that you're single, happy, and free-yeah, Baby!

------------------------

For Sale—One (1) Wife, slightly used, 1964 Model

Date: 2008-04-14, 2:09AM PDT

Needs muffler, as it is currently VERY LOUD. Intake valve is stuck in the open position.

Rear end needs major overhaul. A crack there has grown monstrously large.

Needs re-wiring—Many wires are currently crossed.

Lots of little dings in the body, which have been covered up with too much paint in a failed effort at camouflaging them.

Needs re-upholstering—Carpet has turned a dingy gray.

Needs front-end work--Headlights are too close to the ground, and fenders are too far apart.

May not pass emissions test, as it currently produces foul clouds of malodorous gases on a regular basis,

Heater works great. Hot air is never in short supply..

Asking $500 or trade for 1984 model.

it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests

PostingID: 641609489

-----------------

What else can I say? Guys, if you get married, THIS is what you can look forward to-ick! Until next time...

MarkyMark

Seven Signs of Stupidity

2011-12-31T13:10:00.001-05:00

Guys,

Here's another of my 'oldies but goodies'. Someone on Mancoat posted this, and I couldn't resist taking some pot shots at this POS MSN article. Any guy who's dumb enough to marry DESERVES whatever heartache and pain happen to him; yes, I mean all of it! Fellas, do yourselves a favor, and keep your balls. Whatever you do, DON'T GET MARRIED!! Once you do, it's 'curtains for ya'...

---------------------------

Seven Signs He's About to Propose

His apartment is clean, he's saving money, and Thursday night poker with the guys has turned into date night with you? Either your guy is coming down with something, or he's planning to pop the question. Read on for more telltale signs that he's ready to say "I do."

If he knew what was good for him, he'd be saying "I do NOT!" I do not give up my freedom! I do not give up my balls! I do not give up control of my wallet! I do NOT give up everything I love and enjoy for some ungrateful bitch! I do not give some American bitch control over my life! I do not become someone's slave! I do not!!!

1. He's Growing out of His Bachelor Ways

You can tell his bachelor days are behind him when his number one priority is no longer himself. If he's constantly using terms like "we" and "our," and plans for a weekend with the guys in Vegas are suddenly on the back burner while weekend picnics with you are becoming more common, he's probably not just sick of his buddies. He might've realized that he prefers a more settled lifestyle, and this transition puts him squarely on the path to proposing.

You mean he's getting ready to put his head in the noose, don't you, Darlin'?! Let's see if she keeps using 'we' and 'our' after the divorce, pal! And divorce you she will. Women file for divorce first 70% of the time, and you'd best remember that, Fellas.

You know how she'll use the word, 'our'? When she talks about appropriating and controlling your pay, dumb ass! What's hers is hers, and what's yours is 'ours'. Isn't it funny how THAT works when you get married? When she uses 'our', that's womanese for MINE; in effect, she's saying, "I own you and everything you have, pal!" Shoot, I remember hearing female colleagues BRAG about this; they were loud & proud in proclaiming "What's mine is mine, and what's his is mine!" Don't you forget it, either...

2. He's Redecorating

You may also notice certain items have disappeared from his pad, like his college posters and Star Wars memorabilia. Did he ditch that ugly brown chair for a nice new couch? It could be the start of major changes — your boyfriend is making room in his life for you, both physically and emotionally.

Cleaning up clutter and stuff != redecorating, okay?! And if he is redecorating, then it means he's already handed over his balls, since you'll be nagging him to change this, that, and everything else about him, his life, and his place. WTF can't you bitches leave us men alone, huh? Why do you insist on changing us?! Why can't you be happy with how you found us, hmmm? Again, this is a premature, self inflicted castration; don't do it! Guys, as long as you do not propose, you are in the driver's seat; you have the power, and you should keep it. Once you say those two words, "I do", then it's over for you...

3. He's Curbing Big Purchases

Has your boyfriend gone from big spender to scrooge? The plasma screen TV he'd been planning to buy isn't hanging over his mantel, and instead of buying rounds of drinks at happy hour after work, he's home cooking dinner. No, he's not training for Top Chef; he's started to eliminate frivolous spending to brace for a large down payment (on your ring). And it's not just the jewelry he's saving for — he may be putting away money now so that the two of you will be comfortable well into the future.

Let me ask a few pointed questions here, okay? Why can't SHE save for her own ring, hmmm? After all, women earn their own money today, don't they? Why does the guy have to buy a shiny, overpriced, piece of stone anyway? To symbolize his love? Oh please, that just means he's surrendered his balls, and has told the entire world that he has. He's also told the world that he is stupid, stupid, stupid!

As for saving money, that in and of itself doesn't mean he's getting ready to pop the question. Could it mean that, especially in today's economic environment, that a guy is preparing for the worst? Couldn't it mean that he's trying to brace for the reality that he's likely to lose his job? According to The Boston Globe, over one million men have lost their jobs in this recession, while 12, 000 more women are working. Looks like he's trying to play the odds to me.

Then, I have to wonder WHY a man would put off purchasing something HE wants prior to marriage. Why would he do that?! Once he's foolish enough to say those two, little words, "I do", then that's the LAST fun he'll ever have! He won't have the freedom to buy that ATV, big screen TV, that motorcycle, or that boat he always wanted-oh no. That's because it will no longer be his money; his money will be 'our' money. Once he says "I do", then he's effectively said "I don't" to anything and everything else he likes, enjoys, and wants. Once he says "I do", it's all about her. Sorry, but them's the facts...

4. He's Not Complaining About Weddings

While at a wedding together, it's more than just the usual eagerness for an open bar. He's not cracking jokes during the vow exchange — he's commenting on the couple's first-dance song choice and the meal selection. Take it as a sign that he's paying attention to all things wedding-related because matrimony is on his mind.

Why else would a guy go to a wedding, other than the open bar? Why? The only thing I could think of is to celebrate the demise of an enemy. What is a wedding, other than a woman's victory march over having subdued a slave for life, hmmm? You know why women want such grand weddings nowadays? Not only to 'one-up' their girlfriends, but to celebrate having gotten themselves their very own slave, that's why! Once you say "I do", you become her bitch, and Big Daddy Government is there to back her up and see to it that you're enslaved to her for as long as you're drawing breath. Whether you're with her or not, the State will make sure you work for her until you drop dead.

5. He's Taken an Interest in Your Jewelry

Has he been complimenting your great ability to accessorize? Snooping around in your jewelry box? Holding your hand, constantly? All kidding aside, when your favorite ring goes missing, you'll know for sure that he's trying to find a covert way to figure out your size.

WTF would a guy take an interest in her jewelry?! Why? Any guy who tries to purloin his beloved's favorite ring is a dummy! Why would he be in such a rush to surrender his freedom to some bitch who hates him as a man? Sorry, but when you're dealing with American women, the odds are that they hate you; that's what they've been taught their whole lives-to hate, fear, and suspect men. Why would you want to marry someone who hates you as a man? Why? Furthermore, why would you want to tip her off that you're willing to become her slave? When a woman sees her favorite ring missing, she's got to be jumping for joy, because she's about to have her very OWN man-slave.

6. He Wants to Meet the Parents

Okay, so he's probably already met your parents. If he hasn't and has become insistent on meeting them, it's probably for a good reason. But if he already knows them well and has become the first to RSVP for your nephew's birthday party, jumps at the chance for a weekend visit with your parents, or, even more telling, tries to plan outings for both your families to hang out together, he's ready for the next step.

Isn't love grand?! No doubt her family is ecstatic, because it means that they're about to unload a big, pain in the ass-their daughter! Why do you think that they had dowries in the old days? Why did fathers offer dowries to prospective grooms back in the day? Because they knew that they were unloading a liability, a pain in the ass, on the hapless man, that's why! They had to give him some compensation for the lifelong troubles and burdens he was about to assume. IOW, they had to make it worth his while to live with some shrew for life!

7. He's Acting out of Character

You know his daily routine inside and out, and any variation is enough to give you pause. If he's super-insistent that you guys do something you never do (like take a walk through a park or drive to a place to watch the sunset), he may be setting you up to speak those four little words: "Will you marry me?" After all that hard work, be sure to make it easy on him and say "yes!"

So, WTF is wrong with a guy doing something unusual, hmmm? I thought that today's enlightened, modern woman craved spontaneity. I thought that that was the appeal for the bad boys of the world; they're 'unpredictable and mysterious', aren't they?

But, is a guy wanting to marry REALLY out of character? Lawrence Shannon, in his book, The Predatory Female, says that slavery is the natural condition of man; he says that men can't handle freedom; he says that this is why, in spite of all the evidence out there that marriage is a sham, that men by the droves still seek to do it. By seeking marriage, they're seeking their own slavery; indeed, they're VOLUNTEERING for it! Is it really out of character for a man to willingly lay his balls on the chopping block, just so some bitch can proudly display them on her mantle or put them in her purse? I don't think so.

Oh, and Ladies, if a guy proposes to you, please do him a favor, and say 'no'! He may not understand what a bullet he's dodged now, but he will in the future, believe me.

----------------

Those are my thoughts on the seven stupid things a man does before enslaving himself, er getting married. Remember to give American women the husband they deserve-none! Have a good night...

MarkyMark

What Schools USED to Teach

2011-12-31T11:28:00.002-05:00

Guys,

As you know, I've been digging around the net, finding my old posts, and backing them up. It's been a slow, laborious process, and I expect it to remain that way. As I was digging through my old posts, I came across this one. It was from a commenter whose handle was Civilla. She was home maker married to a retired military man if I remember correctly. I couldn't link to her post on this, because her blog is now open to invited readers only; I seem to remember her getting SICK & TIRED of feminazis bothering her, so I can't blame her for limiting access. Isn't it funny how feminazis bitch about choice, but they won't allow other women to exercise THEIR choice to live a traditional lifestyle like Civilla does? In any case, I won't be adding my commentary, as there is nothing I CAN add. Read it and weep, People...

-------------------

Read this post to see how far we've come as far as manners and dress go. My brother's wife, Marty, recently sent me a couple of boxes of old stuff that she found in the attic of my parent's house.

Rummaging through the boxes of mementos -- dolls, photographs, nick-nacks, books and papers, I came across this little booklet: "Eastport (N.Y.) High School, Student Handbook 1969-1970. It was mine when I was a senior in high school during that school year. (This was public school, by the way.)

Page 14 started a chapter on "Citizenship and Manners at School". I will print the chapter in its entirety, although is a little lengthy, to show what was expected of public school students back then, and to show how far we've come.

CITIZENSHIP AND MANNERS AT HOME:

The five Trustees of the Eastport Board of Education were elected by the school districts' qualified voters to govern the operation of our school. The Principal, as educational leader of the program, holds responsibility in the implimentation of all regulations. The Board must require high standards of conduct and appearance if we are to create an atmosphere within the school that will insure the best possible learning conditions.

While respecting individual student rights and responsibilities, the Principal, in his traditional role, is obliged to support and defend what furthers the "common good" and common standards of the community. When individual behavior, action, or dress undermines or is detrimental to these purposes and tends to negate the learning environment of the school, such actions must be limited by the school authorities -- board of education, and district principal.

Therefore, in conjunction with the purposes and climate needed to conduct school properly, the school should set reasonable standards of behavior and dress for its students.The importance of being a good citizen at school and elsewhare cannot be overemphasized.

Our school's reputation is the responsibility of each student as he or she demonstrates habits of citizenship and manners. The following regulations have been developed to assist students in learning accepted standards:

1. Smoking is prohibited in the school building, on the grounds or on any school sponsired trip. This habit is injurious to health and should be discouraged, especially for young people. Enrolled students may not carry matches or smoking materials to school or on any school trip. Offenders will be reported to the principal for punishment.

2. Chewing gum or candy may only be used in the Dining Hall. It is not courteous to use it in class, therefore, it is forbidden.

3. Dress appropriately whenever you are at school. This evidence of respect for your educational institution will bring rewards to all of us in our school's reputation.

BOYS:

1. No jeans above Grade 8.

2. Shirt buttons closed except top button when worn without tie.

3. At all socials -- shirt, tie, and suit coat are required.

4. Hair is to be cut to give a neat manly appearance.

5. If a shirt has tails, they should be tucked in pants.

6. One must respect himself before others will respect him. Being neat and clean generates a respect for you in others.

GIRLS:

1. Girls should give a ladylike impression; therefore slacks, shorts, etc., are not permitted. Skirts should be suitable for school use.

2. Makeup should be appropriate for teenagers. This means no eye makeup except at formal dances in reasonable degree.

3. Hair should be groomed to give a neat appearance; of course this means no curlers, etc.

4. Large dangling earrings are not to be worn during the regular school day.

If in doubt concerning proper dress, makeup, etc., please consult the school nurse-teacher.

Students should use please, thank you, and pardon me, whenever necessary. These phrases are verbal courtesies which are an evidence of good manners.

In a school which houses children in the Kindergarten as well as elementary and upper grades, it is very important to consider the little people. Holding doors and walking (not running) in corridors and to the buses are essential for safety.

KINDERGARTEN:

Upper graders are not to go near the Kindergarten windows, at any time during the school day. Visitors to the Kindergarten must first get a pass at the office. Students from other grades should not use the kindergarten playground or equipment.

PRACTICING GOOD MANNERS AT HOME:

There's no place like home for practicing good manners. A few simple rules will make life much pleasanter for you and your family.

Be your own "picker-upper". Put magazines, books, and games in their proper places.

Don't drape your clothes over chairs. Hang them where they belong.

Improve your table manners. (Look for hints in this book.)

Don't invite guests for meals or stay overnight without first getting permission from your mother and from their mothers.

Respect the property and privacy of the other people in your family.

AT A SOCIAL:

If you're having a party, always remember to...

See that your guests are introduced to each other.

Make sure that everyone has something to do and is not left out of any games.

Tell your best frients to be extra nice to the shy ones and those who are strangers to the group.

If you are invited to a party...

Answer your invitation as soon as you can.

Arrive on time.

Take part in any games that have been planned.

Be friendly and polite to everyone.

INTRODUCTIONS:

It's easy to introduct people properly if you follow a few simple rules.

Introduce a man to a woman -- "Miss Jones, may I introduce Mr. Smith?"

Introduce a young person to an older person -- "Mrs. Grant, this is "Sue Brown. Mr. Kean, this is Kenneth Haines."

Introduce your friends to your mother -- "Mother, this is Helen Parker and John West."

The same rule follows for introducing friends to your father, although you may use the "ladies first" idea and say, "Jean, have you met my father?"

Introduce everyone to a clergyman -- "Dr. Brown or Father O'Brien or Rabbi Grant, may I present my mother?"

IN PUBLIC:

It's bad manners to link arms and walk three or four abreast on a crowded sidewalk or to go into a huddle with your friends so that others have trouble getting past you. Also, remember not to stare or point at anyone and never talk or laugh so loudly that you attract attention.

THE TELEPHONE:

Don't monopolize the phone!

Other members of your family have a right to use the telephone, too. Try to keep your phone calls short. If you must have a long conversation, be sure no one else has to use the phone.

Keep a pad and pencil by the telephone, so that you can write down messages and be sure to be polite to everyone who calls. Ask if the call should be returned and be sure to write down the name and phone number.

TABLE MANNERS:

Whenever possible, use the fork rather than any other piece of silver. Use the knife only for foods which cannot be cut with a fork and the spoon only for foods too soft to be eaten with a fork.

Hold the spoon just above the center of its handle so it rests on the middle finger and is guided by the thumb and forefinger.

Hold the fork as you do the spoon when eating, and in your left hand, prongs down while cutting. Lift food on the hollow, curved side of prongs. Use the knife only for cutting, never to carry food to the mouth. Lay knife and fork on the right outer rim of the plate when you're finished.

SETTING THE TABLE:

If the table is set correctly, you'll have no trouble selecting the right tool. Begin at outside and work in. 1. Napkin, 2. Salad Fork, 3. Fork, 4. Plate, 5. Knife, 6. Dessert Spoon, 7. Teaspoon, 8. Cup and Saucer, 9. Glass, 10. Breat-and-Butter Plate, 11. Butter Knife.

DO:

Do eat slowly and quietly.

Do keep your mouth closed when it contains food.

Always keep your elbows off the table.

Remove your spoon from a cup or tall dish.

Always try to eat whatever you are served.

Do break bread and rolls into small pieces before buttering.

DON'T:

Don't chew with your lips open.

Don't reach across the table or in front of anyone (politely ask for anything out of reach).

Don't tuck the napkin under your chin (unfold it partially and put it across your lap).

Don't ever blow your food to cool it.

Don't play with your food.

And, in another chapter, some suggestions for successful studying:

STUDYING:

1. Develop regular habits of work.

2. Study at definite times each day.

3. Keep your goal in mind when you start.

4. Review your work as you progress.

5. Begin each day at your scheduled time. Don't wait for inspiration. Discipline yourself to work on schedule. Ideas will come.

6. Have good surroundings for study: a quiet place to work, a table with good light, all needed equipment within reach.

7. Do only one job at a time. Let the T.V. or your family's conversation go for the moment.

PREPARING FOR AN EXAMINATION:

1. Take only those notes you will need later.

2. Analyze your own weaknesses and concentrate upon weak points first.

3. Review sensibly. Schedule your time well. Try to see your problem as a whole. Organize the entire subject in a logical and orderly fashion.

TAKING AN EXAMINATION:

1. Keep cool. It's too late to fret when the examination is before you.

2. Read all questions over before answering any of them.

3. Don't wait for inspiration on the hard questions. Begin at once on the easy questions and let your subconscious mind do some of the preparing for you.

4. Neither hurry nor waste time. Ask the instructor for the number of minutes left, if necessary.

5. Allot time sensibly. Don't give undue attention to a question worth a few points.

6. Read the question and be sure you understand what it says.

7. Check your paper carefully before you hand it in.

----------------------

Thought provoking, isn't it? As I said in my comment to this post, we've come a long way, Baby-the WRONG way! Have a good night...

MarkyMark

Cripling the Matriarchy, by Mirror of the Soul

2011-12-31T11:10:00.000-05:00

Guys,

Here's another classic from Mirror of the Soul, and it's about shutting down the Matriarchy. Click the link, scroll about halfway down, and you'll see it. While you're at it, read the other wisdom on that page. Let's do it, Fellas (cripple the Matriarchy and increase our knowledge & wisdom)!

--------------------------------

Shutting Down The Matriarchy

It is pretty easy to shutdown the matriarchy, however, most men are too addicted to pussy to actually shut it down, and because of this, they keep the matriarchy going - chivalrous males are the worst offenders. However, for those of you that want to know how to shutdown the matriarchy, or even just your little section of the matriarchy here is how:

1. Drop out of society. Just disappear. It is easy to do. You engage minimally as possible with society, particularly women. The less visible men are and contributing to society the more women have to take up the slack and will soon burn themselves out, contributing in part to a matriarchal shutdown.

2. Focus on you. Work for you. Become YOU, INC. Your well being is just as important as anybody else's, particularly women's. Can't decide between reading a good book or going a date? Read the book instead, it is much more benefical than spending money on a date, even if you are paying just half of the date. The more dateless women, the more discontent the matriarchy becomes for women, the better. Let women know, it is over for them - remember they don't need men anymore, so let them do without. Plus, and more importantly, you could get accused falsely of rape if you both find each other attractive and sparks fly, and later on she feels gulity for the one night stand, and decides to absolve herself of being a "ho" by accusing you falsely of rape.

3. Support pop and mom stores. Avoid big corporations in buying your products and services, which employ and promote women that can't even do their jobs which further funds the matriarchy with your money.

4. Don't be sucked into that "real man" crap, I have heard it over and over, "A real man would be responsible and get married" or "A real man would support a woman". All this "real man" crap is a ploy by women to trap you into marriage and make you a matriarchal wage slave that keeps the matriarchy going- voluntary by her using you with traditional marriage to get you to support her and the matriarchy, and involuntary through divorce, with the courts forcing you by police arrest and jail to support her and the matriarchy via alimony, child support, etc. Women have access to education and jobs better than men do these days, let women support themselves and their cats. As mentioned in point (1) above, this will contribute to more burned out women and discontent to shut down the matriarchy.

5. Legally minimize your tax burden. Less taxes going to the government will be less money supporting the matriarchy.

-------------------------

That's good stuff that we ALL need to be implementing in our lives, Gentlemen! If we all do what the Mirror suggested, then we can CRIPPLE this Matriarchy of ours real quick like-not to mention pay back all the ungrateful bitches in America while we're at it...

MarkyMark