08 November 2009

Yet Another Typical, American Woman

Guys,

I saw this posting on Craig's List, and I knew my readers needed to see it. Here's yet another insight into the mind of a typical, brainwashed, feminazi, man-hating, American skank. What's sad is that this chick is from Oklahoma, which is in the Midwestern US; gals from the Midwest are thought to be of better quality than those found on the coasts. The attitude exhibited by this woman is all too typical...

-----------------

To the guy I slapped across the face in the bar... - w4m

Dear average-looking frat boy,

The image of your face when I slapped you (left-handed,too, because my drink was in my right), is one I won't soon forget.

My friend had gone to the bathroom, so when I felt a hand grab and slightly grope my ass, I had no reason to suspect that it was her who felt me up, rather than you, the innocent bystander.

I quickly turned over my shoulder and gave you a quizzical look, which you must have interpreted as come-hither, because you winked and gave me a knowing nod. Taking this as acknowledgment of "your" action, I slapped you. Hard.

This was the first time I had ever slapped anyone, and I immediately felt empowered and fully justified, having not relied on my boyfriend to stand up for my fragile female ego. Yay, feminism! This quickly turned to shock however, as I looked over at my friend, doubled over, red in the face and gasping for breath from laughing hysterically. Immediately putting two and two together, I turned to you, still standing with a very bewildered and increasingly angry look on your face. "Ohmygod, I'm so sorry-she..I.. I thought...", I struggled to apologize. "Get away from me, I don't know what's going on, get away you crazy bitch"... and then you backed up and ran away.

Can't say I blame the guy. If it had been me, I would have been tempted to make you wear my drink though...

I probably would have done the same thing, so I don't blame you for running away. I wanted to chase you and explain, but thought better of it for several reasons. I can only imagine the stories the next morning as your buddies rehashed the situation, still wondering why a random girl slapped you for no reason. At least now you (hopefully) know the reason.

Your 'reason' is no reason at all. You're just trying to justify the fact that you slapped the wrong guy.

I'm still sorry. Let me know, and I'll buy you a drink, at a safe distance, so you can be sure no violence will occur. I promise.

Sincerely,

The crazy girl who (somewhat accidently) slapped you across the face

There was nothing accidental about what you did; it was completely intentional! Unfortunately, you're all too representative of the modern, empowered, American woman. And people wonder why I'm still single?

----------------

I can't make this up. Until next time...

MarkyMark

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

CL is a great place to get a clear sense of what AWs are. Here is one from Boise, Idaho-a predominantly Mormon city. Hmmm, aren't Mormon women more traditional?

Irate wife cleaning garage (Boise)

Reply to: sale-5qgsc-1266890796@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]
Date: 2009-07-12, 9:06PM MDT
Flat screen TV, BBQ grill, misc. decoys (lots of them), camoflauge coffin?, animal horns, flyfishing
stuff, and really big canvas tent. I am getting rid of this stuff because it fills up the garage. I am trying to sell it before he gets back in town on Tuesday. $150 OBO.

08 November, 2009 22:39  
Anonymous JadedGuy said...

I dunno, MM. If I was a woman and someone was groping me, I could probably get the urge to smack the groper. At least she is apologizing in public for smacking the wrong man ... which is more than I would expect from a feminist woman.

08 November, 2009 22:56  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If a woman isn't willing to defend her virtue, why should anyone else?

09 November, 2009 00:54  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

JadedGuy:

This woman doesn't need any defenders. For one thing, there was no reason whatsoever for her to not, in her words, chase the guy down and explain herself. By not doing so, her 'apology' to him in the immediate aftermath of slapping him is meaningless. Women have a disturbing habit of making insincere apologies, and again, by not talking to him face-to-face to reconcile matters, her apology holds no weight. Her throwaway line that she "thought better of it for several reasons", without explaining what those reasons were, only buttresses my contention regarding her apology. As a final note on this point, since when does a CL post take the place of a honest-to-god, face-to-face discussion? Posting on CL was a flippant, self-serving action on this woman's part.

Second, nowhere in her CL post do you see any condemnation of her friend's actions. After all, it's clear that her friend wanted to get this poor guy into trouble of some sort, whether it was a slap to the face or, worse yet, a call to the cops to arrest the guy for a sexually-related offense. You can bet your bottom dollar that, if this poster had gone that route, the friend would have supported her wishes, and lied her ass off to the police.

Insincere, flippant, callous, amoral - many words come to mind when reading this CL post. Justifiable isn't one of them.

Dale

09 November, 2009 06:00  
Blogger Professor Hale said...

Sorry (insincerely I add) to disagree. I believe a woman should slap a man if her personal space is violated in public. The woman in this case was deceived as much as the man was innocently accused of wrongdoing. The real culprit is the girlfriend. In crowds, mistakes do happen and when they do, apologies are normally sufficient.

That said, a woman should exercise some restraint and not blindly start swinging every time someone bumps up against her in a bar.

As it is, the man could have called the cops on her for assault, but men seldom do. The right thing for him to do is to get away from the psycho.

Posting the apology on craigs list is just another way for her to entertain her friends and so carries no weight. If anything, it counts as additional insult.

It would have made a great story to tell their grandkids though, if he had stuck around for an apology.

09 November, 2009 09:32  
Anonymous djc said...

I want to hear her say "yay feminism" in about twenty years.

09 November, 2009 09:53  
Blogger Ralph said...

What a typical AW nut.

I think I might understand being upset if I was a woman and someone groped me.

But that's not the issue here.

1) We have a good idea about her character from the beginning of the post. She's a typical frat-party chick who's looking to get drunk. Of course she's going to make dumb mistakes when she's inebriated. It's what people do.

2) When she found out that she was being groped there were many things she could do. She could've calmed down, analyzed the problem, and took the two seconds to find out that it was her equally stupid friend and not some unsuspecting stranger. It would've saved her a slap.

That's what the problem is. She acted before she thought. She has no control over her actions.

What a great symbolic instance of typical AW behavior!

I agree with Dale. This "missed connection" was just her flipping the bird to her consequences.

Thanks for the good work, Mark, and I look forward to the next post!

09 November, 2009 10:04  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Skanks like this have no conscious that is why feminism is so empowering to them. It's pretty obvious that they can do no wrong. But on another note, they tend to love the bad boys and spawn more bad boys. Example being this little story:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Headlines/frtHEAD01110909.htm

-------

This happened in my own backyard so-to-speak. As far as the high school mentioned in the article, I can tell you from word on the street, all the trouble makers go to it, atleast that is what I have been told. I wonder if the three bad boys who are pictured in the article went there at one point as well? I guess I'll know later on.

09 November, 2009 17:17  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mark, you are a brilliant man, but this is one of the few times I have to disagree with you somewhat. Not totally, but somewhat.

For starters, she truly (and quite innocently) thought this man was groping her, so for that, I don't blame her for attacking. She had a genuine reason for her reaction. Just because she was TRICKED doesn't make her reason any less valid. Thanks to her friend, she truly thought the guy was disrespecting her and she responded accordingly. So you're wrong when you say she had no reason. She did.

BUT, she did the one thing that most women in this misandric, matriarchal age would never do upon realizing she was wrong. She apologized.

Yes, she should've attacked her girlfriend upon realizing the real situation and, frankly, it does really rankle me that she does not, in anyway, condemn that awful, heartless bitch for her evil actions.

But considering the era we men are living in, I guess we can only take what we can get. She could've easily just gone home and forgot about the whole thing, but this girl went through the time and trouble to explain the situation.

Would it have been better face-to-face? Of course, but what can I tell you? These are evil times for us western men and any show of accountability from western women is better than nothing.

I still think foreign chicks are better, but at least this western specimen proved herself to be a few steps above her sisters.

Considering the anti-male environment these girls are raised in, her willingness to take ANY amount of trouble to write this sets her apart, in good way.

I still wouldn't marry her, though.

09 November, 2009 20:11  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Prof. Hale:

You can't have your cake and eat it too - which is another way of saying that you can't reconcile the content of your first and third paragraphs. Either she is inherently justified in violently retaliating to a perceived injustice, negating the point made in your third paragraph, or she is not justified in slapping a man whom she believes is behaving roguishly towards her. Either she behaves with restraint *throughout* the process, seeking legally-sanctioned assistance if there is no other way to resolve the situation, or she takes the law into her own hands. Giving her license, however limited, to slap someone grants her liberty to which she is not entitled in this, the so-called age of equality.

To elaborate, let's put the shoe on the other foot. Suppose a guy in a crowded environment has his wedding tackle squeezed. Startled, he looks into the face of a girl who responds to his quizzical look with a grin and a bat of her eyelashes. So, of course, he slaps her, because clearly she's the one who grabbed his frank and beans. To him I would say, I hope you enjoyed your freedom, because you'll be doing hard time for your misdeed.

In summary, you are opening Pandora's Box by allowing for one set of rules to govern female behavior, and other to regulate male action. Yes, the girlfriend was the instigator, but the writer of the CL post made the situation worse by responding irrationally, a luxury that a man would never enjoy.

Sincerely,
Dale

09 November, 2009 21:13  
Blogger Hestia said...

I had several instances as a teenager when I was slapped on the bottom by men. Each time I was somewhere innocent where one would not expect such behavior to happen (the mall, a big box store, and Kohls), nor had I done anything to provoke the action. All three of the men were a good deal older than me and it was clear how young I was. My clothing was modest. I hadn't so much as looked the way of the man who did this, let alone talked to him. Each time I was also too taken aback to do anything but get out of the situation as quickly as possible. Slapping somebody, yelling, or anything else wasn't on my mind, but I do understand why this action might be taken.

When you get groped it's just as unsettling and somebody coming up and smacking you. Many people would react to being smacked by defending ourselves. So it goes with other unwanted touching as well. It's not good she slapped the wrong person or acted so rashly, but it was good she realized her mistake and made an apology. The argument could be made that keeping the company she does speaks volumes about her character, but the slap not necessarily so.

09 November, 2009 22:28  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She may have had the "right" to attack, but then again she did so based upon her own faulty observations. Since when is it okay to react with violent reprisal in any public situation?

If it is granted that she was okay in doing so, then the guy had every right to retaliate by flattening her nose.

09 November, 2009 23:11  
Blogger ruddyturnstone said...

Slapping a guy for "getting fresh" used to be an acceptable female behavior. That was in the days of chivalry. But chivalry, it is often forgotten, was a two way street. Women had obligations and restrictions on their behavior, as well as priviledges and liberties. The slap didn't really physically hurt the guy, and was used to let him know that he was going too fast, or too far, or presuming too much. And men were supposed to take it. As Humphrey Bogart says to Peter Lorre in The Maltese Falcon after Mary Astor slaps him, "When you're slapped, you'll take it and like it."

To repeat, though, there were limitations on what women could do as well. Women were expected to be demure and submissive. To be quiet when men were discussing important issues. To not be forward in public. And to not abuse their privileges. A "loose woman" had no business slapping anybody. Nor was even a decent woman allowed to go around randomly slapping men.

In this case, in the age of chivalry, the woman would have been justified in slapping the man, if he had in fact groped her.

But, as this incident occurred today, and not in the age of chivalry, the woman had no business slapping anyone, even if she had been groped and and she had correctly indentified the groper. Women no longer have any business slapping anybody, except in self defense. Retaliation is NOT self defense. She would be within in her rights to report the incident to the police, but, of course, it is not fair that her complaint would be treated with respect, while an exactly similar one made by a man would be laughed out of the precinct. That is because, unfortunately, one-sided remnants of chivalry do still exist, and, among the worst offenders in this regard are, ironically, feminists and so-called conservative men (like the police).

As for her anonymous apology on CL, it is worse than worthless. It does the guy no good whatsoever but makes the fake apologizer feel better about herself.

10 November, 2009 20:36  
Blogger Pete Patriarch said...

Slapping unknown men is just one of the plenty of ways in which women hold the monopoly of society-sanctioned inter-sex violence.

By the way, Hestia, you know why you didn't slap any of the men who groped you? Because in your heart of hearts, you knew that could lead to bad things, and could possibly lead to you being found washed up on the culvert a few weeks later. This bitch obviously felt protected enough that she could slap an unknown guy, who could be a hoodlum for all she knows. She knew that he couldn't retaliate since a single hand laid on her would lead to her screaming and the nearby white knights pummeling the guy into kingdom come.

15 November, 2009 20:45  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"This bitch obviously felt protected enough that she could slap an unknown guy, who could be a hoodlum for all she knows."

I'm guessing that she could tell the guy wasn't a hoodlum, which is why she slapped him. She wouldn't have dared slap the kind of man who would actually have groped her. In fact, if she had been groped by a hoodlum she probably would have been quite turned on.

16 November, 2009 17:08  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home